9/11 Crime Scene Investigators channel 5 now
09-09-2010, 08:11 PM
#1
9/11 Crime Scene Investigators channel 5 now
Channel five now 
Members of the NYPD's elite Crime Scene Unit recall their efforts to look for survivors in the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre, as well as their search for evidence on the site during the following 18 months. Footage from head-mounted cameras demonstrates the perilous conditions in which Det Sgt Joe Blozis led the hunt for fragments of the planes and their black box recorders
Members of the NYPD's elite Crime Scene Unit recall their efforts to look for survivors in the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre, as well as their search for evidence on the site during the following 18 months. Footage from head-mounted cameras demonstrates the perilous conditions in which Det Sgt Joe Blozis led the hunt for fragments of the planes and their black box recorders
Last edited by SS1; 09-09-2010 at 08:12 PM.
09-09-2010, 08:54 PM
#7
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 3,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still unbelievable, like something from a film! Videos like this make you realise how real it all was - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNNTcHq5Tzk Very difficult to watch.
A minority in America have certainly been responsible for their fair share of misery in some places on the planet, but whatever the people who did this were trying to achieve they clearly targeted the wrong people.
Very difficult to watch.A minority in America have certainly been responsible for their fair share of misery in some places on the planet, but whatever the people who did this were trying to achieve they clearly targeted the wrong people.
Trending Topics
10-09-2010, 06:31 AM
#12
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you realise how huge a task rigging them massive buildings with explosives would be ? also doing it without anyone noticing
Last edited by RobL; 10-09-2010 at 06:37 AM.
10-09-2010, 07:16 AM
#13
10-09-2010, 07:31 AM
#15
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-09-2010, 07:37 AM
#16
you can clearly see planes flown into it on purpose by dickhead terrorists! Dont start all your shite on this thread! Your the kind of cunt that would fucking laugh at what happened then! r.i.p
10-09-2010, 07:45 AM
#17
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you can make a good conspiracy theory out of all historical events and people usually do like the moon landings for example and theres a lot of daft folk about that get sucked in
10-09-2010, 08:44 AM
#20
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regardless of conspiracy this, or conspiracy that, so many unexplained things happened on that day which defy the laws of physics.
The fact you will not find one example anywhere on earth where a steel frame building has collapsed due to fire, let alone one that has collapsed and fell onto its own footprint.
('jet fuel this....', jet fuel that....' - it burns way, way below the melting point of steel)
NB everything on earth falls through the path of least resistance - those building had thousands of tonnes of RSJ's in them - there is not a cat in hells chance a fire, dozens of floors above weakened the steel below and miraculously caused the building to fall straight down.
(if the damaged caused by the plane, and the fire which broke out caused the building to fall, why didn't the top 1/4 fall off/over - why did it pancake like a perfect demolition?)
I was like 'no way' - i believed everything we were fed by the news - why wouldn't you??
Watch the blueprint for the truth on google (all, god know how many episodes) and then, after honestly watching them, tell me, or anyone else there isn't suddenly a massive amount of doubt in your mind what happened.
(the country ((US)) is hardly China, but come on!!)
Or believe what you want, its a free country.
Tom
The fact you will not find one example anywhere on earth where a steel frame building has collapsed due to fire, let alone one that has collapsed and fell onto its own footprint.
('jet fuel this....', jet fuel that....' - it burns way, way below the melting point of steel)
NB everything on earth falls through the path of least resistance - those building had thousands of tonnes of RSJ's in them - there is not a cat in hells chance a fire, dozens of floors above weakened the steel below and miraculously caused the building to fall straight down.
(if the damaged caused by the plane, and the fire which broke out caused the building to fall, why didn't the top 1/4 fall off/over - why did it pancake like a perfect demolition?)
I was like 'no way' - i believed everything we were fed by the news - why wouldn't you??
Watch the blueprint for the truth on google (all, god know how many episodes) and then, after honestly watching them, tell me, or anyone else there isn't suddenly a massive amount of doubt in your mind what happened.
(the country ((US)) is hardly China, but come on!!)
Or believe what you want, its a free country.
Tom
Last edited by the mk1 kid; 10-09-2010 at 09:28 AM.
10-09-2010, 09:25 AM
#22
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-09-2010, 10:17 AM
#23
BANNED
BANNED
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mars
Posts: 4,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When there are more questions than answers you know something fishy is going down.
At first I was a non believer in the conspiracys. Then a mate sent me some links. After you see what they have to say, and the evidence the govt are keeping back (CCTV from the pentagon for example) one has to question the official line given out.
