General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

is it worth batch firing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2008 | 05:40 PM
  #1  
Roosie's Avatar
Roosie
Thread Starter
500bhp Cosworth in making
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,278
Likes: 12
From: Brandon
Default is it worth batch firing?

for track car as im going emerald i can use batch fire method what difference and pros and cons of it
Old 10-06-2008 | 10:13 PM
  #2  
Wardy257's Avatar
Wardy257
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 818
Likes: 1
From: Lisbon
Default

Ask Dave Walker!!! Read his book to.
Old 10-06-2008 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

Both work...

Sequential is better for emissions mainly but does help a little with the other things too.
Old 10-06-2008 | 10:44 PM
  #4  
Billabong's Avatar
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

Swings and roundabouts from what I can tell (and depending who you listen to) - BUT, on a car that already had sequential fuel injection why would you want to go 'backwards' technology wise?

I seriously doubt any experienced Cossie tuner would go to batch fired injection over sequential....
Old 11-06-2008 | 08:07 AM
  #5  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

ask your mate tabetha, he'll tell you to go batch fired as you will be able to get twice as much power from a set of injectors than sequential
Old 11-06-2008 | 08:25 AM
  #6  
costina's Avatar
costina
Live long and prosper!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,158
Likes: 372
From: area 51
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
ask your mate tabetha, he'll tell you to go batch fired as you will be able to get twice as much power from a set of injectors than sequential
Oh dear that old topic again

Paul
Old 11-06-2008 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
pa_sjo's Avatar
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 1
From: Location: Location:
Default

To answer your question, there aren't really any pro's in it.
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:08 AM
  #8  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

one pro is that it is theoretically easier to map as you don't then have to spend time optimising when in the cycle to start injecting on each cylinder as you could do with sequential
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:10 AM
  #9  
joffy's Avatar
joffy
SLOW LEARNER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Default

i might be a complete div but can someone explain the term batch firing and sequential??
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:14 AM
  #10  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

sequential is when you inject fuel into each cylinder in turn on their intake stroke which is basically when it needs it, and batch is when you inject all cylinders at once (some of which will have closed inlet valves etc)
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:16 AM
  #11  
pa_sjo's Avatar
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 1
From: Location: Location:
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
one pro is that it is theoretically easier to map as you don't then have to spend time optimising when in the cycle to start injecting on each cylinder as you could do with sequential
But that is IF you decide to fine-tune the maps to that level of detail, which I doubt anyone does outside of OEM's and works race teams to squeeze the tiniest extra out of it.
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:21 AM
  #12  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

that's why i said theoretically, as almost nobody will. especially as most tuners will not be using equipment to measure emissions and fuel consumption that would be needed to optimise it
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:30 AM
  #13  
joffy's Avatar
joffy
SLOW LEARNER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Default

as you may have guesses im no top engine builder, but the idea of firing fuel into a closed valve doesnt sound like a great idea??
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:44 AM
  #14  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

Almost nick...

Sequential - as you say - each injector delivered all of the required fuel in one hit during the induction stroke.

batch - injectors fire in sets (eg 2 pairs on a 4 cyl engine) - each time the injectors fire, they deliver 50% of the fuel required. As they are firing once per revoultion (so opening once on induction and again on the power stroke) they deliver the same amount of fuel - but in 2 hits rather than one.

Alex
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:46 AM
  #15  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

Originally Posted by joffy
as you may have guesses im no top engine builder, but the idea of firing fuel into a closed valve doesnt sound like a great idea??
Its fine - the fuel will hit the back of the closed valve and vapourise. This not only cools and cleans the valves but also means that when it is sucked in to the cylinder it will mix with the air and burn well.

Alex
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:49 AM
  #16  
pa_sjo's Avatar
pa_sjo
Colossal Pervert
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 1
From: Location: Location:
Default

Actually batch-fire is all injectors at the same time, semi-sequential is like 2on, 2 off as you describe Alex.. Unfortunately the Megasquirt goons call it the wrong thing
Old 11-06-2008 | 09:57 AM
  #17  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

All the injectors at the same time I would call continious injection.

This might be a case of symantics! lol
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:04 AM
  #18  
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 2
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by Roosie
for track car as im going emerald i can use batch fire method what difference and pros and cons of it
Listen to Tabs and prove to everyone that you can get 700bhp out of light blues by batch firing .

https://passionford.com/forum/general-car-related-discussion/203154-power-wise.html

https://passionford.com/forum/showth...ght=batch+fire

Last edited by Mike Rainbird; 11-06-2008 at 10:12 AM.
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:05 AM
  #19  
joffy's Avatar
joffy
SLOW LEARNER
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Default

if you get high fuel consumption as your fuel just to cool and clean the valves, if you run a top ecu is there no way of fuel it sequentially, but to batch fire every 2 or 4 strokes etc to clean and cool the valves?? or am i missin the point all together??
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:13 AM
  #20  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

i think that you're missing the point, or at least i don't understand what you're getting at

if the ecu has the ability to do sequential injection (and std cossie ecus did more than 20 years ago), and the mapper has the ability to use it properly, then that is the best method to use.
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:25 AM
  #21  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
i think that you're missing the point, or at least i don't understand what you're getting at

if the ecu has the ability to do sequential injection (and std cossie ecus did more than 20 years ago), and the mapper has the ability to use it properly, then that is the best method to use.
But is it worth paying for the extra mapping for little benfit (playing the devils advocate here)
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:31 AM
  #22  
foreigneRS's Avatar
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,597
Likes: 24
From: W. Sussex
Default

no it wouldn't be.

but it doesn't necessarily need any extra mapping - just use the same timing as a standard cossie and you will probably be better off than if you used batch (unless using batch you can use less injector driver transistors that you need for other things)
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:35 AM
  #23  
Edmund's Avatar
Edmund
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

The advantage of batch firing is that the ECU needs only to know where TDC is.This means that a sync on the cam is not required.The disadvantage to batch firing is that the Injector Dead Time is doubled for the engine's cycle.This means on higher BHP cars the idle quality will suffer enormously.
Old 11-06-2008 | 10:51 AM
  #24  
AlexF's Avatar
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
From: Newbury
Default

Originally Posted by Edmund
The advantage of batch firing is that the ECU needs only to know where TDC is.This means that a sync on the cam is not required.The disadvantage to batch firing is that the Injector Dead Time is doubled for the engine's cycle.This means on higher BHP cars the idle quality will suffer enormously.
This is true blackadder
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jameswrx
Modellers Corner.
17
09-10-2015 08:26 PM
gcfcos
General Car Related Discussion.
59
06-10-2015 05:04 PM
Oranoco
General Car Related Discussion.
12
02-10-2015 02:18 PM
Iain Mac
General Car Related Discussion.
7
30-09-2015 09:39 PM
Nick 172 Sport
General Car Related Discussion.
3
28-09-2015 07:21 PM



Quick Reply: is it worth batch firing?



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 PM.