General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

whats the greatest car engine ever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2010, 06:38 PM
  #81  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frenchy0204
What F20 was it mate? F20C out the S2000 or the F20B6 out of the Accord? Even if it was the B6, i bet it was still fantastic fun in a little escort, as the F20B6 is a very good engine.

Would love to see some pics if possible? Sounds amazing.
Its a F20C, will be going in my Mk2 but currently I'm trying to clear my feet before carrying back on with the project.

Engine will be standard internals on Jenveys and also dry sumped, nothing outrageous but damn cheap to replace IF it ever went wrong where as the 3 previous engines I had planned for the car would of left me severly skint if they had of ever gone wrong.

A guy over on Turbosport is running one and after a few chats with him it seemed the right way of doing things as the cars cost enough to build without needing a 10k+ engine under the bonnet

If things go well there will be progress this year though...
Old 04-01-2010, 06:40 PM
  #82  
Harry.
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Harry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jigga
Lexus 4l V8. Epic.
How so? Not disagreeing, just wondering as I haven't heard too much about these engines.
Old 04-01-2010, 06:55 PM
  #83  
Frenchy0204
Get to tha choppa!
 
Frenchy0204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Mids
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyBravo
Its a F20C, will be going in my Mk2 but currently I'm trying to clear my feet before carrying back on with the project.

Engine will be standard internals on Jenveys and also dry sumped, nothing outrageous but damn cheap to replace IF it ever went wrong where as the 3 previous engines I had planned for the car would of left me severly skint if they had of ever gone wrong.

A guy over on Turbosport is running one and after a few chats with him it seemed the right way of doing things as the cars cost enough to build without needing a 10k+ engine under the bonnet

If things go well there will be progress this year though...
That sounds bloody brilliant! Do you have a thread up at all? I take it you wouldn't be silly enough to put FWD drivetrain onto that and have stuck with the RWD drivetrain, so is the Escort a MK1/MK2 or is it a later one converted to RWD?

In all honesty though mate, why the hell did you pick a F20C? It has no torque at all throughout the WHOLE REV RANGE! No! Really!!

Old 04-01-2010, 07:47 PM
  #84  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Old 04-01-2010, 07:50 PM
  #85  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Xe Graph, AST1612, Ashley manifold, Jenveys and MBE ecu:

Old 04-01-2010, 07:53 PM
  #86  
Frenchy0204
Get to tha choppa!
 
Frenchy0204's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Mids
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phwaar. ITB's.

I bet that sounds nice!
Old 04-01-2010, 07:55 PM
  #87  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frenchy0204
That sounds bloody brilliant! Do you have a thread up at all? I take it you wouldn't be silly enough to put FWD drivetrain onto that and have stuck with the RWD drivetrain, so is the Escort a MK1/MK2 or is it a later one converted to RWD?

In all honesty though mate, why the hell did you pick a F20C? It has no torque at all throughout the WHOLE REV RANGE! No! Really!!

There is a thread somewhere but it probably has a YB in it back then. I've not updated it for ages and dont plan to until I have some actual progress on it.

Car is a 1979 Mk2 Rs2000 Grp 4 prepped shell

The engines are fantastic in NA trim, more power can be had for not huge amounts of money, find me any throttle bodied 255hp dry sumped engine for less than 5k ?

In turbo form they have made over 500whp by simply adding a turbo and the correct injectors etc.. !

Anyway back on topic although the graphs I am sure some will find interesting.
Old 04-01-2010, 07:55 PM
  #88  
kev 3dr
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
kev 3dr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: widnes
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if mass produced anyone from the main american V8's all have done something ground breaking !!! the A series prob first most flexible engines as was fitted to many FWD and RWD formats and same reason the Xflow should be in there too !!
Old 04-01-2010, 07:57 PM
  #89  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I don't know why I didn't include it but as mentioned the Chevy V8's are also awesome.

