General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Turbo restrictors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2008, 09:30 PM
  #1  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Turbo restrictors

Why do they make more lbft in rally cars, Or is that not down to the restrictor?
Old 09-01-2008, 09:33 PM
  #2  
NEEDFORSPEED
PassionFord Post Troll
 
NEEDFORSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: st.annes, blackpool
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

this ones gona be interesting, i dont think its down to the restrictor
Old 09-01-2008, 09:33 PM
  #3  
OvaBoost
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
OvaBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

High comp i think
Old 09-01-2008, 09:34 PM
  #4  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NEEDFORSPEED
this ones gona be interesting, i dont think its down to the restrictor

I hope so , I wanna know
Old 09-01-2008, 09:39 PM
  #5  
NEEDFORSPEED
PassionFord Post Troll
 
NEEDFORSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: st.annes, blackpool
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

thats all i think its down to high c/r like mine im sure theyll make abit more power with it removed but not alot more.just built for torque
Old 09-01-2008, 09:43 PM
  #6  
RWD_cossie_wil
10K+ Poster!!

iTrader: (9)
 
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: birmingham west mids
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Because the restrictor is 34mm, they tune the engines for absoloutly maximum midrange grunt, as obviously at half engine speed ( say 4000 Rpm) the engine is only roughly consuming half / two thirds the amount of air it does at 8000 Rpm, where it would struggle to flow so much air through a 34mm hole. So if you can't have huge bhp you make the engine a stump-puller instead

Thats how I understand it anyway
Old 09-01-2008, 09:43 PM
  #7  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

the whole car is built around that restrictor

so whats it doing! its limits the outright amount of air which the engine can consume!

so we havent got the option of the engine making alot of BHP over a large rev range, because as you know, BHP is a function of torque and revs!
torque is directly related to airflow!

Trending Topics

Old 09-01-2008, 09:46 PM
  #8  
zippyobrien
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
zippyobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: reading
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i thought it was down to the fact they run alot of boost, on small ish turbos aswell?
Old 09-01-2008, 09:47 PM
  #9  
Spiky
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
the whole car is built around that restrictor

so whats it doing! its limits the outright amount of air which the engine can consume!

so we havent got the option of the engine making alot of BHP over a large rev range, because as you know, BHP is a function of torque and revs!
torque is directly related to airflow!
so going by the last comment, an air filter can change your torque?

hoaw about heat soak? well hot air
Old 09-01-2008, 09:55 PM
  #10  
RWD_cossie_wil
10K+ Poster!!

iTrader: (9)
 
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: birmingham west mids
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spiky
Originally Posted by GARETH T
the whole car is built around that restrictor

so whats it doing! its limits the outright amount of air which the engine can consume!

so we havent got the option of the engine making alot of BHP over a large rev range, because as you know, BHP is a function of torque and revs!
torque is directly related to airflow!
so going by the last comment, an air filter can change your torque?

hoaw about heat soak? well hot air
yup
Old 09-01-2008, 09:57 PM
  #11  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spiky
Originally Posted by GARETH T
the whole car is built around that restrictor

so whats it doing! its limits the outright amount of air which the engine can consume!

so we havent got the option of the engine making alot of BHP over a large rev range, because as you know, BHP is a function of torque and revs!
torque is directly related to airflow!
so going by the last comment, an air filter can change your torque?

hoaw about heat soak? well hot air
how you mean?
Old 09-01-2008, 10:01 PM
  #12  
RWD_cossie_wil
10K+ Poster!!

iTrader: (9)
 
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: birmingham west mids
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

a restrictive air filter with a small micron filter and lots of bends such as in an OE airbox can cause restrictions, but equally a cone filter might cause just as many problems as it solves, as you see a lot of tests where the power goes up at the top end, but you loose torque as all the resonance chambers that were in the original airbox set-up are gone, so you loose all the harmonic waves that can be tuned to optimise power/torque at a certain point. Also it may draw warmer ( less dense, less power ) engine bay air in than an OE airbox

Bit like short/ long throttle body bellmouths to put the power where you want it, short for top end power long for torque etc
Old 09-01-2008, 10:08 PM
  #13  
Spiky
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
Originally Posted by Spiky
Originally Posted by GARETH T
the whole car is built around that restrictor

so whats it doing! its limits the outright amount of air which the engine can consume!

so we havent got the option of the engine making alot of BHP over a large rev range, because as you know, BHP is a function of torque and revs!
torque is directly related to airflow!
so going by the last comment, an air filter can change your torque?

hoaw about heat soak? well hot air
how you mean?

wll you said the torque is related to airflow, so if i had a better filter i'd get better torque???

also

heat soak rom the engine, having a better design, using a box or cold airfeeds, would that be better for torque?
Old 09-01-2008, 10:13 PM
  #14  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

remember you will only flow more if the engine wants to flow more!

your more than likely going to hit the max airflow of the engine before hitting the limit of the filter! does that make sense?

heat soak from the engine? it is better to get the coldest air you can into the engine! buta filter sitting on the front inner wing is normally fine, as at speed the air inside the engine bay is constantly being changed

the hotter the air,, the less dense it is! so the less air per volume
Old 10-01-2008, 12:05 AM
  #15  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So how do you cap BHP with a restrictor? Like rally cars are capped at 300bhp
Old 10-01-2008, 12:19 AM
  #16  
cjwood555
Advanced PassionFord User
 
cjwood555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Solihull
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The restrictor limits the amount of air that can be drawn into the engine. This is because the airflow will become turbulent rather than laminar beyond a certain flow rate, until the turbulence becomes so great that no greater flow-rate can be achieved.

Power is made by burning fuel in air. To make more power, you need to burn more fuel, which means you need more air. Therefore by limiting the amount of air that can flow into the engine you restrict the achievable power output.

Power is an expression of the torque generated at a certain RPM multiplied by that engine speed (and a constant). Therefore it can be taken that for a lower engine speed, the same torque force equates to less power and less air required. We know this from looking at dyno graphs etc.

The way the rally engines are designed, is to get as much torque as possible from as low an engine speed as possible, and to allow keep making as much torque as possible until the restrictor limits the amount of air that can be drawn in. Once past this point, the car will gradually make less torque and the power output will hit a brick wall.

Chris
Old 10-01-2008, 11:10 AM
  #17  
Spiky
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cheers for the info
Old 10-01-2008, 01:27 PM
  #18  
Turby2
Part of the Furniture
 
Turby2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Similar concept, but current 2 litre N/A F3 engines have a single 26mm restrictor and run approx 210 BHP - rpm power band is approx 4000 to 6500
Old 10-01-2008, 01:29 PM
  #19  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Rally cars would run more torque without the restrictor, and a LOT more BHP
Old 10-01-2008, 01:31 PM
  #20  
89xr2
Brap!
 
89xr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: N-Town
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dont rally cars run alot of boost?
Old 10-01-2008, 01:39 PM
  #21  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

at low rpm they run a lot of boost, at high rpm they dont, becuase they have a restrictor

the whole engine is built around that restrictor which totally compromises the design away from what it would be without it
Old 10-01-2008, 01:44 PM
  #22  
Paulo P
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Paulo P's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks
Posts: 4,530
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 89xr2
dont rally cars run alot of boost?
The guy at Prodrive told us that the Impreza WRC runs something like 5 bar of boost That doesn't sound right.
Old 10-01-2008, 01:49 PM
  #23  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Rally cars would run more torque without the restrictor, and a LOT more BHP
i dont think they would run much more BHP (well maybe 400bhp, which i know is 33% )

the compression ratio is right on the limit for the spec of the engine!
Old 10-01-2008, 01:50 PM
  #24  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Rally cars would run more torque without the restrictor, and a LOT more BHP
i dont think they would run much more BHP (well maybe 400bhp, which i know is 33% )

the compression ratio is right on the limit for the spec of the engine!
Without the restrictor they wouldnt run that compression ratio or those turbos though in the first place you welsh mong
Old 10-01-2008, 01:52 PM
  #25  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

dont you think i know that! wheres ima when you need him
Old 10-01-2008, 01:53 PM
  #26  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Rally cars would run more torque without the restrictor, turbo and compression ratio, and a LOT more BHP
ive adited it for you
Old 10-01-2008, 01:54 PM
  #27  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

