General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

F1 - 1.6 ltr CVH's from 2013.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2010, 08:03 AM
  #41  
Lambchop
PF Idiot Sniper
iTrader: (1)
 
Lambchop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 25,903
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
VBH couldnt when she tried in an f1 car

Interesting! What car was it?

Is Brunters smooth enough for an F1 car?!
Old 09-12-2010, 08:07 AM
  #42  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Correction, it was an A1GP car apparently


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQb13JZOCUU
Old 09-12-2010, 08:08 AM
  #43  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
If you think the fuel pressure is low check the oil pressure, lol

I doubt any of those sensors were connected to anything meaningful as the fuel pressure cant be lower than the boost pressure or the fuel wouldnt flow
its maybe fuel pressure accross the injector?
Old 09-12-2010, 08:09 AM
  #44  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaffe
its maybe fuel pressure accross the injector?
Possible I guess although would seem a bizzarre thing to put on a graph given the nature of how you would have to record it etc

But judging by the oil pressure, it seems likely that its just a case of not everything was connected up correctly anyway
Old 09-12-2010, 08:10 AM
  #45  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you think they will chatter as they come into a bend lol, antilag? be like the wrc, speaking of WRC, are they not going NA next year?
Old 09-12-2010, 08:13 AM
  #46  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaffe
Do you think they will chatter as they come into a bend lol, antilag? be like the wrc, speaking of WRC, are they not going NA next year?
Its going N/A for the super 2000 then going to 1.6 turbos after that.


Its starting to look like every motorsport will be 1.6 turbos, the RS Turbo is clearly a pioneer
Old 09-12-2010, 10:33 AM
  #47  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

i can see ALOT more road engines going turboed in the very near future
Old 09-12-2010, 10:44 AM
  #48  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
i can see ALOT more road engines going turboed in the very near future
I have never really been able to understand why lately any ARENT turbo TBH.

Lighter, better on fuel, more power etc

Things like the Audi A6 1.8T show how well a smaller engine can work as a replacement for a bigger one, as that car would normally have had a 2.5 V6 for the same performance and with worse economy.
Old 09-12-2010, 11:00 AM
  #49  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
i can see ALOT more road engines going turboed in the very near future
I agree with chip, I turbo everything, cant see any other way of doing it TBH, Ive heard rumors of NA tuning but dont belive in the Myth personaly.
Old 09-12-2010, 11:51 AM
  #50  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

The problem with NA tuning is all that lag
Old 09-12-2010, 12:03 PM
  #51  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
The problem with NA tuning is all that lag
LOL, the only way to reduce it is by turbocharging
Old 09-12-2010, 12:09 PM
  #52  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chaffe
LOL, the only way to reduce it is by turbocharging
Exactly, other wise its just:
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag

etc
Old 09-12-2010, 01:45 PM
  #53  
Joshy
Dreamer
 
Joshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dorking, Surrey
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Exactly, other wise its just:
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag

etc
Old 09-12-2010, 03:56 PM
  #54  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

lol lol
Old 09-12-2010, 06:43 PM
  #55  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Possible I guess although would seem a bizzarre thing to put on a graph given the nature of how you would have to record it etc

But judging by the oil pressure, it seems likely that its just a case of not everything was connected up correctly anyway
would be easy to measure it using a differential pressure sensor between fuel rail and (e.g.) throttle. but agreed, it would be bizarre.
Old 09-12-2010, 10:21 PM
  #56  
Chip
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 47,250
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foreigneRS
would be easy to measure it using a differential pressure sensor between fuel rail and (e.g.) throttle. but agreed, it would be bizarre.
That wouldn't be measuring across the injector if there was a pressure differential within the inlet, so it would just be plumbing a load of stuff in to nearly measure it, lol
Old 10-12-2010, 06:25 AM
  #57  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

hence why i merely suggested the throttle but could equally have said the 'inlet' wherever that is
Old 10-12-2010, 06:27 AM
  #58  
chaffe
Turbocharging Technician
 
chaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Top secret. Mission:Imposible.
Posts: 3,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Exactly, other wise its just:
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag

etc
wise words, except i would of thought slightly more "lag"
Old 10-12-2010, 07:00 AM
  #59  
Spiky
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (1)
 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 26,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Exactly, other wise its just:
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag
rev limiter
change gear
lag
lag
lag

etc

NA is like a duracell battery though

goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on...



same engine in my car after 3 1/2 yearas abuse, still fine, uses no oil/water, dont even smoke after standing for 3months


thats not to say i dont miss the turbo though
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mk3ste
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
19
17-10-2021 10:09 AM
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
07-10-2015 12:56 PM
mondeomark
Cars & Parts Wanted.
0
28-09-2015 06:28 AM
sridgett
General Car Related Discussion.
13
27-09-2015 06:03 PM
focuspower
Technical help Q & A
0
20-09-2015 03:51 AM



Quick Reply: F1 - 1.6 ltr CVH's from 2013.



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.