General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Plasma or LCD?? Whats best?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 01:27 PM
  #1  
PhilCook's Avatar
PhilCook
Thread Starter
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: Manchester
Default Plasma or LCD?? Whats best?

Looking to buy a flat screen to be wall mounted, but dont know whether to get plas or LCD??

Ideally, want a 42". I have around £600 to spend, could maybe stretch to £700

is it worth getting 1080? I dont have a blue ray, but might get a PS3 in the future
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #2  
dazoriginal's Avatar
dazoriginal
prodigal son
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 0
From: Scotland....The Shire
Default

lcd for me

plasma burns too much
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #3  
Fil's Avatar
Fil
ELASTIC BAND
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,219
Likes: 98
From: rainham, essex
Default

Take a look at the panasonic viera range, can get a 42" 1080p for under £700 , thats what im after and its the best picture allround IMO for SD and HD you can get, only one better ive looked at / seen is the pioneer kuro one, which is £1800 ish!

panasonic P42S10B with DVB-T £650 ish

panasonic P42G10B with DVB-T and DVB-S ( HD freesat ) for £758 currently at costco so includes 5 yrs warrenty, is what im after if its got Diseqc switching for the satellite part, having a hard time finding this out tho?

Last edited by Fil; Oct 6, 2009 at 01:46 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #4  
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Jeebus
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: Staffordshire, UK
Default

It's all personal choice really, both have their positives and negatives so you need to pop to the shops and have a good look at a few sets. If you want value for money, you won't beat this offer from Richer Sounds at the moment, I just picked myself a set up today, only quickly plugged it in before going back to work but really pleased so far, specs are:

47" LCD
1080p 100hz
80,000:1 contrast
Freesat HD (and freeview) built in
24p mode for blue rays
3 HDMIs and all the other ports you need

and the price... £599 !!!

Here is the link: http://www.richersounds.com/product/...47lf77starstar

Although you might be lucky to get one, I was on the waiting list at my local shop and they have had hundred of calls about it.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
pacwest's Avatar
pacwest
Puller of the Wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Default

LCD won the war.

Plasma is being slowly phased out. You can get a plasma TV cheap these days. No gaping difference, but energy use, picture quality are all in LCD's favour.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #6  
Benc30's Avatar
Benc30
Part of the Furniture
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Default

Id wait for LED tv's far better than LCD
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by pacwest
lcd won the war.

Plasma is being slowly phased out. You can get a plasma tv cheap these days. No gaping difference, but energy use, picture quality are all in lcd's favour.

total bollox!

Go and do some proper research on AVforums or just a quick google would show you...

http://www.plasma-lcd-facts.co.uk/home/

Last edited by Porkie; Oct 6, 2009 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #8  
Mr Whippy's Avatar
Mr Whippy
Oderint dum metuant
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
From: You cant have pie without coolWhip
Default

http://www.play.com/Electronics/Elec...V/Product.html
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #9  
B16JUS's Avatar
B16JUS
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Default

as above really each to there own

i think LCD is better up to about 37" then plasma is better

saying that get yourself down to richer sounds and take a look at them LED tv's they are superb and only about a cm thick

J
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #10  
pacwest's Avatar
pacwest
Puller of the Wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
total bollox!
Have you ever sold commercial grade displays? Ever had to fully research what TV technology to place into a building that has to last 5-10 years? I have. Plasma is not the superior technology.

Plasma is done. LCD is next to be done. LED will then come as mentioned. Then that will be done. What part of evolution is not apparent here?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #11  
RichieST's Avatar
RichieST
15K+ Super Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18,732
Likes: 449
From: Wiltshire
Default

Generally below 42" go for LCD, 42" and above go plasma.

LCD TV's tend to be brighter than a plasma, so I would consider this if using in a bright room, if the room is dark then a plasma may be better. Plasmas have better viewing angles, so if you have chairs to the side of the tv, plasma is more viewable. Plasmas also show better blacks and whites than LCD.

Plasmas use more energy than LCD, and are a lot heavier too, something to consider if wall mounting. However I've got my 50" plasma on a stud wall with no issues at all. I also went from a 1080p 42" up to a 720p 50" and I didn't notice any loss of picture quality through the HD.

However, If i were currently in the market for a new telly, I'd wait a year for LED to come down in price. They are about an inch thick, light as a feather, use a fraction of the energy than LCD or plasma, and the picture quality of them is stunning

Hope that helps!
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 03:54 PM
  #12  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

Originally Posted by pacwest
Have you ever sold commercial grade displays? Ever had to fully research what TV technology to place into a building that has to last 5-10 years? I have. Plasma is not the superior technology.

Plasma is done. LCD is next to be done. LED will then come as mentioned. Then that will be done. What part of evolution is not apparent here?

Fooking idiot

He isn't asking what TV to be put in a building that will be on 24 hours a day for 365 days a year is he?

