General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Why arent we all doing this? ( Stu/Karl/Martin/MAD/Tony ?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2006, 12:50 PM
  #1  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Why arent we all doing this? ( Stu/Karl/Martin/MAD/Tony ?)

Spotted this picture on another forum:

http://www.corsaturbo.com/forumstuff/curitiba/01.jpg



Exhaust gas comes out of the engine into the first turbo and through an external gate if there is too much for the first turbo to use.

Then it goes onto the second turbo.

Once on boost the first turbo should offer very minimal restriction to the exhaust gas flow to the second one as it will be bypassed by most of the gasses.

The two compressor outlets are then Y pieced together before the plenum, so if either of them makes any boost then the engine gets it.



What is the reason we arent all doing that?


Seems like a very good idea to me TBH, but i know very little about compounding charging other than its not common, so from that i would assume there is a reason not to do it?


DISCUSS:
Old 05-01-2006, 12:57 PM
  #2  
keithG666
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
keithG666's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: beds
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Why arent we all doing this?

Originally Posted by chip-3door


DISCUSS:
Old 05-01-2006, 12:59 PM
  #3  
Stealth Bomber
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Stealth Bomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Compound turbocharging? Shurely shome mishtake
Old 05-01-2006, 01:00 PM
  #4  
Daviet
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Daviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Scotland,Edinburgh
Posts: 4,463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

has there not been a few posts on compound charging before
Old 05-01-2006, 01:02 PM
  #5  
Stealth Bomber
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Stealth Bomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daviet
has there not been a few posts on compound charging before
Exactly
Old 05-01-2006, 01:03 PM
  #6  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thats not compound charging in the slightest if its how chip explained it.

More like sequential turbos.

Tony Turbosystems did summat like that for Cossies back in the day.

Shithot car tho! From Brazil! MasterPower Turbos, good stuff
Old 05-01-2006, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There hasnt even been a post with a picture of a nice simple after market layour that we could all be using and look like it probably works quite well as far as im aware?

Here is picture, but you need to see it full size really i suspect:

[img:1280:960:c96b8288d4]http://www.corsaturbo.com/forumstuff/curitiba/01.jpg[/img:c96b8288d4]
Old 05-01-2006, 01:04 PM
  #8  
digita1dragon
Advanced PassionFord User
 
digita1dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bristol / Solihull
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wouldnt that produce more boost than youve set on your actuator?
and if so, whats the point?
Old 05-01-2006, 01:04 PM
  #9  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Karl and I wrote a fair bit on it - The problem is matching the turbo sizes, very experimental.
Old 05-01-2006, 01:05 PM
  #10  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thing is, im getting my manifold design finalised at the moment, and it would actually be VERY easy for me to do this, like literally not even a grand extra including the turbo and wastegate etc.

So why shouldnt i?

what are the downsides to it?
Old 05-01-2006, 01:06 PM
  #11  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[img:1280:960:780432c8de]http://www.corsaturbo.com/forumstuff/curitiba/01.jpg[/img:780432c8de][img:1280:960:780432c8de]http://www.corsaturbo.com/forumstuff/curitiba/02.jpg[/img:780432c8de]
Old 05-01-2006, 01:08 PM
  #12  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Rick
Karl and I wrote a fair bit on it - The problem is matching the turbo sizes, very experimental.
Do you have a link to where you wrote that?

Perhaps im over simplifying it in my mind, but i dont see how the turbo size is THAT crucial, i agree for the absolute optimum perofrmance it would probably take a fair bit of experimentation, but for me to just get a useful bit of extra torque at low end surely even a pretty much "finger in the air" guess at turbo size (renault 5 t2 for arguments sake?) would be ok?

Plus i dont mind if i have to try a few turbos to get the right one TBH!
Old 05-01-2006, 01:08 PM
  #13  
RichardPON
20K+ Super Poster.
 
RichardPON's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 23,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rick,

I thought you two wrote about compound charging.

To me, this reads that you're driving the second turbo from the wastegate gasses of the first?
Old 05-01-2006, 01:09 PM
  #14  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This isnt twin or compound charging, this is a sequential turbo setup, been done loads, just not often on aftermaket applications.

IMO youd be better off twin charging it with a turbo and a supercharger, cheaper and simpler if you know how, and more effective too.

