General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

MSD's ALS feature in Fast Ford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2007, 09:54 AM
  #81  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Thats just wrong on so many levels
Old 01-08-2007, 09:56 AM
  #82  
Disabled Account
Banned
 
Disabled Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
..........Is there anyone else in this thread who would be prepared to pay good money to see Stu's teenage daughter use those karate and kickboxing skills to kick the shit out of Mike for slagging off her dad?
You know how tight/stingy I am with money Chip.......but yes I would pay and regard it as £ 20.00 well spent
Old 01-08-2007, 09:56 AM
  #83  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by L8 ECU
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
..........Is there anyone else in this thread who would be prepared to pay good money to see Stu's teenage daughter use those karate and kickboxing skills to kick the shit out of Mike for slagging off her dad?
You know how tight/stingy I am with money Chip.......but yes I would pay and regard it as £ 20.00 well spent

Old 01-08-2007, 09:59 AM
  #84  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by L8 ECU
Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
..........Is there anyone else in this thread who would be prepared to pay good money to see Stu's teenage daughter use those karate and kickboxing skills to kick the shit out of Mike for slagging off her dad?
You know how tight/stingy I am with money Chip.......
Yes squeaky, we do .
Old 01-08-2007, 10:00 AM
  #85  
cosmo V6
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
cosmo V6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by cosmo V6
Originally Posted by T S M
Perhaps your topic should have been "Can some one please explain how als works rather than start the topic attacking stu's article
excellent reply TSM



as opposed to diving straight in
I think you will find that I do, hence why the post....

Old 01-08-2007, 10:16 AM
  #86  
Raasclart
BANNED
BANNED
 
Raasclart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Camden
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

JCB for Mike Rainbird please... as this shovel he is using doesnt seem to be doing much good!!
Old 01-08-2007, 10:26 AM
  #87  
Gary F
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Gary F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Shields
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Old 01-08-2007, 10:58 AM
  #88  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by cosmo V6
Originally Posted by T S M
Perhaps your topic should have been "Can some one please explain how als works rather than start the topic attacking stu's article
excellent reply TSM



as opposed to diving straight in
I think you will find that I do, hence why the post.... It's also blatently obvious by some of the posts that plenty of people that "think" they do, don't though .
Really? Even though i have made the point that my article is about LAG and i described LAG perfectly, even mentioning we were talking about corners and gearchanges, not once did i mention mashing the pedal from idle or low engine speed/ high load, which is what your waffling about...

Where do you think i was wrong then?
Old 01-08-2007, 11:11 AM
  #89  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raasclart
JCB for Mike Rainbird please... as this shovel he is using doesnt seem to be doing much good!!
Really?

There is a subtle difference in what Stu wrote in his article:
Originally Posted by Stu in FF this month
EVER since the turbocharger was conceived a global problem has always been the amount of time it takes to create boost pressure. With any 1.6 or 2-litre engine making good power you will invariably find a Turbocharger that is not quite suited to the engine, in that it takes a long time after pressing the accelerator for it to consume enough air through the turbine to generate good boost pressure. This time delay between pressing the accelerator and receiving boost is called turbo lag and it’s a real pain when you are changing gear, or even just backing off the throttle for a corner. On a rally stage, this delay can win and lose races by quite a margin, so every bit of turbo lag that can be removed is well worth it. What we need is some form of ‘anti’ turbo lag (ALS) device.
That is not the definition of "lag" - which the correct definition is how Stu describes it in this post:

Originally Posted by Stu
Garret themselves say:
What is Turbo Lag?
Turbo lag is the time delay of boost response after the throttle is opened when operating above the boost threshold engine speed.
Boost threshold is where the turbocharger starts producing boost only above a certain rpm (depending on the size of the turbo) due to a lack of exhaust gas volume, to overcome the inertia of rest of the turbine.

He failed to mention these differences, and IMO, these differences are quite important.

Everything else he wrote is perfect and very easy to understand , it's just that by not describing "lag" in terms of mentioning boost threshold, the misnoma of what lag actually is, has continued to be perpetuated - that is all I was trying to get across.
Old 01-08-2007, 11:12 AM
  #90  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Stu,
See above - I hope you don't think I'm being picky, and I hope I have clarified my reason for posting .
Old 01-08-2007, 11:31 AM
  #91  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Mike, am I correct that you are argung stu was wrong to say

Lag is the response time

when he should have said

Lag is the response time when above the boost threshold
Old 01-08-2007, 11:36 AM
  #92  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Chip,
Yes that is 100% what I am saying . That subtle difference of leaving that out will make people think that "lag" is the time it takes for the turbo to spool up from scratch / low rpm.

