CVH/ZVH power graphs
Trending Topics
31-01-2005, 08:07 PM
#8
Originally Posted by RANJ
zvh wud be sids with amhed spec head i think
cvh -jamie goings/c+b i think
cvh -jamie goings/c+b i think
Ranj, go have a cup of coffee and a sit down, then come back and read the thread.
31-01-2005, 10:11 PM
#11
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.1zvh
T34
22psi
NMS Cam
Std Rods
Calibra Turbo Pistons
288.2bhp @ 5864 still 283 @ 6120 to where the graph cuts off.
265lb/ft @ 5403 still got 240lb/ft at 6120 to where the graph cuts off.
T34
22psi
NMS Cam
Std Rods
Calibra Turbo Pistons
288.2bhp @ 5864 still 283 @ 6120 to where the graph cuts off.
265lb/ft @ 5403 still got 240lb/ft at 6120 to where the graph cuts off.
31-01-2005, 10:54 PM
#13
Originally Posted by Rick
Cheers John. Funny torque curve for a 2.1 that
Also, the RR operator will normally abort the run where the car stops producing power, which is why it ends at 6120.
Hope I don't sound too critical!!
01-02-2005, 12:11 AM
#15
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
only one i have i'm afraid 
low compression 1.6 cvh, worked head , hybrid t2 18psi , chargecooler
228 bhp @ 5338 rpm
314nm @ 4896 rpm ( about 230 lb/ft )
low compression 1.6 cvh, worked head , hybrid t2 18psi , chargecooler
228 bhp @ 5338 rpm
314nm @ 4896 rpm ( about 230 lb/ft )
01-02-2005, 01:19 AM
#21
DEYTUKURJERBS
well many many many (ie 6 or so!) i remember a 1.9 or 2litre bottomended white S2 around that had a RR graph for about that power, but not seen it for years.
cant think of a Red S2 with that kinda power, but thats a fuckload of power for a FWD
cant think of a Red S2 with that kinda power, but thats a fuckload of power for a FWD
01-02-2005, 05:50 AM
#24
1618cc CVH, stage 2 head, newman cam, solid lifters, piper vernier, wire ringed block, lowered compression, ARP conrod Bolts, AVA ecu, AVA modified fuel system, AVA high flow tubular manifold, T28 turbo, 360 bearing, reshaped front pipe, AVA Large capacity intercooler, magnex exhaust.
205.1 @ the wheels
01-02-2005, 06:29 AM
#25
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Far too many people generalise.....point being I have seen some seriously pathetic excuses of ZVH engines as I have Zetec and CVH. There have been some CVH engines that have been properly engineered and produced results that would blow the doors of most ZVH or Zetec Turbo's however CVH boys wait until you've seen a proper dyno not RR graph from a properly engineered ZVH engine. I am on the case and should have something posted soon.
Thanks - Sunny.
Thanks - Sunny.
01-02-2005, 06:47 AM
#26
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heres some i collected over the years when i had mine........
2.1 ZVH
Stg T3 .63
Mega Head (Ian Howell spec)
Mfi with 5th inj
Piper T2 Cam
This one is at Well Lane running 14psi.....
Nobles running std head and 14psi and no 5th inj.....
The next 2 are at SCA running a bar......
This one is at nobles running a bar also......
I've seen sids graph and its impressive for running 20psi but he won't show it to anyone till its completed
2.1 ZVH
Stg T3 .63
Mega Head (Ian Howell spec)
Mfi with 5th inj
Piper T2 Cam
This one is at Well Lane running 14psi.....
Nobles running std head and 14psi and no 5th inj.....
The next 2 are at SCA running a bar......
This one is at nobles running a bar also......
I've seen sids graph and its impressive for running 20psi but he won't show it to anyone till its completed
01-02-2005, 06:50 AM
#27
PassionFord Post Troll
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keith, it isn't going back on the dyno so when you say completed the dyno graph will never be completed. Besides, I am sure Sid's dyno graph will open alot of peoples eyes even with it running just 20psi.
01-02-2005, 06:51 AM
#28
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mattbibs
where did you get that graph bud weis??
they don't do many fords any more, more into jap stuff. they have a gorgeous skyline they are building up , expected to be circa 800bhp
i popped into see them a few weeks back and found them to be really good, friendly and helpful. very knowledgable too. i had asked them to tune my engine and when it couldn't be done because of an air leak ( after they had looked at it for a while) thay did it the following day and charged me nothing
pretty good when your paying for peoples time and knowledge that they be so accomodating. would recommend them to anyone they also built my engine so if the figures are good then
01-02-2005, 06:55 AM
#29
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sunny
Keith, it isn't going back on the dyno so when you say completed the dyno graph will never be completed. Besides, I am sure Sid's dyno graph will open alot of peoples eyes even with it running just 20psi.
Yes mate....what i meant was he won't be showing any graphs until he is happy to do so when its totally complete which will be never....lol
01-02-2005, 06:59 AM
#30
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bud-weis
Originally Posted by mattbibs
where did you get that graph bud weis??
they don't do many fords any more, more into jap stuff. they have a gorgeous skyline they are building up , expected to be circa 800bhp
i popped into see them a few weeks back and found them to be really good, friendly and helpful. very knowledgable too. i had asked them to tune my engine and when it couldn't be done because of an air leak ( after they had looked at it for a while) thay did it the following day and charged me nothing
pretty good when your paying for peoples time and knowledge that they be so accomodating. would recommend them to anyone they also built my engine so if the figures are good then
01-02-2005, 08:42 AM
#34
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not at all. Karl speced the cam and timing so as to make it more progressive delivery and get the power up high(er)
I think things would have improved if I'd have had one of Karls big valve heads. Mine was ported etc and had wasted stem valves, not larger in size though.
Yes, looks like it lacks the low-down torque normally associated with 2.1 ZVH.
Also, the RR operator will normally abort the run where the car stops producing power, which is why it ends at 6120.
Hope I don't sound too critical!!
I think things would have improved if I'd have had one of Karls big valve heads. Mine was ported etc and had wasted stem valves, not larger in size though.
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
Originally Posted by Rick
Cheers John. Funny torque curve for a 2.1 that
Also, the RR operator will normally abort the run where the car stops producing power, which is why it ends at 6120.
Hope I don't sound too critical!!
