General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Remapping your car could mean no MOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2010, 02:44 PM
  #41  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanW@FastFord
Actually I don't know why I'm arguing the point, I fitted Bluefin to my car and wrote it off the same day! (seriously!)
Old 08-12-2010, 02:45 PM
  #42  
zetec-Sam
neeeeeeeeooowmmmm
iTrader: (2)
 
zetec-Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Laannndaaaannnn
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DanW@FastFord
Actually I don't know why I'm arguing the point, I fitted Bluefin to my car and wrote it off the same day! (seriously!)
That must have been one hell of a powerful bluefin map.
Old 08-12-2010, 02:58 PM
  #43  
Guile1
Part of the Furniture
 
Guile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by focusrrx87
as said about brakes ect not being anywhere near there limit,

1.8 mk 3 mondeo has the same size brakes as 2.0, 2.5 and even the st220 i do belive,

so how will re-mapping your 1.8 to 135(ish)bhp decrease safty when the brakes already deal with these stresses??


Does it share the same tyres?
Calipers / pads?
suspension ?
Aerodynamic properties / body shell / shape?
is it the same weight?


the way i see it:

yes things are shared , over engineered but working them CLOSER to the limit decreases saftey ... i can't really ADD much more to my argument.



Of courses it not black and white ... but i can see why remapping can = MOT faluire.... Maufacturers spend millions testing , employ the best , and do things for a reason... If your 'MATE' in a small garage tells you they are wrong or knows better then fine.. im not gona argue

i think maps can really help improve cars in some cases . but like i said.... when you change the design of a tested product ...... you MUST question the effects OVER TIME.
If these are not officially tested , why should a car be legal?

thats my view and guess it comes from being a software tester

Last edited by Guile1; 08-12-2010 at 03:07 PM.
Old 08-12-2010, 03:19 PM
  #44  
Psycho Warren
Carbon Crazy
iTrader: (5)
 
Psycho Warren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stoke on Trent
Posts: 20,725
Received 128 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

you forget there is a whole subsection of the car industry that doesnt have the same tests etc and its called kit cars so they have a super MoT called the iVA. Most of the parts used are from mainstream cars and being used not as originally designed so under your arguements should never be legal, but the IVA shows they meet basic safety standards and thats what is important obviously. If full EU type approval was the be all and end all for safety then the kit car industry would be shut down.....

so already your arguement is flawed when you dont legally need type approval for one group of cars (even new ones) and yet you claiming you should do for another???
Old 08-12-2010, 03:21 PM
  #45  
DanW@FastFord
Spelling Club King!
iTrader: (1)
 
DanW@FastFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fast Ford
Posts: 10,415
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guile1
Does it share the same tyres?
Calipers / pads?
suspension ?
Aerodynamic properties / body shell / shape?
is it the same weight?
Yes. The 90, 115, and 130 bhp Mondeos all share the same engines, tyres, bodyshell, interiors and brakes. They are identical apart from a few engine components (injectors, turbo, map).

So by your rationning would it be ok to 'tweak' a 90ps Mondeo up to 130ps?

Would it be more 'illegal' to take a 130PS Mondeo up to 150ps, than it would be to take a 90 to 130? If so why?
Old 08-12-2010, 03:51 PM
  #46  
bonnerworld
15000
 
bonnerworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ashford, Kent
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

idont think anything will come of it regards the mapping, how will they know, roling road every car to get the BHP fit every mot station out with every type f computer ecu reading device and check that the map matched exactly the manufactures specs

and even then, how many cars dont actually have the BHP that the manufactures say, case in point focus ST170 how many of them make 170 ponys on a dyno (how many do with a remap)

also i totally agree with what someone said about cheap/basic cars being involved in more crashes, totally agree, most of the people i know that crash have been in crap cars that have no feel rubbish brakes poor handeling and thats why they crash

rant over (sorry)
Old 08-12-2010, 04:20 PM
  #47  
zetec-Sam
neeeeeeeeooowmmmm
iTrader: (2)
 
