Ford Escort RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Turbo Series 1 and 2.

Power Vs. Reliability....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 06:30 AM
  #1  
Dub604's Avatar
Dub604
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: in your mrs
Default Power Vs. Reliability....

Okay fellas,

quick question, what is the optimum power output of a modified ERST? I mean before you start having reliability issues.. (more than normal lol) A friend told me once you hit over 200 brake, that's when lots of items are at the limit. so what would you do to take your ERST to your opinion of optimal power output, whilst maintaining good reliability??
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 09:27 AM
  #2  
Joe91's Avatar
Joe91
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Exmouth
Default

It depends what spec/who does your engine i think, Norris motorsport have built mine and mapped it to 240bhp which is plenty of power but very reliable at the same time so i have the best of both..The engine is capable of alot more power but reliability wouldnt come with it..

Joe

Last edited by Joe91; Jan 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
johnnysash's Avatar
johnnysash
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Default

I agree with 200bhp for reliability of clutch, gearbox, drive shafts, and also strain on the shell etc.... There are of course modified parts which can easily handle this.... But for a standard ish car I would say 200bhp is a sensible limit......
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 12:04 PM
  #4  
simontrayler's Avatar
simontrayler
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
Default

From what I've read, Christian and Tony both ran around the 350 bhp mark and both has pretty reliable cars...
I agree with Joe. Depends who does the work and how, hod much thought and prep and corresponding mods are and how much money you want to put into it.

Strengthen and uprate it before it goes wrong, and you'll be as safe as house. But, it will cost.
I'm gonna be doing just this, so it wants to be
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
Rob_DOHC's Avatar
Rob_DOHC
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,790
Likes: 43
From: London
Default

I think it really depends on a lot of things spec and maintenance and driving style included. If your a Kevin and drop the clutch at every given oportunity a standard 130bhp rs turbo is unreliable....

With a decent set of conrods, efi and an ib5 gearbox and you don't drive like a spanner (all the time) then a well spec'd 230-250 imo is perfectly suited to the road. People always quote 200bhp as this is the maximum output of 80% of the rs turbos on the road, its more or less the natural limit of MFI.


But things don't really get fun until your past 200bhp

Rob,
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 12:43 PM
  #6  
simontrayler's Avatar
simontrayler
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
Default

Very true Rob, very true! Lol. We call them them Derek's or Barry's round here, but, Kevin works too lol.

Drive like a d*ck and you will break it.

But you'd like to think (still have faith in some RS owners, lol) that if you ploughed a small fortune into it, that you like after it and respect your RS/investment/reputation a little and drive it sensibly some of the time... But, often not the case.

Good point though Rob!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 12:47 PM
  #7  
phil_rs's Avatar
phil_rs
yam yammer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 3
From: Stourbridge, West Mids
Default

Originally Posted by Rob_DOHC
I think it really depends on a lot of things spec and maintenance and driving style included. If your a Kevin and drop the clutch at every given oportunity a standard 130bhp rs turbo is unreliable....

With a decent set of conrods, efi and an ib5 gearbox and you don't drive like a spanner (all the time) then a well spec'd 230-250 imo is perfectly suited to the road. People always quote 200bhp as this is the maximum output of 80% of the rs turbos on the road, its more or less the natural limit of MFI.


But things don't really get fun until your past 200bhp

Rob,
Pretty much bang on IMO

EFI certainly helps but only if it's in good working order.... second hand looms can be very hit and miss!
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 12, 2013 | 08:06 PM
  #8  
Dub604's Avatar
Dub604
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: in your mrs
Default

So, lets just say I only had access to 94 octane, what would be a safe power figure to aim for then??
are those octane boosters an option??
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 08:14 PM
  #9  
phil_rs's Avatar
phil_rs
yam yammer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 3
From: Stourbridge, West Mids
Default

Where are you from?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
Dub604's Avatar
Dub604
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: in your mrs
Default

I moved from the UK to Canada, I sold my RST before I left and i'm in finally in a position where I can start to look for a new one to ship over (from Greece/ Italy LHD)
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2013 | 09:06 PM
  #11  
the_frozen_one's Avatar
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 842
Likes: 2
From: Crawley, West Sussex
Default

Originally Posted by Dub604
So, lets just say I only had access to 94 octane, what would be a safe power figure to aim for then??
are those octane boosters an option??
94?

You poor maples. Pump fuel is 95 here, super is 97-98.

