General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Brunters & top speed runs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:21 PM
  #1  
Ima Racing's Avatar
Ima Racing
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Default Brunters & top speed runs.

What i didnt know was the main straight is 2 miles long and the brake markers are at 1.5miles in which an M5 pulled 183mph, now forgive me if i am wrong but Rod's top speed was acheived by going past the brake marker (due to big big bollocks ) so technically not 1.5 miles?

Trying to work out where the 1.5 miles comes from thats all...looks to me like 1.7 + miles? Is the timer set at 1.5 miles or does it move and are the speeds via that timer or gps incar?

Please clarify This is not meant to upset anyone either just trying to learn facts

Last edited by Ima Racing; 20-03-2010 at 05:23 PM.
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:24 PM
  #2  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

i think (not 100% though) brunters is actully only 1.7 miles long ? so braking at 1.5 to stop for 1.7 ?

could be completely wrong but i thought it was 1.7
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:26 PM
  #3  
Ima Racing's Avatar
Ima Racing
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Default

...jimbo i just read on the m5 board its actually 2 miles hence this post
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:27 PM
  #4  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

hmm ok must be wrong but they also barrier off the last section as there is a great big plane now sat there
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:29 PM
  #5  
focusv8's Avatar
focusv8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 86
From: Nottingham
Default

From Brunters website

At the heart of the 670 acre site is an impressive 4 mile circuit and an amazing 60m wide, 2 mile straight – one of the longest in the country.

.
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:29 PM
  #6  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

yep your right 2m maybe brake at 1.7 dunno where i got that from


http://www.bruntingthorpe.com/
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:32 PM
  #7  
Ima Racing's Avatar
Ima Racing
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Default

.....on the vmax day the timer was set at 1.5 miles, but all i hear on here is braking as late as poss to acheive the highest top speed if this is the case...its not 1.5 miles?
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:32 PM
  #8  
turbotoaster's Avatar
turbotoaster
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: stoke-on-trent
Default

well people will use brunters differently depending on whether its an event(vmax) or a mag feature.

You cant assume everyone will have good enough brakes to stop from a top speed run at 1.7miles hence vmax does it at 1.5miles for safety

Suppose you can say, top speed including braking within 2miles as then that covers everyone.....or top speed at brunters, in which you can use the tarmac as you please.

Big concern about having the plane there as im gonna be stuck for distance on my run. Thats why i have been thinking about RAF woodbridge as recommended by Rod.

Last edited by turbotoaster; 20-03-2010 at 05:34 PM.
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:38 PM
  #9  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

Originally Posted by turbotoaster
well people will use brunters differently depending on whether its an event(vmax) or a mag feature.

You cant assume everyone will have good enough brakes to stop from a top speed run at 1.7miles hence vmax does it at 1.5miles for safety

Suppose you can say, top speed including braking within 2miles as then that covers everyone.....or top speed at brunters, in which you can use the tarmac as you please.

Big concern about having the plane there as im gonna be stuck for distance on my run. Thats why i have been thinking about RAF woodbridge as recommended by Rod.
its quite scary coming up to that plane at speed, come at it at 175 and thought shit imagine 220 like that porshe
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:40 PM
  #10  
turbotoaster's Avatar
turbotoaster
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: stoke-on-trent
Default

did anyone find any pictures of the crash, did it actually hit the plane?
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:42 PM
  #11  
cossie4i+'s Avatar
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 22,368
Likes: 32
From: Somerset
Default

Always had timing gear in the car when i have been at Brunters

Would like to do it again now i have the bigger turbo, sure it would hit 170mph now

Steve
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:46 PM
  #12  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

Originally Posted by turbotoaster
did anyone find any pictures of the crash, did it actually hit the plane?
did the porshce crash ?
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:51 PM
  #13  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Brunters was 2.1 miles long prior to the car park & bank being built at the bottom. Mine first ran there in 2002 & at that stage it was 1.7miles long cos I measured it, so dont lets argue about that. Its many years since it was 2 miles long.
Woodbridge is slightly shorter but safer cos it does have a run off area.
Old 20-03-2010 | 05:58 PM
  #14  
focusrrx87's Avatar
focusrrx87
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: kent
Default

what are the rules and reg's there how do u go about using it?? Can u just turn up?? Top speed runs from a rolling start?
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:05 PM
  #15  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by J1mbo
did the porshce crash ?
One of the Porsches crashed but not the fast one as i understand it.
Vmax starts 400metres or so down the back straight so they are getting 1/4 mile before the straight .
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:08 PM
  #16  
cossie4i+'s Avatar
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 22,368
Likes: 32
From: Somerset
Default

As your on here Rod, what would my theoretical top speed be with 205/40/17s, standard 2wd diff and T5 with a 7600rpm limit ?

