Technical help Q & A Got A technical problem with you car? Keep it in here where the techies hang out and we will try to solve it for you!!

Which parts will reduce the torque on a YB engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27-11-2017, 12:36 PM
  #1  
Mr C
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Leicester LE3
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Which parts will reduce the torque on a YB engine?

If I had a YB 2Ltr engine for circuit use with a Borg Warner EFR 7064 Int WG on L8 ECU, and wanted to reduce the torque curve on the dyno graph so that it didn't have a 300ftlb increase between 3200-4200rpm, what options do I have?
I'm quite happy to have a reduction in torque from the 490 ftlb (it would help traction and gearbox) but keep the 460 BHP top end if its possible.
I'm almost starting from scratch with the engine build and don't want to be changing coolers and pipes and inlets if I change to the slightly larger BW EFR at a later date so what are the pros and cons of fitting these parts below on the above set up, will they add/reduce torque/BHP and affect throttle response etc;
.A/S /Hart inlet cover over a 4x4
.70mm Throttle body over a 63mm 2wd
.using 70mm pipes on a 100mm intercooler over 63mm pipes
.or using a 63mm piped 70mm core intercooler


Is there a method of boost control that I could add that would help flatten the torque curve without changing the ECU and adding £1000s to my bill?
Old 27-11-2017, 12:48 PM
  #2  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Power is Torque X Revs so reducing the torque should reduce the power too but a mapper could play with the boost and move the power around a bit. I have high and low boost with the same turbo as yours, on low boost I get just over 400bhp and it feels massively different to the 469bhp in high boost.

My charts are on my 205 4x4 Cossied Pug thread somewhere.


If you are using the car on track then go for the best intercooler you can afford, it will all work on 63mm and 70mm I am sure.

The Hart inlet does improve flow / power if the map allows.
Old 27-11-2017, 01:59 PM
  #3  
Mad_Mat
New Owner
 
Mad_Mat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Herts Beds Bucks
Posts: 734
Received 93 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

I would have thought some form of clever boost control was in order. Perhaps by gear.
I think in most cases this is handled by the ecu. I'm not sure if the L8 has the ability to allow you to cap boost in lower gears etc.

Last edited by Mad_Mat; 27-11-2017 at 02:17 PM.
Old 03-12-2017, 04:24 PM
  #4  
Mr C
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mr C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Leicester LE3
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've been recommended the A/S inlet and the power I want will be possible on a 63mm piped cooler and 70mm core so good to have it confirmed Caddyshack thank you. I do need to find a suitable large injecter for 550BHP Max but mappable on L8, I've had in confirmed it is possible to reduce boost at set revs using L8 if traction is constantly an issue at certain RPM, good to know, only a few tuners will map this though so Harvey Gibbs or Stu at MSD will be given a call in the future.
Old 03-12-2017, 06:52 PM
  #5  
costina
Live long and prosper!!
iTrader: (1)
 
costina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: area 51
Posts: 9,158
Received 371 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

Adjusting the intake cam can change the torque curve but not as much as you want.

A good tuner should be able to advise better solutions to your problem.
Old 18-12-2017, 10:20 PM
  #6  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,913
Received 258 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

If your ecu is incapable of giving you good boost control options, then something like this would do.

It claims to offer boost by gear, boost by rpm, or boost by vehicle speed. Obviously you need to provide that information to the controller.

gear would need a speed reference.

So in the absence of a suitable speed signal, boost by rpm would allow you to tailor torque/boost by ramping it in.

If you make large changes to your existing boost patterns, you will need all the tuning re-checked to ensure everything is safe.

There are other controllers out there that can offer similar...usually much higher priced though

https://sirhclabs.com/

There are also lots that make similar claims...but fall short feature wise. I've never used this one, but on paper it looks excellent value for money for such a controller.
Old 16-01-2018, 05:37 PM
  #7  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Out of interest why do you want to reduce the increase in torque between them revs?

Is it causing a problem?

I thought that was one of the benefits of using that turbo setup?

Cheers Paul
Old 16-01-2018, 06:03 PM
  #8  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

He wants to help the gearbox longevity and aid traction
Old 16-01-2018, 06:05 PM
  #9  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

What gearbox is he using?

Is traction an issue with the big sudden increase in low down torque?

Cheers Paul
Old 16-01-2018, 06:24 PM
  #10  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
What gearbox is he using?

Is traction an issue with the big sudden increase in low down torque?

Cheers Paul
No it’s not. He is hopping to match what I did with Toby’s engine but he isn’t there yet as far as we know.

Mark
Old 16-01-2018, 07:09 PM
  #11  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I guessed not as you mentioned before it’s not a problem.

What is he hoping to match exactly??

Cheers Paul
Old 16-01-2018, 07:44 PM
  #12  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I guessed not as you mentioned before it’s not a problem.

What is he hoping to match exactly??

Cheers Paul
Toby’s 468hp and 490ftlb.

Mark
Old 16-01-2018, 08:08 PM
  #13  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Toby’s 468hp and 490ftlb.

Mark
469, I think but I may have rounded up.
Old 16-01-2018, 09:21 PM
  #14  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Oh you mean just power?

Choosing that turbo setup is gonna give that big early torque figure so I don’t understand why he wants to decrease it....

Cheers Paul
Old 16-01-2018, 09:28 PM
  #15  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Oh you mean just power?

Choosing that turbo setup is gonna give that big early torque figure so I don’t understand why he wants to decrease it....

Cheers Paul
Same here lol. Just turn the boost down in the areas you don’t want the tq it’s simple.

Mark




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:45 AM.