MSD Solid Beam Mounts
#81
14000+ post superhero
I've no idea what's happening here really but won't the bigger standard rubber mount be compressed under load so ends up the same size as the solid mount once fitted ?
#84
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
Dissagree to a point, the alloy or TAS (trans auto sport anyone remember them?) composite ones that I use do hold the beam fine,the bolts line up correctly and the cars I've prepped or seen prepped have been straight when checked.
Granted the OP pic doesn't look right with the plate on an angle where as the pics paul posted do fit exactly as expected.
Steve
#85
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
Paul
Im shocked at your comments based on shit you seem to find on the net
I gave you a lot more credit than this
Im not going to comment anymore as this is the usuall PF posts from people who dont know as much as they think , and the main reason i dont use this site anymore
Im shocked at your comments based on shit you seem to find on the net
I gave you a lot more credit than this
Im not going to comment anymore as this is the usuall PF posts from people who dont know as much as they think , and the main reason i dont use this site anymore
#87
10K+ Poster!!
#89
cossie fan (unluckerly)
#90
PassionFord Post Troll
Has anyone measured to see if the both halves going together into the beam leaves a gap in between them to make up for the height difference?
#91
cossie fan (unluckerly)
When I put the engine back in mine I’ll take mine to work remove the bolt and plate take that measurement and get more detailed pictures
Last edited by ajamesc; 15-04-2018 at 05:08 PM.
#92
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
#93
10K+ Poster!!
I just did mine as tight as I could with a long spanner and no, it wasn’t bent.
#95
10K+ Poster!!
Keep calm guys, this is an interesting debate with lots of great info. We can have differing opinions but it helps everyone.
#96
PassionFord Post Troll
I agree Toby no point slagging each other or trying to make someone look stupid, quite simple, insert an alloy bush into the rear beam and measure the overall height and compare to the height of a poly bush/standard bush then case closed. No need for 3 pages of nonsense.
#97
Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
With homologation it will stipulate where mounting has to be I.E turrets axle wheelbase and track ect but there wont be things like fixing plates listed and seeing as there were several teams building cars they would differ from others and its still the same today . And Paul s by the looks of your pics thats a group a rally beam not a circuit car beam
#99
PassionFord Post Troll
#100
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (8)
As I stated all along, its not about the current owners, its about the cars with me.
Having done some more research and also now had it confirmed by an independent RS500 expert, I wanted to rectify a statement I made on this thread about Pauls Ringhausen LUI RS500 but unfortunately someone on passionford has decided to censor the debate and removed all my associated posts!
Rather than bring it up again, to the very few people what would have read my statement at the time, I seek to now confirm that I had in fact mixed Pauls car up with its identical sister Ringhausen RS500.
For that I apologise, it was a genuine error based on what happened to the sister car at the time and its subsequent replacement.
All the other information I provided about the spec of Group A RS500s in general and their components I still stand by, however if I later find I have been incorrect on any of that I will also rectify such information.
I am a neutral party in relation to these cars, have no axe to grind with anyone, I just like facts and not conjecture, and if proved wrong will happily acknowledge such.
I do not agree with one sided censorship in a debate, so have no plans to keep posting anymore on this matter on passionford so I suggest interested parties also do their own independent research.
Having done some more research and also now had it confirmed by an independent RS500 expert, I wanted to rectify a statement I made on this thread about Pauls Ringhausen LUI RS500 but unfortunately someone on passionford has decided to censor the debate and removed all my associated posts!
Rather than bring it up again, to the very few people what would have read my statement at the time, I seek to now confirm that I had in fact mixed Pauls car up with its identical sister Ringhausen RS500.
For that I apologise, it was a genuine error based on what happened to the sister car at the time and its subsequent replacement.
All the other information I provided about the spec of Group A RS500s in general and their components I still stand by, however if I later find I have been incorrect on any of that I will also rectify such information.
I am a neutral party in relation to these cars, have no axe to grind with anyone, I just like facts and not conjecture, and if proved wrong will happily acknowledge such.
I do not agree with one sided censorship in a debate, so have no plans to keep posting anymore on this matter on passionford so I suggest interested parties also do their own independent research.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SMILER258
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
36
28-09-2015 09:04 AM
DavidK
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
1
27-09-2015 02:55 PM