General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Why build 500+ bhp cossies?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17-02-2013, 10:29 PM
  #1  
escortcabby
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
 
escortcabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: birmingham
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why build 500+ bhp cossies?

Had a good chat with my mate today who had a 390bhp saff cossie that he LOVED to drive,now after 2 years its fully built and made 517bhp BUT although its FAST he says it doesnt sound and drive like it used to,says it was a much better car at 390bhp and said it feels punchier now but it built speed quicker at 390bhp..has lag now to so really have to work the revs high which he didnt like,therefore SOLD it to hes cousin who now has it locked away..
Why have a 500bhp cosworth for street use if its not going to perform any better than a 350-400 properly driven one? Also i seen a 450bhp cosworth get its arse whooped by a 340 bhp stage 3 t34 saff at the pod last year.. Now i know a 500bhp cossie would obviously be immense but why is it that a near 400bhp saff would perform near enough the same if not quicker as a road car? why do people build 500bhp cossies top end power when in real situations that power never gets used as half the time it would probably be OFF boost.. very interesting imo .. so whos done it? whats it performed like ? just curious not having a dig
Old 17-02-2013, 10:41 PM
  #2  
james kiely
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (5)
 
james kiely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: god knows
Posts: 12,877
Received 424 Likes on 399 Posts
Default

this is the million dollar question mate .

stage 3 cossies in around the 380/400 mark are the best most reliable and affordable you can have .and the quickest in everyday situations .
Old 17-02-2013, 10:44 PM
  #3  
escortcabby
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
 
escortcabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: birmingham
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by james kiely
this is the million dollar question mate .

stage 3 cossies in around the 380/400 mark are the best most reliable and affordable you can have .and the quickest in everyday situations .
exactly! My mate said hes t34 390bhp setup was alot quicker than hes new set up. He said it was the biggest mistake he made with the car and said if he raced hes old set up the old set up would have dusted him 90percent of the time on the road.
Old 17-02-2013, 10:49 PM
  #4  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,793
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

I had a 350bhp set up before my 500bhp gt30 on autronics set up the 350 set up was shit slow against how it is now in all ways! As it is now running and holding 2.6 bar it pulls like fuck and is really really fast!
Old 17-02-2013, 10:52 PM
  #5  
escortcabby
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
 
escortcabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: birmingham
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajamesc
I had a 350bhp set up before my 500bhp gt30 on autronics set up the 350 set up was shit slow against how it is now in all ways! As it is now running and holding 2.6 bar it pulls like fuck and is really really fast!
2.6bar on a gt30 now that must be a handfull! have you run it up the strip?
Old 17-02-2013, 10:57 PM
  #6  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,793
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by escortcabby
2.6bar on a gt30 now that must be a handfull! have you run it up the strip?
No never mate not really ever been into the shows and track it's more of a road toy! I'm big into bikes! I have a gsxr1000 that's my main like but before that I had a 98 carb'ed R1 in gear on the move the saff was as quick easy but with 350 never in a million years
Old 17-02-2013, 11:12 PM
  #7  
escortcabby
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
 
escortcabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: birmingham
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajamesc
No never mate not really ever been into the shows and track it's more of a road toy! I'm big into bikes! I have a gsxr1000 that's my main like but before that I had a 98 carb'ed R1 in gear on the move the saff was as quick easy but with 350 never in a million years
wow,so say if you raced a 380bhp saff how many car lengths you reckon you would pull over a quarter mile?
Old 17-02-2013, 11:14 PM
  #8  
botters
competant bodger
iTrader: (2)
 
botters's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: preston
Posts: 6,234
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

cue rod coming along to tell everyone their cars are slow
Old 17-02-2013, 11:15 PM
  #9  
escortcabby
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
 
escortcabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: birmingham
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by botters
cue rod coming along to tell everyone their cars are slow
id race him today !
Old 17-02-2013, 11:15 PM
  #10  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Mines up to 550bhp now and every evolution of it has got better and better I love the current spec but I wouldn't turn down another 50 horses.
Rich
Old 17-02-2013, 11:20 PM
  #11  
escortcabby
BANNED
BANNED
Thread Starter
 
escortcabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: birmingham
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sonic Boom
Mines up to 550bhp now and every evolution of it has got better and better I love the current spec but I wouldn't turn down another 50 horses.
Rich
i seen your car in action at a drag strip mate it was mentally fast and sounded ace!
Old 17-02-2013, 11:45 PM
  #12  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by escortcabby
i seen your car in action at a drag strip mate it was mentally fast and sounded ace!
Cheers mate managed a 11.9 @ 128mph with a slippy clutch
Rich
Old 18-02-2013, 04:27 AM
  #13  
Glenn_
Glennvestite
iTrader: (1)
 
