General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

How fast do you think it will go ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2006, 09:52 PM
  #81  
Fast Guy
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Fast Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,529
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MADRod
Also the weight of the car makes no difference to Topspeed we did one run fully stripped it was no quicker. We have done 0-180 in 17.82 secs so we are not looking for extra accleration .
True it doesn't. But in theory it should help you get there quicker.

Idealy you need to raise the revs you make peak power at, so that your peak power is geared for the max theoretical speed you can make. Max power at 7000 can only hold you back on a top speed run.

If you're only having one last shot, then why not fit some wild cams for the attempt and then go back to a more useable road cam after?
Old 04-06-2006, 10:07 PM
  #82  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by puddy
Originally Posted by MADRod
Originally Posted by Stuart.W
Bloody hell, you've finally realised a 6 speed gearbox is the way to go, next thing you'll be suggesting is perhaps a lighter car too

I'm guessing ONLY 216.5mph

If you had a proper (6 speed) gearbox and lost 200kgs (the car that is) then i'd say 225mph IF all 4 wheels stay on the ground that is.

Best of luck with anything official over 210mph as thats an amazing achievement

ps Can you take me out for a spin to show me how fast it is because I think your car is really really SLOW

No the T56 isnt the way I want to go im perfectly happy with the Tremec.
Also the weight of the car makes no difference to Topspeed we did one run fully stripped it was no quicker. We have done 0-180 in 17.82 secs so we are not looking for extra accleration .
We simple dont have the Power to approach 220 in the distance we have.
Would need to be past 210 in the mile & that im afraid is not on.
Joel English has a Dynoed 960bhp & with his wing off better aerodynamics he managed 215.7 in 1.5miles so im pretty sure thats out of reach as well. The record at Brunters is 211 ( Long tail Macca 1) to approach or beat that is a very big call, remember even the Rocket & the Famous Ultima only managed 204.
I will Post my Computer figures for a Sierra to reach 215 in 1.5 miles the Power required may shock.
Thanks for all these comments its been worthwhile.
Rod
Surely you can accelerate a lighter mass to the same top speed more

quickly?

Also braking distances for a lighter mass would be shorter,thus gaining

extra time still accellerating?

puddy


As rod mentioned in an earlier post, the weight makes surprisingly little difference over such a big distance, it might get you to 150mph a fair few yards sooner, but when you add those extra yards on the end when you are doing 210mph+ they only translate to a second or two longer to try and accelerate from that speed due to the rate you are covering ground at and hence make very little odds in the grand scheme of things.
Old 04-06-2006, 10:45 PM
  #83  
Dan
20K+ Super Poster.
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Local, when i'm home...
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I reckon 215+mph, best of luck!
Old 04-06-2006, 10:47 PM
  #84  
pee vee
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
pee vee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wiltshire, Bath, chippenham area!
Posts: 7,428
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

true..
but when you are talking getting faster than 210 surely every little helps
Old 04-06-2006, 11:22 PM
  #85  
Stuart.W
Regular Contributor
 
Stuart.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bucks / Berks
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

where are these calcs Rod?
Old 05-06-2006, 06:03 PM
  #86  
Keith B
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Keith B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rod - the whole gentlemans agreement thing sounds a bit lame. Max speed is max speed. Max speed over 1.5miles doesnt really compare to anything other than for someone else thats run at Brunters. Still its your car and your mission - best of luck.
Old 05-06-2006, 06:47 PM
  #87  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi

Some calcs & thoughts.
I use the following Formula-


For my benchmark I use a known set of figures from a Sapphire we know was running close to optimum. MADAde 185.5mph from 535bhp.

This gives the following figures.

180 – 484bhp
185 – 526bhp
190 – 570bhp
195 – 616bhp
200 – 664bhp Peak required = 710bhp
205 – 715bhp Peak required = 765bhp
210 – 769bhp Peak required = 822bhp
212 – 791bhp Peak required = 846bhp
214 – 814bhp Peak required = 870bhp
215 – 825bhp Peak required = 883bhp
218 – 860bhp Peak required = 920bhp
220 – 884bhp Peak required = 946bhp

Not that easy because we are pulling 4.8% longer gearing & going 10% more past peak Power than Ade hence the second set of figures.
Problem at the mo is we don’t have accurate Power Figures ,I use- 690bhp on race Fuel & 180 (90% efficient) from the Nitrous = 870bhp.
This suggests 214 is as good as it gets.
Before we run I expect to have Dyno figures for the engine & atw figures on the gas.

