General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Is there a better designed plenum than this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #121  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

what a superb topic, and as regards to MADRods 150+ shot of Nos, I am 99% sure that the 500 plenum dosn't need to be able to flow extra air, as I thought the whole point of Nos was it is OXYGEN RICH air, not extra VOLUME of air
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #122  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
what a superb topic, and as regards to MADRods 150+ shot of Nos, I am 99% sure that the 500 plenum dosn't need to be able to flow extra air, as I thought the whole point of Nos was it is OXYGEN RICH air, not extra VOLUME of air
nos has no oxygen content until the chemical reaction within the combustion camber then it releases oxygen.
learn all you want here or ask
http://www.noswizard.com/bboard/
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #123  
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
RWD_cossie_wil
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 11
From: birmingham west mids
Default

[/quote]
nos has no oxygen content until the chemical reaction within the combustion camber then it releases oxygen[/quote]


so the compound Nitrous OXIDE (hint there ) dosn't consist of 2 nitrogen atoms and one OXYGEN atom then? please explain where the oxygen magically appears from if its not in the N20??
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #124  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

You are both correct, interpreting each other wrong though.

The oxygen gets RELEASED from the N2O during combustion, forming 02-molecules, adding these to fire creates... Well INTENSE energy to say the least. Everything burning requires a supply of oxygen, the more the better it burns. The same with combustion, the more oxygen you add the more efficient the combustion will be.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #125  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

nos has no oxygen content until the chemical reaction within the combustion camber then it releases oxygen[/quote]


so the compound Nitrous OXIDE (hint there ) dosn't consist of 2 nitrogen atoms and one OXYGEN atom then? please explain where the oxygen magically appears from if its not in the N20?? [/quote]
hey dude thats quite a reaction
the post that i was commenting on was disscussing airflow through the plenum. nos would not pass any oxygen at this point oxygen would be released in the combustion chamber only if nos was released to air then there would be no oxygen content.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:45 PM
  #126  
PhilM's Avatar
PhilM
PassionBMW.com Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Wheres these pcis then
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #127  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

The pictures has been sent to Mike, i hope hes putting them up, as he said he would... I suppose hes not wanking to them?

Originally Posted by PhilM
Wheres these pcis then
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #128  
EscortWRC's Avatar
EscortWRC
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Default

NOS is for people who can't build motors anyway......
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:53 PM
  #129  
Kev.H's Avatar
Kev.H
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,613
Likes: 0
Default

Mike Ringburn pull ya fecking finger out
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #130  
RANJ's Avatar
RANJ
BANNED
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 1
From: FuKnOsE
Default

Originally Posted by EscortWRC
NOS is for people who can't build motors anyway......
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #131  
PhilM's Avatar
PhilM
PassionBMW.com Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Mikes probably blinded himself, lol, go open a Photobucket.com account bud! Youll find it useful, its free and dead easy to host pics!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #132  
Billabong's Avatar
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

LOL - Mike usually has a 6pm curfew on the internet

Patrik, if you email them to me, I'll post them up asap.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:01 PM
  #133  
Kev.H's Avatar
Kev.H
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EscortWRC
NOS is for people who can't build motors anyway......
I think Kev Sharpe and Rod have proved how good NOS is
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:02 PM
  #134  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

He will get them up in time! These are, as i said before, no pictures of an actual plenum, but the original piece runners and trumpets modified by me. Hope theres interest for this to?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #135  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kev.H
Originally Posted by EscortWRC
NOS is for people who can't build motors anyway......
I think Kev Sharpe and Rod have proved how good NOS is
Theres hundreds of drag-racing guys that has proven this before them. A lot of engine builders considers N2O to be false power and cheating. I do not totally disagree with them...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #136  
EscortWRC's Avatar
EscortWRC
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
Default

And when the bottle runs out...you're stuck with what's left

If your engine can take the cylinder pressure from the nitrous, it can take it from a bigger turbo....so make more power and don't worry about the bottle being empty
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:09 PM
  #137  
Kev.H's Avatar
Kev.H
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hexxon
Originally Posted by Kev.H
Originally Posted by EscortWRC
NOS is for people who can't build motors anyway......
I think Kev Sharpe and Rod have proved how good NOS is
Theres hundreds of drag-racing guys that has proven this before them. A lot of engine builders considers N2O to be false power and cheating. I do not totally disagree with them...
Yes but i dont know hundreds of drag racers guys names And I thought it was created by the director of fast n furious for chavs in Novas