Many Thanks

Steve
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:10 PM
  #17  
turbotoaster's Avatar
turbotoaster
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: stoke-on-trent
Default

i heard it was one of the 9ff cars so id imagine in the context of it that it isnt exactly a slow porsche lol

Well they do gain that distance but theres only so fast you can go around that bottom corner so really apart from putting less strain on your drivetrain i dont think theres much to be gained.
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:15 PM
  #18  
Ima Racing's Avatar
Ima Racing
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Default

Originally Posted by MadRod
One of the Porsches crashed but not the fast one as i understand it.
Vmax starts 400metres or so down the back straight so they are getting 1/4 mile before the straight .
It wouldnt matter if they started 10 miles before the main straight, you can only go round the corner at a certain speed
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:28 PM
  #19  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by Ima Racing
It wouldnt matter if they started 10 miles before the main straight, you can only go round the corner at a certain speed
Ive told them that but they love wasteing time & effort .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&h...&v=Z4E9LaXUBCY

The master shows how it should be done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hXNzf2kjqc
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:30 PM
  #20  
DanW@FastFord's Avatar
DanW@FastFord
Spelling Club King!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 21
From: Fast Ford
Default

It's quoted as 2 miles, but as Rod correctly states it's nearer to 1.7 miles. Having said that there is generally some bollards (and occasionally parked cars) at the bottom further shortenning any runs. It's pot luck as to what you find when you go there.

The Porsche that crashed was the funky 9ff one and it went through the timing lights at 222mph (the same as the 9ff cabby) before crashing. I've seen the pics and it was a mess, although the cockpit and structure are all sound so it wasn't as massive a crash as the speed suggests.

Some people prefer to start their runs on the back straight and carry the speed round the corner, but I've found that it's quicker to start far back on the main straight purely because by the time you can get the hammer down (using the first method) you're already a fair way down the straight. Other mags have tested it too and found the same, so I'm not sure why VMAX do that as it adds an extra unneccessary element of danger into the mix!
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:36 PM
  #21  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by cossie4i
As your on here Rod, what would my theoretical top speed be with 205/40/17s, standard 2wd diff and T5 with a 7600rpm limit ?

Many Thanks

Steve
183.2 mph
500bhp should pull it to that Speed.
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:36 PM
  #22  
-beefy-'s Avatar
-beefy-
formerly beefy-rst-2
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,072
Likes: 3
From: cleveland rsoc
Default

whats with marks dodgy bracelet in the vid rod ?

looks like a bloody dart player lol
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:42 PM
  #23  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by DanW@FastFord
It's quoted as 2 miles, but as Rod correctly states it's nearer to 1.7 miles. Having said that there is generally some bollards (and occasionally parked cars) at the bottom further shortenning any runs. It's pot luck as to what you find when you go there.

The Porsche that crashed was the funky 9ff one and it went through the timing lights at 222mph (the same as the 9ff cabby) before crashing. I've seen the pics and it was a mess, although the cockpit and structure are all sound so it wasn't as massive a crash as the speed suggests.

Some people prefer to start their runs on the back straight and carry the speed round the corner, but I've found that it's quicker to start far back on the main straight purely because by the time you can get the hammer down (using the first method) you're already a fair way down the straight. Other mags have tested it too and found the same, so I'm not sure why VMAX do that as it adds an extra unneccessary element of danger into the mix!

Thanks Dan glad you said the distance, Phil would im afaid not have believed me.
You are correct about the start the only reason we use the bend is to save on the clutch with a full bore launch. Saw Mike Rainbird set a Rwd record back in the day from a standing start .
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:44 PM
  #24  
Its Dave's Avatar
Its Dave
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: Sutton
Default

Originally Posted by DanW@FastFord

The Porsche that crashed was the funky 9ff one and it went through the timing lights at 222mph (the same as the 9ff cabby) before crashing. I've seen the pics and it was a mess, although the cockpit and structure are all sound so it wasn't as massive a crash as the speed suggests.

So glad im out of this game, not seen the pictures but can imagine what it was like
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:51 PM
  #25  
Coldo's Avatar
Coldo
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Default

What kind of motor is that at 0:57s?
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:53 PM
  #26  
turbotoaster's Avatar
turbotoaster
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
From: stoke-on-trent
Default

Originally Posted by MadRod
Thanks Dan glad you said the distance, Phil would im afaid not have believed me.
You are correct about the start the only reason we use the bend is to save on the clutch with a full bore launch. Saw Mike Rainbird set a Rwd record back in the day from a standing start .

that and the drivetrain, id imagine launching off down the straight in alot of 4wd cars would put alot of strain on there gearboxes, if you coming out of the corner in third gear id imagine the strain would be less than launching hard in 1st
Old 20-03-2010 | 06:56 PM
  #27  
DanW@FastFord's Avatar
DanW@FastFord
Spelling Club King!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,415
Likes: 21
From: Fast Ford
Default

Originally Posted by MadRod
Thanks Dan glad you said the distance, Phil would im afaid not have believed me.
I really wouldn't bank on Phil believing a word I say Rod!
Old 20-03-2010 | 07:56 PM
  #28  
cossie4i+'s Avatar
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 22,368
Likes: 32
From: Somerset
Default

Originally Posted by cossie4i
As your on here Rod, what would my theoretical top speed be with 205/40/17s, standard 2wd diff and T5 with a 7600rpm limit ?

