Originally Posted by
S1 JOHN S1
Just because u aint getting anything jealousy will get u no where dude
Serious though what he has said is around right
He assumed an RST had an RST CVH in there
anyone would think he has killed someone with the way u lot go on about it
Can i reccomend a life your self's and just keep on topic i think they been enough said already really,Wanna say summat to me PM u know where the PM function is
i agree,what he said is correct about the chipped rs bit,but what relevance did it have to what turbocabessex said,none,he siad he had 226 @16psi and oranaco said thats impossible on a 1600.doubted his figure in other words then you butted in and started sticking up for oranaco when clearly he was in the wrong
he was wrong to assume, he was wrong to say its impossible to get that power on 16psi,he was also wrong when replied that it may not be a cvh as cvh's can make that power at that boost as me and davie have shown,he was correct that a basic rst makes 170-180bhp on 16psi.so he's correct on something that has nothing to do with this thread or the argument with turbocabessex