Originally Posted by EscortWRC
And when the bottle runs out...you're stuck with what's left
bit like when u run out of petrol then
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #138  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Pictures sent to Bill as well
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #139  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kev.H
Yes but i dont know hundreds of drag racers guys names And I thought it was created by the director of fast n furious for chavs in Novas
Haha! True that, all of it!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #140  
swerv's Avatar
swerv
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
From: northants
Default

cool thread, really enjoyed reading it

BTW how can you compare running out of petrol to running out of NOS

NOS is good for the 1/4 and thats it imo
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:39 PM
  #141  
Billabong's Avatar
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

Name:  1.jpg
Views: 287
Size:  23.5 KB

Name:  2.jpg
Views: 278
Size:  29.5 KB

Name:  3.jpg
Views: 307
Size:  24.1 KB

Name:  4.jpg
Views: 289
Size:  32.6 KB

Name:  5.jpg
Views: 298
Size:  26.1 KB

Pics cropped and resized slightly, hopefully the attention to detail can still be seen.

Hexxon
Heres the pictures of my runners and trumpets. Pay notice the textural differences on different parts of it as an example. This is a early version, in the final version there will be some fabrications on the contact surface with the plenum box, to ensure radiused surfaces everywhere inside the plenum, no sharp corners. 200 hours or so in total will be required for the final version.

The piece which the pictures display has been totally reworked on all of the surfaces being internal. All of the surfaces has been smoothed out and reformed where there was gain in doing so. The basic surface smoothing, that is, making sure that no nasty bumps and holes are present (such as relics from casting), is performed to eliminate turbulence inside of the intake, optimizing the volumetric efficiency of the engine at ALL revs and loads.

The trumpets were then polished to further remove turbulence, but the part of the runners where contact with fuel is present was left with a rougher texture, to optimize fuel atomizing. All of the inside of the plenum will be polished when finished actually.

The runners were reformed to suit the characteristics i wanted in my engine, theyre bigger in the cross sectional area as you might have noticed.
Interesting thread you've got going here
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:46 PM
  #142  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks bill, yes please edit the post and post the text for me, so that i dont have to rewrite it

Its not MY post, its yours!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:48 PM
  #143  
leecavturbo's Avatar
leecavturbo
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 0
Default

and inside pics of a std inlet look like ?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:48 PM
  #144  
Disabled Account's Avatar
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for posting pics Bill

Just for comparrison, Nick Waples flowed inlet pics:



Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #145  
Billabong's Avatar
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

Thanks for posting some comparison pic's, Doug

Have edited my post above, with Patrik's comments.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #146  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Who is this Nick Waple? Remember, not increasing the outlet, as well as the outlet would generate gas velocities worse than original at same gas flow... Nick has done that though Well, nice enough, besides that i dont like the idea of o-ringing against the head, all of the heat from the head is transferred via the material into the intake.

Originally Posted by Doug Stirling
Thanks for posting pics Bill

Just for comparrison, Nick Waple flowed inlet pics:



Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:57 PM
  #147  
Billabong's Avatar
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

Patrik, Nick Waples is a well respected 'head man' - did Mike R's head and quite a few others, he's ex-F1.

I think neoprene is the material used for the O rings, but Doug can confirm....
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:59 PM
  #148  
Stavros's Avatar
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 1
From: North Korea
Default

Oooh Hexxon, not allowed to diss Mr Waple in the UK cosworth scene, hes "god" you know
I think he did RS500 race head porting, and we know nothings faster or better than RS500 spec, ever, ever
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #149  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Billabong
Patrik, Nick Waples is a well respected 'head man' - did Mike R's head and quite a few others, he's ex-F1.

I think neoprene is the material used for the O rings, but Doug can confirm....
Ok. Been looking at the picture, hes enlarged the whole runner properly, nice one that. Edit my post and remove the facts based on blind eyes...

Dont like the idea regardless of material actually, since the aluminium surfaces will be in contact...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #150  
Billabong's Avatar
Billabong
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

LOL - Steve, that's not how I meant it!

Patrik, I *think* the O ring is just instead of the std paper gasket - better at preventing leaks, but again, I'll await Doug to confirm that.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #151  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Billabong
LOL - Steve, that's not how I meant it!

Patrik, I *think* the O ring is just instead of the std paper gasket - better at preventing leaks, but again, I'll await Doug to confirm that.
You are correct in that an o-ring sealing is a way more efficient way to seal But, every technique has it applications...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #152  
Stavros's Avatar
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 1
From: North Korea
Default

I know YOU didnt mean it Bill, but i bet a lot of people think that!

And looks like Pat' was being a bit blind and it was good afterall
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:08 PM
  #153  
Disabled Account's Avatar
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Default

Who is this Nick Waple? Why has he just been increasing the area of the "outlet" of the intake? Or am i blind? Would generate gas velocities worse than original at same gas flow that... Well, otherwise nice, besides that i dont like the idea of o-ringing against the head, all of the heat from the head is transferred via the material into the intake.

Hexxon,
Nick supplies the flowed YB head and inlet as a matched set. The "O" rings are indeed neoprene as Bill said.

The problem with the standard gaskets is firstly they have to be "opened up" to match head/inlet.......and with big (ish) boost engines (2.5 BAR) they can blow apart/break up over time
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #154  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Yes, it was easy to make that assumption based on the surfaces... But i was wrong in seeing that

The only thing i might want to argue is the size, in volume, of the runners, what are the application of these? What amount of power will it be extracting? What boost?

Originally Posted by Itsmeagain
I know YOU didnt mean it Bill, but i bet a lot of people think that!

And looks like Pat' was being a bit blind and it was good afterall
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #155  
Disabled Account's Avatar
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hexxon
The only thing i might want to argue is the size, in volume, of the runners, what are the application of these? What amount of power will it be extracting? What boost?
My one pictured above is spec'd up for 32 - 36 PSI boost, so with a T4 turbo 510 - 548 BHP.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #156  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Stirling
Who is this Nick Waple? Why has he just been increasing the area of the "outlet" of the intake? Or am i blind? Would generate gas velocities worse than original at same gas flow that... Well, otherwise nice, besides that i dont like the idea of o-ringing against the head, all of the heat from the head is transferred via the material into the intake.

Hexxon,
Nick supplies the flowed YB head and inlet as a matched set. The "O" rings are indeed neoprene as Bill said.

The problem with the standard gaskets is firstly they have to be "opened up" to match head/inlet.......and with big (ish) boost engines (2.5 BAR) they can blow apart/break up over time
Ok, thanks for the info doug! As ive said, the runner inlet/outlet-ratio seems nice to me...

I still dont like that solution with the sealing My final solution will also be involving making a grove in the runners head-contact-surface, then applying a custom ptfe/teflon-based 3 mm spacer onto that, the spacer having a grove in it as well. Two o-rings on each side of the spacer, twice effective, sealing away leakage and temperature.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #157  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Stirling
Originally Posted by hexxon
The only thing i might want to argue is the size, in volume, of the runners, what are the application of these? What amount of power will it be extracting? What boost?
My one pictured above is spec'd up for 32 - 36 PSI boost, so with a T4 turbo 510 - 548 BHP.
Ok, thanks for that info as well! Very nice stuff! Have any pics of the head? As i suspected though regarding set up. Excuse me for making the following statements on the engine, it will probably be a hell of a performer anyhow, me i am but a unexperienced 22 year old crybaby though with way too much attention to details in relation...

With the runner size, judging by the eye(which yet again may be blind), you will have a fairly low gas velocity at low revs combined with low boosts. The fact that using a t4, which is a fairly slow spool-uper, will probably create a very manly, but inefficient according to me, ketchup-effect as we call it in sweden. Im hoping on the opposite for you anyway, with my bad eyes, probably will be the case
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:27 PM
  #158  
Paddy's Avatar
Paddy
Legend
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,859
Likes: 15
From: Surrey/Hants
Default

I read how to design a plenum and did my own, it's good for 500bhp. And it's also not bad for slicing up and putting on breakfast cereals.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #159  
hexxon's Avatar
hexxon
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah sure youll get some fruity power with that one... HUMOUR CHECK -> BREAKDOWN... Haha!

Originally Posted by paddy1977
I read how to design a plenum and did my own, it's good for 500bhp. And it's also not bad for slicing up and putting on breakfast cereals.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #160  
Stavros's Avatar
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 1
From: North Korea
Default

Originally Posted by hexxon
With the runner size, judging by the eye(which yet again may be blind), you will have a fairly low gas velocity at low revs combined with low boosts. The fact that using a t4, which is a fairly slow spool-uper, will probably create a very manly, but inefficient according to me, ketchup-effect as we call it in sweden.
Im no expert, but from what ive seen (various engines, non YB) id say your probably right, if your saying the port size is big for the power we talking about.

I think youl find (from what i understand thats been going on, lol) a lot of the new wave of huge power YBs in the UK have less huge ports but much more power (ie the ports could be smaller and still give the power, tho maybe not on the exact same spec), and drive pretty damn nice too cause of the smaller ports.

LOL@Paddy too Has mike asked if he can sell it yet?
Reply



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43 PM.