He's moved on to a higher place where is intelect is apprecaited apparently.
Old 10-01-2008, 02:18 PM
  #28  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by GARETH T
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Rally cars would run more torque without the restrictor, and a LOT more BHP
i dont think they would run much more BHP (well maybe 400bhp, which i know is 33% )

the compression ratio is right on the limit for the spec of the engine!
Without the restrictor they wouldnt run that compression ratio or those turbos though in the first place you welsh mong
You'd also not run the

the cams, valve gear, inlet plenum, exhaust manifold, exhaust system, intercooler, injectors and on the list goes.....lol

In fact if you wanted a fast road or track engine, it wouldn't resemble a raly engine at all......
Old 10-01-2008, 02:20 PM
  #29  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Indeed and yet still the rally mongs bang on about 10:1 as if it is relevant to anything that isnt running a gay arse restrictor in it
Old 10-01-2008, 02:30 PM
  #30  
ian sibbert
Advanced PassionFord User
 
ian sibbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lancaster, Lancs
Posts: 1,859
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Indeed and yet still the rally mongs bang on about 10:1 as if it is relevant to anything that isnt running a gay arse restrictor in it
Ay....careful, they are my brethren.......lol.....

I think most genuine rally people do understand the difference, certainly those who frequent PF do.....
Old 10-01-2008, 02:41 PM
  #31  
dumped
Advanced PassionFord User
 
dumped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont think that by purely removing the restrictor they would make a LOT more hp but depends how you quantify a LOT. Some properly optimised rally cars run smaller diameter exhaust manifolds to increase gas velocity to produce boost much earlier and increasce torque as they are capped at the top end but the restrictor. This in turn means at the top end they are both strangled by air restrictor and manifold backpressure before you even reach the dinky turbo.
Old 10-01-2008, 02:46 PM
  #32  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dumped
I dont think that by purely removing the restrictor they would make a LOT more hp but depends how you quantify a LOT. Some properly optimised rally cars run smaller diameter exhaust manifolds to increase gas velocity to produce boost much earlier and increasce torque as they are capped at the top end but the restrictor. This in turn means at the top end they are both strangled by air restrictor and manifold backpressure before you even reach the dinky turbo.

The standard turbo would be the limiting factor in most cases.
I wasnt talking about JUST removing the restrictor though, was talking about an engine built and specced without having to have one.
Old 10-01-2008, 03:00 PM
  #33  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Indeed and yet still the rally mongs bang on about 10:1 as if it is relevant to anything that isnt running a gay arse restrictor in it
any particular rally mong? perhaps someone that has very recently bought a 'proper rally car'?
Old 10-01-2008, 04:36 PM
  #34  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Cheers
Old 10-01-2008, 05:50 PM
  #35  
big_wig_074
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
big_wig_074's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,594
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

as i said earlier rad,dont bother with this,its a racing "restriction",my idea is a better one!!!
Old 10-01-2008, 05:51 PM
  #36  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah defo
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jessie_rs
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
62
06-08-2019 09:27 PM
RSBryden
General Car Related Discussion.
6
06-09-2015 08:39 PM
cozzzzy power
Ford RS Turbo Parts for Sale
0
04-09-2015 08:14 AM
turbowag
Cars & Parts Wanted.
0
03-09-2015 08:07 AM
Jerry Ryan
General Car Related Discussion.
0
02-09-2015 08:02 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo restrictors



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14 PM.