Pennies to tune in the grand scheme of things too
Old 04-01-2010, 07:59 PM
  #90  
markcoznottz
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
markcoznottz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: nottingham
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pound for pound got to be the Yb cossie lump hasnt it?. You remember when everyone used to go to car shows just to catch a glimpse of these cars?. Everyone of my mates wanted a cossie it was THE car to aspire to if u loved motors. On a standard engine a stage 3 was what 330 bhp?, and in the early 90's that was a shit load of power. Look at the cars that were around at the time, a peugeot 205 gti 1.9 only had 130 bhp, escort turbo same, astra gte 16v bit more. Pound for pound its got to be the cheapest ever for horsepower in this country. Dont get me wrong, with cars like evos and scoobys the games moved on, but that was the golden age of tuning in this country, and the cossie ruled.
Old 04-01-2010, 08:02 PM
  #91  
Glenn_
Glennvestite
iTrader: (1)
 
Glenn_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darlington county durham
Posts: 62,761
Received 1,044 Likes on 998 Posts
Default

well said mark.
Old 04-01-2010, 08:03 PM
  #92  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

^^ Have to agree with that, stage 3 YB back in the day must of been silly fast in comparison to anything else on the road !
Old 04-01-2010, 08:09 PM
  #93  
JonnyBravo
10K+ Poster!!
 
JonnyBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 11,058
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

^^ Have to agree with that, stage 3 YB back in the day must of been silly fast in comparison to anything else on the road !
Old 04-01-2010, 08:20 PM
  #94  
Darylc.
49cc superbike!
iTrader: (1)
 
Darylc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 3,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I quite like the fiat twin cam but I also like the Ford Sidevalve engine (sad int I?)
Old 04-01-2010, 08:49 PM
  #95  
m4tt274
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
m4tt274's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 3,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agree with most of the above and although its not the greatest engine ever, from ford i think the BOA V6 is a good design, at the time ford thought it was unmachable. find another N/A V6 that can match 207 ft/lb on pump fuel and witha cat and be able to meet all the american emmision crap and still manage 28mpg. u can pick them up for pennys, u get cosworth twincam heads, mahle pistons and a fillet rolled crankshaft uprated rods. and providing u put decent oil in them and change the cam chain tensioner every 80K i know of engines that have coverd 300K and u can hammer the bollox of them and they will take it.
the new boxer diesel is a bloody good motor aswel, but not really old enough to know.
Old 04-01-2010, 09:16 PM
  #96  
alangti
BANNED
BANNED
 
alangti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: billingham
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

good old rover v8 lol from the sd1
Old 04-01-2010, 09:38 PM
  #97  
alanfordtw-15
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
alanfordtw-15's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ireland
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i remember reading that the nissan v6 that came in many variations in maximas/350's won an world institute of engineers engine of the year award for ten years in a row from 95 on. they tested engines on power output/ecomony/build quality ect
Old 04-01-2010, 09:39 PM
  #98  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frenchy0204
In all fairness, it is quite hard to find other other N/A 2.0 engines that are pushing out 250hp. I did find one though.

http://www.carfolio.com/specificatio...ar/?car=119262

Just wanna say though, I don't think you get what i was trying to say mate. I don't mean they lack torque completely, or throughout the whole rev range. My point was that LOW DOWN (Read it again chip. LOW DOWN. Did you get that?), i personally think they don't have as much torque as other engines with the same ammount of cylinders and similar cylinder capacity, which is MY opinion. I'm sure either one of us could be proved wrong or right, but i suppose the only way to find out would be with graphs, but i truly don't give a fuck whether you agree with me or not, so I'm not gonna bother going into that ammount of detail.

I suppose we will have to agree to disagree eh??

But they do have good low down torque, thats the whole point of vtec!
It allows them to run a lairy cam up top for peak power, but a milder one at lower RPM to still make good torque lower down.
Old 04-01-2010, 09:45 PM
  #99  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Harry.
How so? Not disagreeing, just wondering as I haven't heard too much about these engines.

Fully ally construction, half a million mile reliable, they are so smooth that you can bounce them off the rev limiter and still stand a coin up ON ITS END on top of the engine and it wont fall off, the internals are good for massive power in standard form, they have one of the flattest torque curves of any engine ever, the standard internals are capable of approaching 9000rpm.

They are just truely epicly awesome "money no object" engines.

People look at the shitty looking exhaust manifolds and think "what a load of crap" cause they dont realise they have been specifically designed like that to smooth the torque curve, if they were equal length sexy tubular race ones then they would gain up top and lose down the bottom, which isnt what lexus wanted.

