620 BHP!
17-06-2005, 01:12 PM
#82
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
So my 438bhp / 375lb ft guess wasn't far off 
. Not that I'm sad or anything and know what power an engine will make with certain hardware 
.
I can't wait to see thw whole car finished off, will be awesome (for pulling 14 year olds, as that is the only use it will see ) 
.
. Not that I'm sad or anything and know what power an engine will make with certain hardware .I can't wait to see thw whole car finished off, will be awesome (for pulling 14 year olds, as that is the only use it will see
) .Awesome mate - Why the low boost at the top end though ? 26 is really low.
Have you sorted a box ?
17-06-2005, 01:19 PM
#83
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Regarding my oil pressures, you're all worrying over nothing, as we ran out of oil so just topped it up with half a litre of super unleaded, which just thinned it out a bit .
.
17-06-2005, 02:40 PM
#87
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Steve,
Of course all the base maps are the same for each engine with the same hardware, as they come from one source
.
Of course all the base maps are the same for each engine with the same hardware, as they come from one source
.Still its a nice flat torque curve that will need some uprated box....its very flat.
The T38 appears to be strong...
17-06-2005, 03:07 PM
#93
Well boost doesnt really mean Zilch as such, as the breathing limits of the engine, the temperature and the boost are what determine airflow.
So its certianly relevant but isnt the B all and End all.
Once of the main things boost shows of course is how bad the standard engine is at consuming air!
So its certianly relevant but isnt the B all and End all.
Once of the main things boost shows of course is how bad the standard engine is at consuming air!
17-06-2005, 03:13 PM
#94
Chip,
The point I was making is that you can't compare two different turbos and the boost they are running and say that the one running more boost must be either more powerful or running similar power to the "bigger one" just because of running BIG boost.
The point I was making is that you can't compare two different turbos and the boost they are running and say that the one running more boost must be either more powerful or running similar power to the "bigger one" just because of running BIG boost
.
17-06-2005, 03:32 PM
#100
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mongsville, wiping Jimbo.'s spastic arse.
Posts: 23,032
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
dingy, If the turbo can make that power at that low boost.. then im happy. less stress 'innit' 
Im currently looking for a quaife Big tooth box
as for same maps.. i can assure you from what i saw Ding, they most certainley arent
Im currently looking for a quaife Big tooth box
as for same maps.. i can assure you from what i saw Ding, they most certainley arent
17-06-2005, 03:36 PM
#101
Dave - was meaning that more boost might make more power Nothing to do with stress 
My t34 ran flat out for 3 years with NO issues lol
Awesome re BOX
Again missing the point re the maps but still glad your happy
Nothing to do with stress My t34 ran flat out for 3 years with NO issues lol
Awesome re BOX
Again missing the point re the maps but still glad your happy
17-06-2005, 03:42 PM
#102
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mongsville, wiping Jimbo.'s spastic arse.
Posts: 23,032
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
dingy, I would have been happy with 410.... 440's a bonus. Thats what i asked for.
what dont you understand about the map then?
what dont you understand about the map then?
17-06-2005, 03:51 PM
#107
Originally Posted by Westy
Originally Posted by dingy
I don't understand nothing ...
17-06-2005, 03:52 PM
#108
Originally Posted by dingy
Originally Posted by Westy
Originally Posted by dingy
I don't understand nothing ...
sorry, didnt realise certain people can post on certain threads
please forgive me Dave, Im not worthy
17-06-2005, 03:53 PM
#109
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mongsville, wiping Jimbo.'s spastic arse.
Posts: 23,032
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
no worries dingston.
Phil, it was mate.. well im assuming it is. The turbo isnt a TT one so yeah pretty pleased with the results
Phil, it was mate.. well im assuming it is. The turbo isnt a TT one so yeah
pretty pleased with the results
17-06-2005, 04:07 PM
#112
Advanced PassionFord User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dave,
Ive just put the engine in my escort back together so it looks as if its driven to England so the AA can take it to Peter.b while I go pick up another car the far side of Blackpool
Ive just put the engine in my escort back together so it looks as if its driven to England so the AA can take it to Peter.b while I go pick up another car the far side of Blackpool
18-06-2005, 09:33 AM
#117
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: essex
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems you have fairly low torque, like my h/c engine Dave.
Mine is 411bhp @ 20psi, but because of the lack of boost, the torque is limited.
Should be a strong trouble free power at that level
Mine is 411bhp @ 20psi, but because of the lack of boost, the torque is limited.
Should be a strong trouble free power at that level
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post