16v I4's
#1
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16v I4's
Guys does anybody know if there's any difference between the I4 found in the mk6 RS2000 and the I4 in the later (bull ayed frog) granada's?
Just back from a rumage at the scrappy and there's an abundance of I4's there just their in granada's and only one RS is lying about.
What anyone know what their like for turbo charging? no zetec's im afraid
Just back from a rumage at the scrappy and there's an abundance of I4's there just their in granada's and only one RS is lying about.
What anyone know what their like for turbo charging? no zetec's im afraid
#3
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dojj i was thinking the very thing mate but couldn't be too sure fella
the 2.3 was the galaxy motor if im right and its pretty much a bottom end swap i think (correct me if im wrong right enough), i was thinking about the S1 as it cant be a bad base with 150bhp out the box??
dont know about pistons and rods though because the zetec turbo gear can be relativley cheap from the states but i dont know how big they are or I4's
i was gonna sell my S1 but the work situ is changing for the better so i can afford a bit of a resto and a project, just think think this would be different and a bit of a challange
right im off to the gym cos im a skinny coont
the 2.3 was the galaxy motor if im right and its pretty much a bottom end swap i think (correct me if im wrong right enough), i was thinking about the S1 as it cant be a bad base with 150bhp out the box??
dont know about pistons and rods though because the zetec turbo gear can be relativley cheap from the states but i dont know how big they are or I4's
i was gonna sell my S1 but the work situ is changing for the better so i can afford a bit of a resto and a project, just think think this would be different and a bit of a challange
right im off to the gym cos im a skinny coont
#4
RS2000 4x4
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Burbage Embassy, Barwell, Leicestershire
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the 2L in the scorpio is slightly less powerful than the one in the RS2000 i think there might be a difference in the cams aswell as the inlet and exhaust manifolds, the oil dipstick is probably also in a different location for the rwd, as for the 2.3 in the galaxy or scorpio that produces lots more torque than the 2L and a 2.3 galaxy or scorpio using the RS2000 inlet and exhaust and cams with slightly skimmed head to raise the compression ration can see about over 170 in bhp and torque, as for turbo charging it can be done there was a guy that built a 2.3 RS2000 turbo and that made 300bhp at 12psi, also the standard RS2000 engine could probably be used to give 200bhp with standard internals and a low pressure turbo
#5
RS2000 4x4
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Burbage Embassy, Barwell, Leicestershire
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this might help you
http://www.fordscorpio.co.uk/engdata16v.htm
there is also loads of information about the RS2000 engine on www.rs2000-16v.co.uk, loads of conversion have been done over there
http://www.fordscorpio.co.uk/engdata16v.htm
there is also loads of information about the RS2000 engine on www.rs2000-16v.co.uk, loads of conversion have been done over there
#6
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
the engines are basicly the same
but the blocks are tapped for either rwd of fwd applications so if you get one, get one from the correct vehicle
you also need to think about losing the balancer shafts on the fwd cars and bolting on a normal sump, but then you have to find somethng to blank the oil feed hole to the balancers and add a bit of the block where it's been relived for them to fit into
everything else will just bolt into place and you can then use the rs2k cams and away you go
edis is going to be a simple thing to arrange as they fire coil packs in the head rather than seperate so all you need is a driver or megasquirt it (or use the rs2k loom with bigger injectors)
but the blocks are tapped for either rwd of fwd applications so if you get one, get one from the correct vehicle
you also need to think about losing the balancer shafts on the fwd cars and bolting on a normal sump, but then you have to find somethng to blank the oil feed hole to the balancers and add a bit of the block where it's been relived for them to fit into
everything else will just bolt into place and you can then use the rs2k cams and away you go
edis is going to be a simple thing to arrange as they fire coil packs in the head rather than seperate so all you need is a driver or megasquirt it (or use the rs2k loom with bigger injectors)
Trending Topics
#9
PassionFord Post Whore!!
sure the 2.3 galaxy I4 motors are only about 135bhp, just a lot more torquey
as mentioned above, to get the best out of them you need to mix n match the 2 engines, galaxy bottom end with RS2k head i think
as mentioned above, to get the best out of them you need to mix n match the 2 engines, galaxy bottom end with RS2k head i think
#10
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cheers for the link kitchy, interesting reading
Matts16001 your spot on mate he did and im sure they'll be hearing from me if i go ahead
however the body needs a resto first, so ill need to get that underway but thats next year stuff now.
