Ford Escort RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Escort Rs Turbo Series 1 and 2.

cvh low comp or zvh low comp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
mercurygreyrsturbo's Avatar
mercurygreyrsturbo
Thread Starter
PassionFord Regular
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: norfolk
Default cvh low comp or zvh low comp?

Hi, i'm gonna do a new bottom end for my s2 rs turbo. i'm having mixed feedback about which 2 go 4. i've been told just to low comp the 1.6 botom end and that would be fine but i've heard u can use the 2 litre zetec from a focus. is this true? i'm running about 190bhp from a harvy gibbs top end, stage 3 turbo, switable boost chip (7 and 15 psi) and front mount intercooler. i was told with a zetec low comp bottom end i could turn the boost up to around 28psi and see around the 250bhp mark. which is the best 2 go for and whats involved? many thanks
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
peteh's Avatar
peteh
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh
Default

id like to know also, maybe low comp 1.9 aswell maybe?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #3  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

hi comp steel 1600
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
gus's Avatar
gus
10K+ Poster!!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,507
Likes: 11
From: essex
Default

you have to cofuse the matter dont ya stu
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #5  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

I have used a bottom end from a Focus RS.
The compression ratio whould have been 6.3:1 if I bolted my head straight on because the Focus RS forged pistons have a large dish in them.
So a large head skim is required (or new pistons) I also fitted longer rods.

I am now up and running but have not been on a rolling road yet!

I had a 1.9 CVH which was running 27psi and 320BHP but this Zetec build feel a lot quicker!(lights the tyres up at 25psi in 4th gear).
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #6  
Turbo-Beal's Avatar
Turbo-Beal
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Default

Theres no subsititute for more cc's
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #7  
MJC's Avatar
MJC
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex/South Yorkshire
Default

In my opinion, if you go down the increase in cc route then you should change the cylinder head to a 16v item also. The most restrictive part of a CVH engine is the head!" the bottom end is plenty strong enough. I'd either stick with the 1600cvh bottom end, lower compression ext or do a full 2litre 16v conversion
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 12, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

To me it is the chalange of the 8 valve head!
I have only started tuning it his year but I do feel there is untapped potenshal.
But I guess we will see?
S.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #9  
NEWTON's Avatar
NEWTON
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
From: under the bonnet
Default

Originally Posted by MJC
In my opinion, if you go down the increase in cc route then you should change the cylinder head to a 16v item also. The most restrictive part of a CVH engine is the head!" the bottom end is plenty strong enough. I'd either stick with the 1600cvh bottom end, lower compression ext or do a full 2litre 16v conversion
1600 head restrictive,thats funny look at stuart collins car 350 bhp,very restrictive......NOT
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 05:13 AM
  #10  
gus's Avatar
gus
10K+ Poster!!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,507
Likes: 11
From: essex
Default

but then look at what he has done to engine to get there



think he is just saying that its alot easier, chealer to do afull zt
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 06:32 AM
  #11  
Badman38's Avatar
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 6
From: the land of oz slough
Default

450bhp is easily Achievable with the right cvh head,

but then gus is right takes a fooking lot of money and custom parts to get there, much easier with a 16v head.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 06:35 AM
  #12  
Badman38's Avatar
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 6
From: the land of oz slough
Default

Originally Posted by sas

I had a 1.9 CVH which was running 27psi and 320BHP but this Zetec build feel a lot quicker!(lights the tyres up at 25psi in 4th gear).
wheels spins in 4th!! what in the dry? then sort out either your your tyres, diff and a decent set of adjustable lower arms.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #13  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

I think you will find that I dont run much negative camber and my toe settings are at at 2mm total toe out, almost no torque steer!
The roads are dry.
You should try 3rd gear, it spins all the way up to 7200rpm rev limit!
I do have proper Avon ZZ3 tyres.
S.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 07:22 AM
  #14  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

u sorted the box yet si
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #15  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

Yip up and running, really really well.
Went for a blast last night - amazingly quick
But I guess it is all talk on my part, we will have to wait a little till we really know how quick.
S.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #16  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

if u want them injectors there in the bk of my car mate
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #17  
Badman38's Avatar
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 6
From: the land of oz slough
Default

Originally Posted by sas
I think you will find that I dont run much negative camber and my toe settings are at at 2mm total toe out, almost no torque steer!
The roads are dry.
You should try 3rd gear, it spins all the way up to 7200rpm rev limit!
I do have proper Avon ZZ3 tyres.
S.