zetec-Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Laannndaaaannnn
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

iirc just by plugging in a fault reading machine, garages can tell if the ecu's been mapped...
Old 08-12-2010, 04:39 PM
  #48  
dojj
Resident Wrestling Legend
iTrader: (3)
 
dojj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Little India
Posts: 50,018
Received 258 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guile1
Does it share the same tyres?
Calipers / pads?
suspension ?
Aerodynamic properties / body shell / shape?
is it the same weight?
other than the st being slightly lower and having a bigger bodykit and a spoiler on the back, everything else is the same

so the kit causes more drag so it can't go as fast in the first place

some lesser spec'd models also share the same engines such as the titanium tdci's, which also have the same kit on them but aren't badged as st's

so your arguement fails there

not sure about other models, but you are talking to a mondeo nerd here who has nerdier nerds to back up his arguements if the need arrises
Old 08-12-2010, 06:25 PM
  #49  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Guile1 - you'd better not tow a trailer, you'll never stop

actually you have a point, but it's a theoretical one rather than a practical one
Old 08-12-2010, 06:26 PM
  #50  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Guile1 - you'd better not tow a trailer, you'll never stop
Or have a passenger
Old 08-12-2010, 06:38 PM
  #51  
Guile1
Part of the Furniture
 
Guile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
Guile1 - you'd better not tow a trailer, you'll never stop

actually you have a point, but it's a theoretical one rather than a practical one


Yea agree its never black or white.
Personally I hate this government and their policies... they have damaged the automotive industry in this country enough and they seem to hell bent on doing more damage..

I hope we never end up with hybrid / electric snot boxes, wired to black boxes watching our every move!!!
Old 08-12-2010, 06:42 PM
  #52  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I am of the opposite opinion, the sooner we are on nuclear power station fuelled electric cars the better, the drop in desire for petrol will bring the prices down potentially and even if it doesnt it will at least mean petrol lasts us longer, and after a week of driving my electric commuter car I can go and do a trackday in my petrol one.
Old 08-12-2010, 06:56 PM
  #53  
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 7,707
Received 237 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Agreed, 2 year rule is a SHIT idea.
How about no MOT, I can remember it starting . No one gave a monkeys back then . Were we a happier nation, YEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Old 08-12-2010, 07:01 PM
  #54  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MadRod
How about no MOT, I can remember it starting . No one gave a monkeys back then . Were we a happier nation, YEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Cars were a lot slower and were built differently, wasnt such an issue, there is a lot more to go wrong on a modern car.
Old 08-12-2010, 07:16 PM
  #55  
Taps
Part of the Furniture
 
Taps's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Cars were a lot slower and were built differently, wasnt such an issue,
Oh but it was, thats why it was brought in.
Old 08-12-2010, 08:42 PM
  #56  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
I am of the opposite opinion, the sooner we are on nuclear power station fuelled electric cars the better, the drop in desire for petrol will bring the prices down potentially and even if it doesnt it will at least mean petrol lasts us longer, and after a week of driving my electric commuter car I can go and do a trackday in my petrol one.
not likely as the supply will go down to match, and as not so much oil will be processed into petrol it will be more costly per unit.

i wonder what would happen to all of those products and materials that are by-products of the refining process.
Old 08-12-2010, 08:59 PM
  #57  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
not likely as the supply will go down to match, and as not so much oil will be processed into petrol it will be more costly per unit.

i wonder what would happen to all of those products and materials that are by-products of the refining process.
Those products would still be needed so the refining process would still happen, and petrol would be the unwanted by-product that was given away for free hopefully
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JoeyBoyden
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
26
04-01-2024 02:36 PM
Stu @ M Developments
General Car Related Discussion.
41
21-08-2015 06:47 AM
A.t.p
Ford Escort RS Turbo
3
15-08-2015 11:37 AM
Botts
General Car Related Discussion.
4
13-08-2015 04:16 PM
gordyshreds
General Car Related Discussion.
20
10-08-2015 02:59 PM



Quick Reply: Remapping your car could mean no MOT



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM.