YOUR ideal spec for a 500bhp YB?
#81
cossie fan (unluckerly)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Like I said every one will have there own opinion and rate what they have experienced!
I went in a very well known 500bhp ish car with a t4 then again in the same car when it was 500bhp ish on one of the first gt series turbo set ups and the difference was night and day the two did not compare at all
I went in a very well known 500bhp ish car with a t4 then again in the same car when it was 500bhp ish on one of the first gt series turbo set ups and the difference was night and day the two did not compare at all
#82
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Like I said every one will have there own opinion and rate what they have experienced!
I went in a very well known 500bhp ish car with a t4 then again in the same car when it was 500bhp ish on one of the first gt series turbo set ups and the difference was night and day the two did not compare at all
I went in a very well known 500bhp ish car with a t4 then again in the same car when it was 500bhp ish on one of the first gt series turbo set ups and the difference was night and day the two did not compare at all
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#83
10K+ Poster!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All fine and well moving with the times but it is expensive and for most people not worth the extra money.
A t4 spec motor is still bloody fast, even by today's standards.
A t4 spec motor is still bloody fast, even by today's standards.
#86
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The problem half the time is people who have been in a t4 car are old school 7.2 with a 16/14 timed at 120deg so felt like shit, I can honestly say I prefer my t4 engine to any other engine we've ever done, it's so driveable, silly torque and massive power band.
Mark yes I plan to run it but will no doubt struggle with grip, soon find out
Mark yes I plan to run it but will no doubt struggle with grip, soon find out
![Big Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
#87
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Jim,
What Turbo did you dad use in his Escos??
Does Mike have a T4 setup in his Escort too?
Bottom line is, it all comes down to personal choice of what the person wants, it's a subject like many you'll get many different views, opinions etc.
Go with what YOU want to I'd say to folks, your money
What Turbo did you dad use in his Escos??
Does Mike have a T4 setup in his Escort too?
Bottom line is, it all comes down to personal choice of what the person wants, it's a subject like many you'll get many different views, opinions etc.
Go with what YOU want to I'd say to folks, your money
![Smile](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
#96
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i dont see it as just a case of (what someone fancys) lol
its about what works, what gives the biggest band of power at both ends.
i cant demonstate on a yb as i have no data.
the difference can be night and day literally even from a dyno plot, then theres throttle response which no dyno can measure but it can certainly be felt from the driving seat.
heres is a plot i have to demonstrate 2 turbos that are capable of flowing approx 800 hp max but look at the difference in the curves !
night and day difference one is an old t88, the other a gt40 series on the exact same engine, everything is identical except turbo.
![](http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee41/scooobyslayer/r33dynocomp_zps9e483211.jpg)
that is a comparable example of an old t series turbo against a gt series, the plot speaks for itself imo. then theres the throttle response of twin scroll aswell which is noticably better than open scroll, now stick an efr turbo on there the results would be shocking i think, i shall have some soon
its about what works, what gives the biggest band of power at both ends.
i cant demonstate on a yb as i have no data.
the difference can be night and day literally even from a dyno plot, then theres throttle response which no dyno can measure but it can certainly be felt from the driving seat.
heres is a plot i have to demonstrate 2 turbos that are capable of flowing approx 800 hp max but look at the difference in the curves !
night and day difference one is an old t88, the other a gt40 series on the exact same engine, everything is identical except turbo.
![](http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee41/scooobyslayer/r33dynocomp_zps9e483211.jpg)
that is a comparable example of an old t series turbo against a gt series, the plot speaks for itself imo. then theres the throttle response of twin scroll aswell which is noticably better than open scroll, now stick an efr turbo on there the results would be shocking i think, i shall have some soon
![Wink](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
#105
15000
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Horsham, West Sussex
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#106
15000
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Horsham, West Sussex
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Its a 2wd escort and is mad on the road
#107
10K+ Poster!!
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/pf_gold_member.png)
#109
10K+ Poster!!
![](https://passionford.com/forum/images/pf_gold_member.png)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Could you explain a bit more on how to differentiate the two as I would like toad understand this more....no picking an argument or trying to be clever...I really do want to know.
To me lag is put your foot down and then wait for the power....ie waiting for spool up or taking time for the turbo to come in....haven't a clue on boost threshold but seems to be how the engine stays on boost?
To me lag is put your foot down and then wait for the power....ie waiting for spool up or taking time for the turbo to come in....haven't a clue on boost threshold but seems to be how the engine stays on boost?
