Ford Escort RS Cosworth This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Cosworth.

My New Spec...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2008, 07:54 PM
  #121  
Martin-Hadland
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
 
Martin-Hadland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 119 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yeti Racing
Great post Karl, just one question If I may...............

What would the losses be NOT having solid lifters fitted to a NMS modded head ?
Jason,

I thought we were going solid lifters on your engine??

Regarding the hydraulic v solid lifter thing...

I have been running solid lifters on most of my 500 + Hp engines for years (and have be ridiculed for doing so) but until you have tried it please don't knock it, it IS the way to go!!

Karl, you give too much away

Martin.
Old 09-04-2008, 08:03 PM
  #122  
Bullett
10K+ Poster!!

iTrader: (2)
 
Bullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: essex an proud
Posts: 11,951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Yes it is mate

Old 09-04-2008, 08:05 PM
  #123  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
So have you tested on same spec cams, but solid lifter spec?

edited my reply Dan....

I read it wrong.
Old 09-04-2008, 08:06 PM
  #124  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Jason,

I thought we were going solid lifters on your engine??

Regarding the hydraulic v solid lifter thing...

I have been running solid lifters on most of my 500 + Hp engines for years (and have be ridiculed for doing so) but until you have tried it please don't knock it, it IS the way to go!!

Karl, you give too much away

Martin.

do the solids need constant adjusting Martin?
Old 09-04-2008, 08:16 PM
  #125  
Franco
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Franco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Jason,

I thought we were going solid lifters on your engine??
Looking at my choices, will chat to you before i decide!

Don't forget the LS2! I've checked the dude out and people reckon he's legit!
Old 09-04-2008, 08:29 PM
  #126  
markk
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 10,638
Received 105 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by martin-reyland
Jason,



Regarding the hydraulic v solid lifter thing...

I have been running solid lifters on most of my 500 + Hp engines for years (and have be ridiculed for doing so) but until you have tried it please don't knock it, it IS the way to go!!


Martin.

i agree - my rally engines have run solid lifters for many years, for other reasons than just the power abilities.
Old 09-04-2008, 08:44 PM
  #127  
CossieRich
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
 
CossieRich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 17,169
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

awesome read. Nice input Karlos
Old 10-04-2008, 08:49 AM
  #128  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I agree that any engine that is going to revved consistantly beyond 7500rpm SHOULD have solid lifters for the reasons stated. However, if an engine is going to be rev limited to 7250, then I see no reason to have them. However, I would listen to what my engine builder wanted in the engine after I explained how the car would be used. My 180mph 500bhp engine and Paul's engine are on hydraulics. However, for top speed runs, I personally would consider solid lifters essential.

Euan,
Just read Chip's comments regarding YUMs top speed run on that thread. When you hold the engine at high rpm for a long distance, the lifters get hammered that much, that they pump all the oil out of them . You can tell when this happens, as the valve gear suddenly goes all rattley at the end of the run. What effect this has on the engine is that the valve opening / closing duration goes to rat-shit, leading to a loss of power until the lifters pump back up again. It doesn't cause any detrimental damage (although the VE goes haywire to what it was mapped to, so the car can run very rich), but does increase the wear and tear on the valve train.

Running solid lifters negates this, but they become a servicable item and should be shimmed every 6-10,000 miles (or when the top end noise dictates it is time to do so).
Old 10-04-2008, 11:12 AM
  #129  
Karl
Norris Motorsport
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Martin,

Edited to remove some technical content.
Old 10-04-2008, 11:31 AM
  #130  
JamesH
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (21)
 
JamesH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
Posts: 10,807
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Should back pressure not be measured just after the turbine housing Karl?
Old 10-04-2008, 05:02 PM
  #131  
RWD_cossie_wil
10K+ Poster!!

iTrader: (9)
 
RWD_cossie_wil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: birmingham west mids
Posts: 11,919
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James90RS
Should back pressure not be measured just after the turbine housing Karl?
No, because there is no restriction bar the exhaust from there, you are interested in the pressure between the exhaust ports in the head and the entry to the turbine wheel, as if there is more pressure there than boost pressure, how can the engine get rid of the waste gasses from the cylinders? (in very basic terms, and In my interpretation of things ) Don't forget this is a dynamic pressure as well, so even if the engine is doing 7500RPM and the turbo is spinning at 100,000 rpm, the turbine wheel and wastegate can only flow so much gas before reaching choke point, where it cannot physically 'fit' or flow any more gas through the avaliable holes
Old 10-04-2008, 05:44 PM
  #132  
Kelv
Almost there!

iTrader: (4)
 
Kelv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Gatwick (ish)
Posts: 7,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

all this input, i can gladly say im more than happy with what Karl and Martin have put across.

