Stack dash owners with 225,40,R18
#2
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Re: Stack dash owners with 225,40,R18
Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Did you enter 2002mm as the circumference?
#3
Monte Geek
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshunt, Herts
Posts: 8,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know that, but it got to be closer then the 2515mm I came up with lol
I think I'm exactly 500mm out through fucking up my sums so 2015mm as its a new tyre sounds right?
I think I'm exactly 500mm out through fucking up my sums so 2015mm as its a new tyre sounds right?
#6
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Please tell me HOW you can get confused . Jack the car up so that the tyre is off the ground, put a piece of string around the outside of the tyre until the string touches each other. Mark where this is, remove string, measure circumference. Or use one of those floppy seamstress tape measures to do the same thing. How can you possibly get 500mm extra ?
#7
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Re: Stack dash owners with 225,40,R18
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by Paul Ripley
Did you enter 2002mm as the circumference?
Trending Topics
#8
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Martin,
Surprised at YOU asking that . This is because different manufacturers have different sizes for the same tyre "size" - they round them up or down. For example a 235 tyre might actually be 240mm wide or a 225 might be 220mm wide. Depends on the tyre type, the size given by the manufacture is just a "guide" and not definitive . And because the sidewall height is an percentage of the width, you can see then why they actually vary in daimeter and therefore circumference .
Also, it CLEARY states in the Stack instructions to measure the circumference NOT to calculate it (and that is because of the reason stated).
Surprised at YOU asking that . This is because different manufacturers have different sizes for the same tyre "size" - they round them up or down. For example a 235 tyre might actually be 240mm wide or a 225 might be 220mm wide. Depends on the tyre type, the size given by the manufacture is just a "guide" and not definitive . And because the sidewall height is an percentage of the width, you can see then why they actually vary in daimeter and therefore circumference .
Also, it CLEARY states in the Stack instructions to measure the circumference NOT to calculate it (and that is because of the reason stated).
#9
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Martin,
Surprised at YOU asking that . This is because different manufacturers have different sizes for the same tyre "size" - they round them up or down. For example a 235 tyre might actually be 240mm wide or a 225 might be 220mm wide. Depends on the tyre type, the size given by the manufacture is just a "guide" and not definitive . And because the sidewall height is an percentage of the width, you can see then why they actually vary in daimeter and therefore circumference .
Also, it CLEARY states in the Stack instructions to measure the circumference NOT to calculate it (and that is because of the reason stated).
Surprised at YOU asking that . This is because different manufacturers have different sizes for the same tyre "size" - they round them up or down. For example a 235 tyre might actually be 240mm wide or a 225 might be 220mm wide. Depends on the tyre type, the size given by the manufacture is just a "guide" and not definitive . And because the sidewall height is an percentage of the width, you can see then why they actually vary in daimeter and therefore circumference .
Also, it CLEARY states in the Stack instructions to measure the circumference NOT to calculate it (and that is because of the reason stated).
#11
1st to 200 without NOS
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Stack still tell you to measure for this reason and the fact of tyre wear . Don't forget that the overall wheel height can be affected by as much as 10mm just by tyre wear alone....
#12
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
When I measured mine with new tyres on (the time we were at Alconbury together (you with BOM) . My Stack read 172mph crossing the line and the time recorded by the Datron was 172mph . Several months later with the tyres almost needing to be changed, the Stack read 183mph and the Datron read 180.6mph - I think that is pretty accpetible from measuring the circumference and not calculating it .
FYI The AVS Yokohamas are amongst the biggest culprits, due to the square shoulder of the tyre, their 235s will catch the arches on the back of a Sapphire (due to them being approx 240mm wide), where others that run a more rounded shoulder are actually 230mm and fit no bother .
FYI The AVS Yokohamas are amongst the biggest culprits, due to the square shoulder of the tyre, their 235s will catch the arches on the back of a Sapphire (due to them being approx 240mm wide), where others that run a more rounded shoulder are actually 230mm and fit no bother .
#14
Caraholic
iTrader: (3)
Originally Posted by gingeRS
string
you just need some big verniers
you just need some big verniers
Obviously you can work it out from the diameter, but how many people have verniers big enough to take an accurate dimension to do this . However, most people have some string and a tape measure .
#15
Monte Geek
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cheshunt, Herts
Posts: 8,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used my old dear's seamstress tape measure and it wasn't long enough so had to add to measurements and I've very obviously fucked it up Just wanted to see what everyone else had come up with to see if I was even slightly close as it was reading 12mph over the Tom Tom at 40
#16
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Originally Posted by Mike Rainbird
Originally Posted by gingeRS
string
you just need some big verniers
you just need some big verniers
Obviously you can work it out from the diameter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mark RS
Ford RS Cosworth Parts for Sale
7
12-10-2015 06:01 AM
rsguy
General Car Related Discussion.
44
29-09-2015 03:29 PM