Or compound charge it like Dumped's saff with turbo blowing into turbo.

But all 3 ways are v.v.cool.

Love the way theyve done away with the intercooler by just injecting the nitrous into the compressor outlet too
Old 05-01-2006, 01:09 PM
  #15  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by digita1dragon
wouldnt that produce more boost than youve set on your actuator?
and if so, whats the point?
there would be two actuators............one turbo would boost up then the other would kick in and both would be controlled by their seperate wastegates when the desired boost is reached for each turbo i'd imagine. Just like a normal seqquential set up.

As Steve says its not compound charging (where one blower feeds the other)
Old 05-01-2006, 01:09 PM
  #16  
Fudgey
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Fudgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 20,134
Received 106 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

i asked this aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaages ago with the pic below i seen.



[img:533:800:4693ebc43d]http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2040414.009/2040414.009.1L.jpg[/img:4693ebc43d]
Old 05-01-2006, 01:11 PM
  #17  
Stealth Bomber
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Stealth Bomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Thing is, im getting my manifold design finalised at the moment, and it would actually be VERY easy for me to do this...
Do it do it do it do it
Old 05-01-2006, 01:14 PM
  #18  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fudgeass
i asked this aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaages ago with the pic below i seen.



[img:533:800:6752d4888d]http://www.germancarfans.com/news/2040414.009/2040414.009.1L.jpg[/img:6752d4888d]

Yeah but that just isnt as easy to understand as a nice picture of it simply implemented, so half of us probably didnt quite picture it right i suspect!

LOL
Old 05-01-2006, 01:16 PM
  #19  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh and also dan, those turbos dont have their own seperate inlets, so the larger one is a flow restriction on the inlet side to the smaller one, this one isnt though!
Old 05-01-2006, 01:16 PM
  #20  
Mongo
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

chip-3door

Cool idea mate

Could you use a smaller turbo to spool the larger one? Would that get around the exhaust side complexity?
Old 05-01-2006, 01:20 PM
  #21  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
chip-3door

Cool idea mate

Could you use a smaller turbo to spool the larger one? Would that get around the exhaust side complexity?
I dont want to do that, i want to run the two seperately, i want the small one to provide boost to the engine, then the engine can provide the exhaust gas to spool the larger one
Old 05-01-2006, 01:20 PM
  #22  
Fudgey
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Fudgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 20,134
Received 106 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

its also for the vectra 2.2 dervs lol

pic was just to illustrate how its done really.

ie i wouldnt do it quite like that
Old 05-01-2006, 01:21 PM
  #23  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fudgeass
its also for the vectra 2.2 dervs lol

pic was just to illustrate how its done really.

ie i wouldnt do it quite like that
I suspect its done that way largely to allow the use of a single inlet source, which is easier for lfow meters and filters etc.
Old 05-01-2006, 01:25 PM
  #24  
Fudgey
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Fudgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 20,134
Received 106 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

and production costs lol
Old 05-01-2006, 01:27 PM
  #25  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

yes Dan, thats what i mean, the production costs of not joining them
Old 05-01-2006, 01:28 PM
  #26  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Mongo
chip-3door

Cool idea mate

Could you use a smaller turbo to spool the larger one? Would that get around the exhaust side complexity?
I dont want to do that, i want to run the two seperately, i want the small one to provide boost to the engine, then the engine can provide the exhaust gas to spool the larger one
if i was doing that chip i would probaly go with a small supercharger
Old 05-01-2006, 01:36 PM
  #27  
Mongo
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Probably not got enough space in the engine bay of the mini for a supercharger... Infact you'll struggle to get a second turbo in there?
Old 05-01-2006, 01:37 PM
  #28  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any, small superchargers are still very big compared to a small turbo, and also they have to be mounted in certain places (ie near the drive belts)

I wanted to supercharge the car originally (instead of a turbo not as well) but there just isnt the space, its SO tight in the bay even N/A that its not an option really for me.

I agree though that may be a good idea on something like my cossie (replica ) though, and wouldnt mind having a go doing so at a later date perhaps.

The problem with a supercharger though is they arent good at providing big torque low in the rev range and then not providing a lot of resistance at the top of the rev range dont forget!
Old 05-01-2006, 01:39 PM
  #29  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Probably not got enough space in the engine bay of the mini for a supercharger... Infact you'll struggle to get a second turbo in there?
Correct on the charger, wrong on the turbo.

