General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Speedo vs Sat Nav vs Speed Camera's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2008, 09:21 AM
  #1  
Paul Eggleton
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
Paul Eggleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Saving the planet
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Speedo vs Sat Nav vs Speed Camera's

I've just borrowed a friends Tom Tom for Le Mans and it's the first time I've had Sat Nav in the car and have an observation.

I know std speedo's are crap, but I expected the BMW's to be vaguely accurate. According to the Tom Tom the speedo is under reading by a good 7mph and this is at speeds around 60-80.

So how accurate are Sat Nav speed read outs and how do they compare to proper timing gear and speed camera's.

I understood that Datron etc also used GPS. Does the Datron stuff have quicker sampling rates for more accuracy or is the Tom Tom reading pretty close and the BMW's speedo is actually crap?

Whats your experiences? Going by the Tom Tom I could be driving faster and not worry about it

Ta
Old 11-06-2008, 09:23 AM
  #2  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Speedo under-reading? Not likely.
Has it different wheels?
Sat navs are spot on 100%, checked mine against all our tacho'd lorries.
My bmw is 2/3 mph over at all speeds I've checked, and that's a 95 - run off diff so more accurate than your old cable driven that are typically 10% over at all speeds.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:24 AM
  #3  
Matt Evans
Black Country RSOC
 
Matt Evans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stourbridge
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My Garmin sat nav reads about 10% slower than the speedo readings as well?

I thought it was highlighting the safety cushion that manufacturers build into the speedos?
Old 11-06-2008, 09:26 AM
  #4  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

tomtom is very accurate if you hold a steady speed for a while. i guess you meant over reading? i.e. that your speedo shows 68, but the satnav shows 60? if not, there is something wrong, perhaps different size wheels as suggested?
Old 11-06-2008, 09:29 AM
  #5  
Paul Eggleton
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
Paul Eggleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Saving the planet
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, yes meant over reading
Old 11-06-2008, 09:34 AM
  #6  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Evans
My Garmin sat nav reads about 10% slower than the speedo readings as well?

I thought it was highlighting the safety cushion that manufacturers build into the speedos?
They build in over-read, be taken to court if it under-read.
10% is typical on older cars, modern abs/diff read are pretty accurate, but always read over, unless wheels/rolling radius has changed.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:35 AM
  #7  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Paul - you got stock wheels?
Mine with new tyres (old 95 M3) reads 80mph and 78 on sat nav, so pretty good.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:37 AM
  #8  
Paul Eggleton
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Thread Starter
 
Paul Eggleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Saving the planet
Posts: 5,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C4llyT
Paul - you got stock wheels?
Mine with new tyres (old 95 M3) reads 80mph and 78 on sat nav, so pretty good.
Yes, Std CSL 19's
Old 11-06-2008, 09:41 AM
  #9  
Phil
Jeebus
iTrader: (1)
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My dad used to have a 5 series back in 2002 ish, that over-read by 10% as well. Personally I think it is a scam to make services come round faster! If your speedo over reads by 10% then you are going to get your car serviced 10% more (even with the smart service intervals I think!)
Old 11-06-2008, 09:41 AM
  #10  
pee vee
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
pee vee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wiltshire, Bath, chippenham area!
Posts: 7,428
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

im sure the sample rate of proper timing gear is higher than tom tom!
tom tom seems to sample once a second? datron etc is far more accurate than that.

but they must all use the same gps sattellites? so would be pretty good i'd say
Old 11-06-2008, 09:46 AM
  #11  
S1rst
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
S1rst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 5,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes tomtom is 100% spot on as its done by gps. My tomtom reads 78mph when the vans speedo shows 80 so not far out at all. Whereas i know my mates Audi A3 used to read 70 on the tomtom with the speedo showing 79-80! same with his Passat come to think of it. Most other new-ish cars/vans i know are only out by about 2 or 3 at the most, so maybe its a german thing if your bmw is a fair bit out too.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:49 AM
  #12  
XRT_si
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
XRT_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,861
Received 54 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Road Angel's were originally quoted as being within 0.7% accurate when they were first released. Therefore in theory ALL GPS based devices including Sat Navs are around this figure.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:55 AM
  #13  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pee vee
im sure the sample rate of proper timing gear is higher than tom tom!
tom tom seems to sample once a second? datron etc is far more accurate than that.

but they must all use the same gps sattellites? so would be pretty good i'd say
No problem if you're not on and off the throttle every second then, but cruising.
They know your location within a metre, so accurate.
Old 11-06-2008, 09:58 AM
  #14  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pee vee
im sure the sample rate of proper timing gear is higher than tom tom!
tom tom seems to sample once a second? datron etc is far more accurate than that.