must be a problem with escort turbos alot of them have problems with traction. fiesta rs turbos with more power then yourself dont seam to have these same issues, but it also could be the cvh power delivery.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 12:37 PM
  #18  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #19  
Badman38's Avatar
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 6
From: the land of oz slough
Default

Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
i'm down the pod on sunday with a spare set of driveshafts bloody keep on breaking them, will need to get some practise in to improve on my Previous times, but i have major traction problems at the pod.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 01:22 PM
  #20  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

Are there many more people going on Sunday as I might have to try and get out of work.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #21  
Badman38's Avatar
Badman38
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 6
From: the land of oz slough
Default

Originally Posted by sas
Are there many more people going on Sunday as I might have to try and get out of work.

quite a few from this site and fiestaturbo.com loads camping due to the saturday night special.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #22  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

i mite go
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #23  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
get a need turbo then si ive got a new custom spec turbo cumin , speced to flow 400bhp with minimal lag
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #24  
DazC's Avatar
DazC
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 12,748
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo-Beal
Theres no subsititute for more cc's
There is. It's called a turbo.

1600 CVH for me.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #25  
NEWTON's Avatar
NEWTON
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
From: under the bonnet
Default

Originally Posted by DazC
Originally Posted by Turbo-Beal
Theres no subsititute for more cc's
There is. It's called a turbo.

1600 CVH for me.
1600 cvh for me aswell,its all good
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #26  
sas's Avatar
sas
should be good!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 2
From: fife
Default

Originally Posted by stuart collins
Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
get a need turbo then si ive got a new custom spec turbo cumin , speced to flow 400bhp with minimal lag

Thanks for the info Stu, but mine does boost upto 2.5 bar at the expense of lower rev power.
My inovate lambda guage is getting repaired so not too sure where I stand in the fuel supply staiks?

What clutch are you running?
Si.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 11:51 PM
  #27  
Charlie Chalk's Avatar
Charlie Chalk
Unknown.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50,873
Likes: 1
From: ...
Default

sas Any engine pics?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2006 | 07:38 AM
  #28  
stuart collins's Avatar
stuart collins
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 2
From: shrewsbury shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by sas
Originally Posted by stuart collins
Originally Posted by sas
The wheelbase does have an influance on traction, and yes the Festa does have an advantage.
But the biggest issue on traction is power delivary and due to spec of my turbo unit it only delivers a small amount of boost between 3 and 4 thousand rev so it comes in with quite a force at 4200 so light the tyres up.
I would be going to Santa Pod this Sunday but I now have to work!!
get a need turbo then si ive got a new custom spec turbo cumin , speced to flow 400bhp with minimal lag

Thanks for the info Stu, but mine does boost upto 2.5 bar at the expense of lower rev power.
My inovate lambda guage is getting repaired so not too sure where I stand in the fuel supply staiks?

What clutch are you running?
Si.
standard 1300 cvh
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #29  
MJC's Avatar
MJC
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex/South Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by MJC
In my opinion, if you go down the increase in cc route then you should change the cylinder head to a 16v item also. The most restrictive part of a CVH engine is the head!" the bottom end is plenty strong enough. I'd either stick with the 1600cvh bottom end, lower compression ext or do a full 2litre 16v conversion
1600 head restrictive,thats funny look at stuart collins car 350 bhp,very restrictive......NOT
The 1600 cylinder head is restrictive!" there is obviously lots you can do to improve it and loads of people have achieved very good power figures from it. The point I was trying to make was that in my opinion its only worth while going for extra cc if you use the 16v head to make full use of it. The 1600 bottom end works very well with a mod head so I personally would stick with that.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #30  
turboloon's Avatar
turboloon
PassionFord Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: n.e.scotland
Default

go zvh torque is awsome i had low comp cvh now running 1.8 zvh it defo pulls a lot harder and is a very cost effective mod.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #31  
nigel b's Avatar
nigel b
PassionFord Post Troll
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 22
Default

sas
you must have something wrong as mine puts down all of its power in 2nd,3rd,4th etc..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
Oct 10, 2023 06:52 PM
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
Oct 17, 2021 10:09 AM
timsrs
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
5
Nov 13, 2018 11:48 AM
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
Oct 7, 2015 12:56 PM
Tank Mike
Cars & Parts Wanted.
0
Sep 26, 2015 08:07 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM.