dojj

iTrader: (3)

since my last review during 2008 (which lead to some arguing with people who i think i've made up with again ) i purchased another copy the other day as the shop didn't have a copy of redline

and what i can say is that the mag IS better than i remember it to be, i especially like the non box out box outs, and relocating the tech pages is also a good move from a presentation point of view

the only obvious "discovery" i've found is the omission of rod's saph from the listings, even though there is a pic of him being the fastest cossie ever and martins non 20 mph run (although i can understand that these figures are from "real world collected by pf testers" types)

so, in summary, room for improvement but good work keep it up

Benni

Non 20mph? I think Martin should change tuners.

fuzzy

why the need to review the mag in the first place?

cossie daz

all i will say about mags of late is that all the show reports have been very poor in all of them
perf ford did a well shit report on santa pod rs day .

lets hope next year gets better

Glenn_

iTrader: (1)

I think its a good mag too.

dojj

iTrader: (3)

maybe the invisable fairiers invisablises the second "zero" on that post

and as for reveiwing the mags, who else is going to if i don't? at least it's good feedback to the guys who work for them rather than just not buying teh mag because it's shit/available info on the internet etc

they are supposed to go out there with the idea of making their publication "the best" not "we need a mag in a few weeks, let's cobble stuff together in time" like it appeared they were doing a while ago

on another note, has mel had the baby yet or not/? i might have missed it if she did

btw, if dan's reading this, postal strike i think is putting a delay on what you were supposed to have sent mate

fuzzy

theyve always been much of the sameness month in month out. theres only so much tey can report on.

dojj

iTrader: (3)

a layout change does a whole lot of good to the look of the mag, a subtle facelift every couple of years means that it's different without being worse/better

besides, if you have mags vying for features then you either think "i;ll wait for the "better" mag to come a knocking, and they may not, or you think you'll go for the quicker option if that's the case, then again, they may not either

saph4be

i agree pf has improved massivly but this months ff was frankly shit and i was shocked they reprinted a old feature felt like they could'nt be bothered this month

dojj

iTrader: (3)

and now you've made it clear you were shocked they can take the feedback back to the feedback people who look at the feedback and then do something about it, or not as the case may be

but if you just stopped buying the mag then who owuld know? no one

on the flip side, i thought that a mag geared towards engine swaps meant that there was going to be a disticnt posibility that you'd see the same swaps over and over again

so it's even

i think i'll buy next motnhs pf as well to see how things are going

kosman

to be fair i bought this months pf when i was out in lorry other night and it was crap,woudlt read it again,fast ford is better but id already read that,dumped pf in bin,just couldnt get on with it for some reason.

Fudgey

iTrader: (4)

i dont buy any

although i have only bought FF in the past, and i have never ever bought a copy of pf, even before i worked for FF!

FezzaBoy87

PF is a good mag i'v bought it for ages. Abt 5yrs i think it was best abt 4 years ago bt still its good. will always buy it.

Rod-Tarry

Not really true
The 0-60 is the yardstick in the new lists, mine only recorded 4.09 back then so dont make the list.