Technical essay Archives A collection of topics you really shouldnt have missed first time round if your interested in the technical aspect of how these Fords work..!! Also many Workshop manuals available in downloadable format. Access is available to Gold Members only.

Ways to combat detonation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14-11-2005, 02:20 PM
  #1  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Ways to combat detonation?

What are the best ways of combating detonation?

Mapping a friends engine at the mo, but have had to remove alot of ignition advance to get rid of the detonation.

Down to about 13 deg @ 0.5 bar under load.

I think most of this is due to the poor chamber design he now has after fitting a decomp plate (no more squish).

I know that backing off the advance moves the ignition event back in the cycle and lowers the post ignition cylinder pressures which in turn prevents post ignition gases from igniting on their own after the spark.
I was just wondering if there are any other methods of reducing det that i could use?*

The ACTs are already pretty low and the engine also runs at a decent temp.

Would water injection give me any det protection other than cooling the charge?

I realise stu might not want to give away his secrets, so one for the home mappers really.

Any suggestions welcome.

Cheers,

DC.



* bar removing the plate and rebuilding with some dished pistons and/or careful enlarging of combustion chamber. Not my engine so can't open it up.
Old 14-11-2005, 02:36 PM
  #2  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What AFR are you running?

Fuel is a pretty good Det surpressant!
Old 14-11-2005, 02:46 PM
  #3  
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
AlexF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newbury
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

your options are:

a bit more fuel...

lower the boost....

drop the act....

back off the ignition.

Its best to run as much ign as you can even if it means dropping the boost.

Alex
Old 14-11-2005, 03:02 PM
  #4  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
What AFR are you running?

Fuel is a pretty good Det surpressant!
Currently running 12:1 at that point in the map.
Old 14-11-2005, 03:20 PM
  #5  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by chip-3door
What AFR are you running?

Fuel is a pretty good Det surpressant!
Currently running 12:1 at that point in the map.
Pretty much forget about running any more fuel then!

Looks like the options are pretty minimal!

What CR is it?
Can you do anything about that?
Old 14-11-2005, 03:25 PM
  #6  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would not recommend using WI as a det suppressent, as if / when water runs out / jet gets blocked - engine goes BANG.
Old 14-11-2005, 03:29 PM
  #7  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I would not recommend using WI as a det suppressent, as if / when water runs out / jet gets blocked - engine goes BANG.
could say same about fuel injectors tho surely? and idve thought, providing you got a decent setup, no greater risk?

Trending Topics

Old 14-11-2005, 03:30 PM
  #8  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Itsmeagain, its ok if there is some sort of warning i guess?

But most people with WI dont know its run out!
Old 14-11-2005, 03:35 PM
  #9  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

CR is a knats cock under 8.7:1.

Would like to be running 10psi in the end. I have dialed out all the det so far at 7 psi but it just seemed like quite a low advance figure for that boost/cr setup.

Do you think the lack of squish makes that much difference?

Not sure that shed loads of fuel is the best way to combat det / run an engine. Our local so called tuner once showed me a RR printout of his cossie running 9:1 afr and seemed to think it was fueling great!
Old 14-11-2005, 03:39 PM
  #10  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

8.7:1 isnt exactly high compression, so thats lil strange.

GTST skylines are 9.5:1 as standard and ive seen them running 1.5bar no problems on pump fuel

Gotta be down to huge squish area surely? Prob would work better without the decomp plate!
Old 14-11-2005, 03:39 PM
  #11  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I would not recommend using WI as a det suppressent, as if / when water runs out / jet gets blocked - engine goes BANG.
Ok... aprt from the running out aspect, does it do anything to help suppress det apart from cool the charge?

I have monitored the ACTs on this engine and as far as i can remember they were pretty good.
Old 14-11-2005, 03:45 PM
  #12  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Itsmeagain
8.7:1 isnt exactly high compression, so thats lil strange.

GTST skylines are 9.5:1 as standard and ive seen them running 1.5bar no problems on pump fuel

Gotta be down to huge squish area surely? Prob would work better without the decomp plate!
Thats what i mean. Would love to see an ignition map from a car that spec.

Think it must be the lack of squish that encourages the det?
Old 14-11-2005, 04:01 PM
  #13  
Jasesapphy
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Jasesapphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bournemouth, Poole, Dorset
Posts: 4,542
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I run 11psi on a 10.5:1 engine, that has cast pistons
Old 14-11-2005, 04:39 PM
  #14  
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
AlexF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newbury
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know its obvious...

but what engine is this?

Alex
Old 14-11-2005, 06:19 PM
  #15  
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!

 
Billabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northants
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Itsmeagain
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
I would not recommend using WI as a det suppressent, as if / when water runs out / jet gets blocked - engine goes BANG.
could say same about fuel injectors tho surely? and idve thought, providing you got a decent setup, no greater risk?
I'll wager that Mike means you shouldn't really utilise WI as a normal means to reduce det' when mapping - ideally, WI should be the last resort, a safeguard to combat high charge air temp's (yes that's CAT's not ACT's ).

I.e. WI shouldn't be kicking in whilst driving around normally.....

Another option is higher octane fuel, but again this is a compromise, unless you have easy access to run it all the time (or dual maps)

If you can't reduce det' to an acceptable level, then something is amiss (as you've already said) - do you really want to map a 'compromised' engine??
Old 14-11-2005, 10:37 PM
  #16  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

how old is the fuel in the tank?
Old 15-11-2005, 09:01 AM
  #17  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fresh optimax, so not that.
Old 15-11-2005, 09:04 AM
  #18  
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!

