bud-weis

anyone tried this, obviously its not accurate but it's still fun, see wot ya get

i got 13.63 @ 103mph

http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculate.asp

dave cos4x4

iTrader: (5)

i wish mine did them figures it gave me.



Dave.

Nick500

Seems to be quit good! tried a few variations of cars and all seem reasonable!

Nick

Phil

iTrader: (1)

Oh my god! That is the funniest thing i've seen in a while..

Sometimes I wonder where people get there estimated times from, and now I know!

Anonymous

Lol, mine should run a mid 12 instead of a low 13 according to that, NO chance.

Utter rubbish, like most of these things on the net!

MadMac

tell ya what, it aint far off compaired to normal stats considering it dont take into account gearing an areodynamics

AndyRST

I wish the RST could do the 1/4 mile times and the 0-60 times quoted.

But the RST has doesn the terminal speed calculated (100.3 mph @ Santa pod)

My calculated times:

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 200
Weight without Driver (KG) 987
Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 205.89
0-60mph (Secs) 5.58
0-100mph (Secs) 13.89
60-100mph (Secs) 8.31
Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.98 @ 100.32 MPH
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.78 @ 102.14 MPH

MadMac

how light is ya RST!!! 987kg!!!

bud-weis

got my weight wrong, now says

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 230
Weight without Driver (KG) 930
Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 251.28
0-60mph (Secs) 4.88
0-100mph (Secs) 11.74
60-100mph (Secs) 6.86
Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.25 @ 106.25 MPH
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.05 @ 108.22 MPH

i wish

NEO™®©

13.62 @ 103.08 MPH

The Youth.

iTrader: (1)

well I found it very accurate!!
my 100E has done a best 1/4 of 14.9 at 93mph
the computer said: 14.82 @ 92.61 MPH !!!!!!!
close enough for me!!
steve

Lloyd

0 to 60 2.91 0 to 100 7.59 1/4 mile 11.49 123m,mph sounds about right

rsrob

doesnt the rst wiegh 1200kg

Lloyd

with full trim or stripped out?

james_birch

dont forget its without driver so if your a fat bastard of corse ya time will be slower!

and as for an rs tubro weighing 900kg!

tho the 0-60 seems a bit optimistic!

B13F RS

Did one on my old S22.1ZVH and it was almost bang on

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 254
Weight without Driver (KG) 1200
Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 215.06
0-60mph (Secs) 5.36 actually done a 5.2
0-100mph (Secs) 12.73 actually done a 12.06
60-100mph (Secs) 7.37
Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.71 @ 103.76 MPH actually done a 13.6 @ 108 MPH



Heres my cossy.......

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 400
Weight without Driver (KG) 1700
Drive Type Rear Wheel Drive (RWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 239.07
0-60mph (Secs) 4.78 actually done a 4.8
0-100mph (Secs) 10.53
60-100mph (Secs) 5.75
Quarter Mile (Secs) 12.98 @ 111.03 MPH actually done a 13.5 @110
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 12.88 @ 112.27 MPH


Pretty good calculator if you ask me

B19-TRB

dont know how much my car old s2 weighs!

paul220tcoupe

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 258.6
Weight without Driver (KG) 1185
Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 221.73
0-60mph (Secs) 5.25
0-100mph (Secs) 12.40
60-100mph (Secs) 7.15
Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.59 @ 104.71 MPH
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 13.39 @ 106.60 MPH


It must be me whos a shit driver then cause i cant get under 14.5! lol. But ive only done the 1/4mile twice and that was on around 220bhp so that may be why.

Oranoco

Must be at least as accurate as the fabled arse dyno though

paul220tcoupe

PMSL!!

Its a bit er, weird thou.

Cause i put in some top fuel dragster specs and it comes out like this.

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 6000
Weight without Driver (KG) 400
Drive Type Rear Wheel Drive (RWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 15,240.80
0-60mph (Secs) 23.24
0-100mph (Secs) 16.73
60-100mph (Secs) -6.51
Quarter Mile (Secs) 15.77 @ 117.96 MPH
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 15.67 @ 118.97 MPH


WTF! 60-100mph in -6.51!!!!

D-Sport

i did mine based on last years run, 537 bhp and a time of 11.54, it came up as 11.43, i put in 1300kg for a esc cossie, is that the correct weight???

paul220tcoupe

You what?

scooby8272

Power at Flywheel (BHP) 275
Weight without Driver (KG) 650
Drive Type Rear Wheel Drive (RWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 429.87
0-60mph (Secs) 3.40
0-100mph (Secs) 8.49
60-100mph (Secs) 5.09
Quarter Mile (Secs) 11.73 @ 117.50 MPH
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 11.63 @ 118.91 MPH

CozzyBrom

wat a load of crap

my car 800 bhp on noz

1300 kg
0-60 2.8
0-100 5.2
1/4 mile 10.4
do they not factor in wheel spin

foreigneRS

if they only use a peak power figure, it can't be accurate at all.

look at the torque curve of a n/a 2.0 producing say 220 bhp, and then look at one producing the same power with a turbo.

it also has nothing to do with wheelspin, suspension geometry, tyre width/compound......

fn, but pointless.

Oranoco

Surely you've heard of the arse dyno?

Milko Pete

Mine wasnt that far out on Cos or Civic, but they must be quoting the best time you would ever get, with perfect launch etc etc.

my Rs turbo weighed 970 without driver, 1200!

Smit

iTrader: (5)

Paul you plumb

it's a Dingy/NMS thing...just go along with it

AndyRST

Might be wrong but thought a RST weighed around 980kg ish ????

KEVFRST

got mine, if this is accurate id be well happy. however im not 100% sure on the weight of the FRST


Power at Flywheel (BHP) 163
Weight without Driver (KG) 900
Drive Type Front Wheel Drive (FWD)
Power To Weight Ratio (BHP/Ton) 184.02
0-60mph (Secs) 6.10
0-100mph (Secs) 15.85
60-100mph (Secs) 9.75
Quarter Mile (Secs) 14.54 @ 95.76 MPH
Drag Quarter Mile (Secs) 14.34 @ 97.48 MPH

davi

Seems pretty good to me .