Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
L8 ECU
Ye i just thought i heard somewhere that digital images couldnt be used as evidence. Think it was on here actually when someone crashed into someones car and they took pics off there phone as evidence?
Well, when there is a road accident involving serious injury the police take lots of pics of the trye/skid marks on the road and pics of other related damage at the scene, they deffo use digital camaras (seen them outside my house), and I guess they use those digital images to effect a dangerous/wreckless driving conviction.
So, I cant see that it's one rule for them and one rule for us - or am I being naive?