Big Thanks To MA DEVELOPMENTS..(NOW WITH GRAPHS)
#41
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Right, just got home and the car is AWESOME the Anti-lag is just wrong and the Launch Control too.
I've put the graphs on the first page of the post.
Thanks again to Mark/ Dean/ Rod...transformed the car...
I've put the graphs on the first page of the post.
Thanks again to Mark/ Dean/ Rod...transformed the car...
#44
PassionFord Post Whore!!
, sounds good.
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
#45
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
, sounds good.
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
Dan, spool up is slow, it's peaking @ 30 psi on the road
Goes very well, BUT i defo need more low down..
Just need to start saving now again ...
#48
PassionFord Post Troll
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Shropshire.
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds good m8
Did MAD convert it to 4wd for you too..................
Cause your old 3 door scared you away to the land of the rising sun for some gay 4x4 traction ,and that was 100bhp less than the Saph!!!!
Did MAD convert it to 4wd for you too..................
Cause your old 3 door scared you away to the land of the rising sun for some gay 4x4 traction ,and that was 100bhp less than the Saph!!!!
#49
Norris Motorsport
Hi Pete,
Your car will never make more low down power whilst you continue to use the version of T38 you have. I have mapped several cars with your turbo on, and none have made significant power below 4000rpm even on different spec engines.
Regards blaming the cams for low torque, remember they are quite a wild cam and hence inherently better at delivering power higher in the rpm range. Nevertheless when I mapped your car in Jim's ownership it made 390lbf ft at similar boost levels, so its a little low at 350lbf ft.
I'm still not quite sure why you did'nt discuss changing your turbo etc with me before changing your mgmt, but as long as you're happy that's what matters.
Your car will never make more low down power whilst you continue to use the version of T38 you have. I have mapped several cars with your turbo on, and none have made significant power below 4000rpm even on different spec engines.
Regards blaming the cams for low torque, remember they are quite a wild cam and hence inherently better at delivering power higher in the rpm range. Nevertheless when I mapped your car in Jim's ownership it made 390lbf ft at similar boost levels, so its a little low at 350lbf ft.
I'm still not quite sure why you did'nt discuss changing your turbo etc with me before changing your mgmt, but as long as you're happy that's what matters.
#50
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Karl, what do you think could be the reason for the drop in torque, obviously there are laods of factors that could effect this but any ideas?
#52
PassionFord Post Troll
Originally Posted by Captain Mike
Originally Posted by M.A.D.RST
Cool
I should be going to Mark's soon for Autronic
I should be going to Mark's soon for Autronic
In an Evo i hope
Mike
#53
Norris Motorsport
Charlie,
To be fair the turbo is awfull. All the lag of a T4, without the power of a T4.
Regards why its dropped from 390lbf ft to 350lbf ft, I have no idea. I remapped the car recently for pete, and felt I had increased the torque from the previous 390lbf ft, so to see a reduction is most bizarre.
As another good example steve (Dingy) runs an identical spec engine to Pete (i.e. pistons, head and cams) and running a T4 makes 410lbf ft/490bhp at 26psi, 450lbf ft/530bhp at 34PSI, so its not striclty true to blame the cams, although as mentioned above they are more tailored to high rpm power.
To be fair the turbo is awfull. All the lag of a T4, without the power of a T4.
Regards why its dropped from 390lbf ft to 350lbf ft, I have no idea. I remapped the car recently for pete, and felt I had increased the torque from the previous 390lbf ft, so to see a reduction is most bizarre.
As another good example steve (Dingy) runs an identical spec engine to Pete (i.e. pistons, head and cams) and running a T4 makes 410lbf ft/490bhp at 26psi, 450lbf ft/530bhp at 34PSI, so its not striclty true to blame the cams, although as mentioned above they are more tailored to high rpm power.
#55
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by MAD YUM
Originally Posted by CharlieSaff
Karl, what do you think could be the reason for the drop in torque, obviously there are laods of factors that could effect this but any ideas?
Fudged figures
Well done nice graph, bet that feels great on the road
#56
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by CosKev3
Sounds good m8
Did MAD convert it to 4wd for you too..................
Cause your old 3 door scared you away to the land of the rising sun for some gay 4x4 traction ,and that was 100bhp less than the Saph!!!!
Did MAD convert it to 4wd for you too..................
Cause your old 3 door scared you away to the land of the rising sun for some gay 4x4 traction ,and that was 100bhp less than the Saph!!!!
