Ford Escort RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Turbo Series 1 and 2.

Pace doubble capacity intercooler.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28-01-2010, 12:31 PM
  #41  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1


Dude seriously grow up!
me is thinkin a case of pot, kettle an black here
Old 28-01-2010, 12:31 PM
  #42  
Dar-rst
PassionFord Regular
 
Dar-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Plymouth, uk
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i can only see what you wrote
Old 28-01-2010, 02:44 PM
  #44  
milesy23rst
PUG 306 GTI-6
iTrader: (16)
 
milesy23rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: torquay devon
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have run pace half width intercoolers up to 190-200bhp and they run too high act's but up to around 13-14psi they are fine and do the job, imo you would be better off with a front mount say from airtec as they are very good value for money if you are going for 200bhp just my opinion, and for christ sake people grow up its like a school bloody playground!!!!!
Old 28-01-2010, 02:57 PM
  #45  
T28 RST
Ok then
 
T28 RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 4,300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oranoco
16psi won't get 226bhp in a million years from a 1600 CVH, sorry mate, just not possible
I ran a consistant 200 - 205 ATW for 4 years with my 1.6 cvh which ran 16psi
Old 28-01-2010, 03:10 PM
  #46  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Using what turbo etc?

Ok, I acknowledge that perhaps I should have used a bit more clarity in my initial post as I was being a little vague.

Come on though guys we all know the amount of people with a chipped RS Turbo that claim 200bhp when in reality the figure is typically more like 170bhp. On a generic 1600cc CVH RS Turbo running 16psi I would expect to be seeing a figure of around 180-190bhp. Would you not agree?
Old 28-01-2010, 03:38 PM
  #48  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oranoco
Using what turbo etc?

Ok, I acknowledge that perhaps I should have used a bit more clarity in my initial post as I was being a little vague.

Come on though guys we all know the amount of people with a chipped RS Turbo that claim 200bhp when in reality the figure is typically more like 170bhp. On a generic 1600cc CVH RS Turbo running 16psi I would expect to be seeing a figure of around 180-190bhp. Would you not agree?
where did he say he had a chipped rs???
u made an assumption and was wrong.

davie ran a t28 turbo and i ran a stg3 t3,his 16psi mines 17,so your comment about it being impossible is not correct

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1
Sound's right me to me fella
u bumming oranaco?
Old 28-01-2010, 04:33 PM
  #50  
T28 RST
Ok then
 
T28 RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 4,300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oranoco
Using what turbo etc?

Ok, I acknowledge that perhaps I should have used a bit more clarity in my initial post as I was being a little vague.

Come on though guys we all know the amount of people with a chipped RS Turbo that claim 200bhp when in reality the figure is typically more like 170bhp. On a generic 1600cc CVH RS Turbo running 16psi I would expect to be seeing a figure of around 180-190bhp. Would you not agree?
AVA only give wheel figures

This was my spec

1600 cc
Stage 2 big valve head (ported and polished)
Newman cam, solid lifters
Piper vernier
wire ringed block
Lowered compression(7.5:1)
ARP conrod Bolts
AVA ecu with 7000rpm limiter
AVA modified MFI fuel system
AVA high flow tubular manifold
T28 turbo + 360 bearing
Reshaped cosworth front pipe
AVA Large capacity intercooler
Magnex exhaust
Modified airbox
AP 4 paddle clutch
Old 28-01-2010, 04:51 PM
  #51  
rstdave
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (3)
 
rstdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bristol/Bath
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good old passion argumental thread lol
Old 28-01-2010, 05:03 PM
  #52  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1
Just because u aint getting anything jealousy will get u no where dude

Serious though what he has said is around right

He assumed an RST had an RST CVH in there anyone would think he has killed someone with the way u lot go on about it

Can i reccomend a life your self's and just keep on topic i think they been enough said already really,Wanna say summat to me PM u know where the PM function is
i agree,what he said is correct about the chipped rs bit,but what relevance did it have to what turbocabessex said,none,he siad he had 226 @16psi and oranaco said thats impossible on a 1600.doubted his figure in other words then you butted in and started sticking up for oranaco when clearly he was in the wrong

he was wrong to assume, he was wrong to say its impossible to get that power on 16psi,he was also wrong when replied that it may not be a cvh as cvh's can make that power at that boost as me and davie have shown,he was correct that a basic rst makes 170-180bhp on 16psi.so he's correct on something that has nothing to do with this thread or the argument with turbocabessex

Last edited by JamboRS; 28-01-2010 at 05:08 PM.
Old 28-01-2010, 05:22 PM
  #53  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

And because he is defending my view point he's bumming me? I'm quite happy to discuss the viewpoints without letting the level of things drop to that found in a school playground.