So my guess is 214mph max maybe a tad less if conditions aint perfect.
Rod
Old 05-06-2006, 08:41 PM
  #88  
cossie350
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
cossie350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Take the wing mirrors off and before anyone takes the piss try sitting a 150mph on your private runway and put your hand out the window
Its got to help not alot but then 215 is better than 214. And it cost nothing
Old 05-06-2006, 09:42 PM
  #89  
Taylor
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Best of luck ,alot of time and effort in this car so hope you get as much as poss(220+???)
Old 05-06-2006, 11:09 PM
  #90  
Stuart.W
Regular Contributor
 
Stuart.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bucks / Berks
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Really Rod, hardly the kind of technical formulae expected from an aerospace engineer is it

I thought you were going to get all technical with us and only 214mph!

If you knew what distance you had covered arriving at 180mph in 17.82seconds and knowing what rate of acceleration you still had at 180mph then surely you could calculate what terminal speed you would be doing at the 1.5mile mark, especially as it'll all be done in one gear from 180mph onwards making it so much easier to calculate.

All you need to know is:

Coefficient of drag: 0.32 (assuming 4x4 undertray & bonnet)
Frontal area: 0.639 m2

You see I've already filled those in for you...........

Power & Torque at the wheels at both initial and terminal speeds. Rolling resistance of tyres. Rolling Radius of tyre. Weight of car (with lift taken into account) and finally the average diameter of Marks left and right testical (i'm not offering to measure). So you see Rod, it should be 216.5mph and not 214, you'll see


ps Got a close ratio T56 with a 0.70:1 6th gear you can borrow if you don't like the new Himalayain spec' cams.
Old 05-06-2006, 11:27 PM
  #91  
Benni
Ban[B][/B]ned
 
Benni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Pool.
Posts: 34,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

217 mph. Wish you the best of luck aswel.
Old 06-06-2006, 07:18 AM
  #92  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart.W
Really Rod, hardly the kind of technical formulae expected from an aerospace engineer is it

I thought you were going to get all technical with us and only 214mph!

If you knew what distance you had covered arriving at 180mph in 17.82seconds and knowing what rate of acceleration you still had at 180mph then surely you could calculate what terminal speed you would be doing at the 1.5mile mark, especially as it'll all be done in one gear from 180mph onwards making it so much easier to calculate.

All you need to know is:

Coefficient of drag: 0.32 (assuming 4x4 undertray & bonnet)
Frontal area: 0.639 m2

You see I've already filled those in for you...........

Power & Torque at the wheels at both initial and terminal speeds. Rolling resistance of tyres. Rolling Radius of tyre. Weight of car (with lift taken into account) and finally the average diameter of Marks left and right testical (i'm not offering to measure). So you see Rod, it should be 216.5mph and not 214, you'll see


ps Got a close ratio T56 with a 0.70:1 6th gear you can borrow if you don't like the new Himalayain spec' cams.
Yep ! your calcs are better but mine are easier to understand can I point out your formula does not include a WTF factor when you start to consider what you would do if your brakes fail at 200 & you are hurtling towards the Brunters car park. This tends to slow you up lets say by 2.5mph making my 214 about right.
Rod
Old 06-06-2006, 08:56 AM
  #93  
dumped
Advanced PassionFord User
 
dumped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dont like your WTF calc!

What has been your topspeed at brunters - 202 to date? I know the 206s were are woodbridge. Got to be a hell of an attempt!

Sounds fun for you and your son... strange my dad refuses to go in my car since i took him out with a T35 and NOS 6 odd years ago
Old 06-06-2006, 11:48 AM
  #94  
Big G
PassionFord Post Whore!!