Glenn_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darlington county durham
Posts: 62,761
Received 1,044 Likes on 998 Posts
Default

I wouldnt mind a go in a 500bhp cossie.I think mines fast on greens with a standard T3 lol.
Old 18-02-2013, 08:27 AM
  #14  
Ginge !
just finding my feet
 
Ginge !'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Im behind you
Posts: 41,046
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It's just lie people who take drugs, chasing that first few highs and trying to get better than that so raising the game

I'm sure a well speced and set up car can have a decent power and rather than fuck all the fuck me were off but run out of road

I hated the leggy feel of my cossie but love the feel of my Impreza but need more power to have the same shove just at the rpm of my impreza

Then when that happens tg gearbox will need changing and then I'll get bored of the power and I'm back chasing that high
Old 18-02-2013, 08:50 AM
  #15  
Cosnada
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Cosnada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,143
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Why chase horse power when its the torque that really counts.
Old 18-02-2013, 08:53 AM
  #16  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cosnada
Why chase horse power when its the torque that really counts.
Both are important
Old 18-02-2013, 08:54 AM
  #17  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Thing is, Turbo's have come on so much now, i.e the Borg Warner ones spool up like T34s and make for a great road car EVEN at 500-600,

Personal choice i guess
Old 18-02-2013, 09:39 AM
  #18  
Kam B
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Kam B's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SLOUGH INIT BRUV!!?
Posts: 5,040
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Interesting thoughts, but i guess quicker spool up time on the turbo and good torque will suit fast road configuration. If you like to go fast in a straight line then having a blast on the motorway would suit 500bhp
Old 18-02-2013, 10:02 AM
  #19  
SmudgerByName
Ford Fanatic
 
SmudgerByName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Solihull
Posts: 517
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I guess it all depends on what the owner is looking for and what it's used for. Yes for some people 350+ BHP is enough and most people would be happy with that but the problem comes when you get used to the power. It becomes mundane and then yoou need a new thrill. Whether or not it's a case of selling and getting something else or improving what you already have (hence the 500+ bhp cars you see)
Old 18-02-2013, 10:08 AM
  #20  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,793
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

All these people who think power full yb's are un reliable laggy and only good for straight line don't have a clue what there on about lol
You have iver simply not been in one or only been in some badly set up torque less heap with a t4 on it and standard brakes and suspension lol
Old 18-02-2013, 10:30 AM
  #21  
Rsmat
300+

iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Staffi
Thing is, Turbo's have come on so much now, i.e the Borg Warner ones spool up like T34s and make for a great road car EVEN at 500-600,

Personal choice i guess



I've looked into the Borg Warner turbos mate and to make then do the numbers ESP on the EVO's you have to push then beyond the capabilities .... Unless going bigger and ruining the spool up of the T34 characteristics ...so still shit for my application so I think
Old 18-02-2013, 10:30 AM
  #22  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Exactly as my post above James, agree totally.
Old 18-02-2013, 10:32 AM
  #23  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rsmat
I've looked into the Borg Warner turbos mate and to make then do the numbers ESP on the EVO's you have to push then beyond the capabilities .... Unless going bigger and ruining the spool up of the T34 characteristics ...so still shit for my application so I think

Mat,
Like i said kid, personal choice, as for pushing turbo's, 36 psi on yours isn't then...
Old 18-02-2013, 10:40 AM
  #24  
lee2cossies
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
lee2cossies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south wales
Posts: 3,020
Received 39 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sonic Boom
Cheers mate managed a 11.9 @ 128mph with a slippy clutch
Rich
Rich have u got a basic run down on your engine spec?
Old 18-02-2013, 10:43 AM
  #25  
Rsmat
300+

iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Staffi
Mat,
Like i said kid, personal choice, as for pushing turbo's, 36 psi on yours isn't then...


Never said it wasn't ..... Just spoke to a few evo boys and they said there shit don't bother ... And my turbos still alive so we will see


And no it isn't ... We will see 38-39 if kept on this turbo and over 40 if I get a different turbo

Last edited by Rsmat; 18-02-2013 at 10:44 AM.
Old 18-02-2013, 11:01 AM
  #26  
cossie4i+
TT T38 Power
iTrader: (15)
 
cossie4i+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Somerset
Posts: 22,368
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Had both and TBH around the 380bhp mark makes for a great all round road car.