Ill take a poke about on sr2k.com for the mix n match
Matts16001 your spot on mate he did and im sure they'll be hearing from me if i go ahead
however the body needs a resto first, so ill need to get that underway but thats next year stuff now.
Ill take a poke about on sr2k.com for the mix n match
#12
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
quality dojj, any idea what this would be like to drive?
I've got 230bhp on my car now and the boost kinda thumps in so its a hold on tight affair but the tyres do scrabble so im thinking it might be futile trying to get more power down above the 250 mark which is where ill be aiming for
I've got 230bhp on my car now and the boost kinda thumps in so its a hold on tight affair but the tyres do scrabble so im thinking it might be futile trying to get more power down above the 250 mark which is where ill be aiming for
#14
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MD Cos
www.rs2000-16v.org
i'd use a zetec though... purely for the fact i can sell you an st170 head!
i'd use a zetec though... purely for the fact i can sell you an st170 head!
need to do the resto first and that'll be after i go florida in may
#15
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by Lucid
quality dojj, any idea what this would be like to drive?
I've got 230bhp on my car now and the boost kinda thumps in so its a hold on tight affair but the tyres do scrabble so im thinking it might be futile trying to get more power down above the 250 mark which is where ill be aiming for
I've got 230bhp on my car now and the boost kinda thumps in so its a hold on tight affair but the tyres do scrabble so im thinking it might be futile trying to get more power down above the 250 mark which is where ill be aiming for
he bolted a dohc 8 valve twinky head to it and, with a bit of a drop in cr (with the normal set up it's 10.8:1 ) he's got a set of cams in there plus a bit of a chipped ecu and bigger injectors and it makes 170 brake and 170 lb/ft for not much effort
2.0 economy, 2.9V6 power and torque, the best of both worlds and not a bit of forced induction in sight
and it's got a set of sloppy pistons, but more on that from the man himself i think
#17
Live long and prosper!!
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Cawood
sure the 2.3 galaxy I4 motors are only about 135bhp, just a lot more torquey
as mentioned above, to get the best out of them you need to mix n match the 2 engines, galaxy bottom end with RS2k head i think
as mentioned above, to get the best out of them you need to mix n match the 2 engines, galaxy bottom end with RS2k head i think
Kenny from MSD done a RS2000 turbo conversion..
Hmmm Turbo my Galaxy now thats an idea
Paul
#19
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cracking pics mark
couple of questions
what CR did the pistons give mate? and are the manifolds custom jobbies, im suspecting the exh may poss be
and lastly what type of management, im assuming its not a case of whacking something like OFAB on?
Many thanks pal
Pete
(nipping out but ill catch this up when i get back )
couple of questions
what CR did the pistons give mate? and are the manifolds custom jobbies, im suspecting the exh may poss be
and lastly what type of management, im assuming its not a case of whacking something like OFAB on?
Many thanks pal
Pete
(nipping out but ill catch this up when i get back )
#21
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Lucid
cracking pics mark
couple of questions
what CR did the pistons give mate? and are the manifolds custom jobbies, im suspecting the exh may poss be
and lastly what type of management, im assuming its not a case of whacking something like OFAB on?
Many thanks pal
Pete
(nipping out but ill catch this up when i get back )
couple of questions
what CR did the pistons give mate? and are the manifolds custom jobbies, im suspecting the exh may poss be
and lastly what type of management, im assuming its not a case of whacking something like OFAB on?
