what mpg
do ford quote for
1. a 1995 rs2000 4x4
2. a 2000 mondeo st200
the reason i ask is ive just sold my rs2k and want to know how much of a difference there is between the 2 as i now want an st200.
thanks
1. a 1995 rs2000 4x4
2. a 2000 mondeo st200
the reason i ask is ive just sold my rs2k and want to know how much of a difference there is between the 2 as i now want an st200.
thanks
Ignore what Ford quote. Most of the figures are done on engine dynos so bear no relevance to the real world.
For the ST200 you'll get 20-25 around town and up to 30 on a long steady run. If you cane it you'll get under 20 very easily.
I'd imagine high 20s to early 30s for the RS2K, but that's just a guess.
For the ST200 you'll get 20-25 around town and up to 30 on a long steady run. If you cane it you'll get under 20 very easily.
I'd imagine high 20s to early 30s for the RS2K, but that's just a guess.
The mpg figures are derived on a dyno, the car that is, the test criteria demands this, but without wind resistance etc, and computer controlled driving for hours and hours.
They bear no relationship to actual in use mpg, as a rough rule look at urban as a average.
tabetha
They bear no relationship to actual in use mpg, as a rough rule look at urban as a average.
tabetha
agreed, i think the cougar had essentially the ST24 engine so would get slightly better economy.
I know someone who went from a ST200 to a St220 and said his economy is now better than it was
the ST200 is pretty juicy and will get a good 5+mpg less than a RS200 imo.
I know someone who went from a ST200 to a St220 and said his economy is now better than it was

the ST200 is pretty juicy and will get a good 5+mpg less than a RS200 imo.
Trending Topics
Guest
Posts: n/a
Injector size size is 17 to 19 IIRC so larger injector's granted,
And what about better air intake's the bigger at the top and lower intake's and also the exhaust manifold's are slightly bigger so isn't the ST200 getting a better and cleaner "burn"?
also tip of the day remove the main CAT and it will still pass emission's on the 2 (pre cats)
I think we should have a test with 24 and 200 engine's
And what about better air intake's the bigger at the top and lower intake's and also the exhaust manifold's are slightly bigger so isn't the ST200 getting a better and cleaner "burn"?
also tip of the day remove the main CAT and it will still pass emission's on the 2 (pre cats)
I think we should have a test with 24 and 200 engine's
TAlking from experience here and the 200 will return around 32 ona steady run at 75ish and around 25 - 26 around town.
Feel free to drop me a pm and I'll take you out and let you drive one of our 200's so that you can get a feel for one.
Jeff
Feel free to drop me a pm and I'll take you out and let you drive one of our 200's so that you can get a feel for one.
Jeff
Injector size size is 17 to 19 IIRC so larger injector's granted,
And what about better air intake's the bigger at the top and lower intake's and also the exhaust manifold's are slightly bigger so isn't the ST200 getting a better and cleaner "burn"?
also tip of the day remove the main CAT and it will still pass emission's on the 2 (pre cats)
I think we should have a test with 24 and 200 engine's
And what about better air intake's the bigger at the top and lower intake's and also the exhaust manifold's are slightly bigger so isn't the ST200 getting a better and cleaner "burn"?
also tip of the day remove the main CAT and it will still pass emission's on the 2 (pre cats)
I think we should have a test with 24 and 200 engine's
I'd also leave the regular cat on and replace the precats with MSDS headers. Much better for power gains than the other way round.
And yes, I did misread your Cougar mpg comment
Averaged 28.5 in mine when I had it... mainly town driving and stop start stuff, sitting on dual carriageway at around 75ish would return 34mpg according to the computer. I was prepared for a best of 25mpg and was very surprised and impressed with the economy of my ST200.
How much you got to spend?
Cheers,
Grant
How much you got to spend?
Cheers,
Grant
Guest
Posts: n/a
To get the power out the 200 Ford had to wring the ECUs neck, so it's less fuel efficient than the 24.
I'd also leave the regular cat on and replace the precats with MSDS headers. Much better for power gains than the other way round.
And yes, I did misread your Cougar mpg comment
Soz!
I'd also leave the regular cat on and replace the precats with MSDS headers. Much better for power gains than the other way round.
And yes, I did misread your Cougar mpg comment
But mate i am wrong in assuming the PRE cat's are not really restritive as the main one is????
I was gonna take all 3 of mine and then whip the main on for the MOT,Naughty i know but never did do that
I miss the V6 raw they just bore me after 100mph slow as,Or it seem's now having a turbo car one been a cossie and my S1 everything else seem's slow now
Although be it the V6 is better round town for blast as the power is just there
Sod i am gonna go buy a cougar again
Averaged 28.5 in mine when I had it... mainly town driving and stop start stuff, sitting on dual carriageway at around 75ish would return 34mpg according to the computer. I was prepared for a best of 25mpg and was very surprised and impressed with the economy of my ST200.
No worry's mate
we all do it at time's
.
But mate i am wrong in assuming the PRE cat's are not really restritive as the main one is????
I was gonna take all 3 of mine and then whip the main on for the MOT,Naughty i know but never did do that
I miss the V6 raw they just bore me after 100mph slow as,Or it seem's now having a turbo car one been a cossie and my S1 everything else seem's slow now
Although be it the V6 is better round town for blast as the power is just there
.
Sod i am gonna go buy a cougar again
lol 
But mate i am wrong in assuming the PRE cat's are not really restritive as the main one is????
I was gonna take all 3 of mine and then whip the main on for the MOT,Naughty i know but never did do that
I miss the V6 raw they just bore me after 100mph slow as,Or it seem's now having a turbo car one been a cossie and my S1 everything else seem's slow now
Although be it the V6 is better round town for blast as the power is just there
Sod i am gonna go buy a cougar again