You get something like 85% of peak torque from 2K rpm till nearly the rev limiter, when you accelerate it one it feels almost like driving an electric car, its just totally linear.


One of my favourite engines of all time without a doubt, wonderful combination of 8 cylinders and high technolog, its crazy to think the design dates back to the late 80s!
Old 04-01-2010, 09:46 PM
  #100  
pee vee
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
pee vee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wiltshire, Bath, chippenham area!
Posts: 7,428
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyBravo

thats quite interesting to see.. not seen an overlay graph like that before of the same engine... I was always assuming that a standard plenum setup would give better low down torque than the TBs due to air speed etc..
I guess that graph shows the torque on the TBs engine building initially very slightly slower than the plenum engine.. but thought the gap would be slightly more noticable than that... maybe at very low engine speeds it would.. but then, when would that actually matter in the real world!

Last edited by pee vee; 04-01-2010 at 09:47 PM.
Old 04-01-2010, 09:54 PM
  #101  
TT300
400 N/A BHP
 
TT300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ash, Hampshire
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Slightly out of topic but was the s54 e46 m3 engine one of the highest power na 6 cy cars? Or something like highest bhp per litre???
Old 04-01-2010, 09:58 PM
  #102  
RS Grant
Made in Scotland
iTrader: (1)
 
RS Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 9,055
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I'd also say the S2000 engine.


Cheers,
Grant
Old 05-01-2010, 09:31 AM
  #103  
markcoznottz
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
markcoznottz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: nottingham
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alangti
good old rover v8 lol from the sd1
What an obselete design of engine buick didnt want?.
Old 05-01-2010, 10:05 AM
  #104  
brad
PassionFord Post Troll
 
brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 3,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markcoznottz
What an obselete design of engine buick didnt want?.
yeah cant have been a very good engine , didnt last long did it

theres a reason buick didnt use it and it wasnt because it wasnt any good
Old 05-01-2010, 10:19 AM
  #105  
mato
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
mato's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wasn't the Rover V8 only popular to a lack of feasible alternatives at the time, e.g compact and relatively light V8's.
However its wasn't actually that light as it was been compared to engines such as the B series which is extremely heavy. It is also extremely expensive to tune to a reasonable power output in na form e.g. 350+bhp and prove extremely unreliable at such outputs, so it isn't therefore that great really is it? (or am I missing the point entirely?)
Old 06-01-2010, 10:10 AM
  #106  
trevorcossie
saffy cossie yes
Thread Starter
 
trevorcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: london
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very nice
Old 06-01-2010, 10:55 AM
  #107  
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Porkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex... and Birmingham!
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mato
Wasn't the Rover V8 only popular to a lack of feasible alternatives at the time, e.g compact and relatively light V8's.
However its wasn't actually that light as it was been compared to engines such as the B series which is extremely heavy. It is also extremely expensive to tune to a reasonable power output in na form e.g. 350+bhp and prove extremely unreliable at such outputs, so it isn't therefore that great really is it? (or am I missing the point entirely?)
nope you are totally correct! pants engine!
Old 06-01-2010, 10:58 AM
  #108  
SiZT
Advanced PassionFord User
 
SiZT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 1,896
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
nope you are totally correct! pants engine!
Agreed, the only reason the Rover V8 was/is popular is because it was cheap and readily available. People don't seem to realise that this isn't the case now though and still keep buying them.
Old 06-01-2010, 11:20 AM
  #109  
Alps Pacino
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Alps Pacino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 8,968
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

the b16a honda vtec engine, was in production in 1990 and managed to produce 150bhp from a n/a 1.6 engine and still be 100% reliable even at 200k miles.

Might not seem that impressive as it is only a 150bhp motor but compare it to any other 1.6 n/a engine even modern ones and it is still a cracking little motor
Old 06-01-2010, 11:34 AM
  #110  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
nope you are totally correct! pants engine!
Not in the 70s, it was a good engine at the time.

Its just people wanting to use a rover v8 these days that are the problem when there are so many better options.
Old 06-01-2010, 11:35 AM
  #111  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alps Pacino
the b16a honda vtec engine, was in production in 1990 and managed to produce 150bhp from a n/a 1.6 engine and still be 100% reliable even at 200k miles.

