Low Compression Vs High Compression - Discuss

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 10, 2008 | 07:22 AM

#201

CossieRich

Did Someone Mention TUV

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 17,169

Likes: 3

From: Surrey

Quote:

Originally Posted by theburns1

yes they did, dick head!

thanks for the useful info you have given. I am sure Stavros will come back with something to make you feel like a cock

Oct 12, 2008 | 01:41 AM

#202

theburns1

cannock is a race track

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 527

Likes: 0

From: cannock

y dont people do research before they comment! i'm not wrong, i'm not guessing. and it was the 1980's f1 i'm not talking about modern times.

Oct 12, 2008 | 02:10 AM

#203

msport

Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 65

Likes: 0

From: swe

Quote:

Originally Posted by theburns1

y dont people do research before they comment! i'm not wrong, i'm not guessing. and it was the 1980's f1 i'm not talking about modern times.

You are right, there were different enginespecs. Some were highcomp some low. Honda used high as seen on this link. There are other engines on this site also, 7:1 - hondas 9.4:1 But the most of them were in the 7.5:1 area.

http://www.gurneyflap.com/hondav6turbo.html