General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Zetec 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2005, 08:33 PM
  #1  
JamesS2RS
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
 
JamesS2RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herts(under a s2 with a centrino laptop)
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Zetec 2.0

How much bhp can the standard rod's in a mondeo 2.0 zetec take??

I am thinking for using one for a zvh conv on my s2 rst any help would be great.

Thanks,

Jim
Old 12-12-2005, 08:52 PM
  #2  
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Oranoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HertFORDshire
Posts: 25,425
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

A good friend of mine who posts on here from time to time did 316 bhp on his stock rods without a problem. I have, however, heard of peoples rods failing well before that level
Old 12-12-2005, 08:56 PM
  #3  
JamesS2RS
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
 
JamesS2RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herts(under a s2 with a centrino laptop)
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you think it would be safe to run 250bhp??

Thanks,

Jim.
Old 13-12-2005, 09:33 AM
  #4  
Mike C
The Special One
iTrader: (1)
 
Mike C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bridgnorth
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes, i'd say 250-280 was about the "safe" limit
Old 13-12-2005, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Escort-Ian
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Escort-Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry to butt in, but what sort of revs can the stock rods take?
Old 13-12-2005, 09:36 AM
  #6  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

IME rods are more likely to die from revs than torque.

Ive happily put 400bhp through rods that ive been "reliabley informed" by people that they cant take more than 350 (vuaxhall 2.0 16v ones)

So its all about HOW you get 250bhp or 300bhp etc
Old 13-12-2005, 09:47 AM
  #7  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Totally agree with chip on this one.

To put it simply in a high revving NA engine the most extreme forces on the rods will be at the top of the stroke when it is trying to return the piston back down the bore.

If you turbo an engine you do not effect the forces at this point, but simply put the rod under more load (in compression) in the middle parts of the compression and ignition strokes.

So a 300bhp NA zetec might need to rev to 9000rpm and will certainly spell the end for the stock rods, however a 300bhp forced induction zetec will prob be ok on stock rods.
Old 13-12-2005, 09:57 AM
  #8  
Escort-Ian
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Escort-Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Escort-Ian
sorry to butt in, but what sort of revs can the stock rods take?
anyone know?

i had been thinking about putting bigger cams on mine, hard limiter is currently at 7000rpm but have been told that anymore than this and i'm tempting death
Old 13-12-2005, 09:59 AM
  #9  
Anonymous
Banned
 
Anonymous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Standard rod bolts on most engines fail before the rods themselves, so might be worth asking that question of someone, ie what actually fails?

Also might be worth looking into deseaming them and shotpeening them, as thats worth an extra 500-750rpm on most rods!

Or just get a few people together and group buy some sets of steel rods at under 300 quid each, problem solved
Old 13-12-2005, 10:00 AM
  #10  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ian,
What sort of induction are you running?
I notice you sig says 165bhp. Was that on the satandard intake or throttle bodies?
Strange figure that. Bit more than i would expect with standard intake and bit less than i would expect with well mapped tbs.
Old 13-12-2005, 10:04 AM
  #11  
Fudgey
Baby Cheesus
iTrader: (4)
 
Fudgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 20,134
Received 106 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

doug, ians is on jenveys.

as per chip, 7k rpm is the limit really, personally id only go to 6800 on std rods but hey ho.
Old 13-12-2005, 10:20 AM
  #12  
Escort-Ian
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Escort-Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Garage19
Ian,
What sort of induction are you running?
I notice you sig says 165bhp. Was that on the satandard intake or throttle bodies?
Strange figure that. Bit more than i would expect with standard intake and bit less than i would expect with well mapped tbs.
it's on webber bodies, less than i expected too which is why i thought possibly wrong choice in cam profile
Old 13-12-2005, 10:30 AM
  #13  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Do you have non stock cams?

problem with the weber TBs / ECU setups is that they are supplied with maps that have to cater for a fairly broad state of engine tune. One engine might be 10:1 with a stock exhaust manifold and the next might be 12:1 all singing, all dancing.

If you have a decent exhaust manifold design, i would think about upping the CR to 11-11.5:1 to gain 4-5 bhp and a bit more grunt in the middle, seeing if you can get the software to allow you to look at / adjust the mapping and get on a dyno and have a play with your induction legnths.

I would reckon on 180-185 bhp being more near the mark.
Old 13-12-2005, 12:07 PM
  #14  
percybigun
Twistin me melon man
 
percybigun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone know if these rods (made by cosworth in USA for the focus 2.0 zetec american version) would fit in the UK 2.0 zetec silvertop engine?

http://www.focussport.com/cosworth_connecting_rods.htm

they are about Ł500 for a set.

and if i put them in with decent rod bolts, and i was running say 300bhp at flywheel (supercharger and nitrous) max 7000rpm, are the pistons or rings likely to fail?
Old 13-12-2005, 12:59 PM
  #15  
Escort-Ian
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Escort-Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Garage19
Do you have non stock cams?

problem with the weber TBs / ECU setups is that they are supplied with maps that have to cater for a fairly broad state of engine tune. One engine might be 10:1 with a stock exhaust manifold and the next might be 12:1 all singing, all dancing.

If you have a decent exhaust manifold design, i would think about upping the CR to 11-11.5:1 to gain 4-5 bhp and a bit more grunt in the middle, seeing if you can get the software to allow you to look at / adjust the mapping and get on a dyno and have a play with your induction legnths.

I would reckon on 180-185 bhp being more near the mark.
the ecu is fully mapable and it was mapped with a perfectly smooth power graph so it ain't that

spec is stage 1 head (ported/polished), fast road cams (but with standard pulleys, would verniers benifit alot?), trust electrical 4 branch manifold and the 45's

also engine was fully rebuilt, new everything so power figure was on a tight engine
Old 13-12-2005, 01:37 PM
  #16  
Garage19
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Garage19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nr Ipswich
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ian,

A couple of things spring to mind.

A perfectly smooth power graph cannot be used as an indication that an engine has been mapped to its potential. I could create a smooth power graph with all the wrong figures. It might not make much power, but it would be smooth. Who mapped your engine?

The other thing is that, on a zetec you don't actually need vernier sprockets to adjust your cam timing. The stock sprockets are held on a taper with no key way so can be adjusted at your peasure. The verniers will just make the adjustment a little bit easier and you will have marks for reference if you need them.

Also, out of interest, who did your headwork?

Cheers,

Doug.
Old 13-12-2005, 01:40 PM
  #17  
Escort-Ian
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Escort-Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Garage19
Ian,

A couple of things spring to mind.

A perfectly smooth power graph cannot be used as an indication that an engine has been mapped to its potential. I could create a smooth power graph with all the wrong figures. It might not make much power, but it would be smooth. Who mapped your engine?

The other thing is that, on a zetec you don't actually need vernier sprockets to adjust your cam timing. The stock sprockets are held on a taper with no key way so can be adjusted at your peasure. The verniers will just make the adjustment a little bit easier and you will have marks for reference if you need them.

Also, out of interest, who did your headwork?

Cheers,

Doug.
engine was mapped by Northampton Motorsport (only a few places in the uk can map the webcom stuff) and head was done by Cylinder Head Developments

appreciate your input btw
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
arkeye
Ford Focus ST
1
20-02-2016 01:22 PM
Daniel Howard
Ford Classics & Vintage
2
03-10-2015 10:44 PM
The Enigma
General Car Related Discussion.
6
29-09-2015 10:31 AM
mondeomark
Cars & Parts Wanted.
0
28-09-2015 06:28 AM



Quick Reply: Zetec 2.0



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:21 PM.