When in fact, lag is the time it takes to spool up when the turbo is in its operating range .

Obviously ALS is for the latter, not the former (in my experience of it on my car).
Old 01-08-2007, 11:41 AM
  #93  
Matt
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by Matt
lets not forget everybody that with mike were talking about a man technical enough to try (after a call to harvey from germany ) and repair a split hose on a red hot engine and burn himself in the same spot a million times i hear rumour he also got his tongue stuck to a ski lift once too
Matt,
WTF are you on about , I first thought it was the dump valve leaking, so I asked him if he thought it would be okay to remove the DV to test the theory, but he advised against it. I burnt myself on the supplementary radiator that sits above the normal one trying to get the DV out to have a look at it, and if you have ever seen how tight me engine bay is, then you will know there's room for fag papers and that's about it . Upon checking the DV, this seemed to be all okay anyway(was fully sealing), so I then stripped the whole induction system out to check the turbo to intercooler pipe, which being fully heat wrapped had no evidence of leaks. It wasn't until the final jubilee clip was removed and the pipe pulled off that you could see that where the heatwrap stopped (where the jubilee clip was on the last part of the end of the pipe) that the heat transfer from the ALS into the jubilee had melted the hose underneath the clamp and this is where it was leaking. I cut this back, made sure the heatwrap was underneath the jubilee and it held okay for the rest of the time at the Ring. However, don't let the facts get in the way of your story, I like your version so much better .


looked like this to everyone present

"can i undo this harvey?"
"yes"
"ouch"
"what about this harvey?"
"yes"
"ouch"

Old 01-08-2007, 11:42 AM
  #94  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Mike, would you say that:

Lag is the response time when above the boost threshold


Effectively would be read as meaning:

Lag is the response time when above the boost threshold, and that threshold doesnt change irrespective of the use of ALS


And its that latter part of the sentance which is in fact implied that is your key issue with what Stu said, that people will not realise that the boost threshold hasnt changed and they still need to be at the same rpm?
Old 01-08-2007, 12:07 PM
  #95  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Mike, would you say that:

Lag is the response time when above the boost threshold
Yes, but I would use the word "within" .


Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Effectively would be read as meaning:

Lag is the response time when above the boost threshold, and that threshold doesnt change irrespective of the use of ALS
I can see that I am probably being set-up for a HUGE fall, but I can take it like a man . Yes, that is my experience of ALS on a large turbo. In fact, when I first got it fitted, I was HUGELY disappointed in the fact that the boost threshold point was not changed and that with it activated, there was absolutely no improvement UNTIL you got into the boost threshold and then it was like "Oh my god", with absolutely NO "lag" between gear changes (as in the true definition of lag in my eyes ), whilst in the boost threshold.

I even quizzed Harvey and Ahmend at the time as to why that would be and it was explained that on the Mountune Torque Control set up, that as soon as the accelerator is re-pressed, the ALS disengages, and you're then relying on normal exhaust gases to over-come the inertia of the turbo. If these are lower than the amount of energy that was being pumped into the turbine when the ALS was active, then the turbo slows back down and needs the required gas energy to bring it back into it's boost threshold, which can only be achieved with the relevant rpm showing. Therefore if the car is outside this rpm range, you still suffer from the same lack of response as normal. It's a really weird feeling as well, as it starts to feel responsive and then dulls as the energy can no longer over come the inertia of the turbo.

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
And its that latter part of the sentance which is in fact implied that is your key issue with what Stu said, that people will not realise that the boost threshold hasnt changed and they still need to be at the same rpm?
No, the key issue was with the "lag" terminology . However, as an added aside, with a big turbo (such as a T4), then yes that is my experience of the boost threshold not changing, as per the earlier explanation. I was hoping that in this regard, Stu was going to say, well if you do this, that and the other, then we can bring the turbo onto boost before it's normal rpm threshold is reached.
Old 01-08-2007, 12:20 PM
  #96  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I can see that I am probably being set-up for a HUGE fall
Thats the first thing in this thread you got totally correct Mike



Ive actually got very little experience of antilag of the type you are discussing, however Ive got plenty of experience of using nitrous as antilag.


What happens with nitrous as antilag is that you see an increased amount of exhaust gas flow as a result of the nitrous, so consequently as well as providing extra power during the lag period, it also reduces the lag time (due to more gas flow spooling quicker) but ALSO it lowers the boost threshold due to the extra gas flow.

Now im sure that all makes perfect sense to you?

However, the key thing is what happens when the nitrous stops.

If you put that engine in 5th gear, outside the boost threshold and point it up a hill (to slow engine RPM change enough for you to see what really happens) what you will find is that when the nitrous stops, the boost actually remains, as you are now in a situation where the engine sees boost as the nitrous stops, so consequently flows a larger volume of air than it normally would outside the threshold (as normally it wouldnt have boost) so as a result it actually KEEPS THE TURBO SPINNING and your boost threshold has magically moved down the RPM


Im absolutely POSITIVE the same will happen (im not sure of the extent to which it will do so though, just that it will) with "conventional" anti lag.
Because at the point you open the throttle and the ALS cuts out you have boost, the engine will create more gas than normal, so will keep the turbo spinning more than normal.



So I think that Stu's article stands as totally correct personally
Old 01-08-2007, 12:37 PM
  #97  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Other than my MAIN bone of contention regarding the true definition of "lag", which was not (in my opinion) adequately clarified .

The MTC set-up doesn't seem to work in the way you describe, with a single ALS valve (maybe not enough air flow?) and a T4. Next time I speak to Ahmed / Harvey, I'll have a chat to them about why this might be (however, that won't be until the weekend, as I dare not interrupt him while he is finishing off my car ) .

And just to clarify my own experiences, I am obviously meaning that when my particular car drops below 3150rpm (the boost threshold of my old engine), my ALS set up had no effect in overcoming the inertia of the T4. So from idle to this point is a "dead zone" in terms of response, with or without the ALS active.
Old 01-08-2007, 12:50 PM
  #98  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

With a bigger valve I suspect you would have seen some of the advantages I mentioned.

The other time that potentially you would have noticed a similar effect possibly (although I doubt you remember your car in this detail) is that if you short shifted 4th on a big hill whilst on full boost so that you came in at about 2900rpm, you would experience boost at under 3K in 5th that would have remained.

Thats such a specific set of circumstances though, that I doubt you can recall if you ever did it!
Old 01-08-2007, 12:56 PM
  #99  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
With a bigger valve I suspect you would have seen some of the advantages I mentioned.

The other time that potentially you would have noticed a similar effect possibly (although I doubt you remember your car in this detail) is that if you short shifted 4th on a big hill whilst on full boost so that you came in at about 2900rpm, you would experience boost at under 3K in 5th that would have remained.

Thats such a specific set of circumstances though, that I doubt you can recall if you ever did it!
A 200 rpm difference I would completely accept, as that is an insignificant amount of rpm to achieve, and the turbo would probably retain the energy for such a short period of time . However, I am intrigued by your comments and will actually test this and data log it and report back .
Old 01-08-2007, 01:02 PM
  #100  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
...I will actually test this and data log it and report back .
Old 01-08-2007, 01:02 PM
  #101  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Are we trying to get tot he bottom of the difference between lag and boost threshold here or the effect ALS has on boost threshold and lag?
Old 01-08-2007, 01:04 PM
  #102  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CossieRich
Are we trying to get tot he bottom of the difference between lag and boost threshold here or the effect ALS has on boost threshold and lag?

I dont think we are still trying to get to the botom of anything mate?

I think Mike probably now realises why Stu's article was worded the way it was, and I think everyone in the thread knows the difference between lag and boost threshold.
Old 01-08-2007, 01:10 PM
  #103  
Stavros
DEYTUKURJERBS
 
Stavros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 29,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
However, I am intrigued by your comments and will actually test this and data log it and report back .
regarding all this ALS bullshit, without testing it on a setup that works well (ie not a single mountune valve on a T4, even WRC cars had twin valves on a T34 FFS) even commenting on it is totally pointless and missleading to goons who dont know the background of the person making the comments.

its like talking about turbos like your an expert in them when you just work at dominos, or something.
Old 01-08-2007, 01:13 PM
  #104  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stavros
its like talking about turbos like your an expert in them when you just work at dominos, or something.
I could understand that happening in the U.S. but surely that would NEVER happen here in G.B?
Old 01-08-2007, 01:20 PM
  #105  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
Originally Posted by CossieRich
Are we trying to get tot he bottom of the difference between lag and boost threshold here or the effect ALS has on boost threshold and lag?

I dont think we are still trying to get to the botom of anything mate?

I think Mike probably now realises why Stu's article was worded the way it was, and I think everyone in the thread knows the difference between lag and boost threshold.
Chip,
I think we can safely say the people reading this post will know the difference , but I don't think the people who read the article will (all because one simple sentence was missed out) .