Many thanks pal
Pete
(nipping out but ill catch this up when i get back )
Around 8.0:1 for the pistons
Manifold was a nissan 200 with a new flange welded on
Emerald management
You REALLY need to log on to RS2000-16v.com and ask for info about Jason/Lord Vaders car
Mark
#22
Mr. Sparkle!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wiltshire - swindon
Posts: 12,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lucid
Originally Posted by Sidewayz
Originally Posted by costina
Turbo my Galaxy now thats an idea
Paul
Paul
#24
Originally Posted by V8 EsCos
2.3 turbo
2.3 8v
169bhp and 171lb ft of torque. Not a lot when measured with a cosworth yardstick, but it's XR V6 power with 2.0 weight and economy.
And yes, as Dojj said - sloppy pistons because I was a muppet and over-honed the bores when I fitted new rings. Sounds like a knackered diesel when it's cold but OK after a few minutes.
It pulls like a train compared to what it did as even a modified 2.0, so can't grumble - especially as it cost me less to build than reconning the 2.0 that was in there already.
#25
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
Lucid
are you thinking of putting it into the S1?
if so, you won't be able to close the bonnet as the engine sits a fair way forward in the engine bay compared to the cvh lump and it sits tall as well
if you remove the vent on the drivers side on the S2's the corner of the cam cover pokes out the top
just in case you were wondering that is, better to let you know before you start building the thing and are about to spanner it into place
are you thinking of putting it into the S1?
if so, you won't be able to close the bonnet as the engine sits a fair way forward in the engine bay compared to the cvh lump and it sits tall as well
if you remove the vent on the drivers side on the S2's the corner of the cam cover pokes out the top
just in case you were wondering that is, better to let you know before you start building the thing and are about to spanner it into place
#26
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SUTTON IN ASHFIELD
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dojj
Lucid
are you thinking of putting it into the S1?
if so, you won't be able to close the bonnet as the engine sits a fair way forward in the engine bay compared to the cvh lump and it sits tall as well
if you remove the vent on the drivers side on the S2's the corner of the cam cover pokes out the top
just in case you were wondering that is, better to let you know before you start building the thing and are about to spanner it into place
are you thinking of putting it into the S1?
if so, you won't be able to close the bonnet as the engine sits a fair way forward in the engine bay compared to the cvh lump and it sits tall as well
if you remove the vent on the drivers side on the S2's the corner of the cam cover pokes out the top
just in case you were wondering that is, better to let you know before you start building the thing and are about to spanner it into place
#28
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by (GRANT)
Originally Posted by dojj
Lucid
are you thinking of putting it into the S1?
if so, you won't be able to close the bonnet as the engine sits a fair way forward in the engine bay compared to the cvh lump and it sits tall as well
if you remove the vent on the drivers side on the S2's the corner of the cam cover pokes out the top
just in case you were wondering that is, better to let you know before you start building the thing and are about to spanner it into place
are you thinking of putting it into the S1?
if so, you won't be able to close the bonnet as the engine sits a fair way forward in the engine bay compared to the cvh lump and it sits tall as well
if you remove the vent on the drivers side on the S2's the corner of the cam cover pokes out the top
just in case you were wondering that is, better to let you know before you start building the thing and are about to spanner it into place
#30
Not sure if you'd need to on a Mk.1/2 Escy - the only reason I took the balancers out and nailed on the Sierra sump onto mine was because I didn't have time to bugger about with the engine going in and out while I modded the 2.3 sump to clear the Sierra steering rack and crossmember.
And, now I know about it, the starter thing with the 2.3 sump / Sierra MT75 box would have been a bitch to find out about at the last minute too.
If Finpower is retaining the type B / N / 9 box he should be able to find a bellhousing with the starter aperture on the correct side so swapping the sump wouldn't be strictly necessary unless the crossmember clearance became an issue.
And, now I know about it, the starter thing with the 2.3 sump / Sierra MT75 box would have been a bitch to find out about at the last minute too.
If Finpower is retaining the type B / N / 9 box he should be able to find a bellhousing with the starter aperture on the correct side so swapping the sump wouldn't be strictly necessary unless the crossmember clearance became an issue.
#31
Can't Find 'em? Grind 'em
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Waterford, Ireland
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RS 2000 had 10.3:1 comp. Scorpio had 9.8:1 and different manifolds. That made them 14ps down. Cams are the same in both but internals have been modified in scorpio for better cooling, strength, etc.