 
Big G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Manchestoh
Posts: 8,463
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MADRod
your formula does not include a WTF factor when you start to consider what you would do if your brakes fail at 200 & you are hurtling towards the Brunters car park. This tends to slow you up lets say by 2.5mph making my 214 about right.
Rod
Doesnt the masses of air exiting the mouth in midscream of "SSSSSssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttt" act as another braking module
Old 06-06-2006, 12:04 PM
  #95  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dumped
I dont like your WTF calc!

What has been your topspeed at brunters - 202 to date? I know the 206s were are woodbridge. Got to be a hell of an attempt!

Sounds fun for you and your son... strange my dad refuses to go in my car since i took him out with a T35 and NOS 6 odd years ago
Have never had a proper run at Brunters since the GT 35/150 nos , restricted exhaust days have around 200bhp more Power now. Ran 201.3 in the pouring rain & passed 150 in 25.7s about 13secs off the pace in the dry those precious seconds should see our dreams realised.
The 210 was at Woodbridge also.
Old 06-06-2006, 02:35 PM
  #96  
JTECH James
Passion for Fords!
iTrader: (13)
 
JTECH James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Devon/Blackpool
Posts: 10,754
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

instead of stopping at the end just make some wings and take off?
Old 06-06-2006, 05:08 PM
  #97  
kouzman
PassionFord Regular
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

personally i would consider the parachute as a safety device and i dont think that its difficult or expensive to install...

your front spoiler will def help as well as lowering the car just a tad...

I m sure that you will touch if not pass 215mph...

Rod team is the BIG cohones team... and that's the end of it...



i wish you good luck from Greece and NYC...
Old 07-06-2006, 12:27 PM
  #98  
Stuart.W
Regular Contributor
 
Stuart.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bucks / Berks
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTECHSAFF
instead of stopping at the end just make some wings and take off?

No need for wings, get to 220mph and it will all on its own
Old 07-06-2006, 12:39 PM
  #99  
Stuart.W
Regular Contributor
 
Stuart.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bucks / Berks
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MADRod
your formula does not include a WTF factor when you start to consider what you would do if your brakes fail at 200 & you are hurtling towards the Brunters car park
Don't worry about the brakes..............worry about the fresh air underneath the tyres




Correct me if i'm wrong but do you not hold the world record for going sideways at 198mph...........hail Rod, drift king
Old 07-06-2006, 12:41 PM
  #100  
JTECH James
Passion for Fords!
iTrader: (13)
 
JTECH James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Devon/Blackpool
Posts: 10,754
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

deffo a CLEAN PANTS moment!
Old 07-06-2006, 12:42 PM
  #101  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

PMSL @ sideways at 198mph
Old 07-06-2006, 12:47 PM
  #102  
JTECH James
Passion for Fords!
iTrader: (13)
 
JTECH James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Devon/Blackpool
Posts: 10,754
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

you can just imagine a squeaky parp from the drivers seat during the sideways at 198 moment.......
Old 07-06-2006, 01:02 PM
  #103  
Stuart.W
Regular Contributor
 
Stuart.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bucks / Berks
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTECHSAFF
you can just imagine a squeaky parp from the drivers seat during the sideways at 198 moment.......
I think that came from the passenger seat, I believe Mark said either..........

I say Rodney dear boy, would you mind awefully just releasing some pressure off that middle pedal

or

OFF THE F*****G BRAKES
Old 07-06-2006, 01:08 PM
  #104  
JTECH James
Passion for Fords!
iTrader: (13)
 
JTECH James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Devon/Blackpool
Posts: 10,754
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

if the situation had got much worse he may have bailled out..... he would have been fine as long as he bent his knees when he landed.
Old 07-06-2006, 01:47 PM
  #105  
PF Ben
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (1)
 
PF Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Rs1 wrote:

"If you get seme Franky detori(sp) sized chap to drive it i can well see it nudging 217"



Mate, haven't you seen Rod?!!!