#111
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I class that as a superb graph, excellant torque over a massive spread or revs, worth so much more than chasing big hp when it comes to enjoying the drive.
I wish I could find some of the posts from 10 years or so ago when I was running compression ratios in the late 8's and late 9's:1 when everyone was telling me you cant do it.
MSD was mapping my high comp engines so long ago, yet now aday s you struggle to find anyone wanting to have an engine at less than 8:1.
#112
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I class that as a superb graph, excellant torque over a massive spread or revs, worth so much more than chasing big hp when it comes to enjoying the drive.
I wish I could find some of the posts from 10 years or so ago when I was running compression ratios in the late 8's and late 9's:1 when everyone was telling me you cant do it.
MSD was mapping my high comp engines so long ago, yet now aday s you struggle to find anyone wanting to have an engine at less than 8:1.
I wish I could find some of the posts from 10 years or so ago when I was running compression ratios in the late 8's and late 9's:1 when everyone was telling me you cant do it.
MSD was mapping my high comp engines so long ago, yet now aday s you struggle to find anyone wanting to have an engine at less than 8:1.
it looks good 3500 - 5500 rpm, but how good is 5500 - 7500 rpm ?
#113
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I class that as a superb graph, excellant torque over a massive spread or revs, worth so much more than chasing big hp when it comes to enjoying the drive.
I wish I could find some of the posts from 10 years or so ago when I was running compression ratios in the late 8's and late 9's:1 when everyone was telling me you cant do it.
MSD was mapping my high comp engines so long ago, yet now aday s you struggle to find anyone wanting to have an engine at less than 8:1.
I wish I could find some of the posts from 10 years or so ago when I was running compression ratios in the late 8's and late 9's:1 when everyone was telling me you cant do it.
MSD was mapping my high comp engines so long ago, yet now aday s you struggle to find anyone wanting to have an engine at less than 8:1.
#114
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
was that on the internal gate or external ?
#117
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lovely and responsive fella but peaks at 5900rpm mine pulls from 3800 full boost and peaks power at 7-7.5 and drops fractionally at 8k so a massive power band
The t4 is old hat no denying and there are much better turbos I completely agree but there is nothing like a old school Yb in a 2wd saff I wouldn't change mine for the world!![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
The t4 is old hat no denying and there are much better turbos I completely agree but there is nothing like a old school Yb in a 2wd saff I wouldn't change mine for the world!
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
iirc rod ran his car after engine dyno on dd rollers and the boost threshold was alot higher and made alot less power, imo for that result on a dd dyno shows its a hell of a set up imo.
ive had a proper t4 spec a1 rallyesport engine, rs 500 inlet 8 greens etc in a 3 door and it was awesome in 2001 but not by todays standards is it imo.
if the bits come on a car then fine but to build a car and having to buy all the parts i dont see the logic on spending money on a t4 when much better is now available.
#119
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#120
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
thats alittle unfair jimbo, its still holding onto over 500 hp above 7000 rpm, i highly doubt you will pull full boost at anywhere near 3800 rpm on a dd rolling road.
iirc rod ran his car after engine dyno on dd rollers and the boost threshold was alot higher and made alot less power, imo for that result on a dd dyno shows its a hell of a set up imo.
ive had a proper t4 spec a1 rallyesport engine, rs 500 inlet 8 greens etc in a 3 door and it was awesome in 2001 but not by todays standards is it imo.
if the bits come on a car then fine but to build a car and having to buy all the parts i dont see the logic on spending money on a t4 when much better is now available.
iirc rod ran his car after engine dyno on dd rollers and the boost threshold was alot higher and made alot less power, imo for that result on a dd dyno shows its a hell of a set up imo.
ive had a proper t4 spec a1 rallyesport engine, rs 500 inlet 8 greens etc in a 3 door and it was awesome in 2001 but not by todays standards is it imo.
if the bits come on a car then fine but to build a car and having to buy all the parts i dont see the logic on spending money on a t4 when much better is now available.
I'm personally not interested in rolling roads, I don't beleive power figures (my escort at "265lbft" was 25 high or our customers 700bhp that gave 775
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
That may sound a bit harsh and I'm sure some may not like it but this thread is all about opinions, and that's my opinion, also my opinion is my t4 powered car is incredible it has a 4000 rpm massively useable rev range where a responsive engine normally has 3500rpm (gains bottom end but dies top) and I wouldn't change it for love nor money and I have driven and mapped multiple different spec 500 engines including other tuners
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post