Ford Escort RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Turbo Series 1 and 2.

cvh low comp or zvh low comp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2006, 11:31 AM
  #1  
mercurygreyrsturbo
PassionFord Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
 
mercurygreyrsturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: norfolk
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default cvh low comp or zvh low comp?

Hi, i'm gonna do a new bottom end for my s2 rs turbo. i'm having mixed feedback about which 2 go 4. i've been told just to low comp the 1.6 botom end and that would be fine but i've heard u can use the 2 litre zetec from a focus. is this true? i'm running about 190bhp from a harvy gibbs top end, stage 3 turbo, switable boost chip (7 and 15 psi) and front mount intercooler. i was told with a zetec low comp bottom end i could turn the boost up to around 28psi and see around the 250bhp mark. which is the best 2 go for and whats involved? many thanks
Old 12-10-2006, 12:55 PM
  #2  
peteh
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (3)
 
peteh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

id like to know also, maybe low comp 1.9 aswell maybe?
Old 12-10-2006, 02:05 PM
  #3  
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
stuart collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: shrewsbury shropshire
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

hi comp steel 1600
Old 12-10-2006, 02:37 PM
  #4  
gus
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 10,507
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

you have to cofuse the matter dont ya stu
Old 12-10-2006, 04:54 PM
  #5  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have used a bottom end from a Focus RS.
The compression ratio whould have been 6.3:1 if I bolted my head straight on because the Focus RS forged pistons have a large dish in them.
So a large head skim is required (or new pistons) I also fitted longer rods.

I am now up and running but have not been on a rolling road yet!

I had a 1.9 CVH which was running 27psi and 320BHP but this Zetec build feel a lot quicker!(lights the tyres up at 25psi in 4th gear).
Old 12-10-2006, 06:15 PM
  #6  
Turbo-Beal
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Turbo-Beal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Theres no subsititute for more cc's
Old 12-10-2006, 07:08 PM
  #7  
MJC
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
MJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Sussex/South Yorkshire
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my opinion, if you go down the increase in cc route then you should change the cylinder head to a 16v item also. The most restrictive part of a CVH engine is the head!" the bottom end is plenty strong enough. I'd either stick with the 1600cvh bottom end, lower compression ext or do a full 2litre 16v conversion

Trending Topics

Old 12-10-2006, 09:38 PM
  #8  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

To me it is the chalange of the 8 valve head!
I have only started tuning it his year but I do feel there is untapped potenshal.
But I guess we will see?
S.
Old 12-10-2006, 10:54 PM
  #9  
NEWTON
Advanced PassionFord User
 
NEWTON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJC
In my opinion, if you go down the increase in cc route then you should change the cylinder head to a 16v item also. The most restrictive part of a CVH engine is the head!" the bottom end is plenty strong enough. I'd either stick with the 1600cvh bottom end, lower compression ext or do a full 2litre 16v conversion
1600 head restrictive,thats funny look at stuart collins car 350 bhp,very restrictive......NOT
Old 13-10-2006, 05:13 AM
  #10  
gus
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 10,507
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

but then look at what he has done to engine to get there



think he is just saying that its alot easier, chealer to do afull zt
Old 13-10-2006, 06:32 AM
  #11  
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Badman38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the land of oz slough
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

450bhp is easily Achievable with the right cvh head,

but then gus is right takes a fooking lot of money and custom parts to get there, much easier with a 16v head.
Old 13-10-2006, 06:35 AM
  #12  
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Badman38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the land of oz slough
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sas

I had a 1.9 CVH which was running 27psi and 320BHP but this Zetec build feel a lot quicker!(lights the tyres up at 25psi in 4th gear).
wheels spins in 4th!! what in the dry? then sort out either your your tyres, diff and a decent set of adjustable lower arms.
Old 13-10-2006, 07:11 AM
  #13  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think you will find that I dont run much negative camber and my toe settings are at at 2mm total toe out, almost no torque steer!
The roads are dry.
You should try 3rd gear, it spins all the way up to 7200rpm rev limit!
I do have proper Avon ZZ3 tyres.
S.
Old 13-10-2006, 07:22 AM
  #14  
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
stuart collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: shrewsbury shropshire
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

u sorted the box yet si
Old 13-10-2006, 07:28 AM
  #15  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yip up and running, really really well.
Went for a blast last night - amazingly quick
But I guess it is all talk on my part, we will have to wait a little till we really know how quick.
S.
Old 13-10-2006, 07:33 AM
  #16  
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
stuart collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: shrewsbury shropshire
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

if u want them injectors there in the bk of my car mate
Old 13-10-2006, 12:27 PM
  #17  
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Badman38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the land of oz slough
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sas
I think you will find that I dont run much negative camber and my toe settings are at at 2mm total toe out, almost no torque steer!
The roads are dry.
You should try 3rd gear, it spins all the way up to 7200rpm rev limit!
I do have proper Avon ZZ3 tyres.
S.