My estate is running with the MSDS headers and de cat pipe. Sounds nice but a pita when you have to crawl under it every year for the MOT!!!!!!!! Like Dan I have never seen 35 in any of the 200's I have had (that's 4) and the estate is averaging 27 at the moment and thats driving like miss daisy.
Most of the journeys in mine were into and out of the town with the longest trip being to the gym and thats mainly through the town as well with a brief cruise at 50mph.. I re-set the computer and got the 28.5 average with that sort of usage.
I'm considering another one if/when the Civic goes as I actually miss my old car, it ticks so many boxes for relatively little cash its hard to ignore IMO.
Cheers,
Grant
Last edited by RS Grant; Oct 21, 2009 at 12:21 PM.
A lot of car for the money agreed, but for me the performance in relation to the mpg was always a big issue. I've got a TDCi now, and it's easily as quick (if not quicker) in the real world and can double the mpg... I do miss the soundtrack though!
Cant comment on the question itself, but more power does not necessarily mean less mpg as some people seem to think. Ive owned many omega, 2.5's and 3.0's and the 3.0's were actually better on fuel.
So many things to consider. I used to have a 2.5 vectra sri that could do 50 mpg on a run, no problem at all! 

The problem with people quoting mpg figures is that some people try and work it out all wrong. They'll stick a tenner in when the light comes on the do x amount of miles and wait for the light to come on. thats just not the way to do it and the numbers can be way out. Only way to do it is fill it up, zero the trip, then re-fill when nearly empty and work it out properly.
So many things to consider. I used to have a 2.5 vectra sri that could do 50 mpg on a run, no problem at all! 

The problem with people quoting mpg figures is that some people try and work it out all wrong. They'll stick a tenner in when the light comes on the do x amount of miles and wait for the light to come on. thats just not the way to do it and the numbers can be way out. Only way to do it is fill it up, zero the trip, then re-fill when nearly empty and work it out properly.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Cant comment on the question itself, but more power does not necessarily mean less mpg as some people seem to think. Ive owned many omega, 2.5's and 3.0's and the 3.0's were actually better on fuel.
So many things to consider. I used to have a 2.5 vectra sri that could do 50 mpg on a run, no problem at all! 

