crumpet

which do you think would be the quickest and most fun out of the two?

thebigmacmoomin

I would say the Williams would be more fun but the Clio 200 quicker.

danneth

clio 200's arent that quick really id go for the williams

Twellsie

iTrader: (1)

seems an odd comparisson given the price differance, but i would imagine they would be very evenly matched, i'd go for a 172 or 182

pee vee

tell you what.. them old williams' are a pretty impressive old school hot hatch!
can be pretty quick too! I'd say it would be closer between the two than you might initially think..

CaftDunt

Have a gander here. Evo recommend them very highly.

http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evol..._williams.html

cjwood555

I had a play with one when I was in my st170 powered rs replica and it was a dead heat. As far as I know that was a standard car.

Chris

bluntys1rsturbo

id say williams would be more fun but the 200 is a cracking car on a track as well

Sp3no

iTrader: (1)

My brother in law had the 197 and out of the 172 & 182 it was the slowest due to the weight. It never felt that quick so i dont imagine the 200 feels very quick either.

rallycross

When I had a williams 3 and a 182 cup at the same time the Williams was more fun, performance was similar between them, but being a 15 year old renault the williams felt a bit fragile. The new clio200 is heavier than the 182 cup so wouldnt be much quicker (if any), but its a much bigger car better daily driver.

My Williams had a lot done to it - chip, exhaust, induction kit, Ao48's, brakes shocks bushes had all been replaced etc so it was a really good example - a good Williams is a really quick little car, loads of grip, really goes well above 4,000 revs and the seats are nice low unlike the later cars where you feel like you are sitting on top of it rather than in it.

jpscossie

iTrader: (1)

Definitely the Williams, it would be the most fun as well. My 172 Cup is more fun than driving a 200 as well.

rs_traynor

my cousin has a 197 cup its had a remap goes pretty good.