Kev...............
#58
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by M.A.D.RST
Originally Posted by Captain Mike
Originally Posted by M.A.D.RST
Cool
I should be going to Mark's soon for Autronic
I should be going to Mark's soon for Autronic
In an Evo i hope
Mike
Mike
#59
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Basky
thought you were a nms man pete?
No bodies man me mate....
I wanted to go with the Autronic on the car and then a GT30 early next year and Mark was the person i wanted to carry out the work for me.
He did a great job with my Evo so WHY go elsewhere??
#60
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
so on the road what Rpm roughly does it hit 30 psi?
Does Mark think the cams are the reason for that too?
Does Mark think the cams are the reason for that too?
Pete does not like the mechanical driveablity of the engine not the boost threshold and the engine was realy specced for another owner for a diff output than it has now,
I recomended to Pete to change the spec of the cams this will IMO bring back the area that he is missing.
Mark
#61
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
, sounds good.
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
Mark
#62
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by CharlieSaff
Karl, what do you think could be the reason for the drop in torque, obviously there are laods of factors that could effect this but any ideas?
The diff in the TQ it could have had measured before could be the diff RR and the what the rpm was calibrated to it.
Mark
#63
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
so on the road what Rpm roughly does it hit 30 psi?
Does Mark think the cams are the reason for that too?
Does Mark think the cams are the reason for that too?
Pete does not like the mechanical driveablity of the engine not the boost threshold and the engine was realy specced for another owner for a diff output than it has now,
I recomended to Pete to change the spec of the cams this will IMO bring back the area that he is missing.
Mark
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
, sounds good.
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
Mark
Thanks for reply,
On the road does it boost the same as it did on the dyno run?
27psi @ 5000 rpm, as that seems either
it werent dyno'd correctly,
it wasn't loaded up till that rpm?
or a issue with the motor.
#64
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
so on the road what Rpm roughly does it hit 30 psi?
Does Mark think the cams are the reason for that too?
Does Mark think the cams are the reason for that too?
Pete does not like the mechanical driveablity of the engine not the boost threshold and the engine was realy specced for another owner for a diff output than it has now,
I recomended to Pete to change the spec of the cams this will IMO bring back the area that he is missing.
Mark
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
, sounds good.
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
A few questions tho,
on graph,
spikes 27, holds 25, tails off to 21 psi.
Also looks like it werent either loaded up correctly or mega slow spool up.
What does it bost on the road, and where does full boost come in?
Mark
Thanks for reply,
On the road does it boost the same as it did on the dyno run?
27psi @ 5000 rpm, as that seems either
it werent dyno'd correctly,
it wasn't loaded up till that rpm?
or a issue with the motor.
It was run in 3rd gear and the boost responce is lethargic this is why the graph is like that, To get anymore boost you need to run more load on it just like on the road so you only get a couple of more psi in 4th and 5th.
Mark
#66
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Mark Shead
Dan
It was run in 3rd gear and the boost responce is lethargic this is why the graph is like that, To get anymore boost you need to run more load on it just like on the road so you only get a couple of more psi in 4th and 5th.
Mark
It was run in 3rd gear and the boost responce is lethargic this is why the graph is like that, To get anymore boost you need to run more load on it just like on the road so you only get a couple of more psi in 4th and 5th.
Mark
Fair enough.
#67
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Captain Mike
I am sure it shifts still
Mike
Mike
Mike, it goes very well yes, BUT the lack of low down grunt is annoying, but you can drive round that if you get my drift..
It'll soon be sorted anyway, spoke to Mark about future plans for the car, so looking all good..
Nice SIG by the way..
Dan, exscuse my lack of replies to you, i'm not brilliant on knowledge on RR graphs..
#70
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Pete, i think so yes, as Karl as said, the cams Jim had in the car are suited for high revs. Jim originally had a T4 on the car, BUT didn't like the lag he told me so he PX`d it for the UT T38..
#71
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by staffi
Dan, exscuse my lack of replies to you, i'm not brilliant on knowledge on RR graphs..
No prob's, thats what i thought.
#72
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by staffi
Dan, exscuse my lack of replies to you, i'm not brilliant on knowledge on RR graphs..
No prob's, thats what i thought.
It's the first one i've had done..
We all have to learn..
#74
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i've been away 2 weeks and all this has happened
you have too much money methinks!!
i have the graphs from Weston Performance handy, i can't see why the torque would be lower??