500bhp is a great laugh when set up correctly like mine, lags not bad and i also have great torque (over 450lb/ft)

Steve
Old 18-02-2013, 11:04 AM
  #27  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajamesc
All these people who think power full yb's are un reliable laggy and only good for straight line don't have a clue what there on about lol
You have iver simply not been in one or only been in some badly set up torque less heap with a t4 on it and standard brakes and suspension lol
Totally agree mate I use mine for racing if anyone thinks a 3 Door with 200 brake less than mine would keep up on a track twisty or not is dreaming.
Rich
Old 18-02-2013, 11:06 AM
  #28  
Sonic Boom
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (11)
 
Sonic Boom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Solihull near Birmingham
Posts: 5,640
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lee2cossies
Rich have u got a basic run down on your engine spec?
CGI 200 Twin feed Ex-WRC Block
10 Long Studs
Wet Nikasil Liners
Cosworth Racing Short Skirt Pistons 7.9:1 Compression Ratio
Cosworth WRC Long Rods
Mountune/Cosworth Crank
Oil Spray Jets
High Pressure and Flow Oil Pump
Wide Wing Sump with a Blue Sprint Sump Baffle
Big Ported Head 27mm Inlet 27mm Exhaust
Danny @ BlueSprint Super High lift Inlet cam
Standard Exhaust Cam
Hart Inlet Manifold
83lb Siemens Injectors
Tubular Manifold with 52mm primaries
GTX3076r Turbo with Tial .82 SS V-Band Exhaust Housing fitted with air to fluid cooler
100mm Airtec Intercooler
Full 4 Port Breather System with -10 Braided Lines
Remote Oil Filter and Oil Cooler system fitted with -10 Braided Lines
550 BHP & 531 ft/lb Torque

RIch
Old 18-02-2013, 12:01 PM
  #29  
lee2cossies
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (2)
 
lee2cossies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south wales
Posts: 3,020
Received 39 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Thanks, I'v got a gt3076 for my build and trying to decide on spec, aiming for around 500hp. Seen your car at shakespheres county last year and very impressed, the times should drop now u have a supra diff and can go a bit harder off the line?
Old 18-02-2013, 12:35 PM
  #30  
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
 
scoooby slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: st neots cambridgeshire
Posts: 10,211
Received 415 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

lol 2 genuine cars one running 350 hp the other running 500 hp assumeing they are running the power they say they are and built and specced properly once your on boost as long as it stays in boost the 350 hp engine isnt gonna win unless its gonna defy the laws of physics fpmsl

i own a 450 hp r32 and a 660 hp r33 and 0 - 100 mph r32 is 10 seconds, r33 is 8 seconds so far, once its on boost the r33 WILL destroy the r32 no question.
Old 18-02-2013, 02:53 PM
  #31  
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 7,707
Received 237 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by escortcabby
exactly! My mate said hes t34 390bhp setup was alot quicker than hes new set up. He said it was the biggest mistake he made with the car and said if he raced hes old set up the old set up would have dusted him 90percent of the time on the road.

Thats nonsense or he has a crap Spec. The more Power they have the more grunt they have . Have had 330, 400, 500, 640. 700, 840 conversions they just got faster & faster. Admit over 640 they are difficult to contain on the road as high end pick-up gets silly.

Heres what my 700bhp conversion did to a 460bhp Escort & yes he was trying between the tears .
Old 18-02-2013, 03:08 PM
  #32  
BRAMMER
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (23)
 
BRAMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The North
Posts: 9,665
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Mines about the max i'd like it for a 2wd road car on a lower comp, GT3076 engine.
It may not be as quick as some car's out there but it's more than enough, it's mapped right and drives as well at 30 as it does peaking at 36psi - as for stage 3 i hated mine and couldn't wait to get a bigger turbo on
Old 18-02-2013, 03:20 PM
  #33  
james kiely
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (5)
 
james kiely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: god knows
Posts: 12,877
Received 424 Likes on 399 Posts
Default

i think what the op means is the lad didnt get feel the difference was worth all the hassle of going to 500bhp when..........90% .........of the time he felt his old setup was better .

for the everyday car that people dont want to sink 1000,s of pounds into stage 3 gives the best bang for its buck.

how many setups ,engine builds have you had rod ,just because yours got faster/better evertime doesnt mean your previous setup was crap does it
Old 18-02-2013, 03:26 PM
  #34  
H15 FSC
PassionFord Regular
 
H15 FSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Billingham, Teesside
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rod-Tarry
Thats nonsense or he has a crap Spec. The more Power they have the more grunt they have . Have had 330, 400, 500, 640. 700, 840 conversions they just got faster & faster. Admit over 640 they are difficult to contain on the road as high end pick-up gets silly.

