Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects. Restoring her to Concourse? Just getting her running again? Or got a mad project? This is your room.

ST170 Turbo Engine Rebuild - CGI - thinking of selling up!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28-08-2006, 08:29 PM
  #1  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Westfield ST170 Turbo Engine Rebuild - CGI - all back on track

I've covered over 5'000 miles in the Westfield this year as Ive been up and down the country to a few shows as well as through Belgium and to Le Mans so I've decided to upgrade the engine over winter, (I get bored easy).

I've been running the car with circa 350 - 400bhp depending on boost but would like a bit more power to propel me into the low 10's even a 9

With the current spec I managed an 11.07 @138 at a RWYB at Elvington on road tyres and I've also manages a few 11.1's at Pod too.

Name:  DSC02568.jpg
Views: 719
Size:  49.4 KB

I'm looking to reliably get over 500bhp out the engine when I'm done which should be a breeze with the spec I already have and what I'm planning.

The easy option would be to just slap on a GT30 and have done but I am looking at building a top spec motor with the best of everything.

I'll be using my current inlet system with a larger Jenvey throttle body and changing my head, cams, exhaust manifold and turbo.

I'm also going to run a slightly higher comp ratio than my pervious engine.

It's a bit drastic but I've always wanted to go this route anyhow.

I'll be using a silvertop block mated to an ST170 head with electric water pump setup to get round the belt fouling the waterpump. No NOS at this stage but I may change my mind.

Silvertop bottom ends have larger maincaps which is the reason for going this route.

Here are some pictures of the ST170 head I recently bought.

This will be getting larger valves and a ported by CNC heads over winter.

I'll be taking off the Variable valve timing which is an easy job.

It's worth noting that these heads flow better than the Cosworth head as they were developed by the Special Vehicle Team in America hence the Focus SVT branding in the states.

I've been told these heads are good for well over 700bhp once ported if I wanted to go that mad



Name:  DSC02565.jpg
Views: 429
Size:  34.5 KB



I'll update as and when things move along

Last edited by AustenW; 07-04-2021 at 10:24 PM.
Old 28-08-2006, 10:43 PM
  #2  
Lamb Souvla
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Lamb Souvla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice mate, love westfields and yours is especially cool.
Is going high comp going to affect boost levels which will affect torque? or is there something you hve planned to combat this??

Cheers Mike
Old 29-08-2006, 02:49 AM
  #3  
xr-stu
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
xr-stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

fair play to you but surely you would be better of spending time/money improving the setup of the car so it can use all of its 400 horses, rather than giving it more power i assume its not gonna be able to handle until its doing 60/70mph. i think if you could get it launching harder off the line you could get your 10s, and that giving it another 100bhp might not be the best way to get the times you want.

either way, thats just my opinion, its your car, so cant really knock whatever you decide to do with it!

whats the score with the 170 head btw? having a big discussion on xrtwo.com about these engines/heads. whats involved in running one on a silver top bottom end? theyre suposed to be faarrrr better than the std zetec heads, and better than alot of so called performace heads you can buy off the shelf from engine builders?
Old 29-08-2006, 02:51 AM
  #4  
xr-stu
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
xr-stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

can you use silver top cams int hese heads? its been a while since i had my rocker cover off, but im sure the cam caps are in a different arrangement? i might just be off my head though!
Old 29-08-2006, 08:49 AM
  #5  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I want a responsive engine off boost hence the high comp route.

Just to note that Andy Nichols with his 800bhp fwd Rover is running high comp and 3 bar of boost and his car has the same torque as Rocket Ronnies Skyline. As proven on the dynopack at AET with Abbey Motorsport present.


I have had the car 3 years now and built it from scratch so its as set up as it can be. The best launch was a 1.7 sec 60 ft on street tyres that I use every day. I also drove the car to the event and home again. I might put some softer springs on the back for straight lining though in the future but thats all I can do apart from putting some huge Mickey Thompson drag tyres on it, which I don't fancy doing as its cheating IMO in a street legal class.

Once on the move it has plenty of traction so another 100 bhp should be fine.

Also the ST head is totally different and the cams are a different thickness on the bearing caps.

These heads are the future for Zetec turbo tuning. Massive flow potential from these.

They flow better in standard form than most big valve performance heads, (silver or black top).

They can flow more than a cossie head too
Old 29-08-2006, 03:29 PM
  #6  
xr-stu
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
xr-stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

fair enough, 1.7 60ft is pretty impressive! i just had visions of it being a slag off the line, seen a cossie powered caterham launch and it was all over the place through 1st and 2nd gear.

the cams are a totally different breed of their own then? i know the S3 cams fit the S1/2 heads so obviously they cant fit the 170 head. are they bugger or small in the 170 head?

how does the variable cam timing system work on these then? is it just a signal from the ECU at xxxxrpm that controls it?

sorry for all the questions but you seem like a knowledgable bloke and nobody else ive spoken to knows much about these engines!
Old 29-08-2006, 04:11 PM
  #7  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The ST cams have a thicker section on the last cap.