There are 3 commercial grade 50' NEC LCD's sitting right in front on me right now actually! so yes I do know all about them!


but I am also REALLY into my home cinema and sport... and so in the last 3 years alone I have done alot of research and reading and viewing and have bought a total of flat screen 5 Tvs.... the smallest being 43 and the largest a 60' ALL PLASMAS.

Because they have the best picture, and they can handle fast moving images.

I don't give a fcuk about energy use and how long they will last being on 24 hours a day!

Last edited by Porkie; Oct 6, 2009 at 04:01 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 04:07 PM
  #13  
It's Czech Mate's Avatar
It's Czech Mate
............
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,970
Likes: 103
From: West Mids
Default

As above, at 42 " youre on the cusp of both LCD and Plasma LCD better below this size and plasma generally better above.

Be aware that plasmas tend to give out a lot of heat comparatively so if its to go in a small room you may find it gets hot! as it needs decent ventilation IME
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #14  
pete mcrash's Avatar
pete mcrash
saff is working!!!...atm
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
From: fishburn sex shop...co.durham
Default

plasma.......(panasonic aswell).....i've just had two loan t.v's while mine was getting a board changed and i was SO pleased to get it back....i had a 37" LG lcd..... good picture but "jumpy" so i took it back and they give me a samsung 42" plasma and it was shite...wasn't even good on HD........
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #15  
Moonstone Steve.'s Avatar
Moonstone Steve.
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 11
From: Kent
Default

50 inches of plasma for me, my brother has lcd and says my picture quality is far better than his and he is well into all this kind of crap

Steve
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #16  
Dlatch!'s Avatar
Dlatch!
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 1
From: chorleywood
Default

LED are the future but right now bang for buck plasma is still tops in my book.
panasonic range are all pretty awesome no complaints on mine its been top
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #17  
turbo_3dr_tommy's Avatar
turbo_3dr_tommy
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: Newton Aycliffe
Default

best lcd for your money

http://fwd.five.tv/gadgets/audio-vid...ma/lg-42lh5000

best plasma

http://fwd.five.tv/gadgets/audio-vid...msung-ps50b550

plasma is a bit more expensive but if you wait till the sales you could get a lovely tv
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:38 PM
  #18  
cjwood555's Avatar
cjwood555
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 0
From: Solihull
Default

Personally, I much prefer the better native contrast of a plasma panel and the much reduced smearing compared to LCD's. That said, I often do work for Bang and Olufsen who acheive superb picture quality out of LCD's with some well developed processing. A Beovision 7-32 costs ten times a Samsung or Panasonic 32" LCD though and therefore I wouldn't bother comparing them.

Plasma's these days last for a very very very long time and most have fairly advanced anti-burn features e.g. pixel shift. Commercial displays have benefited from advances in the display technology, power supply development and improved processing density and I wouldn't hesitate to specify one over an LCD even for 24/7 installations - most customers will upgrade well before the display expires!

But back to the topic - given the same input and processing, a plasma display will nearly always out-perform an LCD.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 11:56 PM
  #19  
Paulo P's Avatar
Paulo P
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,530
Likes: 2
From: High Wycombe, Bucks
Default

I did a bit of shopping around viewing different sets before I bought mine and I went for a 50" Panasonic plasma due to the picture quality. LED tv's are great but they weren't available in 50" so I went for the plasma and I love it
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 03:30 AM
  #20  
zetec_paddy's Avatar
zetec_paddy
rookie crabber
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: woking
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
total bollox!

Go and do some proper research on AVforums or just a quick google would show you...

http://www.plasma-lcd-facts.co.uk/home/
i was a tv salesman for 3 years, lcd isnt wat its cracked up to be. if u dnt have hd, and watch most things in non-hd your far better off with a plasma at a larger size. and there good value for money.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 10:15 AM
  #21  
Roscco's Avatar
Roscco
Livin' [H]ard & Fast
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh
Default

Originally Posted by B16JUS
as above really each to there own

i think LCD is better up to about 37" then plasma is better

saying that get yourself down to richer sounds and take a look at them LED tv's they are superb and only about a cm thick

J
Agreed, although i would have taken LCD to about 40-42"

Look at the massive screens..... most are plasma. Could be wrong but remember something about LCD refresh rates not being to clever at bigger sizes... yet.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:13 AM
  #22  
Stu @ M Developments's Avatar
Stu @ M Developments
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28,824
Likes: 95
From: Blackpool, UK Destination: Rev limiter
Default

I did around 5 month of reasearch and product testing before deciding to go panasonic Plasma. I now have 2.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #23  
Graceland's Avatar
Graceland
Team HOTHOT!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,065
Likes: 1
From: Huddersfield Drives: Trains ;)
Default

We have 2 50" plasma TV's (one is mine, one is Adams) - Mine is a Philips that I got 2 years ago, superb and has done everything I asked apart from PS3 connectivity.