Ben
Old 07-06-2006, 04:00 PM
  #106  
Fast Guy
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Fast Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N Yorks
Posts: 1,529
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart.W
Frontal area: 0.639 m2
Is that right? The car is over 1m wide and 1metre high, so that's a minimum if 1m2 surely?
Old 07-06-2006, 04:13 PM
  #107  
Stuart.W
Regular Contributor
 
Stuart.W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bucks / Berks
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its actually around 1.94m2, it was too early in the morning ok

Its nice to know some of you are awake
Old 07-06-2006, 05:11 PM
  #108  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stuart.W
Originally Posted by JTECHSAFF
you can just imagine a squeaky parp from the drivers seat during the sideways at 198 moment.......
I think that came from the passenger seat, I believe Mark said either..........

I say Rodney dear boy, would you mind awefully just releasing some pressure off that middle pedal

or

OFF THE F*****G BRAKES
Mark gets very verbal, He admits that having a senile old geezer with the drivin ability of a monkey is a bit stressfull at 200mph as you are about to get on the brakes. I think his worst moment was at 5th gear when I did the test run , I reached 193 & had to get on the brakes in the wet he was not sure if I could handle that, I couldnt but managed to stop somehow.
Rod
Old 07-06-2006, 05:17 PM
  #109  
AGAR-COSWORTH
Redumbdancy
 
AGAR-COSWORTH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aberdeen / Glasgow
Posts: 4,882
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by AGAR-COSWORTH
Originally Posted by MADRod
Originally Posted by cossie350
Hi rod theres been a lot of talk about moving your peak power up the rev range would it not be easier to change the gearing so that the top speed is 217 at 7.5k or ami talking shit Good luck anyway.... When you attempting this ?
Changing the gearing is difficult we are already on 19" at the back & finding a Jag diff of a suitable ratio is difficult. Go too long on gearing & you lose accleration & the car wont get up to these speeds. Its all a compromise im afraid, what I really need is a 6th gear to slip into at around 195 now that would be nice.
Just out of interest why are you using the Jag diff - i was speaking in passing to a few guys about your car and the spec (inc the jag diff) they found it strange that you ran it as they said it was hardly the best option to go for, commenting that it would contribute alot of tranny loss.

I have no idea whether what they said it correct, so please enlighten me.
Name another diff at the right cost and strenght and a kit to drop in a cossie straight away,
Look at the Gbox also and you will see we went for strenght over trans drag.

Mark
I see now, i have no real idea about the interchange-ability of cossie diffs with others etc - cheers
Old 07-06-2006, 05:53 PM
  #110  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AGAR-COSWORTH
Originally Posted by madevelopments
Originally Posted by AGAR-COSWORTH
Originally Posted by MADRod
Originally Posted by cossie350
Hi rod theres been a lot of talk about moving your peak power up the rev range would it not be easier to change the gearing so that the top speed is 217 at 7.5k or ami talking shit Good luck anyway.... When you attempting this ?
Changing the gearing is difficult we are already on 19" at the back & finding a Jag diff of a suitable ratio is difficult. Go too long on gearing & you lose accleration & the car wont get up to these speeds. Its all a compromise im afraid, what I really need is a 6th gear to slip into at around 195 now that would be nice.
Just out of interest why are you using the Jag diff - i was speaking in passing to a few guys about your car and the spec (inc the jag diff) they found it strange that you ran it as they said it was hardly the best option to go for, commenting that it would contribute alot of tranny loss.

I have no idea whether what they said it correct, so please enlighten me.
Name another diff at the right cost and strenght and a kit to drop in a cossie straight away,
Look at the Gbox also and you will see we went for strenght over trans drag.

Mark
I see now, i have no real idea about the interchange-ability of cossie diffs with others etc - cheers
I see you have no idea there was only 2 choises on diffs I would use,
A 9inch prob the best one at the time was to costly to use ratio would have been the easy bit,
The Jag diff also cost nothing as I already had one and a deal was struck on the beam mods ,
So in real terms it cost 1/3 of the cost of a 9inch

Mark
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brickhouse
General Car Related Discussion.
8
23-09-2015 06:28 AM
truffleshuffle
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
1
10-09-2015 09:35 PM
markk
General Car Related Discussion.
9
09-09-2015 08:11 AM
Billy_RS
Pictures, video & Photoshop Forum
15
05-09-2015 12:04 PM



Quick Reply: How fast do you think it will go ?



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 AM.