 
Billabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northants
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What engine and what management?
Old 15-11-2005, 09:30 AM
  #19  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

BMW 318 is

Megasquirt!
Old 15-11-2005, 09:39 AM
  #20  
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!

 
Billabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northants
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's a knowledgable chap who knows his BMW's on here and a couple of users with Megasquirt experience also. Maybe edit the post title and add BMW 318 & Megasquirt.
Old 15-11-2005, 09:58 AM
  #21  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Cheers Billabong.

This is my fourth MS install/mapping. So pretty familiar with the MS kit.

But being my fourth engine to map, still on a steep learning curve where mapping is concerned!
Old 15-11-2005, 01:49 PM
  #22  
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
AlexF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newbury
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Billabong
There's a knowledgable chap who knows his BMW's on here and a couple of users with Megasquirt experience also. Maybe edit the post title and add BMW 318 & Megasquirt.
I know both systems


Its not an ideal engine to turbocharge, your porbably finding the limits of the combustion design.

Alex
Old 15-11-2005, 01:50 PM
  #23  
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
AlexF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newbury
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

can you upload the maps?
Old 15-11-2005, 01:53 PM
  #24  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

You have changed the spark plug heat range havent you?
Old 15-11-2005, 02:40 PM
  #25  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Stu, that sounds MUCH more likely than chamber design and squish at such low levels of boost!
Old 16-11-2005, 10:36 AM
  #26  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
You have changed the spark plug heat range havent you?
Stu,

So what your saying is the plug electrodes are running too hot and in turn causing the detonation?

So simply trying a cooler running plug may help?

Will give this a try at the weekend. Dial some of the advance back in and let you know the results.

Thanks,

DC.
Old 16-11-2005, 10:37 AM
  #27  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Keep us posted, very interesting topic
Old 16-11-2005, 10:45 AM
  #28  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Keep us posted, very interesting topic
Will do. Should have a chance to re map on sat.

Chap is putting a new clutch in it as we speak. Last mapping session, as we started pulling the fuelling map closer to ideal the worn clutch started deciding it couldn't cope with the new found torque!
Old 16-11-2005, 11:35 AM
  #29  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

New plugs puchased! Gone from NGK 7s to 9s.

Two steps cooler. Hope it works.
Old 16-11-2005, 11:47 AM
  #30  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

NGK 7s on 7psi at 10.5:1.... Detonation or not, that could have killed her stone dead.
Old 16-11-2005, 11:48 AM
  #31  
Smit
The 60ft Launch King
iTrader: (5)
 
Smit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
Posts: 23,682
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Keep going Doug

Silly question but who's beemer is it?

Stu - Thought Doug said it was around 8.7:1
Old 16-11-2005, 11:56 AM
  #32  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Smit,

A friend of mine. Not sure you know him.

If you are down the pub (sorry, truck stop ) next Wed i will try and bring it along. Will take you for a spin if yer fancy it?

Yep 8.7:1, but been doing some research i think Stu is right about the heat range of the old plugs. Way out!
Old 16-11-2005, 11:59 AM
  #33  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Doh.... didnt read deeply enough to realise it was decompressed
Old 16-11-2005, 12:04 PM
  #34  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Eye, but with an aluminium plate!

Chap bought it from Ferriday. I was a bit worried about it so had a chat with Mike something un pronouncable from ferriday and he seemed to think it should work as an extension of the head and hold the cylinder pressures ok.

Seems to be holding up ok so far...

Still loose any decent squish the piston/head design had though!

DC.
Old 16-11-2005, 12:18 PM
  #35  
Smit
The 60ft Launch King
iTrader: (5)
 
Smit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
Posts: 23,682
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I'm on nights next week Doug so won't be up the trucky

Be there the week after though as i'm on 2-10

Got a picture of the turbo conversion, sounds kinda funky
Old 16-11-2005, 12:20 PM
  #36  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Squish is of course very important, but its not the end of the world at those power levels.

Lots of people on big (well ish relative to cossies!) power vauxhall engines use 1.9mm gaskets to lower the CR and seem to get away with it just fine.

Obvously taking some metal out without ruining the squish would be better, but i personally dont think its that causing the problem.
Old 16-11-2005, 12:21 PM
  #37  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is it using a eurpean 323 TD manifold?
Old 17-11-2005, 09:21 AM
  #38  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
Thread Starter
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nope. Custom tubular exhaust manifold and modided stock inlet.

Surely a 323 would be a six pot? Or did Europe get a four pot version?
Old 17-11-2005, 11:40 AM
  #39  
AlexF
10K+ Poster!!
 
AlexF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newbury
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J871yhk

Its not an ideal engine to turbocharge, your porbably finding the limits of the combustion design.

Alex
I havent quoted myself before....

A decomression plate is a bodge!

Thats why your getting det, very bad combustion chamber design. You've change the attributes of the CChamber completely, things like squish, flame front and end gasses are now completely different to the original design.

Alex
Old 17-11-2005, 11:41 AM
  #40  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Garage19
Nope. Custom tubular exhaust manifold and modided stock inlet.

Surely a 323 would be a six pot? Or did Europe get a four pot version?
sorry mate, wasnt paying attention, thought it was a 6 pot engine, i just saw bmw and my mind refused to admit any less number of cylinders


Quick Reply: Ways to combat detonation?



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 PM.