At first I was a non believer in the conspiracys. Then a mate sent me some links. After you see what they have to say, and the evidence the govt are keeping back (CCTV from the pentagon for example) one has to question the official line given out.
10-09-2010, 10:27 AM
#25
Found this quote -
"It treats statements made at this time as if they represent reasoned judgments, not impromptu, often poorly thought-through misimpressions and uninformed speculation... In sum, Loose Change is researched very shoddily, making numerous mistakes of fact and judgment. Nevertheless, this has not prevented it from becoming extraordinarily popular."
Yeah, so the BBC are part of the conspiracy too... yeah.... right. Ever thought that in the utter panic that followed there was a lot of confusion, and that some people made mistakes?
All the conspiracy 'facts' have counter-facts demonstrating how they're flawed, but people just want to believe there's more to it.
10-09-2010, 10:32 AM
#27
Dan exactly i have been to the 911 site 3 times each time a year apart when your looking at ground zero it amazes me how they managed to stand up without dickheads flying planes into them! the one next to it about half the size of the towers , when you look to the top of it & think they were higher its crazy
10-09-2010, 11:03 AM
#28
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-09-2010, 11:36 AM
#29
Advanced PassionFord User
I've always tried to keep an open mind on the matter, but one things for sure, I certainly don't believe it happened the way the media portrayed it and if you do, you are deluded.
10-09-2010, 12:01 PM
#30
10K+ Poster!!
+1, which is why you cant just dissmiss the conspiracy theory out of hand, and take planes flew into buildings, buildings fell, end of, as the 'truth'.
you posted this thread at 9:11....................
10-09-2010, 01:42 PM
#32
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the buildings had fallen over when hit by the planes it would have been silly to think something was amiss, but seeing as the buildings didn't fall over on the point of impact when the forces were infinitely higher, we are lead to believe it was fire that brought them down.
Well jet fuel doesn't burn at a high enough temperature to melt steel, and it certainly doesn't burn at a high enough temp to burn all the steel in the 140 odd floors below - that steel work at most should have warped, bent and buckles under the strain had the building collapsed without charges, but it didn't, and hardly any of these mammoth columns could be found - they literally vanished!
I listened to a recording of a fire crew on the floor below the point of impact telling control the flames were not too bad, and they would have it under control etc - this building was 99.9% intact when it 'fell down' moments later and cut that transmission short.
Tom
Watch these and tell me it isn't at least a 'bit fishy'!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b74naeawdCs - this one is dull, skip to others unless you have time for the whole picture...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ59g...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELp1b...eature=related
3 of 13...
Last edited by the mk1 kid; 10-09-2010 at 02:18 PM.
10-09-2010, 02:13 PM
#33
PF's Guitar God!!!
I guess everything has to be taken with a pinch of salt. But i'm for the whole planned theory.
Fire Fighters said they were really confused to the explosions happening after the WTC collapsed. And that the steel used needed to be at 3000 degrees before it could melt.
Fire Fighter radio's can be heard here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow
And the explosion after they collapsed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kOIvwThj-U
Fire Fighters said they were really confused to the explosions happening after the WTC collapsed. And that the steel used needed to be at 3000 degrees before it could melt.
Fire Fighter radio's can be heard here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow
And the explosion after they collapsed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kOIvwThj-U
Last edited by Pardeep; 10-09-2010 at 02:17 PM.
10-09-2010, 04:29 PM
#35
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe you should do a little research on the three clowns that made loose changefar from credible
this is a decent site http://www.debunking911.com/ explains all the myths with proper credible sources
far from crediblethis is a decent site http://www.debunking911.com/ explains all the myths with proper credible sources
10-09-2010, 04:35 PM
#36
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: stoke on trent
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-09-2010, 05:00 PM
#37
PassionFord Post Troll
Plenty of time to plant explosives. Do you ever question any "maintenence" going on in your office over the weekend?
10-09-2010, 05:03 PM
#38
PassionFord Post Troll
Much more scientific and more analystic.http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html
10-09-2010, 05:04 PM
#39
this again? soonn we will be due another ps3 vs xbox thread?I will always believe it was a cover up and no one will ever change my mind on that, people can think im deluded or whatever doesn't really interest me
I will never understand how WTC7 fell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0
While loose change has alot of interesting points i agree it has some flaws to, blueprint is alot better imo, im not sure how anyone on here can doubt the words of architects, demo experts etc etc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssuAM...eature=related
says it all imo, anyone defend the falling of that building?
10-09-2010, 05:27 PM
#40
PassionFord Post Troll
Also can someone tell me how a 50 tonne steel beam ended up 600ft away from the towers if they just "fell" down?