The problem with people quoting mpg figures is that some people try and work it out all wrong. They'll stick a tenner in when the light comes on the do x amount of miles and wait for the light to come on. thats just not the way to do it and the numbers can be way out. Only way to do it is fill it up, zero the trip, then re-fill when nearly empty and work it out properly.
So many things to consider. I used to have a 2.5 vectra sri that could do 50 mpg on a run, no problem at all! 

The problem with people quoting mpg figures is that some people try and work it out all wrong. They'll stick a tenner in when the light comes on the do x amount of miles and wait for the light to come on. thats just not the way to do it and the numbers can be way out. Only way to do it is fill it up, zero the trip, then re-fill when nearly empty and work it out properly.
More power sometime's can mean less fuel to make the engine turn as such my cougar would get 400+ to a tank and that is motorway and town (mixed) and my lass's car at the time pug 206 1.1 and did 300 to a tank worked so much harder on a journey and nippy round town at the cost of fuel IMO
My 2 cent's mind
More power sometime's can mean less fuel to make the engine turn as such my cougar would get 400+ to a tank and that is motorway and town (mixed) and my lass's car at the time pug 206 1.1 and did 300 to a tank worked so much harder on a journey and nippy round town at the cost of fuel IMO
.
Guest
Posts: n/a
So not mcuh difference mate is there,
the fact is a 1.1 doing 70MPH is working hard with rev's etc,Where as my cougar is sat say 2.5krev's just chugging along really well
Can't remember the correct rev's it was really relaxed where as the pug was nearly at 4k,
Cougar could have been like 2800 under 3k suppose
not thinking of selling mate, the rs2000 4x4 is sold and now in lithuania
i do quite alot of motorway miles and i have kids so the extra room should be nice
im viewing one in portsmouth on sunday, 56kmiles
im viewing one in portsmouth on sunday, 56kmiles
Last edited by Mark_; Oct 21, 2009 at 05:40 PM.
thats a very kind offer mate,
im going to look at one on sunday
If you do get one and want a decat pipe let me know as i have a spare one sat in the shed at the moment. Could even deliver it to you!!!
Jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Be very wary there know to fail on water pump's around this mileage and the temp sensor don't read the over heat and MELTDOWN,
So i was warned ever the 24 has this issue but more the 200 for the extra strain
Get a metal water impella

What i was told on UKCOUGAR'S.com and .net.
nice one john, ive been told about the plastic impeller.
ill give it a good check over.
is there a way to tell if the one of the headgaskets has gone or due to go?
some one told me to blip the throttle and listen for a rattle or clicking noise
ill give it a good check over.
is there a way to tell if the one of the headgaskets has gone or due to go?
some one told me to blip the throttle and listen for a rattle or clicking noise
Guest
Posts: n/a
I ragged mine every day to the limiter and sold it 2 year's ago now to a mate and it is still running super with 160k
Strong as
But noises certainly listen for anyway
I did a bit of reading about these cars and the ST200 will have the metal water pump, it was only the early ST24 MK2 that had the plastic type.
The headgasket has a design flaw which can cause the tick tick when you blip the throttle, it wont cause the typical water mixing/mayo problems and the car can be driven without a problem.
Cheers,
Grant
The headgasket has a design flaw which can cause the tick tick when you blip the throttle, it wont cause the typical water mixing/mayo problems and the car can be driven without a problem.
Cheers,
Grant
The 'dreaded tick' is common on V6 Mondeos. If it's the head gasket then it won't cause any harm in the short term, but it could render the block and head scrap if it's neglected. But mine had the 'tick', so when I broke it I took the heads off to check, and they were fine, so the tick was something else, most likely the exhaust manifold gasket.
Guest
Posts: n/a
It can happen just because it don't happen everyday don't mean it won't to moz

If i was u mark i would get that changed over ASAP as that was what i did
Guest
Posts: n/a

Nah mate a mate has a garage up road so gonna have to get in the air could be squirty a lil cos it's a ally header tank and a lil over full lmao,
But we'll see mate :S,
Got her running 14psi now
sound's rude boi U still up for a visit this weekend mate?





