No tax, no insurance, no mot and still able to drive
25-03-2011 | 09:57 PM
#84
ST by Name and by Nature
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 460
Likes: 20
From: Berkshire
Your car must be a shed, cos most of the people on here care too much about their cars to run the risk of having it crushed.
The name on the invoice usually confirms ownership of the car, 90% time same as registered keeper, but doesn't have to be.
It is annoying people not taxing or insuring their cars, that is why i reckon scrap both and put the price of petrol up, I know it would be alot, so at least you pay for what you use and unless you own a refinery, bit harder to get round.
The name on the invoice usually confirms ownership of the car, 90% time same as registered keeper, but doesn't have to be.
It is annoying people not taxing or insuring their cars, that is why i reckon scrap both and put the price of petrol up, I know it would be alot, so at least you pay for what you use and unless you own a refinery, bit harder to get round.
25-03-2011 | 11:01 PM
#86
Thread Starter
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: BIRMINGHAM
Your car must be a shed, cos most of the people on here care too much about their cars to run the risk of having it crushed.
The name on the invoice usually confirms ownership of the car, 90% time same as registered keeper, but doesn't have to be.
It is annoying people not taxing or insuring their cars, that is why i reckon scrap both and put the price of petrol up, I know it would be alot, so at least you pay for what you use and unless you own a refinery, bit harder to get round.
The name on the invoice usually confirms ownership of the car, 90% time same as registered keeper, but doesn't have to be.
It is annoying people not taxing or insuring their cars, that is why i reckon scrap both and put the price of petrol up, I know it would be alot, so at least you pay for what you use and unless you own a refinery, bit harder to get round.
25-03-2011 | 11:04 PM
#88
Advanced PassionFord User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 38
From: ayrshire
25-03-2011 | 11:07 PM
#89
PassionFord Post Troll
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,094
Likes: 3
From: Under the car :cry:
the more i read this thread the more i think kenna_86 is a re-registered banned user on the wind up and pretty much every reply has taken his (or her, can't be being sexist now can we 
) bait!
go on then who are you?
either that or kenna_86 has got the IQ of a watermelon
) bait! go on then who are you?
either that or kenna_86 has got the IQ of a watermelon
25-03-2011 | 11:56 PM
#90
Virgin
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Gloucester, UK
You may own you're house.. well own the freehold to your house, but technically the queen owns the land. The freehold gives you the right to reside there permanently. In theory the queen, well more like the government on behalf of the queen can take your land from you. to build new roads, railways, airfields etc. Paying you compensation.
Your car however you do actually own... but of course if you were to use it on public property, then you have to abide by the laws in place.
26-03-2011 | 08:29 PM
#92
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Still not took the advise about stopping the crack then.
Regardless of what you've heard or think your totally and utterly wrong.
If you drive any car on a public road without tax,mot,insurance you Will get stopped an when you try an tell plod that the "government doesn't own the car you do instead" then not only will you get points and a fine you risk getting taken to the loony bin for chatting utter bollox..
Regardless of what you've heard or think your totally and utterly wrong.
If you drive any car on a public road without tax,mot,insurance you Will get stopped an when you try an tell plod that the "government doesn't own the car you do instead" then not only will you get points and a fine you risk getting taken to the loony bin for chatting utter bollox..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