Heres what my 700bhp conversion did to a 460bhp Escort & yes he was trying between the tears .
im confused?? what did you do to it???

if you mean you over took a car with 240bhp less than you on a dual carriage way/motorway in a straight line, then well done

now try it down some twisty B roads or track,

what the op is saying is that a low lag 390hp will feel quicker around the streets than a laggy 500+ motor,we are not talking not flat out on a dual carriage way.
Old 18-02-2013, 03:45 PM
  #35  
Fiesta_Jed
Regular Contributor
 
Fiesta_Jed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: scotland
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMO the people that complain that their new big power engine is a turd to drive and their old 3??bhp spec car was faster, do so because they have a badly specd big power engine.

Building a good 3??BHP spec YB isnt difficult, standard engine, T34.63 and lots of boost.

The cams, CR and Turbo all work well together and give a good usable power band.

I imagine that building a 500bhp YB that drives just as good (if not better) is perfectly possible, if you know what your doing.

Ie. The correct cams, turbo, CR and headwork must be chosen.

What most people who try and build a big power engine do is raid the burton power catalog and seek advice from the keyboard tuners, and they end up with a spec like this.

"stage 3" head
Cams that for whatever reason are not suitable for their application
A massive turbo that runs low boost
A CR that they thought sounded good.

Then they wonder why it makes no torque, is laggy and horrible to drive before coming to the conclusion that its the mappers fault

Built correctly a 500bhp car will be faster than a 300bhp car regardless of the road.

Last edited by Fiesta_Jed; 18-02-2013 at 03:48 PM.
Old 18-02-2013, 04:40 PM
  #36  
Rsmat
300+

iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H15 FSC
im confused?? what did you do to it???

if you mean you over took a car with 240bhp less than you on a dual carriage way/motorway in a straight line, then well done

now try it down some twisty B roads or track,

what the op is saying is that a low lag 390hp will feel quicker around the streets than a laggy 500+ motor,we are not talking not flat out on a dual carriage way.


Exactly my argument all the time ... Straight line ... Anyone can go quick in a straight line .
Old 18-02-2013, 04:45 PM
  #37  
Staffi
20K+ Super Poster.
iTrader: (1)
 
Staffi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Don't be nosey
Posts: 21,194
Received 107 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

These threads really make me giggle to be honest, no disrespect to ANYONE who posts on them, BUT the T34 350-400 boys will always say their setup is the best and then yes you've geust it the 500-600 will say theirs are far superior, pretty pointless threads really.

BUT LIKE I SAY, PERSONAL CHOICE.

now let's move on amd talk about fanny's or something
Old 18-02-2013, 04:52 PM
  #38  
JamesH
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (21)
 
JamesH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
Posts: 10,807
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fiesta_Jed
IMO the people that complain that their new big power engine is a turd to drive and their old 3??bhp spec car was faster, do so because they have a badly specd big power engine.

Building a good 3??BHP spec YB isnt difficult, standard engine, T34.63 and lots of boost.

The cams, CR and Turbo all work well together and give a good usable power band.

I imagine that building a 500bhp YB that drives just as good (if not better) is perfectly possible, if you know what your doing.

Ie. The correct cams, turbo, CR and headwork must be chosen.

What most people who try and build a big power engine do is raid the burton power catalog and seek advice from the keyboard tuners, and they end up with a spec like this.

"stage 3" head
Cams that for whatever reason are not suitable for their application
A massive turbo that runs low boost
A CR that they thought sounded good.

Then they wonder why it makes no torque, is laggy and horrible to drive before coming to the conclusion that its the mappers fault

Built correctly a 500bhp car will be faster than a 300bhp car regardless of the road.
Exactly what I couldn't be bothered to write!
Old 18-02-2013, 04:52 PM
  #39  
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
 
scoooby slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: st neots cambridgeshire
Posts: 10,211
Received 415 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H15 FSC
im confused?? what did you do to it???

if you mean you over took a car with 240bhp less than you on a dual carriage way/motorway in a straight line, then well done

now try it down some twisty B roads or track,

what the op is saying is that a low lag 390hp will feel quicker around the streets than a laggy 500+ motor,we are not talking not flat out on a dual carriage way.

read the post the op said about getting wooped at pod with 150 hp less, bad start or not all that extra power means much faster acceleration and to beat it in a drag race well it wouldnt happen all things being equal, that video shows 240 hp more and it destroys it its very relevant imo.
Old 18-02-2013, 04:56 PM
  #40  
Rsmat
300+

iTrader: (2)
 
Rsmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: either at work or on way :)
Posts: 27,262
Received 585 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Staffi
These threads really make me giggle to be honest, no disrespect to ANYONE who posts on them, BUT the T34 350-400 boys will always say their setup is the best and then yes you've geust it the 500-600 will say theirs are far superior, pretty pointless threads really.

BUT LIKE I SAY, PERSONAL CHOICE.

now let's move on amd talk about fanny's or something



Buy a Cossie then join the conversation


Quick Reply: Why build 500+ bhp cossies?



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.