i drove Andys car last night, clocked up a few miles on part throttle and generally got a feeling how the package worked for those mild driving moments and its ability to plod along gracefully and i was very impressed, then gave it a few miles of full throttle, car was perfect - the smooth way it picked up and the way it seemed to grow stronger and stronger as the revs increased - a very well put together engine and a perfect partnership between Martoon and Karl.

im hoping mines going to be a stormer

Last edited by Kelv; 10-04-2008 at 05:45 PM.
Old 10-04-2008, 05:53 PM
  #133  
bigpower
PassionFord Post Troll
 
bigpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Kelv,
It is nice is all area's of driving isnt it!
Old 10-04-2008, 07:46 PM
  #134  
Bullett
10K+ Poster!!

iTrader: (2)
 
Bullett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: essex an proud
Posts: 11,951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Kelv

im hoping mines going to be a stormer

it will be mate.im sure of that
Old 10-04-2008, 09:43 PM
  #135  
JamesH
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (21)
 
JamesH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
Posts: 10,807
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RWD_cossie_wil
No, because there is no restriction bar the exhaust from there, you are interested in the pressure between the exhaust ports in the head and the entry to the turbine wheel, as if there is more pressure there than boost pressure, how can the engine get rid of the waste gasses from the cylinders? (in very basic terms, and In my interpretation of things ) Don't forget this is a dynamic pressure as well, so even if the engine is doing 7500RPM and the turbo is spinning at 100,000 rpm, the turbine wheel and wastegate can only flow so much gas before reaching choke point, where it cannot physically 'fit' or flow any more gas through the avaliable holes
Fair point
Old 10-04-2008, 10:38 PM
  #136  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wonder what the power would be without a restrictive exhaust?
Old 11-04-2008, 06:23 AM
  #137  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rapidcossie
wonder what the power would be without a restrictive exhaust?
Who's engine?


As it would of been good to see the housing test done, with a head, cams and cam timing chosen for power not response.
Old 11-04-2008, 06:29 AM
  #138  
Franco
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Franco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kelv
all this input, i can gladly say im more than happy with what Karl and Martin have put across.

i drove Andys car last night, clocked up a few miles on part throttle and generally got a feeling how the package worked for those mild driving moments and its ability to plod along gracefully and i was very impressed, then gave it a few miles of full throttle, car was perfect - the smooth way it picked up and the way it seemed to grow stronger and stronger as the revs increased - a very well put together engine and a perfect partnership between Martoon and Karl.

im hoping mines going to be a stormer
Can anyone smell something?
Old 11-04-2008, 07:39 AM
  #139  
Mike Rainbird
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
 
Mike Rainbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norwich
Posts: 26,403
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yeti Racing
Can anyone smell something?
Is it an autumnal colour and got something to do with a piece of anatomy on the face?
Old 11-04-2008, 07:45 AM
  #140  
Franco
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Franco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 11,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 11-04-2008, 04:33 PM
  #141  
NEIL A
PassionFord Post Whore!!

iTrader: (6)
 
NEIL A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LEVEN , FIFE
Posts: 5,297
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rapidcossie
wonder what the power would be without a restrictive exhaust?
If i end up with the same turbo as you it will be interesting to see what the power levels are like, at a set boost level with my mongoose compared to your custom exhaust on very similar spec engines.
Old 11-04-2008, 04:52 PM
  #142  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NEIL A
If i end up with the same turbo as you it will be interesting to see what the power levels are like, at a set boost level with my mongoose compared to your custom exhaust on very similar spec engines.
50 bhp is there for the taking with a proper exhaust IMO.
Old 11-04-2008, 05:39 PM
  #143  
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
iTrader: (1)
 
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What size bore you got Euan, 3 ½" or 4"?
Old 11-04-2008, 05:42 PM
  #144  
rapidcossie
10K+ Poster!!
 
rapidcossie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 14,907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Charlie Chalk
What size bore you got Euan, 3 ½" or 4"?

half the exhaust is 4" then its twin 3", rad.
Old 13-04-2008, 07:33 PM
  #145  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

great thread

regarding back pressure - depending on the size of the exhaust system (and number of boxes, bends, length etc), then having the outlet of the external wastegaste returning to the exhaust system will in all likelihood have an increased back pressure over one that vents separately. it is simple physics as more mass flow will be going through the main exhaust system (although there are many factors involved and you would need back to back testing on different 'screamer pipes' to prove it)
Old 15-04-2008, 06:33 AM
  #146  
Fiecos Dan
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fiecos Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: S/E Kent, Thanet
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It will also disturb (sp) the flow if not done correctly, which will also raise the back pressure.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rsjonny
Cars for Sale
1
21-11-2014 10:53 PM
mk6turbo
Cars for Sale
9
07-02-2014 07:48 PM



Quick Reply: My New Spec...



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 PM.