Any Scoooobey Experts?
#1
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just looking for a little light to be shone on this:
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/501632.htm
Whats the difference between and WRX & an STi?
Why would you fit STi part to a WRX? Are the STi's better?
Anyone know the owner or the car as its only in Essex....
Cheers!
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/501632.htm
Whats the difference between and WRX & an STi?
Why would you fit STi part to a WRX? Are the STi's better?
Anyone know the owner or the car as its only in Essex....
Cheers!
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't the car and it looks like those are the only sti parts that have been fitted. You can fit anything from an sti to a wrx and the sti intercooler is much better than the wrx one. I'd suspect that the rear spoiler isn't a genuine one.
The sti is a better car because it comes with more power, better interior, better brakes, wider wheels etc
The sti is a better car because it comes with more power, better interior, better brakes, wider wheels etc
![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
#4
Twistin me melon man
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i've been in a 04 (approx) WRX with STi bits and a remap and it went like stink. but before the remap it wasnt that quick to be honest.
the WRX brakes arent exactly amazing especially when the power has been upped.
beware, that that WRC will be Ł415 to tax next year and Ł430 after that (hence why alot of people are selling them and why the values have been hit)
the WRX brakes arent exactly amazing especially when the power has been upped.
beware, that that WRC will be Ł415 to tax next year and Ł430 after that (hence why alot of people are selling them and why the values have been hit)
#5
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
But this is a WRX, i've checked the Parkers tax guide and it says
Is that the right model car?
Subaru Impreza Saloon (00-05)
2.0 WRX AWD Turbo 4d
2.0 WRX AWD Turbo 4d
Rates effective from 13 March 2008
Date of Registration 6 Months 12 Months Band CO2 (g/km) 1 Jan 2003 1 May 2005 Ł115.50 Ł210.00 F 219
#7
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't the car and it looks like those are the only sti parts that have been fitted. You can fit anything from an sti to a wrx and the sti intercooler is much better than the wrx one. I'd suspect that the rear spoiler isn't a genuine one.
The sti is a better car because it comes with more power, better interior, better brakes, wider wheels etc![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
The sti is a better car because it comes with more power, better interior, better brakes, wider wheels etc
![Grin](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
there are more models of subaru's that there are womens shoes lol
Last edited by Turbosystems; 16-05-2008 at 10:22 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Twistin me melon man
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
CO2 emissions (g/km) = 219
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/629/629/7293011.stm
#10
Twistin me melon man
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the 4wd WRX i looked at on parkers came up with 242g/km
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/road-tax/?deriv=20141
but the one they list as AWD is 219g/km?
i just did a vehicle enquiry on my mates number plate on his subaru WRX, (on the DVLA site) and his has come up as 242g/km
so theres your answer, WRX's as of 2009 will be Ł415, and as of 2010 they will be Ł430
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/road-tax/?deriv=20141
but the one they list as AWD is 219g/km?
i just did a vehicle enquiry on my mates number plate on his subaru WRX, (on the DVLA site) and his has come up as 242g/km
so theres your answer, WRX's as of 2009 will be Ł415, and as of 2010 they will be Ł430
#11
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the 4wd WRX i looked at on parkers came up with 242g/km
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/road-tax/?deriv=20141
but the one they list as AWD is 219g/km?
i just did a vehicle enquiry on my mates number plate on his subaru WRX, (on the DVLA site) and his has come up as 242g/km
so theres your answer, WRX's as of 2009 will be Ł415, and as of 2010 they will be Ł430
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/road-tax/?deriv=20141
but the one they list as AWD is 219g/km?
i just did a vehicle enquiry on my mates number plate on his subaru WRX, (on the DVLA site) and his has come up as 242g/km
so theres your answer, WRX's as of 2009 will be Ł415, and as of 2010 they will be Ł430
#12
Twistin me melon man
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cambs UK
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i read (on an official source but cant remember where) that its all supposed to be frozen for a few years after that, but they have already moved the goalposts once and whose to say we'll still have the same government then so it could all change again.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DavidK
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
1
27-09-2015 02:55 PM
puntoturbo
General Car Related Discussion.
9
04-05-2005 02:10 PM