Might not seem that impressive as it is only a 150bhp motor but compare it to any other 1.6 n/a engine even modern ones and it is still a cracking little motor
I thought the b16a in the crx was 160bhp?
Old 06-01-2010, 11:36 AM
  #112  
turbolee
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
turbolee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

honda v-tecs i would say
Old 06-01-2010, 11:53 AM
  #113  
Alps Pacino
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Alps Pacino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 8,968
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
I thought the b16a in the crx was 160bhp?
b16a was 150bhp
b6a1 was 160bhp odd i think
b16a2 was 160bhp i think

The b16b is an even better engine but less produced,, thats the one in the ek9 civic type-r 185bhp from a 1.6 n/a which is very very good going imo.

edited to say my old crx made 152bhp and had 140k on the clock and still on the standard engine, head gasket everything. Me mate bought it off me and did a few bits to it and it made 176bhp on a completly standard engine with 170k miles and nothing but breathing mods nothing internal at all

Last edited by Alps Pacino; 06-01-2010 at 11:55 AM.
Old 06-01-2010, 11:56 AM
  #114  
Ebonycossie4x4
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Ebonycossie4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 7,853
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

If we are talking standard engines its got to be the current M series of engines for me.
Old 06-01-2010, 11:57 AM
  #115  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

alps, ek9's are awesome little cars, would love one at some point
Old 06-01-2010, 12:00 PM
  #116  
Alps Pacino
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Alps Pacino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 8,968
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

ye i know i love me hondas, best front wheel drive performance cars out there imo obviously across the whole range compared to other makes whole range. I like them cause i was blasting about in them when everyone just thought they were a poxy 1.6 and didnt realise they rev to 8500rpm standard and make 150bhp, whicj means they have the same sort of pace as an xe nova
Old 06-01-2010, 12:25 PM
  #117  
dom123
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
dom123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this forum is weird... everyones joined, because at one time or another they liked the good old fords and there engines.. but now it seems its all the rage these days on here to slag them off...

imo the yb is the greatest engine, simple because it is so simple and basic and a brain dead diy mechanic can get them to 350bhp and be unbelievable reliable.

also there also a very small engine, so they can fit in many different cars...

how people can compare a honda engine is behond me punching a perfetic 200bhp, compared to yb with a couple of cheap mods and have 350bhp 320lbft and it will be very strong... lets face it thats the same bhp as a e46 07plate m3. and a yb with that kind of punch is what £1700 what a bargin... probly less than the price of throttle bodies for a different engine..

my yb has seen of porsche boxters, carrera s, and a carrera 4s, targa e46m3. i fancy my chances on a gt3 too when i come across one... thats some serous cars my old yb has pulled from.. let alone everyone says there shit??
Old 06-01-2010, 12:30 PM
  #118  
Escow-Van
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Escow-Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Notts
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd back the Rover V8. Not particularly powerful, but it is my second favourite car noise. Got a treat yesterday as everyone was bringing out their old Range Rovers and Discos for the snow
Any engine that remains in production for nealy half a century can't be all that bad...
Old 06-01-2010, 12:34 PM
  #119  
danneth
TORQUE!
 
danneth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 11,756
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dom123
this forum is weird... everyones joined, because at one time or another they liked the good old fords and there engines.. but now it seems its all the rage these days on here to slag them off...

imo the yb is the greatest engine, simple because it is so simple and basic and a brain dead diy mechanic can get them to 350bhp and be unbelievable reliable.

also there also a very small engine, so they can fit in many different cars...

how people can compare a honda engine is behond me punching a perfetic 200bhp, compared to yb with a couple of cheap mods and have 350bhp 320lbft and it will be very strong... lets face it thats the same bhp as a e46 07plate m3. and a yb with that kind of punch is what £1700 what a bargin... probly less than the price of throttle bodies for a different engine..

my yb has seen of porsche boxters, carrera s, and a carrera 4s, targa e46m3. i fancy my chances on a gt3 too when i come across one... thats some serous cars my old yb has pulled from.. let alone everyone says there shit??

Old 06-01-2010, 12:46 PM
  #120  
It's Czech Mate
............

 
It's Czech Mate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Mids
Posts: 12,970
Received 102 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

How about this for an engine? 122bhp per litre is a lot for a production road car


Quick Reply: whats the greatest car engine ever



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 PM.