but they must all use the same gps sattellites? so would be pretty good i'd say
you're right, the sample rate of proper timing gear is higher than satnav. i would guess that tomtom is 10Hz though, even if it only updates on the screen at 1Hz. but as i said, if you are holding the speed steady over a good distance, then it will be accurate to within +/- 1mph

and yes they all use the same satellites, but some systems are more sensitive than others and have more channels so can theoretically be more accurate
Old 11-06-2008, 10:26 AM
  #15  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

gps accuracy is about 15m, so roughly about 1%

gps can be even more accurate with the right codes, down to about 30cm's, but these codes are tightly guarded and licensed

Last edited by GARETH T; 11-06-2008 at 10:42 AM.
Old 11-06-2008, 10:33 AM
  #16  
foreigneRS
Testing the future
 
foreigneRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 17,597
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GARETH T
gps accuracy is about 15m
exactly, so if you've travelled 10 km at the same speed, that 15m error becomes pretty small
Old 11-06-2008, 10:43 AM
  #17  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

very true mate,, i was trying to say that they are very accurate!
Old 11-06-2008, 11:04 AM
  #18  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you sure it's 15M and not 1.5M?
Is spot on to a house number, not 50 foot out ever.
Old 11-06-2008, 11:11 AM
  #19  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

theres loads of things that contribute to the accuracy of the gps, electronic inaccuracy being just one
Old 11-06-2008, 11:17 AM
  #20  
GARETH T
Professional Waffler
 
GARETH T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: barry-south wales
Posts: 30,980
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

sorry, my last post didnt really help

just reading a little, the standard civil channels can be improved down to 30cm's and the military codes down to a few mm's
Old 11-06-2008, 01:10 PM
  #21  
jammy86
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
jammy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

All cars are setup about 10% over reading. The comment about servicing your car more often as a result is not correct since the odometer is correctly setup. If you travel at 60mph on the speedo for 10 mins, you wont cover 10 miles.

All big manufacturer cars will do this no matter how new. My brothers 56 plate audi 4a underread by exactly 10%.

Satnavs speed calculations are accurite to 0.001% I beleive and use a doppler shift from multiple satalites to work our your exact velocity (velocity not being the same as speed).

JAmes.
Old 11-06-2008, 01:12 PM
  #22  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well mine isn't 10% out, only at 20mph
Old 11-06-2008, 01:27 PM
  #23  
jammy86
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
jammy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jammy86
All cars are setup about 10% over reading.
JAmes.
Old 11-06-2008, 01:27 PM
  #24  
jammy86
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
jammy86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh actually, my mates 1989 Firebird is only 0.1% inaccurite....

JAmes.
Old 11-06-2008, 01:29 PM
  #25  
BigNige
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
BigNige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my Audi A6 speedo is Always about 10% about at all speeds vs garmin satnav

however my TT is out by about 2-3mph from 30 till about 100 then its spot on at about 110 not looked long enough at sat nav at higher speeds

Nige
Old 11-06-2008, 03:38 PM
  #27  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

My S2 speedo is more accurate than my BM!
Old 11-06-2008, 03:57 PM
  #28  
cossiegreg1
PassionFord Post Troll
 
cossiegreg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Durham Drives:sapphire cosworth
Posts: 3,237
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

how bad are cossies? obv cant speak for every cossie but just in general
Old 11-06-2008, 04:37 PM
  #29  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

10% is typical of old cable driven speedos.
Old 19-06-2008, 03:06 PM
  #30  
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
iTrader: (4)
 
scoooby slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: st neots cambridgeshire
Posts: 10,211
Received 415 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=cossiegreg1;3351213]how bad are cossies? obv cant speak for every cossie but just in general[/QUOTE


at 50 on my speedo on the cos its 51 on tom tom, 100 is 103 on tom tom.
Old 19-06-2008, 04:10 PM
  #31  
C4llyT
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
C4llyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Standard rolling radius by looks of that pic...
Old 19-06-2008, 05:04 PM
  #32  
Tangodeltasierra3
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Tangodeltasierra3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Super Barnsley
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the speedo on my lorry is calibrated to 85knh max and my TomTom says 53/54mph which is about bang on.
Old 19-06-2008, 05:10 PM
  #33  
vinnyvangough
Advanced PassionFord User
 
vinnyvangough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holsworthy, Devon
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My Corsa reads spot on at all speeds to my mates Tom Tom. Seems wierd being right????
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark94
Ford Mondeo Including ST
5
10-10-2023 06:52 PM
gcfcos
General Car Related Discussion.
59
06-10-2015 05:04 PM
stevecfrst1
Cars for Sale
1
30-09-2015 05:18 AM
rsguy
General Car Related Discussion.
44
29-09-2015 03:29 PM



Quick Reply: Speedo vs Sat Nav vs Speed Camera's



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 AM.