The only thing, as far as I'm concerned I'm in the wrong for, is making the assumption we were talking about a 1600CVH and a Pace intercooler.

The whole point to this is making sure the thread poster gets the best advice possible. In my experience a double capacity Pace intercooler is not a good investment for the guy. Can you honestly say you would recomend otherwise?
Old 28-01-2010, 05:53 PM
  #54  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oranoco
And because he is defending my view point he's bumming me? I'm quite happy to discuss the viewpoints without letting the level of things drop to that found in a school playground.
you want to discuss now when your first post didnt look like it was open for discussion

Originally Posted by Oranoco
The only thing, as far as I'm concerned I'm in the wrong for, is making the assumption we were talking about a 1600CVH and a Pace intercooler.
no u were wrong to say its impossible to get 226bhp with 16psi,whether thats cvh or not it makes no difference as they can do that power with that boost

Originally Posted by Oranoco
The whole point to this is making sure the thread poster gets the best advice possible. In my experience a double capacity Pace intercooler is not a good investment for the guy. Can you honestly say you would recomend otherwise?
i would recommend a pace double capacity for std boost anything above that id recommend a bigger cooler
Old 28-01-2010, 06:24 PM
  #56  
ROB7656
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
ROB7656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Witham essex
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ive always been led to belive the pace half width is ideal for 12 psi anything above could be risking it.
Old 28-01-2010, 06:27 PM
  #57  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1
Jambo,Do u get some sorta kick outta using this lad's thread for u stupid shit argument now?

I am sure all YOUR questions u can ever ask power wise aswell,Are in D4's thread 23page's
eh?i was looking at this thread to comment then noticed you and oranaco ganging up so i just even the teams out am always up for an argument
seriously look back and tell me what this guy has actually said for you to comment,i dont see anything in his reply to warrant you buttin in and your reply was unjust,usual pf posse im afraid.sorry am no in the click but i say what i see

"I am sure all YOUR questions u can ever ask power wise aswell"

i dont understand that,i only know english sorry,but if you translate ill try and answer that aswell
Old 28-01-2010, 06:29 PM
  #58  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ROB7656
ive always been led to belive the pace half width is ideal for 12 psi anything above could be risking it.


id say 12psi is prob the max id want to run through it,there a great replacement for a std car running std boost and maybe want to upgrade but not raise boost levels,but asking a product to do something its not designed to do then saying its shit cos it doesnt do it.
also not just the pace,the pro alloy DC is the same,we seen over 70 degrees at 14psi on the rollers.not ideal

Last edited by JamboRS; 28-01-2010 at 06:30 PM.
Old 28-01-2010, 07:44 PM
  #59  
Ad4m RST
BANNED
BANNED
 
Ad4m RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,160
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JamboRST
eh?i was looking at this thread to comment then noticed you and oranaco ganging up so i just even the teams out I only post during arguments
Fair enough defending the guy but I thought exactly the same when I read his post...most people claiming reasonably big power will back it up with main parts of their spec. 226hp @ 16psi is do-able but I'm goin to take a shot in the dark and say his spec wasn't half as good as yours or Davies were.

Add to that he's meant to have made it on this old skool Pace interwarmer? bit of a reach...

Wouldn't mind seeing the 226hp graph TBH
Old 28-01-2010, 08:13 PM
  #61  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ad4m RST
Fair enough defending the guy but I thought exactly the same when I read his post...most people claiming reasonably big power will back it up with main parts of their spec. 226hp @ 16psi is do-able but I'm goin to take a shot in the dark and say his spec wasn't half as good as yours or Davies were.

Add to that he's meant to have made it on this old skool Pace interwarmer? bit of a reach...

Wouldn't mind seeing the 226hp graph TBH
until i see a spec/graph ill reserve judgement.but for all we know this could be a well specced 300bhp motor being choked to death by a pace and thats why its running only 16psi or on the other scale as oranaco says it could be a std car with nothing more than a chip and cooler,but oranaco shot him down and at least if your going to shoot him down do it with a statement thats true.
Old 28-01-2010, 08:20 PM
  #62  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JamboRST
also not just the pace,the pro alloy DC is the same,we seen over 70 degrees at 14psi on the rollers.not ideal
Which is obviously just peachy for making 200+bhp ATW. It would follow the logic that at a higher pressure the inlet temps would be higher still.

So my comment stands with 220+bhp on that cooler with a 1600 CVH. Both of you claiming the figures at those boost pressures were not running the double capacity coolers were you.

And reading your comments it would seem fairly obvious that you too would not recomend this cooler on a 200bhp car. Or are you going to say otherwise?