Many Thanks

Steve
Originally Posted by MadRod
183.2 mph
500bhp should pull it to that Speed.
Thanks for the reply

Its about 440bhp so what would you expect ?

Steve
Old 20-03-2010 | 08:11 PM
  #29  
Ima Racing's Avatar
Ima Racing
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Default

cossie4i its really hard to say because your 440bhp is probably at the fly whereas rod is talking about 500bhp on the dyno....my guess is you'd see 175mph.
Old 20-03-2010 | 08:18 PM
  #30  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

Originally Posted by Ima Racing
cossie4i its really hard to say because your 440bhp is probably at the fly whereas rod is talking about 500bhp on the dyno....my guess is you'd see 175mph.
at the fly wheel and on dyno is the same ?

or am i missing something ?
Old 20-03-2010 | 08:20 PM
  #31  
cossie4i+'s Avatar
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 22,368
Likes: 32
From: Somerset
Default

Originally Posted by Ima Racing
cossie4i its really hard to say because your 440bhp is probably at the fly whereas rod is talking about 500bhp on the dyno....my guess is you'd see 175mph.
I woud be happy with 170mph

Did 162.2mph on a T34.48 at Brunters, timed by Fast Ford

Steve
Old 20-03-2010 | 08:22 PM
  #32  
Ima Racing's Avatar
Ima Racing
Thread Starter
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Default

Originally Posted by J1mbo
at the fly wheel and on dyno is the same ?

or am i missing something ?

...yes you are missing alternator belt/ps belt and not as good exhaust etc..so you would lose approx 30bhp incar imo....+ most maps are backed off for incar arnt they the dyno is normally for that look at me figure.
Old 20-03-2010 | 08:59 PM
  #33  
J1mbo's Avatar
J1mbo
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,986
Likes: 1
From: Peterborough
Default

Originally Posted by Ima Racing
...yes you are missing alternator belt/ps belt and not as good exhaust etc..so you would lose approx 30bhp incar imo....+ most maps are backed off for incar arnt they the dyno is normally for that look at me figure.
i wouldnt say 30 hp, depends what dyno you have seen really, i can only speek of what i see at our place, exhaust the same size as car normally, maps same, alternator run, no p/s

but i agree, its not going to be exactly the same a small loss
Old 20-03-2010 | 09:01 PM
  #34  
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 119
From: Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by Ima Racing
...yes you are missing alternator belt/ps belt and not as good exhaust etc..so you would lose approx 30bhp incar imo....+ most maps are backed off for incar arnt they the dyno is normally for that look at me figure.
No ignition or boost was taken out of my map after dyno
Old 21-03-2010 | 09:00 AM
  #35  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by Ima Racing
...yes you are missing alternator belt/ps belt and not as good exhaust etc..so you would lose approx 30bhp incar imo....+ most maps are backed off for incar arnt they the dyno is normally for that look at me figure.

Um!! not at MAD.
I spy both PS & Alternator there Phil. Mark added Boost for 5th gear run, 2.2bar on the Dyno 2.5bar on the run.



Old 21-03-2010 | 09:08 AM
  #36  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by cossie4i
Thanks for the reply

Its about 440bhp so what would you expect ?

Steve
Dave Moss ran 178 with 440bhp but i think that was one of lifes perfect runs & difficult to repeat, i guess Phil is about right at 175mph. Please understand you require 440 at the end of the run not just at the start & thats the hard part many unhappy faces there when their 190mph car runs a 177 it aint easy.
Old 21-03-2010 | 09:20 AM
  #37  
Mark V8's Avatar
Mark V8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,108
Likes: 171
From: Essex
Default

Kind of on topic, 253mph standing mile

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9vMQRIp1E

Even the yanks are using Wizards of Nos.

Mark
Old 21-03-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #38  
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 237
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by V8 EsCos
Kind of on topic, 253mph standing mile

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9vMQRIp1E

Even the yanks are using Wizards of Nos.

Mark
It would be slower at Brunters . At 250 the last half mile would take less than 6 secs & the Bugger has to stop or hit a plane . Great achievement but has Power & Capacity to run those Speeds & then 7 miles to slow down. Rather like comparing Posh's tits with Jordons.
Old 21-03-2010 | 02:23 PM
  #39  
GaryHurn's Avatar
GaryHurn
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
From: south wales
Default

my engine builder is building an engine for an escort cosworth that is aiming to break 200mph at brunters, one of m.a.d. customers i think. 800-850 is the aim
Old 21-03-2010 | 02:35 PM
  #40  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Likes: 22
Default

As above, there is nowhere near 2 miles of useable space at brunters, more like 1.7 miles or so.


Quick Reply: Brunters & top speed runs.



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 PM.