Speed camera thought
#1
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
When i was driving home from scotland yesterday admiring all 4 bazillion speed cameras, i had a thought.
Digital images cant be used as evidence as they can be altered etc. But the police use the photo from the camera as evidence to convict motorists.
I'm probably talking wank but it was just a thought
Digital images cant be used as evidence as they can be altered etc. But the police use the photo from the camera as evidence to convict motorists.
I'm probably talking wank but it was just a thought
#5
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Gatso's are not digital - they use a roll of film (400 shots = 2 pics per offence).
http://www.ukspeedcameras.co.uk/index1.htm
Limitations : Once they run out of film they become inactive. Approximately only one in 4 GATSO static cameras is fully operational at any one time. Some have now been painted bright colours.
http://www.ukspeedcameras.co.uk/index1.htm
Limitations : Once they run out of film they become inactive. Approximately only one in 4 GATSO static cameras is fully operational at any one time. Some have now been painted bright colours.
#7
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
L8 ECU
Those fucking horrible little mobile things are though aint they
Those fucking horrible little mobile things are though aint they
Trending Topics
#8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
L8 ECU
Ye i just thought i heard somewhere that digital images couldnt be used as evidence. Think it was on here actually when someone crashed into someones car and they took pics off there phone as evidence?
Ye i just thought i heard somewhere that digital images couldnt be used as evidence. Think it was on here actually when someone crashed into someones car and they took pics off there phone as evidence?
#9
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
L8 ECU
Ye i just thought i heard somewhere that digital images couldnt be used as evidence. Think it was on here actually when someone crashed into someones car and they took pics off there phone as evidence?
Ye i just thought i heard somewhere that digital images couldnt be used as evidence. Think it was on here actually when someone crashed into someones car and they took pics off there phone as evidence?
So, I cant see that it's one rule for them and one rule for us - or am I being naive?
#10
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Macclesfield - you'll never leave....!
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
digital images if recorded to a digital video recorder MUST have digital signatures encoed on them with a algorithim that matches the device they were encoded on - this is somewhat like a 128 bit wifi encryption which must match and is 'allegedly' uncopyable, so the digi sig onthe film MUST match the one on the recorder or else it can be shown it has been tampered with.
![Smokin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smokin.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post