power,wot u think now with graph....
#41
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
That's as laggy as my GT30!! WTF? ![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
#42
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by MattRS1600i
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
That's as laggy as my GT30!! WTF? ![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
is that At the wheels or Fly? as 246 ATW is impressive
#43
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by crazycage
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
That's as laggy as my GT30!! WTF? ![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/shocked.gif)
#46
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by GARETH T
it you measure it at 8.5:! or you goign off what the pistons was ment to be?
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#48
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Christian and Beccy
Any idea how they measured RPM?? I just wonder if it's a pick-up discrepancy? Does seem awfully laggy.
#49
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wiltshire, Bath, chippenham area!
Posts: 7,428
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah... why does the power seem to Drop off completely at about 5700
RPM on just about all RS turbo engines ive seen graphs for?
also Why does it make 106 lb/ft at less than 1500 rpm
and yet it makes less than 40 at about 1600 rpm???
not a dig or anything mate. just wondering
good result really for a T3.. apart from the lag issue
RPM on just about all RS turbo engines ive seen graphs for?
also Why does it make 106 lb/ft at less than 1500 rpm
and yet it makes less than 40 at about 1600 rpm???
not a dig or anything mate. just wondering
good result really for a T3.. apart from the lag issue
#50
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by pee vee
yeah... why does the power seem to Drop off completely at about 5700
RPM on just about all RS turbo engines ive seen graphs for?
also Why does it make 106 lb/ft at less than 1500 rpm
and yet it makes less than 40 at about 1600 rpm???
not a dig or anything mate. just wondering
good result really for a T3.. apart from the lag issue
RPM on just about all RS turbo engines ive seen graphs for?
also Why does it make 106 lb/ft at less than 1500 rpm
and yet it makes less than 40 at about 1600 rpm???
not a dig or anything mate. just wondering
good result really for a T3.. apart from the lag issue
#51
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by pee vee
yeah... why does the power seem to Drop off completely at about 5700
RPM on just about all RS turbo engines ive seen graphs for?
also Why does it make 106 lb/ft at less than 1500 rpm
and yet it makes less than 40 at about 1600 rpm???
not a dig or anything mate. just wondering
good result really for a T3.. apart from the lag issue
RPM on just about all RS turbo engines ive seen graphs for?
also Why does it make 106 lb/ft at less than 1500 rpm
and yet it makes less than 40 at about 1600 rpm???
not a dig or anything mate. just wondering
good result really for a T3.. apart from the lag issue
#52
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 9,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
#53
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
#54
PassionFord Post Troll
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
#55
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#56
PassionFord Post Whore!!
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#57
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: In front of computer
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It all comes down to what each owner considers value for money. If you add up the cost people spend on these cars it really is scary.
Example:
All Steel Bottom end £2000
big valve cylinder head £500
Stg 3 turbo, T34 turbo etc...£300-£800
Air Filter Kit £60
Exhaust System £250-£400
Tubular Manifold £500-£1000
Management Software £200-£2500
Large Intercooler £300-£500
Decent Gearbox £500+
bigger brake setup £200-£1000
Suspension Kit £300-£800
Fixing Faults with Car, rust, bushes, sensors, etc.. £100-£1000's
Labour For Fittting and mapping £
Dont think about it.
Example:
All Steel Bottom end £2000
big valve cylinder head £500
Stg 3 turbo, T34 turbo etc...£300-£800
Air Filter Kit £60
Exhaust System £250-£400
Tubular Manifold £500-£1000
Management Software £200-£2500
Large Intercooler £300-£500
Decent Gearbox £500+
bigger brake setup £200-£1000
Suspension Kit £300-£800
Fixing Faults with Car, rust, bushes, sensors, etc.. £100-£1000's
Labour For Fittting and mapping £
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
#58
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems a fair enough graph final figure but it seems it not making full boost very early....for a t3 anyway
That explains the tailing off though, you need a bigger turbo mate
![Confused](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#59
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by crazycage
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#60
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: under the bonnet
Posts: 1,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Rs1
Seems a fair enough graph final figure but it seems it not making full boost very early....for a t3 anyway
That explains the tailing off though, you need a bigger turbo mate ![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
![Confused](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
#61
PassionFord Post Troll
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
Just sheerly talking about the amount you have spent on the actual engine.
#62
PassionFord Post Troll
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by crazycage
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
As for doing it right... why is it not right if it is making the same horsepower for £1900 less? If mapped correctly it will be just as reliable. With the right turbo and due to its extra capacity it doesn't have to deal with 22psi to make the power!
#64
focus rs 1672
![Default](https://passionford.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by crazycage
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by Garage19
Originally Posted by NEWTON
Originally Posted by SapphyMike
Originally Posted by Garage19
Now you have got to ask yourself is that value for money when i can get 250bhp out of a stock 2ltr zetec with a £100 headgasket.
My point is why spend all that cash on the CVH when you could get that power from a standard 2ltr zetec with the addition of the right turbo and and some aftermarket management.
![Top](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/smile011.gif)
As for doing it right... why is it not right if it is making the same horsepower for £1900 less? If mapped correctly it will be just as reliable. With the right turbo and due to its extra capacity it doesn't have to deal with 22psi to make the power!
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
![Surprised](https://passionford.com/forum/images/smilies/bigcry.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deathrider666
Technical help Q & A
3
28-09-2015 06:12 PM