Paedo's...a discussion..
07-08-2007, 08:01 PM
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Bosch_Dealer
Chip...2 or 3 pictures you have posted on here boasting as conquests LOOKED under age....now obviously they were legal....BUT isnt it as bad to like legal girls who look underage as a bloke looking at actual underage girls without touching them?
Sounds like you're trying to justify it, or is it just me seeing come across like that?
I'd disagree with that comment phil, as even the though they looked under age they werent, so wheres the issue with that its all legal and above board? compared to actually looking at under age girls there is a big difference and its worrying that you cant see it
07-08-2007, 08:11 PM
#122
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Matt...i am making this point:-
Liking girls that LOOK young but arnt is SUSPECT...IMO..maybe a person who knows underage is illegal but looks for young looking but legal as they do not want to break any laws.
Men who LOOK at underage in there own homes who keep it at that.
Seems connected to me
If i saw a girl i thought looked underage but wasnt and offered me sex..i would turn them down purely on the grounds its NOT a turn on for ME.
Liking girls that LOOK young but arnt is SUSPECT...IMO..maybe a person who knows underage is illegal but looks for young looking but legal as they do not want to break any laws.
Men who LOOK at underage in there own homes who keep it at that.
Seems connected to me
If i saw a girl i thought looked underage but wasnt and offered me sex..i would turn them down purely on the grounds its NOT a turn on for ME.
07-08-2007, 10:24 PM
#123
Sarah is 19, she looks like maybe she could be 14 or 15 at youngest i guess in certain pictures (athough not in real life) either way, she doesnt like like a pre pubescant kid so no I cant even vaguely see your point, and I find it quite worrying if you cant differentiate between someone of 19 who looks a little younger, and an actual child 
Graham, sorry mate no offence, but took one like at the ginge like post and didnt read a single word of it, no offence but its just everything you say tends to be the same so I cant be arsed to read it all again, just thought I should mention it so im not totally ignoring you.
Graham, sorry mate no offence, but took one like at the ginge like post and didnt read a single word of it, no offence but its just everything you say tends to be the same so I cant be arsed to read it all again, just thought I should mention it so im not totally ignoring you.
07-08-2007, 11:29 PM
#124
I seriously doubt there is any conspiracy theory to cover sexual abuse up.
It IS a well known fact that paedophiles do try to get jobs in high positions that enable them to hide thier actions better. For example you would expect a Policemen to be a law abiding example to us all, so automatically less suspicion and also in the case of a paedophile ring, having people in the right places can enable them to get away with the crimes for longer. This is especially true with ritualised sexual abuse where often the links spread deep within the community.
The arguements about stuff on TV are being overcomplicated. It is quite simple that repeated exposure to things like the starving kids in africa etc leads to desensitisation emotionally and also to "normalisation" of the subject matter and what you are seeing.
Otherwise we would all cry or be upset when we saw those starving children on TV. The sight or sound of a child in distress or pain is difficult for most people to deal with especially parents. I can understand why often these things are ignored or covered up as people dont understand or know how to deal with it. BUT I dont think any normal human being could contemplate hurting a child themselves as the very idea of doing such a thing is horrible in it self.
This also comes round to the mental illness arguement. many mental illnesses, especially personality disorders and sexual disorders are more an indication of social acceptability of behaviour and thinking rather than actual illness such as depression or schitzophrenia
Also I dont think saying that people who watch child porn arent as bad is valid point. watching such films supports financially the abuse of children.
Also, more worryingly, watching such child porn DOES desensitise and normalise the abuse of children in the paedophiles brain. then the paedo is only a few steps away from becoming an abuser themselves as those boundaries in thier mind are now broken down.
It IS a well known fact that paedophiles do try to get jobs in high positions that enable them to hide thier actions better. For example you would expect a Policemen to be a law abiding example to us all, so automatically less suspicion and also in the case of a paedophile ring, having people in the right places can enable them to get away with the crimes for longer. This is especially true with ritualised sexual abuse where often the links spread deep within the community.
The arguements about stuff on TV are being overcomplicated. It is quite simple that repeated exposure to things like the starving kids in africa etc leads to desensitisation emotionally and also to "normalisation" of the subject matter and what you are seeing.
Otherwise we would all cry or be upset when we saw those starving children on TV. The sight or sound of a child in distress or pain is difficult for most people to deal with especially parents. I can understand why often these things are ignored or covered up as people dont understand or know how to deal with it. BUT I dont think any normal human being could contemplate hurting a child themselves as the very idea of doing such a thing is horrible in it self.
This also comes round to the mental illness arguement. many mental illnesses, especially personality disorders and sexual disorders are more an indication of social acceptability of behaviour and thinking rather than actual illness such as depression or schitzophrenia
Also I dont think saying that people who watch child porn arent as bad is valid point. watching such films supports financially the abuse of children.
Also, more worryingly, watching such child porn DOES desensitise and normalise the abuse of children in the paedophiles brain. then the paedo is only a few steps away from becoming an abuser themselves as those boundaries in thier mind are now broken down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ECU Monitor Enthusiast
General Car Related Discussion.
19
11-09-2007 10:26 PM
Stavros
General Car Related Discussion.
7
02-10-2006 09:13 AM