Last edited by Oranoco; 28-01-2010 at 08:23 PM.
Old 28-01-2010, 09:49 PM
  #63  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ad4m RST
Fair enough defending the guy but I thought exactly the same when I read his post...most people claiming reasonably big power will back it up with main parts of their spec. 226hp @ 16psi is do-able but I'm goin to take a shot in the dark and say his spec wasn't half as good as yours or Davies were.

Add to that he's meant to have made it on this old skool Pace interwarmer? bit of a reach...

Wouldn't mind seeing the 226hp graph TBH
2.0 zvh
turbosystems chip
ported, polished an gas flowed big valve head
kent cvh 35 cam/ solid followers
lightened/balanced crank
ported polished inlet/throttle body
t34/collins -31 actuator
5th injector set up
PACE DOUBLE CAPACITY COOLER
226bhp/193lb/ft

ill dig graph out an get it scanned an up

like i said classic case of kno it alls who couldnt poss be wrong

Last edited by liam-rst; 28-01-2010 at 09:51 PM. Reason: missed somethin
Old 28-01-2010, 10:38 PM
  #65  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1
Like i said it's a case of people not been psychic (sp)

We were talking the CVH with a DCI,So when your saying blah blah it's assumed u have that spec and not another

It's a case of get off ya high horse and nicely inform someone about spec if they are wrong Not have a go because u think there having a go,Or are u insecure about ur car
and again u pop up when not even bein spoken to, go away fella
Old 28-01-2010, 10:49 PM
  #67  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1
No answer for my post yet again

Ok mate i am off CBA but as long as i pointed out your error's
answer to wot? not bein a cvh? it was a bloody zvh usin all normal rst induction so its perfectly relevant, and as said it was MY OLD CAR so how can i be insecure about somethin i no longer own?
your the one who has no point!!!!
Old 29-01-2010, 05:57 AM
  #68  
T28 RST
Ok then
 
T28 RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 4,300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

S1 JOHN S1

What is the spec of your car, must be fairy good to make 247HP on MFI with a 5TH injector @ 20psi.
Old 29-01-2010, 07:13 AM
  #69  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbocabessex
answer to wot? not bein a cvh? it was a bloody zvh usin all normal rst induction so its perfectly relevant,
It's a different type of engine and of a different capacity so it's not perfectly relevent. I made a logical assumption that you had a CVH seeing as we were talking RS Turbo's. You're entitled to your opinion on the intercooler but simply saying you were running 220+ on it without highlighting certain things was at best slightly misleading. All that was required from yourself was a simple comment to say it wasn't a CVH and that would have cleared the matter up instantly.

Anyway, I can't be bothered to argue on the internet, life's to short and I've got work to be getting on with. Oh and it's Friday so I'm looking forward to hitting the pub
Old 29-01-2010, 12:49 PM
  #70  
JamboRS
focus rs 1672
 
JamboRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth most of the time
Posts: 3,025
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oranoco
Which is obviously just peachy for making 200+bhp ATW. It would follow the logic that at a higher pressure the inlet temps would be higher still.

So my comment stands with 220+bhp on that cooler with a 1600 CVH. Both of you claiming the figures at those boost pressures were not running the double capacity coolers were you.

And reading your comments it would seem fairly obvious that you too would not recomend this cooler on a 200bhp car. Or are you going to say otherwise?
wasnt my car that ran a DC,was my mates and it made 176@wheels(circa 200fly)

this is your quote of what u said,read it and absorb it

Originally Posted by Oranoco
16psi won't get 226bhp in a million years from a 1600 CVH, sorry mate, just not possible
can u get it through your head that 226bhp is possible on a 1600 with 16psi,as me and davie have shown,unless ur assuming again that i should know you meant with a DC cooler.but you never mentioned that.so maybe you should have wrote using a DC cooler and stop assuming

for the 2nd time i would not recommend this cooler to anyone above std boost,12psi at a push,depends on how its driven i suppose,whether thats 200bhp or 400bhp it makes no difference,power is irrelevant.

i may also add that my mates pro alloy DC which produced over 70 degrees on the rollers had some bumper mods to give the cooler more airflow and got the act's down to 55,which again isnt the best but its airflow which is the DC's biggest downfall,nearly all of it is covered.

Originally Posted by S1 JOHN S1
Like i said it's a case of people not been psychic (sp)

We were talking the CVH with a DCI,So when your saying blah blah it's assumed u have that spec and not another

It's a case of get off ya high horse and nicely inform someone about spec if they are wrong Not have a go because u think there having a go,Or are u insecure about ur car

no one mentioned cvh,the thread starter didnt mention cvh,he may have a zt block as far as we know,you and oranaco were the ones that brought cvh into it,the thread starter asked if its good for 200bhp,no mention of engine size.

