DUDE_SWEET_FRST

work safe* (kind of, no nakedness)

opened up my tiscali web page this morning to see this

http://www.tiscali.co.uk/motoring/pitbabes/index.html

TheBishMan

Quality mate....gotta love motoGP birds!!!

DUDE_SWEET_FRST

MAD EVO 4

Stavros

christ alive some right low-rent slappers in some of them events

UK ones are the worst too it seems

Rich_w

"Generally" the girls that do the PR work aren't model material, just moderately good looking. If they were model material, they'd be working as Models

Having said that some of the girls in Redline aren't all that are they

Stavros

Only some of the ones we dont pay

Most the models do PR as well as only the very top ones work/earn enough to live purely off photoshoots, but gotta say, most them ones in that link are pretty bad, tho the photos arnt great which wont help.

Rich_w

How can you suggest that Sophie Howard is fit. Shes just another fat bird with large tits

I love the "interviews" of these "stunners" though. They all sound moronic But I guess its a certain type of person that's attracted to glamour work. May I sugest you guys get a contract with a Professional Model agency, then get some really really good looking girls. Though of course your teenage audience may be dis-appointed these girls dont go topless.

EDIT

Google gives
http://www.models1.co.uk/
http://www.fmmodelagency.com/models.html?girls
http://www.stormmodels.com/index.html

Stavros

Sophie Howard? Dont ever remember her in the mag.
Dont look fat to me?


Interviews? You mean the jokey pisstakey ones we make up ourselfs for every model?

Professional Model Agency? So where you think we find em?
Was Michelle Marsh working in the local B+Q and we asked her to quickly hang em out so we can take a few snappy snaps

Rich_w

Was a while back. But re the agencies. Dont get Glamour, get runway/fashion girls in. Have a look at those 3 links I posted. I'll admit I find it funny that those PR girls aren't all that, but then allow munters in the magazine, just cos they'll go topless.

Stavros

Examples? Like said, only ropey ones ive ever seen arnt the main models, are ones doing stuff for free.
Not even all of em are topless anyhow.

Them links are for supermodels, and unless your gay (i dunno, wouldnt want to make assumptions in this day an age, its a diverse world we live in), SURELY you can see the difference between pretty and sexy?
Supermodels are "pretty" but not many people look at them and think "ooooh, id love to fuck that" as they usually wierd looking sticks, not sexy.

Yaa, lets get Mazumba off the catwalk and into Redline, as a 6foot skinheaded stick figure will just pull in the readers, SEXY AS FUCK



Oh, forgot, bothered

DazC

iTrader: (1)

The Moto GP bird are usually the best!

Rich_w

Not the best example I grant you. Maybe Im a minority, but I find pretty girls, sexy. Sexy isn't about acres of bare flesh. Sexy to me is "implied" A slim girl wearing a well fitting bikini is 100 times better in my eyes than the Sophie Howard pic above. (which is a reasonable photo of her compared to the ones in Redline a year back with her hair black) Same as the top shelf magazines, once its all on display whats left to imagine?

I would say 90% of glamour models have one area that compensates for their whole body. They may have nice tits but a crappy face (seems to be the most popular combo that ) And its that inbalance that makes them unappealing to me.



Michelle Marsh, isnt really that pretty/good looking/sexy. But shes got large tits and seems to be joined at the hip to Lucy Pinder (another plain jane with large tits). So shes in Zoo and Nuts every sodding week. I daresay thats the same target audience as Max/Redline/Fast Car etc etc so it doesn't matter.

Give me Yasmin Le Bon over Pinder or Marsh or Howard any day of the week

I fear we are not going to agree on this

andre_k

iTrader: (2)

so rich, in one thread you have managed to say that you are not attracted to Lucy Pinder, Michelle Marsh, and Sophie Howard, probable 3 of the UK's best looking 'Glamour models'.

Are you gay?





hmmmm... i know which one, or rather two, id rather wake up with...

sophie + lucy pinder... fook pillows, you wouldnt need em!!!

Rich_w

Andrew

You have a 151 BHP, FWD car. Can you not get a real car? Are you Gay?




You're missing my point. I prefer beauty and intelligence over large tits. Thats what I find sexy. YLB was just an example. Not the be all.

But most of the kids wanking over Max/FC/Redline just want tits and arse. Why they buy the car mag when you can just download from the internet I have no idea

Stavros

Who the fuck is that dyke?

Rich_w

Its possibly the worst pic Ive ever seen of Yasmin Le Bon.

Stavros

Looks like shes had a Mastectomy on the one side too.

Looking at Google image search, I wouldnt say thats a bad pic of her, at least she got a nice tan, face has potential, and flat stomach.

In the others she looks just as ropey if not worse.


Different strokes (or dykes ) for different folks

Rich_w

Sorry are you saying you'd rather do



Gary Coleman?

Stavros

Damn straight

DUDE_SWEET_FRST

fords4fun

[quote="Itsmeagain"]Dont look fat to me?

quote]
if thats fat then i love fat birds!

Rich_w

Steve

Was thinking about this thread earlier. Maybe Yasmin Le Bon wasnt the best choice to demonstrate my point.

So if I can change it to Louise Redknapp. Thats the sort of girl thats sexy to me. She doesnt display acres of flesh, she always seems to be a nice person, and shes (relatively) successful. But crucially shes the complete package. Pretty face, nice body. Whereas all the girls above, have 1 thing that defines them, a large chest.

I think more girls aspire to Louise than Sophie. Maybe Im wrong

Some gratitous pics to show my point, these pics are Sexy. If she were butt naked with her flaps on display, if anything it would be less sexy and more erotic, which in a strange way is less appealing. Id rather deal with a sexy girl than some "erotic type" who gets her kecks off really easily. (Oh this is setting me up nicely )

Stavros

Louise Redknapp is fit as fuck, but she dont look any different to half the birds in the mags, most havent even got massive tits anymore, that trend died out at least a yr ago, same as page3 etc etc

And none of ems ever got their flaps out, hell, prob about 1/4 of em arnt even topless.

TBH it seems you arguing about sumat you dont know much about, like the people with their ill-informed asylum seeker arguments etc etc

And yes, Yasmin LeBon was a poor example as shes not fit

Rich_w

Maybe, I've not bought any of the comic style car mags for a long time. Got sick of seeing birds with fake or enormous tits on display Or that Laura bint from the Adult channel whose flat as a pancake and still gets them out. Thats a definete

Well obviously they arent bottomless, 1/4 arent topless still leaves 3/4 top less you numpty. Thats still a majority. Seems to be a trend though that people dont mind seeing the odd girl in the magazine, but when its as many as it is some of them. People stop buying the magazines.

Oh no, all those people that claim Asylum Seekers are evil are spot on. They can see it every week when they go down the Social to scam their benefits, and they see immigrants doing the same thing

Maybe, but we were discussing why Topless and Large tits aren't neccesarily sexier.

I hope you can now understand why you are wrong

Stavros

Im never wrong. ever

Damo V

If we all liked the same thing ... it would be a boring world....


AND to keep it on topic all the female models* / glamour girls* would be sweeping the streets, with the other option filling in the gaps and raking in all the wonga




* Delete as appropriate



Personally, If I'm out and about... I'll use that as an example as pictures of "fit" birds aren't "real life" to me... I will eye up the naturally pretty/fit/sexy looking plain jane bird... I cant be doing with those who strut around made up to high heaven and THINK EVERYONE is looking at them and wants to be with them... cant stand those birds... granted worthy of a poke, lol, but not really my cup of char