The new dyno thread
#4
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#5
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
prob not the best idea to start another!!
i do think the other should have been closed it was gettin a lil bit ott and just to say if TSM reads this i would like to say i agree mike should step down as a moderator due to his lack of rule obeying . . . so i can have a shot at it jokes !!
i do think the other should have been closed it was gettin a lil bit ott and just to say if TSM reads this i would like to say i agree mike should step down as a moderator due to his lack of rule obeying . . . so i can have a shot at it jokes !!
Trending Topics
#8
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
mark this next bit is not aimed at you . .
i would also like to say as i think mike said in the last thread our dyno was tuv approved for fords to do their puma engine work on it
the dyno before the last time or re checking was within 0.3 bhp
and is still within 1 bhp of mountunes
#12
Super Moderator
iTrader: (5)
i dissagree i think he was doing well
mark this next bit is not aimed at you . .
i would also like to say as i think mike said in the last thread our dyno was tuv approved for fords to do their puma engine work on it
the dyno before the last time or re checking was within 0.3 bhp
and is still within 1 bhp of mountunes
mark this next bit is not aimed at you . .
i would also like to say as i think mike said in the last thread our dyno was tuv approved for fords to do their puma engine work on it
the dyno before the last time or re checking was within 0.3 bhp
and is still within 1 bhp of mountunes
#14
PassionFord Post Whore!!
i dissagree i think he was doing well
mark this next bit is not aimed at you . .
i would also like to say as i think mike said in the last thread our dyno was tuv approved for fords to do their puma engine work on it
the dyno before the last time or re checking was within 0.3 bhp
and is still within 1 bhp of mountunes
mark this next bit is not aimed at you . .
i would also like to say as i think mike said in the last thread our dyno was tuv approved for fords to do their puma engine work on it
the dyno before the last time or re checking was within 0.3 bhp
and is still within 1 bhp of mountunes
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
#17
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
The calibration and acuacy of the dyno is not in question, It is the said TUV aproval that was harped on about for as long as I can remeber, That was used in part to discredit the dyno I use saying the figs could not be trusted as it does not have TUV approval, As it happens yours does not have it either,
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
im not questioning the point in hand im just saying you (not you anyone) cant call our figures un accurate
#18
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
The calibration and acuacy of the dyno is not in question, It is the said TUV aproval that was harped on about for as long as I can remeber, That was used in part to discredit the dyno I use saying the figs could not be trusted as it does not have TUV approval, As it happens yours does not have it either,
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
#19
#20
Super Moderator
iTrader: (5)
The calibration and acuacy of the dyno is not in question, It is the said TUV aproval that was harped on about for as long as I can remeber, That was used in part to discredit the dyno I use saying the figs could not be trusted as it does not have TUV approval, As it happens yours does not have it either,
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
mike has constantly put down other tuners achievements past and present
#22
*** Sierra RS Custard ***
iTrader: (3)
The other thread was locked by me,, just to cancel out the mods conspiracy theory.
I felt that Mike probably needed a bit of time to calm down as he had got so offended and started throwing insults at his friends etc, I just didnt feel there was any value in the thread continuing, it had done what I meant for it to do in terms of people knowing the truth about the dynos in question, and I saw no point in it just continuing as a row until it got moved to the spit your dummy room where it wouldnt have been visible to people searching on the site for MAD or Norris or TUV etc in future if they too had heard the rumours.
I felt that Mike probably needed a bit of time to calm down as he had got so offended and started throwing insults at his friends etc, I just didnt feel there was any value in the thread continuing, it had done what I meant for it to do in terms of people knowing the truth about the dynos in question, and I saw no point in it just continuing as a row until it got moved to the spit your dummy room where it wouldnt have been visible to people searching on the site for MAD or Norris or TUV etc in future if they too had heard the rumours.
#25
Super Moderator
iTrader: (5)
aye of course im just saying the figures produced on our dyno are very accurate and probably up to tuv approval standards also the temp probes are positioned so it does not get high correction figures so everything is spot on
im not questioning the point in hand im just saying you (not you anyone) cant call our figures un accurate
im not questioning the point in hand im just saying you (not you anyone) cant call our figures un accurate
#26
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
The calibration and acuacy of the dyno is not in question, It is the said TUV aproval that was harped on about for as long as I can remeber, That was used in part to discredit the dyno I use saying the figs could not be trusted as it does not have TUV approval, As it happens yours does not have it either,
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
It doesnt matter that it did once and you could not carry out any work for Ford until it gets reaproved,
This is the bone of contetion nothing more.
Mark
#27
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
#28
PassionFord Post Whore!!
I dont know but would expect yearly as with most aproveals, Simon spoke to Superflow about it after I ask him about it,
There reply was a waste of time unless you need it for a company that insists on it.
Mark
#29
PassionFord Post Whore!!
aye of course im just saying the figures produced on our dyno are very accurate and probably up to tuv approval standards also the temp probes are positioned so it does not get high correction figures so everything is spot on
im not questioning the point in hand im just saying you (not you anyone) cant call our figures un accurate
im not questioning the point in hand im just saying you (not you anyone) cant call our figures un accurate
NO BODY IS QUESTIONING YOUR DADDYS FIGURES
what they are doing is giving Mike shit for saying TUV approved when it appears it is not!!!!
You need to stop getting so defensive, l bet your old man does not give a rats arse what people say on PF about TUV
If you dont understand any of the above feel free to ask for a repeat
Mike
#32
#33
PassionFord Post Whore!!
You wanted to add it because you are defending your daddy wish is understandable,
WooHoo Mr Norris is in the house,
Simon your figures are crap cause you aint TUV approved, the bogey dont make the power you claim
Mike
WooHoo Mr Norris is in the house,
Simon your figures are crap cause you aint TUV approved, the bogey dont make the power you claim
Mike
#34
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
I dont think he does "diss" any tunners TBH
#35
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Corsham
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#36
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Just wondering if their approval is for how the dyno is set up and how accurate it becomes because of that method rather than them calling out to check? If they actually come out and check it yearly that would be fine for a dyno used for a reasonable amount of work but imagine one that's used everyday, a lot can happen in a year.
#38
B1mbo
iTrader: (1)
Jim you have just left school so you should be fair fresh with simple things, l will spell this out really easy for you
NO BODY IS QUESTIONING YOUR DADDYS FIGURES
what they are doing is giving Mike shit for saying TUV approved when it appears it is not!!!!
You need to stop getting so defensive, l bet your old man does not give a rats arse what people say on PF about TUV
If you dont understand any of the above feel free to ask for a repeat
Mike
NO BODY IS QUESTIONING YOUR DADDYS FIGURES
what they are doing is giving Mike shit for saying TUV approved when it appears it is not!!!!
You need to stop getting so defensive, l bet your old man does not give a rats arse what people say on PF about TUV
If you dont understand any of the above feel free to ask for a repeat
Mike
ffs i was making a point is that a crime !!!!!!!!