The VVT is triggered by a selenoid which allows oil to flow through the inlet cam into the pully wheel which makes it move at a desired RPM altering the cam timing.

Very impressive if you ask me.

This will all be removed and is a simple fix. I will be installing a standard set of Zetec Pulley wheels, (piper ajustables to be precise), I will also have to make up a collar to enable me to fit this to the inlet cam as it is totally different.

The oilway feed in the cam cap will be tapped and a 6mm grub screw threadlocked in to prevent the oil feed.

This will not interfear with the engine running at all, as each cam cap has its own bottom oil feed .

It will be easy to retro install the VVT if ever needed by doing this.

I also plan to bung off a couple of the sensor holes with either tapered grub screws or i'll make up some special blank off bungs
Old 29-08-2006, 05:18 PM
  #8  
Ryan
15K+ Super Poster!!
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 18,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome work austen

have have you found the coil on plug scenerio? i presume they havent caused you any hassle?

what type are they? civic items?

PM me if you wish.

Cheers

Ryan
Car Looms UK
Old 29-08-2006, 05:21 PM
  #9  
Twins
15K+ Super Poster!!
iTrader: (18)
 
Twins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 18,043
Received 117 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Love it
Old 29-08-2006, 05:46 PM
  #10  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Lovely car, watched i with intrest at totb.

Regarding flow figures. These are far from the be all and end all in terms of a heads peformance aren't they. I have no doubt that they are better than the normal (garbage) Zetec heads though The YB head takes a lot of beating, regadless of what flow figures may say.

Are you going to lenghten the rods to imrove the rod/stroke ratio?
Old 29-08-2006, 06:15 PM
  #11  
Johnny Knoxville
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Johnny Knoxville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: having a butt X-ray
Posts: 2,194
Received 54 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

What size are the tappets/lifters are they the same size as the silver/black top engines.
Old 29-08-2006, 09:03 PM
  #12  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The coil on plug are Magnetti Marrelli items bought from Magnetti Marrelli Competition Systems.

I can do the coil pack holder bracket which goes in the centre of the rocker cover if anyone else decides to go this route. It's CNC machined out of high grade 5mm alloy, PM me for details.

Done over 5'000 miles now without missing a beat with this set up.

Not sure on tappet size? I'll just go measure one


He goes to the garage............................................ .........


There 30mm in diameter

As for head flow these heads are probably one of the best flowing 4cyl heads available, and yes possibly even better than the cosworth but thats for another thread.

Hardly anyone has started to highly tune these yet so lets wait and see

For details see

http://www.cncheads.co.uk/products.html

ST170 ported 183 CFM
Cosworth ported 158 CFM

Both using standard valves
Old 30-08-2006, 09:57 AM
  #13  
xr-stu
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
xr-stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

going back to the VVT, somebody sugested on xrtwo.com that this would be useless if not used with the st170 management, but surely all it would take is a signal from the ecu at say 4500rpm or whatever it needs to be, to activate the solenoid. so surely something like a megasquirt V3 ecu with a programable output could be setup to use the standard VVT setup and cams?

interesting stuff. how much did that head cost you if you dont mind me asking? or more to the point, how much do they normally go for?
Old 30-08-2006, 04:34 PM
  #14  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Heads are rare on there own and you can expect to pay from between £450 to £1000+ for a full engine.

I got lucky with this find as its done virtually no miles.

I dont want to run the VVT so will be removing it completely.

Today I managed to tap the oil feed to the VVT and insert a grub screw to block off the oil feed. The oil feed is 4.9mm so I tapped it for an M6 and inserted a grub screw with thread lock.

See the centre of the blue o ring seal

Name:  DSC02572.jpg
Views: 432
Size:  34.0 KB

I also pressed in a couple of 18mm core plugs to block up the hole for the VVT selenoid.

This is required to prevent oil leaking out of the rocker cover.

Name:  DSC02570.jpg
Views: 481
Size:  37.0 KB

See where the oil feed comes out the centre of the head via a one way valve. This will not be needed.

Name:  DSC02571.jpg
Views: 404
Size:  39.6 KB


While I was at it I also put a 17mm core plug where the cam sensor used to be as I will be running this on banked injection a sensor is not needed.

Name:  DSC02573.jpg
Views: 381
Size:  26.6 KB

The ports are a similar diameter to a normal zetec but the port shape is completely different and far superior.