Originally Posted by turbocabessex
2.0 zvh
turbosystems chip
ported, polished an gas flowed big valve head
kent cvh 35 cam/ solid followers
lightened/balanced crank
ported polished inlet/throttle body
t34/collins -31 actuator
5th injector set up
PACE DOUBLE CAPACITY COOLER
226bhp/193lb/ft

ill dig graph out an get it scanned an up

like i said classic case of kno it alls who couldnt poss be wrong
get a graph up mate to i get a gander.torque looks very low for some reason
do kent have a solid profile cam?i thought the cvh35 was a hydraulic

Last edited by JamboRS; 29-01-2010 at 02:13 PM.
Old 29-01-2010, 01:47 PM
  #71  
Ad4m RST
BANNED
BANNED
 
Ad4m RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,160
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbocabessex
2.0 zvh
turbosystems chip
ported, polished an gas flowed big valve head
kent cvh 35 cam/ solid followers
lightened/balanced crank
ported polished inlet/throttle body
t34/collins -31 actuator
5th injector set up
PACE DOUBLE CAPACITY COOLER
226bhp/193lb/ft

ill dig graph out an get it scanned an up

like i said classic case of kno it alls who couldnt poss be wrong
Munching my words...

Quality spec mate, if anything I'd expect more than 230hp lol...definitely more torque. That literally only wanted for a big intercooler init?
Old 29-01-2010, 04:49 PM
  #72  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

JamboRST, you seem under the misguided impression I actually care too much about any of this. I couldn't care less beyond making sure the thread starter gets the best advice possible. I was vague in my initial comment and for that I was in the wrong and happy to acknowledge so.


No nobody mentioned CVH but given as that is the standard type of engine in these cars is it not a fair assumption to make, if not told otherwise, that this is the engine that's in there?

Anyway, matey and I aren't bothered about it and are happy to put it down to slightly crossed wires so it only seems to be you that wants to keep going, knock yourself out mate, I'm off to the pub

Last edited by Oranoco; 29-01-2010 at 04:55 PM.
Old 29-01-2010, 11:02 PM
  #73  
RS1HEN
PassionFord Post Troll
 
RS1HEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: west sussex
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default




i thought i was reading about a pace cooler


...how wrong was i


lol
Old 29-01-2010, 11:09 PM
  #74  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ad4m RST
Munching my words...

Quality spec mate, if anything I'd expect more than 230hp lol...definitely more torque. That literally only wanted for a big intercooler init?
i only ever had it set up to run it in an sold the car before i cout get a proper r/r session, the kent came with hydraulic but burtons said with the spec id be better runnin solid followers so i did
Old 29-01-2010, 11:30 PM
  #75  
Ad4m RST
BANNED
BANNED
 
Ad4m RST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,160
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Fair enough, I've had a couple ZVH's and know how much power they make without too much boost, always ran a front mount though, one was 236hp @ 1bar.

Yeah had to be solid lifters, I've only run the Kent 34 cam got told the 35 was a bit high end on the power.
Old 29-01-2010, 11:38 PM
  #76  
liam-rst
shit happens
iTrader: (1)
 
liam-rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: essex
Posts: 2,985
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

it was the only 1 ive ever had tbh, i only built as i put a con rod through the block an my mate had a 36k zetec out a mondy auto an give it to me, already had the dc cooler from when it had the cvh in it, i built it, had it set up the once on a safety set up, drove it around for bout 3 months inc the track at ford fair an a rwyb day at brands an it never missed a single beat, yh the cvh 35 i did find a bit lumpy tho
Old 29-01-2010, 11:58 PM
  #77  
Micky
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Micky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin,IRELAND
Posts: 1,990
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbocabessex
it was the only 1 ive ever had tbh, i only built as i put a con rod through the block an my mate had a 36k zetec out a mondy auto an give it to me, already had the dc cooler from when it had the cvh in it, i built it, had it set up the once on a safety set up, drove it around for bout 3 months inc the track at ford fair an a rwyb day at brands an it never missed a single beat, yh the cvh 35 i did find a bit lumpy tho
I know british summers are cold,but how you did'nt get Ign retard at FF is amazing!! Micky
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ridgey
Ford RS Cosworth Parts for Sale
12
02-11-2015 06:54 PM
abz474
Cars for Sale
9
01-11-2015 06:53 PM
155lee
Ford RS Cosworth Parts for Sale
19
27-10-2015 04:55 AM
The Youth.
Pictures, video & Photoshop Forum
6
30-09-2015 09:59 PM
simonmcf
Ford Escort RS Turbo
14
22-09-2015 08:40 AM



Quick Reply: Pace doubble capacity intercooler.



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36 AM.