must be a problem with escort turbos alot of them have problems with traction. fiesta rs turbos with more power then yourself dont seam to have these same issues, but it also could be the cvh power delivery.
Old 13-10-2006, 12:37 PM
  #18  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
Old 13-10-2006, 12:45 PM
  #19  
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Badman38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the land of oz slough
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
i'm down the pod on sunday with a spare set of driveshafts bloody keep on breaking them, will need to get some practise in to improve on my Previous times, but i have major traction problems at the pod.
Old 13-10-2006, 01:22 PM
  #20  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are there many more people going on Sunday as I might have to try and get out of work.
Old 13-10-2006, 03:28 PM
  #21  
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Badman38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: the land of oz slough
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sas
Are there many more people going on Sunday as I might have to try and get out of work.

quite a few from this site and fiestaturbo.com loads camping due to the saturday night special.
Old 13-10-2006, 03:38 PM
  #22  
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
stuart collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: shrewsbury shropshire
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i mite go
Old 13-10-2006, 03:54 PM
  #23  
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
stuart collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: shrewsbury shropshire
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
get a need turbo then si ive got a new custom spec turbo cumin , speced to flow 400bhp with minimal lag
Old 13-10-2006, 07:27 PM
  #24  
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
DazC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo-Beal
Theres no subsititute for more cc's
There is. It's called a turbo.

1600 CVH for me.
Old 13-10-2006, 07:52 PM
  #25  
NEWTON
Advanced PassionFord User
 
NEWTON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DazC
Originally Posted by Turbo-Beal
Theres no subsititute for more cc's
There is. It's called a turbo.

1600 CVH for me.
1600 cvh for me aswell,its all good
Old 13-10-2006, 08:51 PM
  #26  
sas
should be good!
 
sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: fife
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by stuart collins
Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
get a need turbo then si ive got a new custom spec turbo cumin , speced to flow 400bhp with minimal lag

Thanks for the info Stu, but mine does boost upto 2.5 bar at the expense of lower rev power.
My inovate lambda guage is getting repaired so not too sure where I stand in the fuel supply staiks?

What clutch are you running?
Si.
Old 13-10-2006, 11:51 PM
  #27  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

sas Any engine pics?
Old 14-10-2006, 07:38 AM
  #28  
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
stuart collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: shrewsbury shropshire
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sas
Originally Posted by stuart collins
Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
get a need turbo then si ive got a new custom spec turbo cumin , speced to flow 400bhp with minimal lag

Thanks for the info Stu, but mine does boost upto 2.5 bar at the expense of lower rev power.
My inovate lambda guage is getting repaired so not too sure where I stand in the fuel supply staiks?

What clutch are you running?
Si.
standard 1300 cvh
Old 14-10-2006, 09:18 AM
  #29  
MJC
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
MJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Sussex/South Yorkshire
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by MJC
In my opinion, if you go down the increase in cc route then you should change the cylinder head to a 16v item also. The most restrictive part of a CVH engine is the head!" the bottom end is plenty strong enough. I'd either stick with the 1600cvh bottom end, lower compression ext or do a full 2litre 16v conversion
1600 head restrictive,thats funny look at stuart collins car 350 bhp,very restrictive......NOT
The 1600 cylinder head is restrictive!" there is obviously lots you can do to improve it and loads of people have achieved very good power figures from it. The point I was trying to make was that in my opinion its only worth while going for extra cc if you use the 16v head to make full use of it. The 1600 bottom end works very well with a mod head so I personally would stick with that.
Old 16-10-2006, 07:26 PM
  #30  
turboloon
PassionFord Regular
 
turboloon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: n.e.scotland
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go zvh torque is awsome i had low comp cvh now running 1.8 zvh it defo pulls a lot harder and is a very cost effective mod.
Old 16-10-2006, 08:03 PM
  #31  
nigel b
PassionFord Post Troll
 
nigel b's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

sas
you must have something wrong as mine puts down all of its power in 2nd,3rd,4th etc..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
10-10-2023 06:52 PM
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
timsrs
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
5
13-11-2018 11:48 AM
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
07-10-2015 12:56 PM
Tank Mike
Cars & Parts Wanted.
0
26-09-2015 08:07 AM



Quick Reply: cvh low comp or zvh low comp?



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48 PM.