Adam has just bought a Panasonic 50" Vierra - Excellent telly, but the image quality appears to be a little down compared to my old Philips. That said, if Adam wsn't tight and got a Virgin HD input going to the screen then the image would be better IMHO but he only bought it for use with the Wii and PC so

Last edited by Graceland; Oct 7, 2009 at 11:19 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #24  
Oranoco's Avatar
Oranoco
Professional Waffler
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,425
Likes: 41
From: HertFORDshire
Default

I went away and did loads of poking about and there is no way I would bother with an LCD set. Half of what I watch isn't HD and the LCD's just seem to almost hang with some of the images leaving a somewhat glitchy picture.

I opted for a Panasonic 42" plasma and I don't regret it one jot. It's not a top drawer model by any stretch but when I looked at it alongside other sets it gave by far a superior picture. It even got the 5 star What Hi-Fi award.

Best bit was it was under £600 through Amazon
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #25  
john's Avatar
john
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 0
From: There
Default

Originally Posted by Benc30
Id wait for LED tv's far better than LCD
A mate of mine has just bought a 50 inch samsung LED and am impressed.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #26  
Kam B's Avatar
Kam B
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,040
Likes: 11
From: SLOUGH INIT BRUV!!?
Default

iv got the new samsung led tv paired with sky HD and shit me its absolutely stunning, air weighs more than that telly and its so slim too

very happy with it and glad i bought that than the other types of screens

buy LED!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #27  
Fil's Avatar
Fil
ELASTIC BAND
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,219
Likes: 98
From: rainham, essex
Default

Originally Posted by Kam B
iv got the new samsung led tv paired with sky HD and shit me its absolutely stunning, air weighs more than that telly and its so slim too

very happy with it and glad i bought that than the other types of screens

buy LED!

did you read the 1st post? if not here it is again

Originally Posted by PhilCook

Ideally, want a 42". I have around £600 to spend, could maybe stretch to £700
led cost a bit more than that


i
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 12:34 PM
  #28  
PhilCook's Avatar
PhilCook
Thread Starter
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: Manchester
Default

So, all in all, panasonice plasma, 42" is the way forward??

Thanks guys
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #29  
Dannn's Avatar
Dannn
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

There is no doubt in my mind that Plasma TV's give a better picture over LCD especially when watching an SD source. With an SD source the picture feels more "organic" to me where as an LCD has that digital pixelated look to it. To be honest if your only going to be watching SD video and want quality then buy a 32" sony CRT TV from ebay for £20!LOL

Now I actually bought an LCD over the Plasma but this was nothing to do with picture quality. The reasons I did were because LCD's are ligher, generate less heat and of course are more engery efficient. I like TV but the picture quality is not a massive thing for me etc.

Also my gut feeling is that LCD's are probably more reliable than Plasma's but I never bothered to research if this was correct or not - I can't be doing with having to be home for swap out's etc.

As for 1080p or 720p...personally I think 1080p is over rated. Myself and the missus compared some video 1080p/720p, AVI upscaled to 720p on our 46" LCD and there was not enough difference for us to be really bothered.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #30  
Porkie's Avatar
Porkie
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
From: Essex... and Birmingham!
Default

hello mate
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #31  
neal666's Avatar
neal666
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Default

pansonic plasma all the way. g10`s are sensible V10`s are better but more money
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #32  
Dannn's Avatar
Dannn
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Porkie
hello mate
Alright matey !
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #33  
anodised's Avatar
anodised
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Northants
Default

my samsung plasma screen went bang within 15 months so did my mates one

ive got a sony lcd and cant fault it

also so manufacturers starting or have already abandoned plasma screens

from here

http://www.which.co.uk/advice/lcd-vs...-tvs/index.jsp
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #34  
patton16i's Avatar
patton16i
Back in business
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: carlisle
Default

my 42"sony is bong on in the bedroom but the same model 47" in the livingroom isnt as gud so it looks to me the bigger the tv plasma is the way.........still realy good tvs.
but there is a hell of a difference in picture quality the bigger the tv in lcd the poorer the picture i wudnt say a lot tho
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #35  
Fil's Avatar
Fil
ELASTIC BAND
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,219
Likes: 98
From: rainham, essex
Default

Originally Posted by PhilCook
So, all in all, panasonice plasma, 42" is the way forward??

Thanks guys

TX-P42G10 is on offer with M&S for 1 day only (10/11/09) for £657.72

+ 5% cashback via quidco ( free to sign up to, been using it for years )

so £624.83 with free delivery, free installation and a 5 year warranty

http://www.marksandspencer.com/Offer...s=global-top-8


Just ordered one
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #36  
furqall's Avatar
furqall
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Default

50" panasonic plasma here
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Westy
General Car Related Discussion.
55
Dec 22, 2005 06:33 AM
Westy
General Car Related Discussion.
14
Nov 30, 2005 10:18 PM
Westy
General Car Related Discussion.
43
Nov 2, 2005 09:45 PM
Thrush
General Car Related Discussion.
17
Jul 27, 2005 02:33 PM
CosRush
General Car Related Discussion.
0
Feb 18, 2005 01:33 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 AM.