Not sure how well a 30 year old cvh would cope running piss water?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 04:08 AM
  #12  
Dub604's Avatar
Dub604
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: in your mrs
Default

So after a little research, it turns out that fuel out here is measured in AKI not RON. so our 94 is actually 99 by the UK standards:

" In the US, octane ratings in unleaded fuels can vary between 86 and 87 AKI (91-92 RON) for regular, through 89-90 AKI (94-95 RON) for mid-grade (European premium), up to 90-94 AKI (95-99 RON) for premium (European super)."
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 10:31 AM
  #13  
the_frozen_one's Avatar
the_frozen_one
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 842
Likes: 2
From: Crawley, West Sussex
Default

Originally Posted by Dub604
So after a little research, it turns out that fuel out here is measured in AKI not RON. so our 94 is actually 99 by the UK standards:

" In the US, octane ratings in unleaded fuels can vary between 86 and 87 AKI (91-92 RON) for regular, through 89-90 AKI (94-95 RON) for mid-grade (European premium), up to 90-94 AKI (95-99 RON) for premium (European super)."
Rock and roll then fella. Get one bought
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 11:01 AM
  #14  
Karlos G's Avatar
Karlos G
Balls Deep!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,185
Likes: 25
From: Suffolk
Default

Originally Posted by Dub604
So, lets just say I only had access to 94 octane, what would be a safe power figure to aim for then??
are those octane boosters an option??
Not a very easy question to answer mate, if it's totally untouched then around 185bhp is you limit (Turbo) but the engine internals if healthy will take around 240bhp (Rods) but that's all hoping the old MFI fuelling will fuel reliably.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 07:34 PM
  #15  
zvh's Avatar
zvh
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 3
Default

my mfi was used daily for 3 years or more at 286bhp at 1.5 bar on a zvh no issues with erl mf2 5th injector kit
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 07:35 PM
  #16  
zvh's Avatar
zvh
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 3
Default

and is still used daily throughout all weathers @334 bhp still no issues
i hate sunshine boys
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2013 | 08:00 PM
  #17  
project rs's Avatar
project rs
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 1
From: wirral
Default

this is one of them questions that you'll get a lot of varying answers for due to the way there driven and serviced like rob above said. from my own experience i had a completely standard car running 19psi and was like that for 3 years with no issues and ran great, then i decided i wanted more power and built a steel engine running a t34 at 2 bar on efi and in the 3 years it's been running like that i had the head gasket go after 18 months but was due to head bolts not gasket and till recently was fine but now the head is scrap due to the alloy make up of the head perishing due to its age/poor cast in first place so i would despite the 2 small hiccups would say that it's been fine as it's been to the pod several times and been run hard over the 3 years as anyone who knows the car will tell you and would put another ported head on it but am going to give a 2lt a go now and see what i can push one of them to, to sum up it's down to making sure that if you want more power then you must build the engine to match not simply try to run 300 bhp through your stock engine or by trying to run 3 bar through your turbo as thats when reliability will be an issue
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 02:35 AM
  #18  
Dub604's Avatar
Dub604
Thread Starter
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: in your mrs
Default

okay, Im not sure how common it is here for a tuner to know about RS turbos ya know. North American Escorts are thought of as pieces of shit, so there isnt much in the way of anything for them lol.

so im wondering if its worth buying one, driving back to the UK and leaving it with a tuner for a while to work with. if the MFI could be an issue, perhaps going EFI, Cossie, or even Megasquirt etc might be the better option, and tune to 220hp ish. Id rather spend the money there, get it done right, and just maintain it here as ill prob have to ship most parts from there anyway.

theres so much to weigh in here. makin my brain hurt lol

Last edited by Dub604; Jan 14, 2013 at 02:36 AM. Reason: spelling lol
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 12:51 PM
  #19  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

If I was you I'd consider putting it on something easily mappable and reliable like Omex. Then if there is an issue you can easily connect to it and check the readings from the sensors and if you ever change the spec, you can always have it remapped locally. If you put it on Cossie then you're reliant on someone knowing and having the equipment locally.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 09:38 PM
  #20  
zvh's Avatar
zvh
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 3
Default

who cant map cossie stuff ????
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 09:46 PM
  #21  
simontrayler's Avatar
simontrayler
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
Default

Who can't map cossie stuff... Or who can map cossie stuff properly and make full use of all it's functions! I thought the same as you, cossie management is old, dated, any muppet can map it, then I was educated by Karl @ NMS!

Cossie used on its basic functions is, as you say easy, but then not do great... If used properly by an operator who really knows their way around it, it's brilliant! There are very few who REALLY know how to use it to its full extent!! Karl @ NMS, Mark Shead, Harvey Gibbs are the go to guys for this stuff (as I was told!). Anyone else is just tip toeing around the basic functionality.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 11:54 PM
  #22  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Let's not forget this lad is in the Canada too so there isn't many Cossie specialists on hand!

