Cawood

so far on me RST i have bayjoo 195 chip (16psi), GRS I/C, pace rad, Magnex and K&N panel filter!

going to cam it up now i think

which do i go for? was looking at the piper 285 T2, reckon this one's best?

also if i buy this one can i use a Kent vernier pulley with it?

cheeRS

dave

GrimmeRS2K

kent cvh 34 is very good cam for a rs turbo, bit more expensive but worth it.

KSA-Cossie

iTrader: (4)

CasperR

There was a article in fast ford a while ago and they featured kent, and they mentioned that the cvh34 was the ideal cam for the 1,6 but the cvh35 was good for the 1,9?

I'll see if I can find the article..

Cawood

cheers lads, so the kent CVH34 better than the 285T2

wheres the power band on that then? is it a the top of the rev range?

G420 DEL

www.burtonpower.com -- KCCVH34

as berton say "ADJUSTABLE CAM PULLEY IS RECOMMENDED, 1500-7000rpm TIMING 119deg"

i got this cam cant fault it

Cawood

sound, cheers but, wheres the power on this cam?

also been told bout the newman cams, gonna look into them aswell!

GrimmeRS2K

the power is 1.5k to 7k, you dont really need the vernier pulley if you cant afford it, the cam is designed to use with standard timing marks, ive never used a vernier, and was told the other day by a tuner that its not needed.

The cam pulls hard after 3k

rs_daz

Ive got a kent cam in mine .And its worn already( 8k )the last owner took it to Engine advantages and they said kent r shit and they have seen a few cars in that the cam has worn .im looking at a piper cam next......

Bread

ive got a piper 300 with a kent vernier on n/a 1.6 cvh lol, like a pig under 3500rpm but really goes when over

james_birch

i got a piper 285t and think its a wicked cam! if i ever replace it it will be with a piper T2! cus im running 17psi the T2 would actually be a better cam to have! but the 285T is a good midrange cam!

only heard bad things about kent lately!

cj2000

i use a piper t2 in mine its well lumpy on tick over but when it gets going its a beast, wicked cam

Cawood

cheers every one!

thing is i dont want a cam that just pushes all the power up to the top of the rev range

GrimmeRS2K

kents old stuff like the cvh 34 and 35 were fine, some of their new cams have had problems but problems occur when they are not run in right from installation!