PassionFord - Ford Focus, Escort & RS Forum Discussion

PassionFord - Ford Focus, Escort & RS Forum Discussion (https://passionford.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Car Related Discussion. (https://passionford.com/forum/general-car-related-discussion-12/)
-   -   2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question (https://passionford.com/forum/general-car-related-discussion/19386-2bar-map-sensor-vs-3bar-map-sensor-question.html)

TIFF Sep 26, 2004 05:58 PM

2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 
This has always bugged me????

Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"

BUT

You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???

SapphyMike Sep 26, 2004 06:09 PM

blinkers lol

Matt Sep 26, 2004 06:18 PM

Re: 2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 

Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor

dont think you quite mean that now do you :blabla:

TIFF Sep 26, 2004 06:30 PM

Re: 2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 

Originally Posted by Matt

Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor

dont think you quite mean that now do you :blabla:

eerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Yep ;)

wimwerf Sep 26, 2004 06:33 PM

Re: 2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 

Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????

Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"

BUT

You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???

38psi is out of range to with a 3bar map.

but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.

GARETH T Sep 26, 2004 06:33 PM

i wouldnt never run boost over the top of my map sensors range :oops:

TIFF Sep 26, 2004 06:34 PM

Re: 2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 

Originally Posted by wimwerf

Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????

Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"

BUT

You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???

38psi is out of range to with a 3bar map.

but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.

I think there is a few out there that are

Karl Sep 26, 2004 06:37 PM

It's all down to how you map the car, such as using throttle multipliers as well as top line extrapolation. In an ideal wolrd we would'nt do this, but since not everything is ideal, there are ways around it that are very reliable.

I usually run anything up to around 6psi over the map sesnors range and find this causes no problems in terms of being able to map it. i.e. up to 23psi on a 2bar and 36psi on a 3bar.

ECU Monitor Enthusiast Sep 26, 2004 07:12 PM

Running over the sensors range has multiple effects....


1) NO OVERBOOST PROTECTION.
E.G. Say you run 35 psi on a 3bar that only measures 29 psi then suddenly your
wastgate jams open and you get 40 psi = engine melt no warning.

2) OVER RANGE BOOST WEARS THE SENSOR OUT
A three bar sensor is designed for two bar of boost. If you continuously keep
stressing the sensor by over pressure you are reducing its usefull working life.
3 bar sensors are fragile even when kept in range from my experience.

3) ECU IS PRETTY DUMB
If the ecu is mapped for the boost out of range say at 35 psi and the sensor tops
out at 29 psi, all is ok if you run 35 psi but drop the throttle back a bit then the
boost tails off, if the boost is 32 psi then it is still getting fuel for 35 psi causing a
rich mixture. Some ecu's can overcome this but not many !

On my car, I run a 5 bar bosch sensor which can measure over 45 psi boost.
My normall running boost is 34-36 psi which is fuelled correctly and I have an over
boost fuel cut at 38 psi.
Also, I have closed loop boost control as the sensor measures the boost through
out the whole range.

Hope all this makes sense.. :cool:

Rs Gus Sep 26, 2004 07:25 PM

Re: 2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 

Originally Posted by wimwerf

Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????

Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"

BUT

You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???

38psi is out of range to with a 3bar map.

but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.

;)

TIFF Sep 26, 2004 08:52 PM

I knew you was one Angus ;)

Lee Reynolds Sep 26, 2004 08:58 PM

ran 28 on esc 2.5 std MAP.

Matt Sep 26, 2004 10:12 PM

Re: 2bar MAP sensor V's 3bar MAP sensor question
 

Originally Posted by Rs Gus

Originally Posted by wimwerf

Originally Posted by TIFF-C20WTH
This has always bugged me????

Why do people kick up such a fuss about cars running 28 psi+ on a 2 bar MAP sensor, as its out of its "Range"

BUT

You dont here people kicking up about people running 38 psi through a 3 bar MAP sensor, but isnt that out of the "Range" of that one too???

38psi is out of range to with a 3bar map.

but how many people are boosting 38psi.....not many i think.

;)

;)

Jim Galbally Sep 27, 2004 08:29 AM

tiff whilst i see the point you're making, consider this...

what "excuse" can you use for not running a 3bar map sensor at that boost?

"i was too pikey to buy a 3bar" is the only one i can think of :cry:

for 2+bar boost applications there are a lot more "issues" to resolve when not using a std marelli 3bar map sensor... so a lot more reasons to do things this way :P

whereas you're just too much of a gypo to buy a proper map sensor ;) :blabla:

Matt Sep 27, 2004 11:25 AM

jim, he runs a 3 bar you tart, he never used to on his stage 1 though and that caused a few issue for others ;)

Jim Galbally Sep 27, 2004 11:28 AM

oops, forgot he was on greys now :oops:

you know what i meant tho :P

TIFF Sep 27, 2004 11:46 AM

Jim

You fookin TIT :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

SapphyMike Sep 27, 2004 12:08 PM

i run 20psi on my 2 bar (thanks to Karl :top: ), but i'll be having the stage 3 treatment next year with a 3 bar :top:

Jim Galbally Sep 27, 2004 01:08 PM

but mike, WHY do you use a 2bar instead of a 3bar?

if you had a 3bar sitting there for free you'd use it yeah?

SapphyMike Sep 27, 2004 02:24 PM

Jim,

I run the 2 bar as Karl set it up with that.

I will be running a 3 bar when i go stage 3.

remember, my 20psi is stage 1.

Mike Rainbird Sep 27, 2004 02:30 PM

This has been done for YEARS, so what is your point actually ? :p

Jim Galbally Sep 27, 2004 02:31 PM

mike, i mean if you had a 3bar sitting there when you went to karl and its available to use if you wanted to at no extra expense... you'd have used it right?

Mike Rainbird Sep 27, 2004 02:36 PM

Yes of course I would, but it seems as though Tiff thinks that running above 15psi or 30psi on each sensor respectively is something new :p.

I was running 19psi on my stage 1 chip before he was born ;) :cry:.

Jim Galbally Sep 27, 2004 02:48 PM

mike, wrong mike, i was after the northern monkey :blabla:

SapphyMike Sep 27, 2004 03:10 PM

Jim,

Of course i would, but if i had a 3 bar, i'd probably have greens to accompany them, therefore i wouldnt of gone for a stage 1 :p

TIFF Sep 27, 2004 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
This has been done for YEARS, so what is your point actually ? :p

I dont think that running high boost on thses is new at all, i was just wondering Mike :blabla:

People are quick enough to tell others that a 2 bar wont work right, but nothing is said to people running a 3 bar above its range.

PS- Im 26, do your maths old man :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Lee Reynolds Sep 27, 2004 03:51 PM

Tony TS didnt say it was daft Jimboy...and i was running light blues. 28psi on 2.5 bar map. Or is he a dumpling?


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands