MY RST Vs 20SX Vs GTIR ????????
#83
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by T28 RST
All i can say is wait and see what comes out in march
any chance you could photoshop your wheels on my saff, pleeaase.
#85
PassionFord Post Whore!!
I thought they would look good with the rim polished and the spokes as is any pictures of them on a saff ? im so stuck with what wheels that im seriously considering just putting some late spec ones on
#86
PassionFord Post Whore!!
rapid cossie,
ok i woz wronge about 350@fly (worked it out in my head)
correct answer is around @ 32% losses= 348@fly=235@whe
@ 29% losses= 330@fly= 234@whe
or may be i wronge, and he runnin more bhp at his spare wheel
ok i woz wronge about 350@fly (worked it out in my head)
correct answer is around @ 32% losses= 348@fly=235@whe
@ 29% losses= 330@fly= 234@whe
or may be i wronge, and he runnin more bhp at his spare wheel
#90
At the end of the day no 2 cars are the same and NO 2 ROLLING ROADS are the same so this debate could go on for ever, the point we are trying to get accross is AVA only loose about 25bhp on FWD/RWD and 50 bhp on 4WD, other rolling roads loose far more which is probably down to the way they are set up and what software they use to run them and also doesnt the size of the rollers come into it
#92
[quote="rapidcossie"]
Mine made 333bhp@flywheel and 240-bhp@wheels on 1.15bar,so similar losses.That was at Well Lane so deduct what you think necessary toget an accurate reading .
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
lambchop,
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
#93
10K+ Poster!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Handcuffed to the Mrs' Bed ;-)
Posts: 10,089
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
I had a blast with a gti-r a couple of weeks back, fella claimed it was pushing 270 horses, was quite quick, but he didn't obliterate me as I thought it would, and when i went past and he pulled out behind me, I was pulling away, but slowed down as approaching a notirous 50 speed limit. He was quite impressed and reckoned i had to be running at least 220 horses
#94
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Mine made 333bhp@flywheel and 240-bhp@wheels on 1.15bar,so similar losses.That was at Well Lane so deduct what you think necessary toget an accurate reading .[/quote]
thats about rite, = 28% losses,
it does matter on alot, roller,bloke,weather,car,transmission oil temp, tyre friction, wieght on wheels etc etc,
also yhe bigger the rollers(dyno) the cooler it will stay, = stays consistant.
it dont work out % spot on,
but as its a resistance, the more bhp you put thro the trans the more is lost.
as i sed b4, bhp@whe is measured, bhp@fly is calculated(unless on a engine dyno.
in feb 02 pf, jap v's ford rollin rd thrash @ nobles a esc cos has 310@fly=184bhp@whe=41% losses or 126bhp lost thro transmission..
98% of time you will see twice as much lost on a 4wd over 2wd.
dan rs wot power are you runnin.
thats about rite, = 28% losses,
it does matter on alot, roller,bloke,weather,car,transmission oil temp, tyre friction, wieght on wheels etc etc,
also yhe bigger the rollers(dyno) the cooler it will stay, = stays consistant.
it dont work out % spot on,
but as its a resistance, the more bhp you put thro the trans the more is lost.
as i sed b4, bhp@whe is measured, bhp@fly is calculated(unless on a engine dyno.
in feb 02 pf, jap v's ford rollin rd thrash @ nobles a esc cos has 310@fly=184bhp@whe=41% losses or 126bhp lost thro transmission..
98% of time you will see twice as much lost on a 4wd over 2wd.
dan rs wot power are you runnin.
#96
PassionFord Post Whore!!
rapid i think your forgetting pulsars are 4wd and your saff and the rst's we are talking about are 2wd.therefor 2 extra wheels to lose power through
#99
PF Idiot Sniper
iTrader: (1)
[quote="rapidcossie"]
innit
euan ask alan about transmission losses and get him to tell you the wee story bout electric fires and a bucket of oil...EVERYONE should get that story and think about it and realise these "losses" are bollocks
chop
ps no tellin most people so not worth it...just keep shhhhhh and to yourself
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
lambchop,
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
innit
euan ask alan about transmission losses and get him to tell you the wee story bout electric fires and a bucket of oil...EVERYONE should get that story and think about it and realise these "losses" are bollocks
chop
ps no tellin most people so not worth it...just keep shhhhhh and to yourself
#102
10K+ Poster!!
[quote="Lambchop"]
innit
euan ask alan about transmission losses and get him to tell you the wee story bout electric fires and a bucket of oil...EVERYONE should get that story and think about it and realise these "losses" are bollocks
chop
ps no tellin most people so not worth it...just keep shhhhhh and to yourself
alan and i have had that convo in detail chop thats why i stirring a wee bit.
i know that if you lost 128 bhp thru the transmission it would probably melt wit the heat...
i will keep the rest for those in the know
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
lambchop,
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
innit
euan ask alan about transmission losses and get him to tell you the wee story bout electric fires and a bucket of oil...EVERYONE should get that story and think about it and realise these "losses" are bollocks
chop
ps no tellin most people so not worth it...just keep shhhhhh and to yourself
i know that if you lost 128 bhp thru the transmission it would probably melt wit the heat...
i will keep the rest for those in the know
#103
Advanced PassionFord User
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
fast guy:
ask your peeps off gtir site, who saw it at pts gtir thrash day, and the ones who have seen it at the pod at usc 04, as i spoke to many of them.
also : R called J off the forum who is my bro.
ask your peeps off gtir site, who saw it at pts gtir thrash day, and the ones who have seen it at the pod at usc 04, as i spoke to many of them.
also : R called J off the forum who is my bro.
Was it a red one, that's what they've narrowed it down to.
#104
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 6,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everyone knows power is measured theoretically by heat/loss. Vizard explains it beautifuly. However do RRs measure by heat/loss or by mathematical equation? Therefore are they correct? No. Simple answer really
#106
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 6,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by T28 RST
What power did your RS Turbo make EIL
I used AVA 3 times to what end I do not know as Alan didn't give me a print out, but gave sound advice hence creating the 4x4 intercooler and basically going for a RW set up. It then made a supposed 189 bhp@wheels at RGM with a stage 3 turbo, standard head,standard cam and no 5th injector However you can decide what it made with those modifications after My belief in RRs came to an end afterwards and decided to DIY from then onwards ala no RRs just what it did on the road
#107
PassionFord Post Whore!!
fast guy,
wots red?
my bro's is white, and my mates 294bhp gtir is red.
also i'm talkin about 3/04 pts thrash, not the one just gone in 11/04.
wots red?
my bro's is white, and my mates 294bhp gtir is red.
also i'm talkin about 3/04 pts thrash, not the one just gone in 11/04.
#110
PF Idiot Sniper
iTrader: (1)
[quote="rapidcossie"]
innit
euan ask alan about transmission losses and get him to tell you the wee story bout electric fires and a bucket of oil...EVERYONE should get that story and think about it and realise these "losses" are bollocks
chop
ps no tellin most people so not worth it...just keep shhhhhh and to yourself
alan and i have had that convo in detail chop thats why i stirring a wee bit.
i know that if you lost 128 bhp thru the transmission it would probably melt wit the heat...
i will keep the rest for those in the know
probably?!?
there would be a big fire i reckon
fiesta cossie
cant be arsed arguin cos i know the truth...all i will say is open yer eyes
who cares whats the guess made at flywheel figures?!its wheel power that counts in the real world
Originally Posted by Lambchop
Originally Posted by rapidcossie
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
lambchop,
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
no way will a pulser get 235bhp at wheels cos that = 350bhp@ fly
with just zorst and 12 psi.
oh my god that is about the most stupid statement i have ever read.
will someone please explain how a car can possibly lose over 100 bhp thru the transmission?
it bloody impossible!
innit
euan ask alan about transmission losses and get him to tell you the wee story bout electric fires and a bucket of oil...EVERYONE should get that story and think about it and realise these "losses" are bollocks
chop
ps no tellin most people so not worth it...just keep shhhhhh and to yourself
i know that if you lost 128 bhp thru the transmission it would probably melt wit the heat...
i will keep the rest for those in the know
there would be a big fire i reckon
fiesta cossie
cant be arsed arguin cos i know the truth...all i will say is open yer eyes
who cares whats the guess made at flywheel figures?!its wheel power that counts in the real world
#111
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
its got all the parts and spec to be a 10 sec car, but aint proven it yet, will hopefully do so in march time.
Theres a Cossie in every pub quicker than mine & several on this Forum.
Talk is easy.
Rod
#112
PassionFord Post Whore!!
your rite rod, talk is easy,
183mph is wot ive seen on my snooper, and my bro's road angle 2(both gps), i know it aint proven as yet,
but i am gona get it finished and get it to a test ground, so i can prove it.
lampchop,
wot your sayin is the rollin roads are quotin wronge,
not me,
so if its such a known fact, why do they keep quotin bhp@fly??
how much bhp@wheels does a good std esc/4*4 get then.
i have sed above twice now, bhp@is measured, and bhp@is calculated(guess wk)
183mph is wot ive seen on my snooper, and my bro's road angle 2(both gps), i know it aint proven as yet,
but i am gona get it finished and get it to a test ground, so i can prove it.
lampchop,
wot your sayin is the rollin roads are quotin wronge,
not me,
so if its such a known fact, why do they keep quotin bhp@fly??
how much bhp@wheels does a good std esc/4*4 get then.
i have sed above twice now, bhp@is measured, and bhp@is calculated(guess wk)
#113
Originally Posted by fiesta cossie
your rite rod, talk is easy,
183mph is wot ive seen on my snooper, and my bro's road angle 2(both gps), i know it aint proven as yet,
but i am gona get it finished and get it to a test ground, so i can prove it.
183mph is wot ive seen on my snooper, and my bro's road angle 2(both gps), i know it aint proven as yet,
but i am gona get it finished and get it to a test ground, so i can prove it.
Achieve those times & you will be in the big league. Best of Luck, anyone who proves his car at somewhere like Brunters has my respect.
Rod
#114
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: paisley
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well rabmcs2.ppl should never underestimate an rs turbo or its driver.my pal had a fairly tuned s2 rs turbo and bet a scooby wrx,me also bein a scooby owner gets jokes like 1.6motors are capable of beating 2.0 turbo'd monsters like mine.200sx would get smoked by u but i think the pulsar would be a different story,they r fast.
#115
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
No bother wish the guy that owned the pulsar and the guy that owned the 200sx was the other way round coz guy wa the pulsar is a aRSe i can hear him now , hes a ford hater which doesn`t` help
#117
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
Nope passed the 200sx owner yesterday , he was heading up the opposite side of by-pass this will probably kick off next sunday coz knockhill is on and we all head up from this area so iLL just wait and see what happens GULP
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nicodinho
Ford Non RS / XR / ST parts for sale.
6
07-10-2015 12:56 PM