Thats it for now.
Old 30-08-2006, 06:23 PM
  #15  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good luck Austin
Old 30-08-2006, 11:18 PM
  #16  
stevenebm
post whore
iTrader: (6)
 
stevenebm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ayrshire
Posts: 5,760
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Old 31-08-2006, 10:08 AM
  #17  
heeman10
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
heeman10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cumbria/Preston
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very good to see As you know Austen, you simply can't have too much power. Going from 11.1 sec runs down to the low 10s isn't something you can achieve by softening rear suspension or "launching better"! With 1.7 sec 60ft times you clearly have it leaving the line well, so power is the only solution here, retaining road legal tyres of course. High CR turbo engines aren't build often enough IMO, and beat any other layout IMO. If only I had a dyno to see how high a CR the Zetec could take before ignition control got impossible... This should be a brilliant engine, keep the updates coming! Ready for TOTB VI?
Old 31-08-2006, 03:25 PM
  #18  
xr-stu
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
xr-stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by heeman10
Very good to see As you know Austen, you simply can't have too much power. Going from 11.1 sec runs down to the low 10s isn't something you can achieve by softening rear suspension or "launching better"! With 1.7 sec 60ft times you clearly have it leaving the line well
the only reason i sugested that was because like i said, i saw a cossie powered kit car launching once and it was all over the shop until 3rd gear. thought it would be the case with this one too...
Old 31-08-2006, 03:31 PM
  #19  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

We are going slightly off topic now but have you guys ever heard of launch control, traction control and boost control, beacause I'm using all three.

As for times the car has a ten in it at present looking through all my timing slips as I never seem to get a perfect run.

Using my best launch, 60ft, 1/8th etc I'd be doing a 10 something

Old 31-08-2006, 06:18 PM
  #20  
heeman10
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
heeman10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cumbria/Preston
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Condescending bastard
Old 31-08-2006, 10:34 PM
  #21  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry if it seemed a bit sharp but it amazes me how people seem to think they no more about my own car and its set up than I do.

Back to topic anyway
Old 01-09-2006, 08:02 AM
  #22  
Ryan
15K+ Super Poster!!
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 18,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do u need to do anymore reinforcement to the chassis?

does anyone know the limitation of the shell? i.e flex etc etc

or is the triangulated chassis pretty strong?

Also what box you hoping to be using? a t5 still? i presume that is what you are running now?
Old 01-09-2006, 11:09 AM
  #23  
heeman10
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
heeman10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cumbria/Preston
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AustenW
Sorry if it seemed a bit sharp but it amazes me how people seem to think they no more about my own car and its set up than I do.

Back to topic anyway
No worries, the majority still follow Clarkson-types and believe traction control methods are only there to stop you having fun, rather than to make efficient use of power. As I always maintain, unless a car is able to spin the wheels all the way to the redline in top gear, it can use more power.
Old 01-09-2006, 11:40 AM
  #24  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

do u need to do anymore reinforcement to the chassis?
Yes, already done

does anyone know the limitation of the shell? i.e flex etc etc
Its fibreglas so will flex if needed

is the triangulated chassis pretty strong?
Yes

Also what box you hoping to be using? a t5 still? i presume that is what you are running now?
I run a Quaife sequential


Let get back to topic now
Old 01-09-2006, 12:29 PM
  #25  
Joris_s1
Virgin
 
Joris_s1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Genk - Belgium
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All I can say is that I really love this project!

Old 03-09-2006, 09:29 AM
  #26  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks like the ideal ZT specification to me. We have run along very similar lines with Cols engine.

I take it you are replacing the disco potato with a Gt30? We are running the 30r with an external gate and a .63 housing. I find the response amazing for a turbo that can make that much horsepower.

Are you going to go for the stainless valves option in your CNC head? We did as i didn't fancy letting the stock (probaby two piece friction welded) exhaust valves deal with that extra heat.

Which leads me onto what else i would like to do on my next ZT... internal thermal coatings. I reckon there is a lot to be said for coating the face of at least the inlet valves. We spend all that effort trying to cool the inlet charge only to shoot it past a hot inlet valve at the last minute. I'm not sure how much cooler the inlet valve will run (need some cosworth/lotus type test facilities for that one!) but its got to be an area worth looking at.

Looking forward to seeing how you get on with this engine. Good to see other people pushing the boundries and not just sticking to those same old routes.
Old 03-09-2006, 10:15 AM
  #27  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AustenW
Also what box you hoping to be using? a t5 still? i presume that is what you are running now?

I run a Quaife sequential




Any more pictures Austin?
Old 03-09-2006, 05:57 PM
  #28  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Been busy today.

Measured the combustion chamber in the head and it's 40cc so I can now work out what bowl I will need in my pistons to get the right comp ratio.

Also paint stripped, sand blasted and smoothened the rocker cover and removed the excess bits of metal ready for powder coating which has taken me all day.

Will post up picks soon once coated
Old 05-09-2006, 10:37 PM
  #29  
fezzajsy
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
fezzajsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: jeRSey..isles
Posts: 13,596
Received 33 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Old 05-09-2006, 11:10 PM
  #30  
stu21t
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
stu21t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: south london
Posts: 3,902
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

very nice looking project you got here.

can i ask where you got the heatshield on the turbo from?
Old 06-09-2006, 04:51 PM
  #31  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Good work so far

Just had a look at those figures from CNC heads. According to them, a Zetec head flows more than a YB in std form - which as you will know - is total garbage.....

Rick.
Old 06-09-2006, 09:52 PM
  #32  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Heat shield is a modified HKS item

Here's a few pics of the rocker cover I've finished tonight.

First I stipped and sanded it down.

Name:  rockerbare2.jpg
Views: 395
Size:  33.7 KB

Name:  rockerbare.jpg
Views: 354
Size:  38.2 KB


Then I got it powder coated silver by a friend,

Name:  Rockerpowdersilver.jpg
Views: 434
Size:  41.9 KB


I then rubbed it down to get all the small marks out of it until it was perfect and sprayed it in 2 pack solid chrome yellow.

Its come out mint.




Name:  rockeryellow.jpg
Views: 344
Size:  30.2 KB
Old 07-09-2006, 07:46 PM
  #33  
Jackass1983
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
Jackass1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice work!
You made it the same way like i did to get the VVT out of the engine!
http://www.st2000.de/vct%20umbau.htm


What kind of Camshaftwheel did you use.
I had build one for my own, cause i dont found a manuell setable.


Would like to see more pics, and facts of you one!

Cheers Mark
Old 13-09-2006, 10:02 AM
  #34  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Will update soon.

I'm currently making up a carbon fibre rocker plug cover to hide my coil on plug set up.

Also going a different route with the block, sump etc.

Decided to go with a Nicosil Linered CGI WRC block and dry sump system for a sealed engine.

Best start saving
Old 13-09-2006, 10:46 AM
  #35  
TimC
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
TimC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Skelmersdale, Lancashire
Posts: 4,367
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

wow

this is gona be one hell of a engine
Old 17-09-2006, 09:38 PM
  #36  
AustenW
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
AustenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nth Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,952
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Been in the garage today and just about finished making the coil on plug mounting plate out of carbon fibre.

Name:  Carbonplate.jpg
Views: 364
Size:  33.6 KB

Will update in the week when my coils arrive.

I've gone for some inductive Magneti Marelli motorsport items.

They have been successfully used by a guy in the states on turbo'd motor producing over 600bhp so should be fine for what I want.

Old 17-09-2006, 10:34 PM
  #37  
TimC
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
TimC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Skelmersdale, Lancashire
Posts: 4,367
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

you are quite the handy man. that looks stunning
Old 18-09-2006, 08:48 AM
  #38  
Ian Howell
Virgin
 
Ian Howell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rick
Good work so far

Just had a look at those figures from CNC heads. According to them, a Zetec head flows more than a YB in std form - which as you will know - is total garbage.....

Rick.
The peak lift flow from a YBT head is very similar to that of a Silver-top zetec - I've tested them on my bench. In the lower lift areas the YBT out performs a Zetec due to it's better port shape and larger valves.

Also, when we produce a 500+ Zetec we only work the last inch of the port and fit slightly oversize valves. With a YBT you need to enlarge the throat to 25mm per port to get similar HP figures.

With regard to maximum achievable flow through the heads, whether Zetec silver top, YBT or St170, the figures will be something like this at 10" H2O.

Zetec silvertop 145CFM
YBT 195CFM
ST170 182CFM.

Yes, the YBT will achieve a huge flow figure, but in order to do this you need 29mm runners, and this causes low velocity and a very soggy feel (compared to Std). The ST doesn't need a huge port, and as such the velocities are still good and the engine will feel sharper.

Hope this helps provide an alternative perspective on potential.
Old 18-09-2006, 01:40 PM
  #39  
Jackass1983
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
Jackass1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hui, your english is to hard for me, for me little german man!

Which engine do you mean with the YBT? i never heard this code!

I have a little problem with my St170 enginge.
I mounted the HEGO Sensor down behind the engine (like on the first Zetec exhausts) but when i´m gone kick his As it glow´s realy hard red/yellow until under the car and incl. the HEGO Sensor and me messureing goes slightly to lean!



Up to which temperature the HEGO sensor will work?

Cheers Mark (sorry for this english!)
Old 19-09-2006, 10:36 PM
  #40  
Ex-Finesse
PassionFord Regular
 
Ex-Finesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Medway / Maidstone, Kent
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like it is going to be an incredible engine, especially with the new bottom end!!

Could you describe the water pump issue a little more please? Do you mean the cambelt fouls the waterpump?


Quick Reply: ST170 Turbo Engine Rebuild - CGI - thinking of selling up!!



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 PM.