2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
This has always bugged me????
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
Originally Posted by Matt
Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor

Yep
Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.
Originally Posted by wimwerf
Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.
Trending Topics
It's all down to how you map the car, such as using throttle multipliers as well as top line extrapolation. In an ideal wolrd we would'nt do this, but since not everything is ideal, there are ways around it that are very reliable.
I usually run anything up to around 6psi over the map sesnors range and find this causes no problems in terms of being able to map it. i.e. up to 23psi on a 2bar and 36psi on a 3bar.
I usually run anything up to around 6psi over the map sesnors range and find this causes no problems in terms of being able to map it. i.e. up to 23psi on a 2bar and 36psi on a 3bar.
Running over the sensors range has multiple effects....
1) NO OVERBOOST PROTECTION.
E.G. Say you run 35 psi on a 3bar that only measures 29 psi then suddenly your
wastgate jams open and you get 40 psi = engine melt no warning.
2) OVER RANGE BOOST WEARS THE SENSOR OUT
A three bar sensor is designed for two bar of boost. If you continuously keep
stressing the sensor by over pressure you are reducing its usefull working life.
3 bar sensors are fragile even when kept in range from my experience.
3) ECU IS PRETTY DUMB
If the ecu is mapped for the boost out of range say at 35 psi and the sensor tops
out at 29 psi, all is ok if you run 35 psi but drop the throttle back a bit then the
boost tails off, if the boost is 32 psi then it is still getting fuel for 35 psi causing a
rich mixture. Some ecu's can overcome this but not many !
On my car, I run a 5 bar bosch sensor which can measure over 45 psi boost.
My normall running boost is 34-36 psi which is fuelled correctly and I have an over
boost fuel cut at 38 psi.
Also, I have closed loop boost control as the sensor measures the boost through
out the whole range.
Hope all this makes sense..
1) NO OVERBOOST PROTECTION.
E.G. Say you run 35 psi on a 3bar that only measures 29 psi then suddenly your
wastgate jams open and you get 40 psi = engine melt no warning.
2) OVER RANGE BOOST WEARS THE SENSOR OUT
A three bar sensor is designed for two bar of boost. If you continuously keep
stressing the sensor by over pressure you are reducing its usefull working life.
3 bar sensors are fragile even when kept in range from my experience.
3) ECU IS PRETTY DUMB
If the ecu is mapped for the boost out of range say at 35 psi and the sensor tops
out at 29 psi, all is ok if you run 35 psi but drop the throttle back a bit then the
boost tails off, if the boost is 32 psi then it is still getting fuel for 35 psi causing a
rich mixture. Some ecu's can overcome this but not many !
On my car, I run a 5 bar bosch sensor which can measure over 45 psi boost.
My normall running boost is 34-36 psi which is fuelled correctly and I have an over
boost fuel cut at 38 psi.
Also, I have closed loop boost control as the sensor measures the boost through
out the whole range.
Hope all this makes sense..
Originally Posted by wimwerf
Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.
Originally Posted by Rs Gus
Originally Posted by wimwerf
Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"
BUT
You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???
but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.
20K+ Super Poster.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
From: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
tiff whilst i see the point you're making, consider this...
what "excuse" can you use for not running a 3bar map sensor at that boost?
"i was too pikey to buy a 3bar" is the only one i can think of
for 2+bar boost applications there are a lot more "issues" to resolve when not using a std marelli 3bar map sensor... so a lot more reasons to do things this way :P
whereas you're just too much of a gypo to buy a proper map sensor
what "excuse" can you use for not running a 3bar map sensor at that boost?
"i was too pikey to buy a 3bar" is the only one i can think of

for 2+bar boost applications there are a lot more "issues" to resolve when not using a std marelli 3bar map sensor... so a lot more reasons to do things this way :P
whereas you're just too much of a gypo to buy a proper map sensor
20K+ Super Poster.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 0
From: Ramsgate, Kent Drives: E39 530D Touring
mike, i mean if you had a 3bar sitting there when you went to karl and its available to use if you wanted to at no extra expense... you'd have used it right?
Yes of course I would, but it seems as though Tiff thinks that running above 15psi or 30psi on each sensor respectively is something new
.
I was running 19psi on my stage 1 chip before he was born
.
.I was running 19psi on my stage 1 chip before he was born
.
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
This has been done for YEARS, so what is your point actually ? 

People are quick enough to tell others that a 2 bar wont work right, but nothing is said to people running a 3 bar above its range.
PS- Im 26, do your maths old man
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DixieTheKid
Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth
11
Jun 6, 2020 11:20 AM
wheelwizardrefurbs
Technical help Q & A
24
Sep 24, 2015 08:35 PM
wheelwizardrefurbs
Technical help Q & A
8
Sep 18, 2015 08:59 PM







), but i'll be having the stage 3 treatment next year with a 3 bar 