Last edited by DazC; Jan 19, 2013 at 08:42 AM. Reason: Spelling fail!!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 12:03 AM
  #23  
simontrayler's Avatar
simontrayler
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Hertfordshire
Default

Exactly Daz. Some use Omex, Emerald, even Gotech if you have to! Anything aftermarket and he'll have more of a chance of finding someone who can map it. Your not limiting yourself to having to find a good Ford specific tuner/mapper that way
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 08:47 AM
  #24  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Reason why I suggested Omex is it's made by GEMS from what I remember and other manufacturers ECUs are also based on the same ECU platform and use a near identical calibration interface (software). I think AEM which are reasonably big in the US are one of the ECUs based on the same platform.

Plus it's dead simple to get your head round so any mapper will be able to adapt within 20 mins on browsing the software. Software is also free to download and all you need is an RS232 lead.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 08:50 AM
  #25  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

I may be wrong about the AEM ECU but I do recall an ECU with a 3 letter name being based around the GEMS/OMEX platform of ECUs. It's been a while!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 09:08 AM
  #26  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

After a bit of digging it appears that the AEM and GEMS software are near identical where as the Omex software is still in the style of the old GEMS software so I could have been right about the AEM ECU after all.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 11:41 AM
  #27  
Beach's Avatar
Beach
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 24
From: Belper
Default

Originally Posted by simontrayler
Who can't map cossie stuff... Or who can map cossie stuff properly and make full use of all it's functions! I thought the same as you, cossie management is old, dated, any muppet can map it, then I was educated by Karl @ NMS!

Cossie used on its basic functions is, as you say easy, but then not do great... If used properly by an operator who really knows their way around it, it's brilliant! There are very few who REALLY know how to use it to its full extent!! Karl @ NMS, Mark Shead, Harvey Gibbs are the go to guys for this stuff (as I was told!). Anyone else is just tip toeing around the basic functionality.
Something i have also recently learnt from Karl, there is far more to the old Webber stuff than meets the eye. Its just knowing how to get it to do what you require!! Very few people can actually use it propperly!

The way i see it with propper builds for power the reliability tends to come, when i fit my low mileage mk2 rs box im pretty sure it wont need a change ever again. Brand fire new engine block, again with this there is far more reliability, as is with everything as we work through these things we make them far more reliable. My RST used to break quite a lot at 190 bhp but i was 19 and drove it hard as an every day car!

At the end of then day you have to ask yourself is any car thats 20 years old going to be reliable once you start upping the power level ? We simply have to work around the issues we find, some have few issues some have many.......
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 12:11 PM
  #28  
luke19790_3's Avatar
luke19790_3
.
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 7
From: Hampshire
Default

Mk2 RS box? from a focus?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 05:25 PM
  #29  
phil_rs's Avatar
phil_rs
yam yammer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 3
From: Stourbridge, West Mids
Default

My advice? Buy a car that has already had a fortune spent on it in all the right areas.. will save you a lot of time, hassle and money in the long run
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 05:47 PM
  #30  
Joe91's Avatar
Joe91
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Exmouth
Default

Yes Luke a mk2 box

NMS are doing them for cvh engines, well they were designing it last time I spoke to them, not sure how far they are with it though.

Joe
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 06:39 AM
  #31  
Beach's Avatar
Beach
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 24
From: Belper
Default

Originally Posted by luke19790_3
Mk2 RS box? from a focus?
Yes mate, the box itself is rated at 400 ft/lb of torque on a car that weighs around 1600 kg and will probably be designed to do an average of 100k.

Couple that to a car that produces 300-400 bhp and simular torque figures and you have youeself one very reliable setup as the Escort weighs a little 950kg ish.

Its not an easy conversion and will more than likey cost the earth but my opinions are that ill do it once and do it right. Not messing about with this one.

Watch this space
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 06:46 AM
  #32  
gus's Avatar
gus
10K+ Poster!!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,507
Likes: 11
From: essex
Default

keep me posted on this box dude
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 07:01 AM
  #33  
Beach's Avatar
Beach
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 24
From: Belper
Default

Originally Posted by gus
keep me posted on this box dude
Its a huge conversion in terms of custom bits and bobs but im told that the ratios are very close to that of a standard rs turbo with the 3.827 final drive (think thats the number lol) obviously the 6th gear is a little taller but with the right engine 180 should be possible. Also having the 6th gear will be nice for cruising to shows and such.

My box at 500 with shafts is a bargain Over the moon about that one.

Need a focus gear cable and selector now too, new clutch, flywheel, driveshafts etc but im pretty sure it will be a fit and forget item.

There will be 3 of us running with this setup all with new engines too!!

Like a kid in a toy shop at the moment its great
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
Oct 10, 2023 06:52 PM
phil51
Ford Focus Diesel
1
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
Iain Mac
General Car Related Discussion.
7
Sep 30, 2015 09:39 PM
dojj
General Car Related Discussion.
2
Sep 29, 2015 10:32 PM
deathrider666
Technical help Q & A
3
Sep 28, 2015 06:12 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56 PM.