as title,whats the pro,cons over these cams?is there any other option with regards to cams on a standard engine??

 

the van has BD10s so i guess they are good cams no idea about the spec of the bottom end

 

don't know much but i would rather have standards than the bd10's...

 

slightly more top end power, but less torque generally

 

mine had more lag when had the bd10s fitted plus you couldnt tell any difference

 

mates got 10's on his 34 powered saff and its very torquey in the mid

 

my saff on a t34, with std cams was over 400lb/ft

 

thats 50/50 at the mo,wondering if it will be worth putting some bd10s in mine and going up too a .63 housing

 

no real need, std cams are very good,

 

Is there any better cam suggestion to give a bit more responsiveness?
Ive heard standard cams are the best for this though, is this true?

 

hmm jtechsaff if that the case not really worth me just putting on a .63 housing might as well leave her alone!i did her of a different fast road cam for a cossie asked on here but got no joy!think it is a bdr10?

 

Posted before I had time

So it is true then.

I juist find my car a little too 'laggy' (well boost threshold), just wondered if any particular cam set ups would improve the way it came on boost>?

 

i am sure you get a bd8r which is better than std and a 10

 

group n spec?? for better response

 

i am the other end of the spectrum as i am running a T3, would BD10's give me more top end power, with sacriface to a little mid range torque?

 

Bd14 inlet. Some people get away with no valve cut outs in their pistons, other like me have big enough for no worries what so ever.