That set up above would fit in my car perfectly

There is just about enough room for a K16 in there on the right manifold mate, and thats probably the turbo i would chose to use as a first attempt as well quite possibly

If not a K16 though i woul only go SMALLER than a K16 not bigger.
Old 05-01-2006, 01:40 PM
  #30  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ahh ok didnt realise it was for the mini

mount the charger out of the bonnet like in mad max
Old 05-01-2006, 01:48 PM
  #31  
Mongo
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Mongo
Probably not got enough space in the engine bay of the mini for a supercharger... Infact you'll struggle to get a second turbo in there?
Correct on the charger, wrong on the turbo.

That set up above would fit in my car perfectly

There is just about enough room for a K16 in there on the right manifold mate, and thats probably the turbo i would chose to use as a first attempt as well quite possibly

If not a K16 though i woul only go SMALLER than a K16 not bigger.
How about a T15 like on my pug

I suppose you could fit the bigger turbo above the gear box.. Would you have any problems with the turbo being mounted so far away from the head?
Old 05-01-2006, 01:48 PM
  #32  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rsnissan
ahh ok didnt realise it was for the mini

mount the charger out of the bonnet like in mad max
Thought about that, but i would have to convert to LHD too then, as it would ctually have to sit COMPLETELY over the bonnet as the engine is only a few mm below the bonnet, and it wouldnt be possible to see past it, and it has to line up with the belts.

Did think of a "torque bar" across the car and the charger running over the gearbox, but i cant do that if ive got a turbo already sat there!


Space is VERY lmited.
Old 05-01-2006, 01:50 PM
  #33  
Mongo
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rsnissan
ahh ok didnt realise it was for the mini

mount the charger out of the bonnet like in mad max
With a big red button mounted in car, that he can switch it on whilst in persuit mode lmao (more like pimp mode)
Old 05-01-2006, 01:51 PM
  #34  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Originally Posted by chip-3door
Originally Posted by Mongo
Probably not got enough space in the engine bay of the mini for a supercharger... Infact you'll struggle to get a second turbo in there?
Correct on the charger, wrong on the turbo.

That set up above would fit in my car perfectly

There is just about enough room for a K16 in there on the right manifold mate, and thats probably the turbo i would chose to use as a first attempt as well quite possibly

If not a K16 though i woul only go SMALLER than a K16 not bigger.
How about a T15 like on my pug

I suppose you could fit the bigger turbo above the gear box.. Would you have any problems with the turbo being mounted so far away from the head?
Thats where the turbo is going anyway mate on the new manifold me and Robbie are working out at the moment, thats how im not having to worry about space as much as Rich thinks i will
Old 05-01-2006, 01:58 PM
  #35  
Mongo
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chip-3door
Thats where the turbo is going anyway mate on the new manifold me and Robbie are working out at the moment, thats how im not having to worry about space as much as Rich thinks i will
Whos that.. My old pessamistic friend Riccardo Lewis?
Old 05-01-2006, 02:01 PM
  #36  
Anonymous
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

indeed mongo, but thats VERY off topic.....









So going back to the original question, can someone (rick?) give me a good reason why i shouldnt do it?

If there is any major disadvantage then i wont bother, ive got a bottle of antilag in the car anyway, so its not like i NEED a second charger but if it brings more to the party than it drinks, then i would like to invite it along anyway!
Old 05-01-2006, 02:05 PM
  #37  
keithG666
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
keithG666's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: beds
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 05-01-2006, 02:08 PM
  #38  
rsnissan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (9)
 
rsnissan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex/Middlesex
Posts: 7,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what happens when both turbos are at full boost would the smaller exhaust housing cause a restiriction then?

as you know the exhaust housing on a turbo affects the engines flow charistics etc.
Old 05-01-2006, 02:09 PM
  #39  
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Chip,

If you have to ask on an internet formum why you should'nt use a method like above then you don't do it!!!!

It does'nt work by the way.
Old 05-01-2006, 02:13 PM
  #40  
Shings
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Shings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: .
Posts: 8,655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Karl
Chip,

If you have to ask on an internet formum why you should'nt use a method like above then you don't do it!!!!

It does'nt work by the way.
You in mate, might pop over in a bit for a general winge and chat



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.