I think when you remove that turbo you should give it to Karl to smash into a thousand pieces, he really doesn't like it
maybe it has a broken turbine blade??
you have too much money methinks!!
i have the graphs from Weston Performance handy, i can't see why the torque would be lower??
I think when you remove that turbo you should give it to Karl to smash into a thousand pieces, he really doesn't like it
maybe it has a broken turbine blade??
#75
20K+ Super Poster.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by bud-weis
i've been away 2 weeks and all this has happened
you have too much money methinks!!
i have the graphs from Weston Performance handy, i can't see why the torque would be lower??
I think when you remove that turbo you should give it to Karl to smash into a thousand pieces, he really doesn't like it
maybe it has a broken turbine blade??
you have too much money methinks!!
i have the graphs from Weston Performance handy, i can't see why the torque would be lower??
I think when you remove that turbo you should give it to Karl to smash into a thousand pieces, he really doesn't like it
maybe it has a broken turbine blade??
You're old news now buddy..
How's Florida..
So looking at those graphs i've lost 30+ftlb..
#76
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol i'm back now mate....got the copy of Fast Ford too, MY feature looks good (even if my pic is fuckin awful )
IF we go by the graphs alone then yes the car has lost a fair bit of torque, however the only real way you can compare is to pop down to Weston Performance and run it again, that way you have a back to back comparison, even DD rollers may differ from one to the next.
also if you have lost that torque i can only assume it's the different mapping or a mechanical fault somewhere.
give me a bell tomorrow and we'll chat
IF we go by the graphs alone then yes the car has lost a fair bit of torque, however the only real way you can compare is to pop down to Weston Performance and run it again, that way you have a back to back comparison, even DD rollers may differ from one to the next.
also if you have lost that torque i can only assume it's the different mapping or a mechanical fault somewhere.
give me a bell tomorrow and we'll chat
#77
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by staffi
So looking at those graphs i've lost 30+ftlb..
Not really.
looking at Jim's old graphs, It was run up in 4th gear, so will read different.
#78
Football Cwazy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire
Posts: 9,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fiecos Dan
Originally Posted by staffi
So looking at those graphs i've lost 30+ftlb..
Not really.
looking at Jim's old graphs, It was run up in 4th gear, so will read different.
#79
PassionFord Post Troll
Been away for a couple of days..........and I'll explain why later as I don't want to hi-jack this thread.
When I had the engine built by Karl....I asked him for a 400bhp engine that would produce a genuine 400bhp on anyone's rollers, and it had to be reliable, and with room for improvement at a later day.....(Bigger Injectors and Turbo). So obviously the engine was specced (Cams, Turbo etc) for 400bhp. Which Karl easily exceeded.
As Pete is now upgrading the engine, the obviously some of the spec of the engine will need to be changed. The Universal Turbo's T38 isn't going to produce anymore than it is at the moment, as it was designed to give around the 420bhp mark, so it will need changing for further power. The cams that Karl specced were as I asked......Mid - High RPM Power, so these also may need changing.
But 442bhp is brilliant bearing in mind the Turbo, and Cams that it's on at the moment, I think the most a UT T38 has ever recorded is 446, so it proves that the rest of the engine is working very well.
Great work by Mark, and I'm sure the Autronics will make it drive so much smoother than the L6 that I had it set up on.
Great work by Mark, and I think we can now truely refer to the car as "Pete's Saph"
When I had the engine built by Karl....I asked him for a 400bhp engine that would produce a genuine 400bhp on anyone's rollers, and it had to be reliable, and with room for improvement at a later day.....(Bigger Injectors and Turbo). So obviously the engine was specced (Cams, Turbo etc) for 400bhp. Which Karl easily exceeded.
As Pete is now upgrading the engine, the obviously some of the spec of the engine will need to be changed. The Universal Turbo's T38 isn't going to produce anymore than it is at the moment, as it was designed to give around the 420bhp mark, so it will need changing for further power. The cams that Karl specced were as I asked......Mid - High RPM Power, so these also may need changing.
But 442bhp is brilliant bearing in mind the Turbo, and Cams that it's on at the moment, I think the most a UT T38 has ever recorded is 446, so it proves that the rest of the engine is working very well.
Great work by Mark, and I'm sure the Autronics will make it drive so much smoother than the L6 that I had it set up on.
Great work by Mark, and I think we can now truely refer to the car as "Pete's Saph"