errrr????? care to explain.....

sounds WRONG to me.

 

I cant.... it just happened that way, my guess is less back pressure.

 

And your point is?

I will have over 40k back from the car cheers, as for labour l did it my self so really all l did was waste MY TIME at NO COST TO ME!!!!!!!

And if you compare that to some people on here that sell there car, ive done well

Also was driving a VERY VERY FAST car which some of you only dream about


Cheers

 

I 'd go t34.63 m8 speak to vince at cr turbos. 400 hp is a shite figure to go for go for 380 with the above turbo or 400 + with t38,t4 or gt30 etc.

 

Thats you told pete

 

Dave, please dont feed the trolls it only encourages them was your car that you enjoyed owning and then IMHO knew when to get out before it became more or a money pit without becoming more fun as well, no one's business but your own.

 

id stick with a T34.63 and 380 ish bhp, relatively cheap, reliable and doesnt need thousands spent on transmission if your sensible.

If youve got money to burn then a fancy turbo etc and get 430 plus bhp.

 

I definately agree that the step between 380 and 400 is of no real noticeable difference to drive, but significantly harder to achieve.

 

the difference between 380 and 400 is the bumper of the 400 in front of the 380 and thats how it stays. Not worth the extra aggro of trying to achieve it

 

GT28 will do 400bhp on the right spec engine very little lag infact i dought if any other turbo will be better on the lag front only problem being it will run out off puff at about 6500 rpm so as long as thats not a problem then that is what i would go for

 

dont know about that if you want to drive it hard then the box will go in 3rd

 

my own4x4 saff running 380 i have to say runs faultless and has not had a pound spent on it in 20 months except a oil change and a new set of wheels and tyres [by choice]
however the gearbox was shotpeened and again no issues.it was livemapped by msd and has a real nice powerband .the only thing id say is the .63 is a bit laggy .


cheers james

 

I see Carlo posts and all of a sudden there are 2 tags about yum. Get over it Carlo mate. merry xmas

 

All the best rich

 

you too mate

 

Yes Rich nothing changes, so so sad

 

im agree with the t34.48 option, have this on mine with std engine greys & 28 psi, its plenty quick enough for me and cant see me changing in the near future

what is the max on a t34.48 out of intrest ?

 

I got 357 bhp when my saph ran a t34.48

 

sounds good mate, imo no need for anymore on the road

 

Yeah but i'm greedy lol.

 

Holset H1E 54/55(millimetre) housing 8
siemens 55lb
22psi boost
ported head
385hv/318lbf·ft

 

my t534 0.63 made 406bhp and just as much torque - this was on a harvey gibbs 400/400 engine.

I had to replaced the turbo almost every 18 months tho - but was fun