#32
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: viborg (denmark)
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thecrust
Not sure if you'd need to on a Mk.1/2 Escy - the only reason I took the balancers out and nailed on the Sierra sump onto mine was because I didn't have time to bugger about with the engine going in and out while I modded the 2.3 sump to clear the Sierra steering rack and crossmember.
And, now I know about it, the starter thing with the 2.3 sump / Sierra MT75 box would have been a bitch to find out about at the last minute too.
If Finpower is retaining the type B / N / 9 box he should be able to find a bellhousing with the starter aperture on the correct side so swapping the sump wouldn't be strictly necessary unless the crossmember clearance became an issue.
And, now I know about it, the starter thing with the 2.3 sump / Sierra MT75 box would have been a bitch to find out about at the last minute too.
If Finpower is retaining the type B / N / 9 box he should be able to find a bellhousing with the starter aperture on the correct side so swapping the sump wouldn't be strictly necessary unless the crossmember clearance became an issue.
#33
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
you've got different tapped holes and stuff for the mounts on the fwd compared to the rwd from what jim was saying, but without actually comparing the lumps side by side it's impossible to tell
all i know is that the rwd lumps weren't fitable in the fwd rs2k's according to the guys who were trying them
all i know is that the rwd lumps weren't fitable in the fwd rs2k's according to the guys who were trying them
#34
I think the engine mount holes are there, just not necessarily tapped so you'll need to address that.
The dipstick holes are also in different locations, but that's relatively easy to sort out too - block one up, drill another in the right place. Job jobbed.
After that you just need an appropriate sump for your application to clear any crossmember or wot-not.
Other than that, I believe the FWD and RWD engine block castings are the same. There was one guy over on RS2000-16v.net who was putting a scorpio 2.3 block in his RS but haven't been over in a while to see if he got it finished or not.
The dipstick holes are also in different locations, but that's relatively easy to sort out too - block one up, drill another in the right place. Job jobbed.
After that you just need an appropriate sump for your application to clear any crossmember or wot-not.
Other than that, I believe the FWD and RWD engine block castings are the same. There was one guy over on RS2000-16v.net who was putting a scorpio 2.3 block in his RS but haven't been over in a while to see if he got it finished or not.
#35
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: viborg (denmark)
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thecrust
I think the engine mount holes are there, just not necessarily tapped so you'll need to address that.
The dipstick holes are also in different locations, but that's relatively easy to sort out too - block one up, drill another in the right place. Job jobbed.
After that you just need an appropriate sump for your application to clear any crossmember or wot-not.
Other than that, I believe the FWD and RWD engine block castings are the same. There was one guy over on RS2000-16v.net who was putting a scorpio 2.3 block in his RS but haven't been over in a while to see if he got it finished or not.
The dipstick holes are also in different locations, but that's relatively easy to sort out too - block one up, drill another in the right place. Job jobbed.
After that you just need an appropriate sump for your application to clear any crossmember or wot-not.
Other than that, I believe the FWD and RWD engine block castings are the same. There was one guy over on RS2000-16v.net who was putting a scorpio 2.3 block in his RS but haven't been over in a while to see if he got it finished or not.
#36
Got to be good for a giggle Moffe - I discovered that with mine running on Megasquirt it stopped knocking like a shagged diesel for those first few minutes when it's cold.
Got to be that the 2.3 doesn't suit the standard Sierra 2.0 ECU and it's either det or pinking something rotten which is causing that noise on cold.
Under megasquirt it don't do it whatsoever - perhaps my bores aren't fooked after all!
Got to be that the 2.3 doesn't suit the standard Sierra 2.0 ECU and it's either det or pinking something rotten which is causing that noise on cold.
Under megasquirt it don't do it whatsoever - perhaps my bores aren't fooked after all!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
richm
Technical help Q & A
7
08-12-2003 06:40 PM
16v, 23, conversion, dohc, engine, ford, galaxy, gumtreekent, headgasket, i4, passionford, rs2000, rwd, turbo