Stav,
My new intake has the full WRC ALS valve on, so I think that will be okay .
Old 01-08-2007, 01:35 PM
  #106  
jbrayley
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
jbrayley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im with Mike on this one

Lag is the time it takes for the turbo to go from making positive boost to full boost. The turbo starts to make positive boost once the car has signifant exhaust gasses to spin the turbo (boost threshold).

I am with Mike in that I think a lot of people would tend to think that anti-lag means the turbo is in full boost all the time - kind of like permanent Lanch control When in reality this is not the case. Now whether the use of ALS *CAN* reduce the boost threshold marginally due to the way it operates is by the by.
Old 01-08-2007, 01:41 PM
  #107  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Everything else he wrote is perfect and very easy to understand , it's just that by not describing "lag" in terms of mentioning boost threshold, the misnoma of what lag actually is, has continued to be perpetuated - that is all I was trying to get across.
So what you are saying is that other peoples ASSUMPTIONS are now my failing?

I am talking about LAG, in an article about LAG, and you think somehow that its my fault that people dont know what LAG actually is?

If you were talking about meat and potato pies, would i be right to slate you publically on an internet forum just because you didnt waste space telling people that there are no tomatoes in a meat and potato pie?
Old 01-08-2007, 01:43 PM
  #108  
jbrayley
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
jbrayley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
So what you are saying is that other peoples ASSUMPTIONS are now my failing?

I am talking about LAG, in an article about LAG, and you think somehow that its my fault that people dont know what LAG actually is?

If you were talking about meat and potato pies, would i be right to slate you publically on an internet forum just because you didnt waste space telling people that there are no tomatoes in a meat and potato pie?
Um, no I never mentioned you at all Stu. I just meant I am with Mike on the fact that a lot of people could be confused by the terminology unless boost threshold was explained to them. No dig at all.

Unless that was aimed at mike, in which case fire away
Old 01-08-2007, 01:45 PM
  #109  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Sorry, your reply wasnt there when i started to type mine. It was for Mike so i have edited it to reflect that.
Old 01-08-2007, 01:49 PM
  #110  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I also notice you have sneakily re-worded what you ACTUALLY said in teh first post yesterday Mike?

Anyone got it cached?
Old 01-08-2007, 01:49 PM
  #111  
jbrayley
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
jbrayley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats fine, thanks
Old 01-08-2007, 01:50 PM
  #112  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

LMAO @ Mike going back and editing the original post this morning


Last edited by Mike Rainbird on Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:52 am; edited 2 times in total



Old 01-08-2007, 01:50 PM
  #113  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Stu, but YOU told them what lag is :

Originally Posted by Stu in FF
This time delay between pressing the accelerator and receiving boost is called turbo lag
But in my opinion, you told them incorrectly . You should have put the Garrett definition .

In my opinion in putting what you did, you have perpetuated the age old mistake of confusing lag and boost threshold, which will now be taken as gospil - because YOU wrote it .

I look forward to your next turbo article where you mention waste-gate chatter .
Old 01-08-2007, 01:51 PM
  #114  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

lol at Mike and wastegate chatter
Old 01-08-2007, 01:51 PM
  #115  
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator



iTrader: (12)
 
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Posts: 28,824
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I will write a clarifier just for you Mike.
Old 01-08-2007, 01:56 PM
  #116  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
I also notice you have sneakily re-worded what you ACTUALLY said in teh first post yesterday Mike?

Anyone got it cached?
Stu,
Perhaps you should actually read your pm's that I sent you, one yesterday and one today, saying I would do this as I didn't want to offend you and had no intention of doing so .

If you note, I only changed one sentence (the first) and two smilies so that it came across "better" .
Old 01-08-2007, 01:58 PM
  #117  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip-3Door
LMAO @ Mike going back and editing the original post this morning


Last edited by Mike Rainbird on Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:52 am; edited 2 times in total



The first edit was yesterday, where I changed the spelling of "seams" to the correct one as pointed out by Bill and the second edit was today, following my two PMs to Stu, telling him I would be happy to do this or even delete it (which he ignored), so I ammended the first sentence and two smilies so it would read "better" and not appear so confrontational .
Old 01-08-2007, 01:59 PM
  #118  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You'll never win Mike
Old 01-08-2007, 02:00 PM
  #119  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I actually cannot beleive what i am reading.
Old 01-08-2007, 02:01 PM
  #120  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rick
I actually cannot beleive what i am reading.
Why not, its there in black and white for you to see


Quick Reply: MSD's ALS feature in Fast Ford



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 AM.